FIP Manual, August 1990
The Federal Identity Program (FIP) policy makes each institution
responsible for managing its corporate identity within the framework of
the government-wide policy and standards. This guide is intended to
shift FIP from a compliance/coordination function to one that is
management and results oriented. This new approach not only reflects the
transition generated by the Government Communications Policy, IMAA
(Increased Ministerial Authority and Accountability) and Public Service
2000, but indicates also the growing importance of corporate identity
management in institutions that undergo fundamental change in corporate
culture.
Corporate identity encompasses much more than symbols and design, it
is central to corporate communications and should be part of an
institution's management function. This guide outlines the principles of
corporate identity and relates them to a public sector institution. It
is intended to clarify government policy on the management of corporate
identity and to point out links with service to the public. Furthermore,
the guide describes how federal institutions can express their own visual
identity within the framework of the Federal Identity Program.
Applicable publications
This section of the FIP Manual should be used with the following
policies:
Communications volume, Treasury Board Manual
- Government Communications Policy
- Federal Identity Program Policy
Corporate Identity
Concept and purpose
The concept of corporate identity and its management evolved over the
last 50 years, and programs are now in place in most large organizations
in the private as well as the public sector. Generally defined as a
management technique for communicating an organization's unique
characteristics in a memorable manner, corporate identity is based on
the premise that key publics must perceive an organization clearly and
accurately if management objectives are to be achieved.
It can be said that every organization, regardless of size, has a
corporate identity, and it can be either formal or informal. The question
is whether an organization manages its corporate identity in the most
effective and purposeful manner possible.
The function of management is to ensure that all corporate
communications reflect the organization and its goals in a consistent
and positive manner, reinforcing each other. In the public sector this
means corporate identity management based on public policy and service
to the public, and consistent with an institutions strategic
communications plans.
An identity program is not a "quick fix" to a problem of corporate
communications, nor should it be seen as a cosmetic that can represent
something the institution is not. In developing an identity one must
examine the institution's past, its present situation and where it wants
to be. It involves long-range planning and represents an integral part
of corporate strategy. Designing a corporate identity is the most complex
of graphic design activities and it is essential to obtain the support
of senior management both for its creation and its maintenance.
The fundamental idea behind a corporate identity program is that
everything the institution does, everything it owns, every service it
provides, should project a clear idea of what the institution and its
goals are. Managing identity is taking a comprehensive view of an
institution's activities, how these are being identified and how the
public perceives the institution.
How it is communicated
An institution's corporate identity is expressed in numerous ways,
both explicitly and implicitly. When considering identity in a broad
sense, the term corporate image is often used. It deals with the general
impression of an institution held by various publics, interest groups,
including employees, and it touches virtually all aspects of an
institution's activities. Corporate image is constantly being
communicated internally and externally and its sources can be classified
as follows:
Nomenclature The titles used for the institution, its branches
and divisions, as well as the words used to identify programs, services
and offices; it includes the titles of personnel.
Organization The hierarchy of an institution; the degree of
relationship between the institution and organizational entities.
Graphic elements The symbols, logotypes, corporate signatures,
typestyles, formats and colours; all forms of visual communication.
Formal statements Statements emanating from the institution
and intended to clarify its mission, objectives or uniqueness for both
internal and external publics.
Formal recognition Awards, certificates and citations
presented by the institution.
Continuous media Stationery, calling cards, forms, signage,
facilities (interior and exterior), vehicle identification.
Transient media Published material, audio-visual productions,
exhibits, advertising, public relations, special events, speeches and
presentations.
The publics
Although corporate identity focuses on communications with the public,
it applies equally to internal communications. An institution would
appear confused if clients and employees were to receive different
messages. This means that all information material for both external
and internal use should clearly convey the institution's corporate
identity. The design of this material expresses an institution's
personality, its unique identity.
Corporate identity of the Government of Canada
For a public administration as diverse and decentralized as the Government
of Canada, the FIP serves as a major unifying element. It promotes visual
coherence and helps the public to recognize federal programs and to
distinguish them from those of other levels of government. By establishing
a visual link between the majority of federal institutions (see note below),
the Program also gives public servants a sense of identity as employees
of the Government of Canada.
