From:
Marnie Jamieson[SMTP:marniejamieson@home.com]Sent: September 29, 2001 5:46 PM
To: procedure@crtc.gc.ca; regulatory.affairs@telus.com
Subject: CRTC application - Telus
We recieved a notice with our phone bill about Telus's intention to
raise our rates to provide service in areas that there is no service.
This notice came only a few days prior to the Sept 20 cut off, which
would indicate to me that Telus does not want us to comment, so they
sent out the notice just prior to the deadline. I am certain they were
aware that notification was required at a much earlier date. (It came
with the phone bill that typically comes between the 14th and the 20th
of each month.)
We are not in faver of the application at all. We believe that if we
are forced to fund a telephone companie's capital venture that we should
also recieve a share of the profits. If there is a market that the
phone company wants to reach, they should fund the capital expenditure
out of their PROFITS. This is supposed to be a privatized company and
they should not be allowed to dip into our pockets to fund expansions.
IF this is a benevolent move to help a community then funding should
come from another source that also wishes to be benevolent to this
community or from the profits of current operations. IF there are no
profits then this company is not competitive or not truly privatized.
This increase is a tax. Companies are not allowed to tax citizens and I
don't think the CRTC should allow them to tax citizens.
Sincerely
Marnie Jamieson