![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Ottawa, February 14, 1997 Tabling Draft Legislation to Amend the Canada Pension PlanStatement by the Honourable Paul Martin P.C., M.P., Minister of Finance to the House of CommonsDelivered text is official version. Mr. Speaker, today it is my privilege to table draft legislation that secures the future of the Canada Pension Plan. These measures are the result of the review of the CPP which the federal and provincial governments have conducted over the past year. As joint stewards with the provinces, we are obliged to do all we can to make sure the plan is there for Canadians -- not only for those who retire but equally for those workers who become disabled during their careers. We believe that Canadians should be able to count on their CPP benefits and that is why we worked so hard to make sure that they can. The problems facing the CPP are fundamental. The chief actuary of the plan has shown that, without changes, the CPP fund will run out of money in less than 20 years. Without changes, contribution rates would have to increase from under 6 per cent today to over 14 per cent to cover escalating costs. Younger generations would have to pay more than twice as much as now -- and get no more for it. This is not fair. This is not affordable. In short, the CPP -- as it now is -- is not sustainable. This has led some to say we should dismantle the CPP. Neither the federal government nor the provinces believe Canadians would be well-served by dismantling the CPP. Canadians know this. They told us so during the public consultations that we and the provinces held across the country last spring. Canadians asked their governments to preserve the CPP, strengthen its financing, improve the fund's investment practices and reduce costs. In other words, don't tinker with it. Make sure it's sustainable. We've done that. The options we have considered in the course of our review required tough choices. But we have come up with a strong and balanced package that will ensure the CPP is there when Canadians need it. And we've done it in a way that has left intact some very important features of the CPP.
Let me outline what we have done. The agreement makes a fundamental change in the financing of the plan. It will move from pay-as-you-go financing to fuller funding to build a much larger reserve fund. The fund now is equivalent in value to about two years of benefits and is declining. With fuller funding, it will grow to about five years of benefits. It will be invested in a diversified portfolio of securities to earn higher returns and help pay for benefits as Canada's population ages. Canadians also told us to stop giving governments exclusive access to CPP funds. We've done that. Governments have agreed to limit their access and to pay interest at market rates. Canadians told us we should not allow contribution rates to go over 10 per cent. We heard them. Contribution rates will rise over the next six years to 9.9 per cent and remain steady thereafter. This is far less than the projected rate of over 14 per cent that the chief actuary said would have been necessary without changes. Several measures have made it possible to keep contribution rates to 9.9 per cent. Let me mention a number of them.
These proposed changes are moderate and balanced. They will slow the growth of escalating costs. Canadians told us to go easy on changes to benefits and we have. Finally Mr. Speaker, Canadians told us to treat them like members of a pension plan. We're going to do that. Public accountability will be strengthened. Canadians will receive annual reports on their CPP accounts as soon as possible. Federal-provincial reviews will be required every three years, rather than every five. Mr. Speaker, with the exception of a small additional increase in the contribution rate for 1997, these proposed changes will come into effect in 1998, once legislation is passed. The changes to secure the CPP are supported by the federal government and the provinces of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Québec, Ontario, Manitoba and Alberta, and the Northwest Territories. We regret that we were unable to get unanimous support and that two provinces feel they are unable to join the agreement. But the requirement to achieve the support of two-thirds of the provinces with two-thirds of the population has been met. It is fair to say that all the options to secure the CPP had a fair hearing. Some were introduced after the public consultations were over. Let me emphasize the door is open to these ideas -- along with several important issues that were beyond the scope of this review. They include:
Canada's retirement income system is not alone in facing challenges from an ageing population and increasing longevity. But almost no other industrialized country has done as much as Canada has to come to grips with these problems. This government promised to make the retirement income system secure for Canadians. We are well on our way to doing it. The CPP is one of the three pillars of our retirement income system. Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) also provide public pensions for seniors. We have taken action to make these programs secure and sustainable as well. The new Seniors Benefit, announced in the 1996 Budget, will consolidate the OAS and GIS into one benefit beginning in 2001. This new benefit is designed to help those most in need and will fully protect low and modest-income Canadians. The third pillar is tax-assisted savings for retirement savings, such as registered pension plans or registered retirement savings plans. We will continue to provide generous incentives for Canadians to save for their own retirement years. Mr. Speaker, all three pillars of Canada's retirement income system are being placed on a secure and sustainable footing. Canadians can rest assured that the pension system as they know it can be counted on by them and by future generations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|