The framework established by FIP policy is intended to maintain a
coherent corporate identity of the government as a whole, while at the
same time providing scope to individual institutions when expressing
their identity.
The framework of FIP consists of:
- three corporate symbols (Coat of Arms, flag, "Canada" wordmark);
- use of the two official languages;
- approved titles of institutions;
- general rules on signatures, typography, colours;
- design standards for key applications (stationery, signage and
vehicle markings).
Fields of applications such as advertising, published material, forms,
audio-visual productions, expositions, as well as personnel identification,
are subject to the general rules on corporate identity but their design
is at the discretion of each institution.
Note: Exceptions are institutions that have been specifically
exempted from FIP policy or are excluded in view of their legal status.
The government's signature
The "Government of Canada" signature has a broad range of applications,
including items intended for government-wide use, activities involving
two or more institutions, and facilities occupied by several government
institutions. The signature is also used to identify certain boards,
councils and committees, and to convey government sponsorship of
shared-cost programs (e.g. those involving a provincial or territorial
government).
Service to the public
Identification, recognition and access are aspects of both corporate
identity and service to the public. The clear and consistent
identification of an institution helps the public to find and access
programs and services. This means applying corporate signatures and
organizational titles in a coherent manner and ensuring that the
identification is functional and user oriented. Integral to the
government's policy on corporate identity and service to the public is
the principle of presenting the two official languages with equal
prominence. Design standards help to ensure a uniform presentation of
the two languages.
Making connections
When making an enquiry, citizens contact the government by telephone,
mail, or in person and use different sources of information in the
process. Such sources include telephone directory 'blue pages",
government and private sector directories and indexes, departmental
information services, public libraries, Reference Canada (the government's
telephone referral service), constituency offices, as well as government
publications, advertisements and forms.
The process of making an enquiry can be complex and frustrating
because many people don't know which department or agency (or which
level of government) is responsible for the program or service they are
seeking. In view of the complexity of the federal administration, its
dynamics and the multitude of sources of information, a systems approach
assists the public when making enquiries. Such an approach entails the
consistent use of corporate signatures, titles, keywords, abbreviations
and addresses, and involves cross-referencing and indexing. An institution's
corporate identity program can provide key elements when designing public
enquiry mechanisms.
When developing sources of information or establishing enquiry
mechanisms, institutions should ensure they are functional and meet the
needs of the public rather than satisfy bureaucratic prerogatives.
Government programs and services should be identified and described by
using plain language, a functional design approach and a simple,
consistent style.
Government signage
Signage is a concrete example of how service to the public can be
enhanced through communications systems and design standards. The FIP
signage system is designed to help people find a government facility and
locate a particular service or office within. Comprised of primary
identification signs, directory boards, directional and locational signs,
the system is being applied in federal buildings, regional and district
offices, employment and immigration centres, passport offices, customs
and taxation offices, ports of entry, health services facilities,
schools, museums, passenger terminals and national parks.
The FIP signage system promotes functional communications and the use
of plain language. A comprehensive set of graphic symbols, based on
national and international standards, forms part of the system. It
includes symbols related to health, safety, public facilities and
services, as well as the symbol that indicates services in both official
languages.
In summary, the signage system provides a uniform visual link among
federal institutions and assists the public in recognizing and using
government programs and services.
Managing an institution's corporate identity
The management of corporate identity involves the initial phase of
selecting a name and adopting a signature and the ongoing activity of
implementation.
The need to manage corporate identity is now well recognized. Studies
of both the private and public sector indicate that organizations known
for innovative management share similar characteristics:
- they create a clear link between corporate strategy, internal
and external communications and the management of corporate identity;
- they recognize visual identity and design as a management tool
and use if in a planned and coherent manner
- they demonstrate leadership and excellence in their services and
products and communicate it clearly and consistently;
- their corporate identity conveys a sense of purpose that is
expressed to both employees and clients; and
- they see their corporate identity as an important asset that
must be prized and developed.
In summary, the purpose of managing corporate identity is to achieve
clear and effective identification of all activities, consistent with
strategic plans for communicating programs. An institution's identity
should convey a sense of purpose, quality and integrity. It is a task
that requires the full support of senior management and the active
involvement of those concerned.
Nomenclature
An institution's title is key to its identity. The words used help to
define and position the institution. The selection of a title is one of
the most important decisions and requires the approval of ministers
(see FIP policy).
