[ Backgrounder ]
December 2, 2002
OTTAWA - The Honourable Lucienne
Robillard, President of the Treasury Board of Canada and Member
of Parliament for Westmount - Ville-Marie, today released the
government-wide results of the 2002 Public Service Employee
Survey.
"We are encouraged by what our employees are
telling us," said Minister Robillard. "The results show us that
although more work remains to be done, we are improving the
public service workplace. This is key to enhancing service to
Canadians. The 2002 survey gives us important information as we
reform the public service."
The 2002 survey posed questions on issues ranging
from an employee's work environment to skills and career
development and labour-management relations. Thirty-nine
questions were repeated from the first Public Service Employee
Survey in 1999, showing improvement in thirty-six. New questions
were added on topics such as service to clients, work-life
balance and official languages. Other questions were refined from
1999 to obtain a clearer picture of issues requiring greater
analysis.
The results show public service employees are
dedicated to their jobs. Ninety-five percent are strongly
committed to making their organization successful, while 84%
believe their organization is a good place to work. Ninety-one
percent of employees are proud of the work carried out in their
units, and 78% are satisfied with their careers. More than
two-thirds (67%) say they can always or often balance the demands
of their work life and personal life. The results indicate that
employee departure intentions are in line with public service
succession planning.
The 2002 results also show a substantial
proportion of public service employees believe progress has been
made toward addressing issues raised in 1999. Employee confidence
that senior managers will try to resolve concerns raised in this
survey is up by one-third from 1999.
The survey was conducted in May and June 2002 by
Statistics Canada on behalf of the Treasury Board of Canada
Secretariat. A team representing departments, agencies, and
public service unions developed the questionnaire, which was
completed by close to 95,000 federal employees in locations
across Canada - a 57.8% participation rate, which is an
improvement over the 1999 survey participation rate of 54.6%.
The survey reinforces the need to address certain
areas, such as learning, career development and general support
for employees. And while 85% of employees report their
organizations treat them with respect, results relating to the
issues of harassment and discrimination show no real movement
since 1999.
"Of all the data contained in the 1999 and 2002
surveys, this is what concerns us most," Minister Robillard said.
"Our goal is a workplace culture where public service values are
clear and all employees are treated with dignity and respect.
Following the 1999 survey, we took several steps to focus on
these issues. Our initiatives included a newly revised
anti-harassment policy. It is too early to gauge the effects of
many of these measures, but we are confident they will have a
positive effect. Over the coming months we may need to take other
steps."
Minister Robillard said that further action to
improve the workplace will be based on these results and
developed in partnership with employees and unions. "Over the
long term, continued collaboration between public service
managers, employees and bargaining agents will lead to continued
progress," she said.
All public service managers are being encouraged
to discuss the results with their employees. As was the case in
1999, departments, agencies and unions will work together with a
view to recommending new workplace improvement initiatives to
senior public service leaders.
- 30 -
An attached backgrounder contains more
information about the 2002 Public Service Employee Survey.
Complete government-wide survey results are available at: www.survey-sondage.gc.ca.
Other 2002 survey-related results are expected shortly. As a
separate employer, the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency intends
to release its results on December 4, 2002. Other departmental
and agency-level results will be made public on December 9,
2002.
Note:
The 2002 survey referred to harassment and
discrimination as defined in the Canadian Human Rights
Act:
Harassment - is any improper conduct by an
individual, that is directed at and offensive to another person
or persons in the workplace, and that the individual knew or
ought reasonably to have known would cause offence or harm. It
comprises any objectionable act, comment or display that demeans,
belittles, or causes personal humiliation or embarrassment, and
any act of intimidation or threat. It includes harassment within
the meaning of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Discrimination - means to treat someone
differently or unfairly because of a personal characteristic or
distinction which, whether intentional or not, has an effect
which imposes disadvantages not imposed upon others or which
withholds or limits access to other members of society. There are
eleven prohibited grounds under the Canadian Human Rights
Act: race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age,
sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, mental or
physical disability and pardoned conviction.
For more information, contact:
Daniel Grenier
Press Secretary
Office of the President of the Treasury Board
of Canada
(613) 957-2666
Mario Baril
Media Relations
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
(613) 957-2391
IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ANY PRINTED
VERSION AND THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS NEWS RELEASE, THE
ELECTRONIC VERSION WILL PREVAIL.
