Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - Government of Canada
Skip to Side MenuSkip to Content Area
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New About Us Policies Site Map Home

Background
Introduction
Modern Comptrollership
MAF Indicators
MAF Implementation
MAF Video
MAF Assessment Scale
Documents and Reports
Frequently Asked Questions

Related Sites:
Risk Management
Office of Values and Ethics

Printable Version

Governance and Strategic Directions

2003 2004 2005 2006

The essential conditions - internal coherence, corporate discipline and alignment to outcomes - are in place for providing effective strategic direction, support to the minister and Parliament, and the delivery of results.

 

Additional Data Sources:

  • Department's Act
  • PAA Tracking System (PAATS)
  • Survey of Departments pursuant to Step 1 of the MRRS Action Plan

Key Relevant Policies:

  • Management, Resources, and Results Structure Policy

2. Utility of the Corporate Performance Framework - A robust performance framework reinforces corporate alignment to outcomes, as measured by:

  • Extent to which the organization's Strategic Outcomes and Program Activity Architecture are consistent with its mandate
  • Clarity and measurability of the organization's strategic outcomes
  • Level of completeness of the Program Activity Architecture and its alignment to the organization's strategic outcomes
  • Quality of the performance measurement structure (including expected results, outputs, indicators, targets, data sources, and frequencies of data collection)
  • Extent to which the performance measurement structure is used to support organizational decision-making

Q: Does the Department have a robust PAA with logical linkages to appropriate Strategic Outcomes?

 

 

Additional Data Sources:

  • Corporate plans, PAA supporting documentation
  • Review of senior executive PMAs
  • Business Plans, Investment plan
  • Review of Governance structures
  • Organizational Structure

Key Relevant Policies:

  • Management, Resources, and Results Structure Policy
  • Directives for the Performance Management Program (PMP) for the Executive Group.

3. Integrity of the Corporate Management Structure - An integrated corporate system of decision-making enables effective allocation of resources to priorities, alignment of activities to outcomes and management of accountabilities, as measured by:

  • Extent to which accountabilities of senior officials and internal decision-making structures are aligned to the organization's strategic outcomes
  • Extent to which Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports are aligned and based on the approved MRRS
  • Alignment of corporate and senior executive performance commitments to the Report on Plans and Priorities
  • Extent to which Memoranda to Cabinet, TB Submissions and public performance reports are grounded in the Government's priorities, and the organization's mandate
  • Presence of a risk-based corporate plan which: is fully aligned to strategic outcomes; serves to align sector business plans; integrates strategic plans, HR plans, and resource plans; and is regularly monitored for progress and performance

Q: Does the Department have a corporate governance structure that effectively supports prioritization and decision-making?

 

 

Additional Data Sources:

  • Reports from horizontal initiatives such as Aboriginal affairs, climate change, water preservation and national security
  • Reports from horizontal initiatives such as Service Canada; Procurement Reform (including Government of Canada Marketplace and Shared Travel); Real Property Reform; Corporate Administrative Shared Services; IT Shared Services (including Secure Channel)
  • Portfolio Management Structure or Plan, input from organization's portfolio partners

4. Effectiveness of Extra-organizational Contribution - Contributions to horizontal policy and administrative initiatives and portfolio management are appropriate to the organization's mandate and resources, as measured by:

  • Level of organizational engagement (e.g. appropriateness, leadership, resource commitment) on horizontal policy and program initiatives
  • Level of organizational engagement (e.g. appropriateness, leadership, resource commitment) on horizontal administrative initiatives or other government-wide transformational initiatives, as set out in the Government's Agenda, the Clerk's Priorities, etc.
  • Presence of a clearly articulated portfolio management structure or plan and governance mechanisms to foster regular dialogue

Q: Does the Department contribute effectively to extra-organizational initiatives?