A title that can be communicated effectively and be remembered
readily represents a distinct advantage in communications with the
public. Choosing a title also means positioning the organization in
relation to others. Ideally, a name should be distinctive and not share
similarities. For example, when an estimated 5,000 organizations have
titles beginning with the word "Canadian", it is evident that recognition
can be difficult.
Applied titles
FIP policy requires institutions to adopt an approved title for use
in their signature. Referred to as "applied titles", these names have a
dual purpose: to express the function or nature of the institution to
the public and to identify it as an institution of the Government of
Canada. The requirement for applied titles stems from the development
of FIP policy in the mid-seventies when existing legal titles were often
long and sometimes convoluted. There was no intent, however, to
perpetuate the need for both legal and applied titles when naming new
federal institutions. This means that legislation establishing the
institution should refer to a title that meets the criteria of FIP policy.
Similarly, certain departments have made reference to their applied title
while amending their Act, thus eliminating the need to distinguish between
legal and applied titles.
Based on the criteria set out in the policy, these are examples of
applied titles:
Forestry Canada
Agriculture Canada
Communications Canada
Department of Finance Canada
Energy, Mines and Resources Canada
lndustry, Science and Technology Canada
Medical Research Council of Canada
National Archives of Canada
Public Works Canada
Statistics Canada
Tourism Canada
The applied titles, legal titles and abbreviations of government
organizations are listed in "Titles of federal organizations", issued
by the Treasury Board Secretariat as Appendix C of the FIP policy. Here
is an example:
Health and Welfare Canada (HWC) Department of National Health and
Welfare
Titles of programs and services Referred to as ''service titles'',
these are names that identify an organizational unit, program or service
and that appear in conjunction with the title of the parent organization.
Their creation is at the discretion of each institution. The English and
French titles should be developed in parallel and certain principles
should be observed when determining the wording. A title should:
- be as brief as possible to promote effective communication;
- begin with a key word and avoid the repetition of words or
concepts used in the title of the parent organization;
- respect the linguistic usage in both official languages; and
- not contain an abbreviation or ampersand (&).
Naming a program or service should be done in context with the
institution's title. When words (or concepts) such as Canadian, Canada,
Government, Federal or National are conveyed by the institution's title,
it would be redundant to repeat them in the service title. To achieve
brevity, the omission of terms that reflect an organization's structure
may be considered (e.g. Administration, Office, Branch or Division).
These terms describe an organization's hierarchy but may be of little
significance to the public that relies on key words to locate and gain
access to services. The example indicates how a title may be modified
for purposes of the signature:
Environment Canada Canadian Parks Service
![Figure 11a](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11a.jpg)
Abbreviations
Symptomatic of a bureaucracy, abbreviations are part of its nomenclature.
Critics refer to them as alphabet soup because few abbreviations are
distinct identifiers or have the potential of becoming widely known.
Nevertheless, it would be unrealistic to dismiss them from government
communications because they provide a convenient "shorthand". To ensure
an abbreviation is understood, it should always appear in the context of
the full title.
Corporate signatures
An organization's structure is expressed through its corporate
signatures. In that sense, the "Government of Canada" signature is the
universal identifier, whereas ministers, senior officials, departments,
branches, agencies, boards, commissions and programs are identified by
distinct signatures. The example indicates the relationship between
organisational structure and corporate signatures.
![Figure 11b](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11b.jpg)
Development
Signatures are developed for new institutions or programs, or an
existing signature may be modified to meet changing requirements.
Institutions may have several variants of their signature, a feature
common among departments that are decentralized or that manage a variety
of programs and services. The creation of a signature should be based on
a clear understanding of the institution's corporate structure, its
goals and, of course, the communications objectives. Government programs
can be identified by different means, e.g. by a signature that identifies
the program together with the parent institution and conveys organizational
structure, or by a signature that identifies the program as a separate
entity without reference to the parent institution. The different means
provide flexibility when linking corporate identity with an organization's
communications strategy.
A signature must be functional. The key is to determine a title that
best reflects management objectives, is meaningful to the public and
communicates the information clearly.
