Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site | ||||||||||||
What's New | About Us | Publications | Energy | Safety & Environment |
||||||||||||
Newsroom | Links | Statistics | North/Offshore | |||||||||||||
Regulatory Documents | Acts and Regulations | Hearings | ||||||||||||||
Submit a Document | Public Registries | Home | ||||||||||||||
Maritimes & Northeast PipelineBrunswick Pipeline Project
|
OFFICIAL LANGUAGES: The National Energy Board is bound by the Official Languages Act and relevant Treasury Board policies. However, some material on these pages originates with organizations not subject to the Official Languages Act and is made available on this site in the language in which it was written. | LANGUES OFFICIELLES : L'Office national de l'énergie est lié par la Loi sur les langues officielles et les politiques pertinentes du Conseil du Trésor. Certains documents lui sont soumis par des organisations qui ne sont pas assujetties à cette loi; ils sont donc reproduits sur notre site dans leur version originale. |
Access documents from: |
Consultez les documents de : |
* 3 February 2006: Letter to Environment Canada and the NEB providing clarification of routing alternatives. [Document A0T0I9]
* 2 2006: Letter to the NEB responding to questions about the new right of way as well as whether the proposed project triggers a screening or a comprehensive study. [Document A0T0G1]
27 January 2006: Letter to Natural Resources Canada responding to questions about the use of explosives. [Document A0S9W3]
6 January 2006: Letter to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the National Energy Board enclosing the Project Description for the Proposed Brunswick Pipeline Project. [Filing A11078]
20 January 2006: Letter to M&NP requesting further information on whether the Brunswick Pipeline Project triggers a screening or comprehensive study under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. [Document A0S8X0]
12 January 2006: Letter to Federal and Regional Authorities requesting a review of the project and a determination of responsibility under Section 5 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. [Document A0S8G8]
12 January 2006: Letter to the New Brunswick Department of Environment and Local Government requesting a review of the project and a determination of responsibility under Section 5 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. [Document A0S8H0]
27 January 2006: Letter to the NEB stating that Environment Canada may be a a Responsible Authority under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, hinging on the potential need for a Disposal at Sea Permit. [Document A0T0E6]
1 February 2006: Letter to the NEB indicating that Natural Resources Canada does not have a responsibility under Section 5 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act with regard to the present scope of the project. [Document A0T0A8]
19 January 2006: Letter to the NEB requesting information on the possible use of explosives prior to making a determination under Section 5 of the CEAA Act. [Document A0S8S1]
12 January 2006: Section 5 Faxback form to the NEB stating that DFO is a Responsible Authority under the CEA Act. [Document A0S8H2]
19 January 2006: Letter to the NEB outlining the DELG&'s environmental impact assessment responsibilities. [Filing A11233]
31 January 2006: Letter to the NEB and Section 5 Faxback form stating that Transport Canada is a Responsible Authority under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. [Document A0S9W5]
Updated: 2006-02-13 | Important Notices |