TTY (Telecommunications device for the hearing
impaired) -- (613) 957-9090
Release of Government-wide Results of the 2002 Public Service
Employee Survey
The 2002 Public Service Employee Survey marks the
second time that the Public Service of Canada has endeavoured to
seek the opinion of all of its employees on a wide variety of
workplace issues. It follows up on the first survey, conducted in
1999. It is believed that Canada is the only country in the world
to systematically survey all of its federal public service
employees.
The 2002 survey posed 114 questions. They were
developed in consideration of well-regarded organizational
principles and practices. From the outset, the survey was
co-developed by large, medium and small departments, agencies,
central agencies, public service bargaining agents and Statistics
Canada. Outside experts such as the Public Policy Forum were also
consulted on the project. A committee made up of similar
representation will advise senior public service leaders on
survey follow-up initiatives.
The following is a narrative report on the results of the
2002 survey:
1. What do employees say about the nature of their work?
The first range of questions on employees'
satisfaction with their work is a key indicator of workplace
health. This is what employees told us.
Eighty-four per cent of employees agree that
their department or agency is a good place to work, and 95% agree
that they are strongly committed to making their organization
successful.
Seventy-six per cent of employees agree that they
can clearly explain to others the direction (for example, the
vision, values or mission) of their organization, and 91% agree
that they are proud of the work carried out in their work
unit.
Eighty-one per cent of employees agree that in
their work unit, people work cooperatively as a team. Eighty-nine
per cent agree that they have the necessary materials and
equipment to do the job.
Eighty-four per cent of employees agree that they
have good ongoing communication with others in their organization
who work on similar projects or issues, and 85% agree that people
in their work unit learn from mistakes and do what it takes to
correct them.
While 58% of employees say they are encouraged to
always or often be innovative or to take initiative in their
work, 44% indicate that they always or often have a say in
decisions and actions that impact on their work, and 19% say that
they rarely or never have a say in decisions and actions that
impact on their work.
Employees also suggested that the quality of
their work often or always suffers because of:
- constantly changing priorities - 37%;
- lack of stability in the organization - 35%;
- too many approval stages - 35%;
- unreasonable deadlines - 28%; and
- having to do the same or more work, but with fewer resources
- 42%.
Twenty-six per cent of employees indicate that
they have had three or more different supervisors over the past
three years or less.
Sixty-seven per cent of employees agree that if
they are faced with an ethical dilemma or conflict between values
in the workplace, they know where they can go for help in
resolving the situation; and 79% of employees agree that if faced
with a health and safety issue in the workplace, they know where
to go for help in resolving the situation.
2. What are employees saying about service to clients?
Regular feedback and measurement of success in
meeting performance standards helps to ensure that we are
providing results for Canadians.
Seventy-three per cent of employees say their
work unit has clearly defined client service standards, and 69%
agree that their work unit regularly applies the client service
standards. A smaller number, 58%, agree that there are mechanisms
in place in their work unit for linking client feedback or
complaints to employees who can act on the information.
While 77% of employees agree that they have the
flexibility to adapt their services to meet client needs, 31% do
not agree that their work unit periodically takes time out to
rethink the way it does business.
3. Workload and work-life balance: are we making
progress?
Workload and work-life balance issues are
persistent challenges in today's
working environment.
We decided to delve more deeply into this topic
in the 2002 Public Service Employee Survey than we did in 1999.
Accordingly, the Interdepartmental/Union Survey Working Group
developed a number of additional questions regarding workload and
work-life balance. The results are clear. Improvement is still
needed.
While 87% of employees indicate that they are
satisfied with their current work arrangements, (e.g. regular
hours, telework, compressed work week):
- 23% say that they feel pressured by others to work more than
their regular hours;
- 17% say they can rarely or never complete their assigned
workload during regular working hours;
- 26% say they can complete their work only sometimes;
- 67% agree that they can often or always balance their
personal, family and work needs in their current jobs; and
- slightly over a quarter of employees say that their career
progress has been moderately or significantly affected by
conflict between work and family or personal obligations.
As for the use of alternate working
arrangements:
- 19% say they work a compressed work week;
- 33% work a flexible work schedule, such as variable start and
end times;
- 5% telework;
- 2% are job sharing; and
- 3% report they take advantage of leave with income
averaging.