![Figure 11c](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11c.jpg)
Content and form
The creation of a signature involves words and typography. It is a
process that is verbal and visual and consists of arranging, organizing
and designing. The goal is to express a signature in typographic terms;
to strengthen the significant, or to make the important stand out
against the less important. Generally, there are different options to
present a signature and these should be compared when choosing the final
design.
Short versions
To meet special requirements, some institutions may need to adopt a short
version of their applied title. Short versions are effective when viewing
conditions or space restrictions call for a concise signature. For
example, the Canadian Coast Guard uses the brief title Coast Guard when
identifying its fleet; and Employment and Immigration Canada uses the
title Immigration Canada when identifying activities related to
immigration only. Institutions that create a short version of their
title should register it in the FIP policy.
Dynamics of corporate identity
Public recognition of an institution is achieved and reinforced
through the consistent application of its corporate signature. While
continuity and uniformity are important factors of corporate identity,
it is also clear that corporate identity and visual communications are
dynamic and therefore subject to changes in corporate culture and
strategy.
Managing corporate identity means flexibility to respond to new
strategies while at the same time preserving the institution's permanent
values. Any modification should be carefully analyzed and planned.
Quality and integrity
Managing corporate identity also means being responsible for its
quality and integrity. The full recognition value of a corporate identity
depends on good quality reproduction which should be monitored in all
applications (e.g. forms, published material, motor vehicles, signs and
directory boards).
The integrity of an institution's corporate identity can be
undermined if the use of other symbols is not controlled. FIP policy
restricts the use of other symbols, including those intended for
government wide use.
Visual Identity
An institution's visual identity is expressed in many ways and is much
broader than corporate identity. The purpose of managing an institution's
visual identity is to ensure that corporate goals are visualized and
communicated effectively. It is based on the premise that decisions on
the design of corporate communications should not be made in isolation.
In that sense corporate identity and visual identity have similar
objectives.
The corporate "look"
Institutions can make their visual communications more effective and
coherent by establishing a corporate "look". This means developing a
visual identity for those applications not subject to FIP design
standards. The need to take such an approach varies from organization
to organization and is at the discretion of each institution. A project
that defines an institution's visual identity will require the support
and approval of senior management and should come under the
responsibility of the corporate identity manager.
The benefit of using a systems approach to make visual communications
more coherent has been recognized by federal institutions with major
publishing programs or significant investments in facilities or equipment.
Some institutions developed simple guidelines while others are using
comprehensive manuals; among these are: Canadian Coast Guard; Canadian
International Development Agency; Emergency Preparedness Canada;
National Archives of Canada; National Research Council Canada; Statistics
Canada; Supply and Services Canada; and Transport Canada.
Development
Generally, graphic standards establish corporate colours, typefaces,
layouts or formats and most often apply to the design of published
material. Outlined below is a suggested best practices approach.
Key to developing graphic standards is the design brief that defines
the project. It requires research into past practices of designing and
producing published material, defining the objectives and writing the
actual brief. The design brief should establish a firm understanding of
the project, its scope, objectives and restraints. It should provide
management with a document that can be used throughout the development
phase and against which design proposals can be compared.
A brief that defines the design and presentation of published
material should address the following aspects: nature of the information
or subject matter; program objectives; communications strategy and
corporate identity; user publics; official languages; budget; production;
marketing; distribution; and sales. In addition, the design brief should
state any objectives related to government-wide priorities (e.g.
environmental protection).
Once the most effective design solution has been determined and
approved by the institution, all design requirements should be translated
into a set of guidelines or standards. Intended for the various
specialists involved (e.g. editors, planners, designers, typesetters,
printers) the guidelines become a practical tool in the design and
production process.
Ideally, graphic standards should create a framework or structure
without limiting the creative process. Because visual communications
and design are dynamic, a proper balance should be struck between firm
rules and guidelines that allow flexibility and encourage innovation.
Advice and assistance
Each institution has named an official (referred to as FIP Coordinator)
to manage its corporate identity. All enquiries regarding the guidelines
should be routed through the FIP Coordinator of the institution.
The Administrative Policy Branch of Treasury Board Secretariat
provides policy interpretation and advice on all aspects of corporate
identity management and information design. Such advice includes the
development of a visual identity within the framework of FIP but tailored
to meet an institution's communications objectives.
Definitions
For easy reference, certain terms established for FIP purposes are
included here.