4. Are the right people in the right jobs, and how are we
doing in the area of retention?
One of our key goals as a public service is to
ensure a healthy, supportive and challenging work environment.
Accordingly, several questions asked relate to staffing and
retention.
Seventy-eight per cent of employees believe that
in their work unit, they hire people who can do the job, but a
disappointingly high 45% of employees indicate that during the
past three years, staff turnover has been a significant problem
in their work unit.
In terms of departures from the public service,
29% of employees indicate they are planning to leave over the
next five years. This is in line with manageable rates of
attrition. It is worth noting that respondents could indicate
more than one time frame and more than one reason for their
departure. Of that 29%:
- 22% (approx. 6% of the total public service) plan to leave
within the next year;
- 41% (approx. 12% of the total public service) plan to leave
within one to three years; and
- 51% (approx. 15% of the total public service) plan to leave
within the next three to five years.
The following were selected most often by
employees as being "very important" reasons for their intented
departure from the public service:
- retirement - 57%;
- to pursue other employment opportunities - 37%; and
- health - 37%.
5. Are we creating a learning environment?
Enabling and sustaining a culture of continuous
learning within the Public Service of Canada is important to an
efficient, effective workforce.
While 75% of employees agree that they get the
training they need to do the job and 63% say that they are able
to get on-the-job coaching to help improve the way they do their
work, only 53% say their immediate supervisor helps them
determine their learning needs.
Thirty-three per cent of employees indicate that,
to a moderate or significant extent, lack of access to learning
opportunities adversely affected their careers.
6. How well are we doing in the area of career
development?
In 1999, career development was an area noted for
focused action. In 2002, we probed this area more
intensively.
Seventy-eight per cent of employees agree that
they are satisfied with their careers in the public service, and
74% say they are moderately or significantly satisfied with their
career progress in the public service. A lower percentage, 65%,
agree that they have the opportunity to develop and apply the
skills they need to enhance their careers.
Slightly less than 50% of employees agree that
they have opportunities for promotion within their department or
agency given their education, skills and experience. Less than
60% agree that they have opportunities for promotion within the
public service given their education, skills and experience. Only
56% agree that their department does a good job of supporting
employee career development.
Twenty-seven per cent of employees indicated that
they had requested a developmental assignment within the last
three years. However, 32% say that they would be reluctant to ask
for a developmental opportunity, such as a secondment or new
project. Of those that indicated they had requested an assignment
in the last three years, 41% indicated that they had been denied
the request, and of concern is the finding that only 22% of those
who requested an assignment and were denied an assignment say
they received a reasonable explanation or justification for the
denial.
Forty per cent of employees indicate that to a
moderate or significant extent, lack of access to developmental
assignments adversely affected their careers.
7. Do employees believe they are treated fairly?
The Public Service of Canada places great
emphasis on equal opportunity and diversity.
Overall, 89% of employees agree that in their
work unit, every individual, regardless of race, colour, gender
or disability would be/is accepted as an equal member of the
team.
An encouraging 84% of employees agree that,
overall, their organization treats them with respect, yet, less
than 60% agree that they are satisfied with the way in which
informal complaints on workplace issues are resolved in their
work unit. Thirty-five per cent do not agree that they feel they
can initiate a formal redress process (grievance, right of
appeal, health and safety, etc.) without fear of reprisal.
Fifty-one per cent of employees agree that they
are classified fairly. Twenty-one per cent of employees do not
agree that when they were candidates in competitions during the
last three years, the competitions were run in a fair manner.
Nineteen per cent also do not agree that when they were
candidates in competitions during the last three years, they had
the opportunity to demonstrate their capabilities for the
positions. Sixty-five per cent agree that in their work unit, the
process of selecting a person for a position is done fairly.
Sixty-three per cent of employees agree that they
feel they can claim overtime compensation (in money or in leave)
for the overtime hours that they work. However, 16% of employees
report that they were rarely or never compensated for overtime
worked.
8. Can employees expect supportive supervision?
A key factor that contributes to employee
perceptions of a healthy workplace is supportive managers and
supervisors
Seventy-eight per cent of employees say that they
can count on their immediate supervisor to keep his or her
promises. Seventy-seven per cent of employees also agree that
their immediate supervisor understands and respects the
provisions of their employees' collective agreement.
Thirty per cent of employees do not agree that
they discuss with their immediate supervisor the results they are
expected to achieve, and 27% do not agree that their immediate
supervisor assesses their work against identified goals and
objectives.
Seventy-one per cent of employees agree that they
get adequate recognition from their immediate supervisor when
they do a good job, while just over 50% agree that their
supervisor does a good job of helping them develop their
career.
Thirty per cent of employees disagree that they
receive useful feedback from their immediate supervisor on their
job performance. Twenty per cent disagree that their supervisor
distributes work fairly, and 25% do not agree that their
supervisors keep them informed about issues affecting their
work.
Seventy-eight per cent of employees agree that if
they were to suggest ways to improve how things were done, their
immediate supervisor would take them seriously, yet 20% say they
do not feel they can disagree with their immediate supervisor on
work-related issues without fear of reprisal.
Only 16% of employees do not agree that their
immediate supervisor supports the use of flexible working
arrangements, subject to operational requirements.
9. How do employees perceive senior management in some key
areas?
In 1999, only 37% of employees believed senior
management would try to resolve concerns raised in the first
Public Service Employee Survey. It is encouraging to note that,
in 2002, the number has risen to 50%.
Nevertheless, only 36% of employees believe that
senior management has made progress toward resolving the issues
raised in the 1999 Survey. Clearly, more sustained management
action is required in order to demonstrate to employees that
practical survey follow-up is a priority.
Seventy-three per cent of employees agree that
senior managers respect the provisions of their employees'
collective agreements. Sixty per cent agree that senior
management actively supports the use of flexible work
arrangements, and 80% agree that supervisors and senior managers
are committed to ensuring occupational health and safety.
Forty-two per cent of employees do not agree that
senior management does a good job of sharing information.
With regard to labour-management relations:
- 36% indicate that they do not know whether senior management
in their organization engages in meaningful consultation with
their union on workplace issues, and 17% do not agree that senior
management in their organization engages in meaningful
consultation with their union on workplace issues;
- 42% do not know whether the relationship between their union
and senior management is highly productive, and 29% agree that
the relationship between their union and senior management is
highly productive; and
- 39% do not know if the relationship between their union and
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is highly productive, and
31% do not agree that the relationship between their union and
the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is highly
productive.
10. Do employees encounter harassment and discrimination in
the workplace?
According to the results of the 1999 Survey, 18%
of employees said they had experienced discrimination and 20%
experienced harassment. Regrettably, harassment and
discrimination are still reported as sources of concern.
Twenty-one per cent of employees report they have
personally been the victims of harassment on the job over the
past two years, and 17% report they have personally been the
victims of discrimination on the job in the past two years.
Despite this, 69% of employees agreed with the
statement, "My department or agency works hard to create a
workplace that prevents harassment and discrimination." Seventeen
percent disagreed, 13% didn't know and 2% said the question was
not applicable to them.
11. Do we have a problem with physical violence in the
workplace?
Violence in the workplace is a serious issue for
any organization.
In developing the 2002 Survey, the
Interdepartmental/Union Survey Working Group decided to propose a
proactive approach to this issue by asking employees whether or
not they had been the victim of physical violence on the job and,
if so, from whom (e.g., co-workers, members of the public,
etc.).
Two per cent of employees indicated that within
the last two years they have been the victims of physical
violence on the job.
12. Do employees feel supported in regard to official
languages?
The roll-up of reaction across Canada with regard
to official languages shows remarkably strong and positive
results which, in subsequent levels of analysis, will be broken
down to take into consideration differences in bilingual and
unilingual regions.
Ninety-two per cent of employees agree that the
material and tools provided for work, including software and
other automated tools, are available to employees in the official
language of their choice.
During meetings in their work units, 85% of
employees feel free to use the official language of their choice.
Eighty-seven per cent of employees agree that when they prepare
written materials, including electronic mail, they feel free to
use the official language of their choice, and 84% indicate that
training offered by their department is often or always available
in the official language of their choice.
Ninety per cent of employees agree that they feel
free to use the official language of their choice when they
communicate with their immediate supervisor. However, 16% do
indicate that to a moderate or significant extent, lack of access
to language training in their second official language adversely
affected their careers.
It should be noted that as with all 2002 survey
results, the figures pertaining to official languages reflect a
public service-wide viewpoint. More detailed demographic analysis
will be done to further break down the official languages results
by region and language group.
|