Application: the act of applying FIP design standards or general rules
to an object (e.g. a sign, a vehicle).
Applied title: the approved name used in the signature to identify an
institution, program or activity. See also legal title, service title.
"Canada" wordmark: the global identifier of the government; it
consists of the word "Canada" with the Canadian flag over the final "a".
Design standard: the approved rules on the use of design elements
outlined in the FIP policy. They prescribe elements such as shape, size,
layout, colour, typography and use of symbols.
Field of application: the gamut of items that bear the identifying
elements of FIP, e.g. stationery, vehicles, signs.
Legal title: the name that appears in the enabling legislation (act),
proclamation, Order in Council, or other instrument used to create a
branch of government. (See also applied title.)
Service title: the name that identifies an organizational unit,
program, service or activity, and for purposes of a signature appears
with the applied title of the parent institution. (See also applied
title, legal title.)
Signature: the combination of a symbol and a title. (Also referred to
as the corporate signature.)
Bibliography
Included here are selected titles on the management of corporate
identity and design. Additional references, including corporate identity
manuals of other government organizations, may be consulted in the
reference library of the Federal Identity Program at the Treasury Board
Secretariat.
Bernsen, Jens (ed.), Design Management in Practice, European/EEC
Design Editions, Danish Design Council, Copenhagen, 1987.
Blackburn, Bruce, Design Standards Manuals, National Endowment for
the Arts, US. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., 1977, (44 pp.).
Blake J., A management guide to corporate identity, Council if
Industrial Design, London, 1971.
Editions du Centre Georges Pompidou, Images d'utilité publique, Paris,
1988, (151 pp.).
Gerstner, Kari, Compendium for Literates, MIT Press, Boston, 1974,
(180 pp.).
Gorb, Peter (ed.) Design Talks, London Business School, The Design
Council, London, 1988, (311 pp.).
Gorb, Peter (ed.), Living by design, The partners of Pentagram, Lund
Humphries Publishers Ltd., London, 1978, (300 pp.).
Heude, Rémi-Pierre, L'image de marque, Éditions Eyrolles, Paris, 1989,
(186 pp.).
Hurlburt, Allen, The design concept, Watson-Guptill Publications,
New York, 1981, (157 pp.).
Leblond, Jean-Claude, Gouvernement du Québec - une nouvelle image de
marque, Antennes, numéro 13-14, 1979, pp. 44-49.
Mollerup, Per, The Corporate Design Programme, European/EEC Design
Editions, Danish Design Council, Copenhagen, 1987, (117 pp.).
Murphy, J. and Rowe, M., How to Design Trademarks and Logos, North
Light Books, Cincinatti, Ohio, 1988, (144 pp.).
Nakanishi, Motoo, Corporate Design Systems, PPC International, Inc.,
New York, 1985, (125 pp.).
Olins, Wally, The Corporate Personality, An inquiry into the nature
of corporate identity, Mayflower Books Inc., New York, 1978, (215 pp.).
Olivetti, Design Process, Olivetti 1908-1978, Ing. C. Olivetti & Ca.,
Italy, 1979, (278 pp.).
Selame, Elinor, The Company Image: building your identity and
influence in the marketplace, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988, (230 pp.).
Simpson, Maria (ed.), Corporate Identity: Name, Image and Perception,
Conference Board Report No. 898, The Conference Board, Inc., New York,
1987, (46 pp.).
Schmittel, Wolfgang, Corporate design, ABC Edition, Zurich, 1984,
(168 pp.).
Wurman, Richard S., Information Anxiety, Doubleday, New York, 1989,
(356 pp.).
Appendix A
Federal Identity Program
Background
![Figure 11d](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11d.jpg) |
As with corporate identity programs generally, the Federal ldentity
Program (FIP) is based on the use of corporate symbols applied in
conjunction with organizational titles. The corporate signatures serve
to identify institutions as part of the Government of Canada rather
than as separate, independent entities. The origins of the government's
corporate identity can be traced to the following events.
1921 The Canadian Coat of Arms was adopted by royal proclamation and
introduced on government stationery. The colours red and white were
declared to be Canada's official colours.
1965 The Canadian flag was adopted by royal proclamation. The maple
leaf was confirmed as an official national symbol.
1969 The Official Languages Act was proclaimed, establishing the
principle of equality of English and French.
1969 The Task Force on Government Information reported that the
government was failing to make its presence known and that important
federal programs were being carried out without the public being aware
of their sponsorship.
|
![Figure 11e](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11e.jpg) |
In its report "To know and be known', the Task Force observed that
organizations did not project a uniform, clearly identifiable image as
functional parts of the same government. Many organizational titles
failed to distinguish clearly public from private, or federal from
provincial. Furthermore, through the use of different and uncoordinated
symbols - many of very poor design - each organization identified itself
as a separate entity. |
1970 The creation of the Federal ldentity Program was announced in the House of Commons.
Standardization and clear identification of federal activities were cited as main
objectives. Information Canada, a new agency, was made responsible to
develop and implement the program.
1974 Treasury Board approved the first policy guidelines that
included the use of the two official languages and a management system
for the development and implementation of the program.
1976 Following the demise of Information Canada, the Treasury Board
Secretariat was given responsibility for FIP.
1978 Treasury Board issued a comprehensive policy and design standards.
During the 80s, FIP underwent several reviews that resulted in changes
to the use of symbols. In 1980 the Canada" wordmark was established as
the global identifier of the government. In 1987 the federal emblem (bar
and maple leaf) was replaced by the Canadian flag. This means that the
Coat of Arms, the flag, and the "Canada" wordmark are now the corporate
symbols of the government.
|
![Figure 11f](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11f.jpg) |
Objectives
The program's policy objectives are:
- to enable the public to recognize clearly federal activities by
means of consistent identification;
- to improve service to the public by facilitating access to
programs and services;
- to project equality of status of the two official languages,
consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982)
and the Official Languages Act (1988);
- to ensure effective management of the federal identity consistent
with government-wide priorities, and to achieve savings through
standardization;
- to promote good management practices in the field of corporate
identity and information design.
![Figure 11g](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11g.jpg)
Rationale
Although not prepared for that purpose, the rationale for FIP was
well expressed in the 1981 report of the Parliamentary Task Force on
Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements. The following statement could
apply to all aspects of federal identity:
"...spending without federal presence is not just frustration for the
politician, if is also a denial of the citizen's right to see the
government's work and to judge it. When the federal role is not evident,
it cannot be assessed. Visibility involves a search for the chance to
take the credit, but at the same time, a willingness to shoulder the
blame. As politicians, therefore, we reject the simplistic view that a
concern for visibility is no more than public relations for its own sake.
Answerability of federal MPs to the public is the other side of the coin
from accountability of ministers to Parliament, and a government that is
not visible cannot be answerable".
In summary, federal programs, services and contributions should be
recognizable to the public in order for the government to be accountable.
From a practical point of view, FIP represents an important aspect of
service to the public. The program's guidelines are based on the use of
plain, non-bureaucratic language, functional graphic design and a systems
approach in identifying government services.
Scope
The Federal Identity Program is considered to be one of the largest
corporate identity programs undertaken by a national government. An
estimated 18,000 facilities, 16,000 government vehicles, and a multitude
of forms, stationery items, published material and advertisements are
identified in accordance with FIP guidelines. The program is being
applied by over 100 federal institutions in all regions of Canada as
well as abroad.
A global viewpoint
An aspect worth noting is the relationship between the visual
identity of the government and that of the century. The report to the
1969 Task Force on Government Information first referred to this aspect.
The report said:
'A great deal of the responsibility for the image of a country rests
with government. There are scores of ways in which government is
instantly recognized. They range from the flag and the appearance of
government buildings the stationery and letterheads, advertisements,
insignia on government vehicles and so on. Abroad, the distinction
between government and Canada merges into a single image". The report
called it "l'image Canada".
In 1988 this concept was addressed at an international design
exhibition at the Centre Pompidou in Paris. Under the theme "Images
d'utilité publique", the exhibition examined how the state and public
authorities and organizations communicate with people and how information
design directly affects the functioning and quality of society. The
Federal ldentity Program was among the case studies from different
countries that demonstrated national, civic and cultural visual
identities. Internationally, the Program is well recognized among
corporate identity and design consultants.
![Figure 11h](/web/20061130001339im_/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fip-pcim/images/1_0-11h.jpg)
|