|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax Expenditures and Evaluations: 2001: 3 Table 2
Notes: * † The Economic Statement and Budget Update of October 2000 set out a timetable for fulfilling the government’s commitment to reduce, by 2004, the federal corporate income tax on business income not currently eligible for special tax treatment, from 28 to 21 per cent. Including the corporate surtax, the tax rate used for the benchmark is reduced from 28.12 per cent for 2001 to 26.12 per cent for 2002, and 24.12 per cent for 2003. Since this measure represents a change in the benchmark tax system, there is no tax expenditure associated with this measure. This reduction in the benchmark rate reduces the value of exemptions, deductions and deferrals as well as non-refundable tax credits and tax reductions whose value depend on the benchmark rate.1 Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, changes in the projections from those in last year’s edition of this document result from changes in the explanatory economic variables upon which the projections are based.2 The 1996 figures are based on final data and may differ from the figures in last year’s edition of this document, which were based on preliminary data.3 The increase in the tax expenditure from 1998 to 2000 is attributable to a large increase in projected taxable income during this period. The decline in the tax expenditure starting in 2001 results from the reductions in the benchmark rate.4 The increase from 1996 to 1997 reflects an increase in the level of M&P profits. The decline in the tax expenditure starting in 2001 results from the reductions in the benchmark rate.5 This measure was announced in the 2000 budget and is effective January 1, 2001. The lower rate on general income of small businesses and the change in the benchmark federal tax rate effective January 1, 2001, only partially affect estimates for taxation year 2001 since many firms reporting income in the 2001 taxation year earned a portion of that income in the 2000 calendar year, before the rate reductions were introduced.6 The estimates are lower after 2000 as a result of the phased-in reductions in the general corporate income tax rate.7 The decrease in 1997 reflects a lower level of earned investment tax credit.8 This measure was introduced in 1997.9 The increase in the tax expenditure from 1996 to 1997 reflects an increase in capital gains. The increase in 2000 and 2001 reflects the net effect of a projected increase in capital gains and the reduction in the capital gains inclusion rate from three-quarters to one-half during 2000.10 Estimates for the non-deductibility of Crown royalties and mining taxes and the resource allowance are highly dependent upon the level of activity in the resource industries. Major differences between the estimates prepared in 2000 and these estimates are due to higher prices for hydrocarbons (i.e. crude oil and natural gas) and increased production in 2000 and subsequent years. Improved data for prior years have also become available. Both series decline after 2001 to reflect the fact that hydrocarbon prices are expected to fall after reaching a peak in that year.11 The lower value for 1997 reflects new data received since the publication of the previous report. Additions to depletion pools were eliminated as of January 1, 1990. The declining value of this tax expenditure reflects the fact that these pools are being drawn down, albeit subject to any limitations imposed by the successor rules.12 This tax expenditure consists of the fast write-off of certain capital assets, including capital equipment used for scientific research and experimental development, of resource exploration and development expenditures and of energy conservation and efficiency equipment. See the document entitled Tax Expenditures: Notes to the Estimates/Projections, published in 2000 and available on the Department of Finance Web site (http://www.fin.gc.ca), for an explanation of why no figures have been calculated.13 The amount of this tax expenditure can fluctuate from year to year depending on the amount of current-year losses and the availability of income against which to apply these losses.14 The amount of this tax expenditure can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending primarily upon the level of construction activity.15 The amount of this tax expenditure can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending upon advertising expenses claimed.16 This measure was introduced in 1998.17 Estimates were computed on the basis of an analysis of payments to non-residents and withholding tax collections available for 1999, the latest year for which complete data were available. Estimates in previous publications were based on similar data for the years 1992-94. Figures for 1996-98 and 2000-2003 are, respectively, backward and forward projections based on the 1999 estimates. These estimates and projections are based on the benchmark assumption that no behavioral response would occur after the hypothetical removal of existing withholding tax exemptions. This assumption is particularly difficult to sustain for this type of tax, as indicated in the document entitled Tax Expenditures: Notes to the Estimates/Projections, published in 2000 and available on the Department of Finance Web site (http://www.fin.gc.ca). Consequently, the amounts shown in the table should not be regarded as estimates and projections of the revenue gain that would be realized from the hypothetical removal of the listed withholding tax exemptions.18 Data were previously unavailable for this expenditure. With a number of years of data now available from the NPO return (introduced from January 1, 1993), it has become possible to produce a tax expenditure estimate for NPOs for the first time.19 This measure was effective for the years 1997 to 2000 inclusive.20 The increase in this tax expenditure from 2000 to 2002 results from the increase in the tobacco manufacturers' surtax from 40 per cent to 50 per cent of the Part I tax on profits from tobacco manufacturing, effective April 6, 2001.21 Corporate income earned in the resource sector is taxed at 29.12%. The benchmark federal tax rate dropped to 28.12% on January 1, 2001, and will decline to 26.12%, 24.12%, and 22.12% on January 1, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. The rate reductions will apply only to sectors that did not benefit from special tax preferences. The resource sector benefits from a number of such preferences (accelerated exploration and development expenses and fast write-offs for certain capital assets, the structure of the resource allowance) that act in conjunction to reduce the effective tax rate on this sector below comparable rates in other sectors, including manufacturing. Accurate measurement of estimates for the tax expenditures would require taking these interactions into account but this is not possible because of methodology and data constraints.The Department has initiated consultations on options to extend the lower tax rate to this sector while at the same time improving the tax structure. 22 This measure was first introduced in the 1995 budget and extended in subsequent budgets. After a review of capital taxes levied on financial institutions, the temporary tax was not extended beyond its scheduled expiry date of October 31, 2000.23 This tax expenditure includes the additional 6 2/3 per cent refundable tax on investment income as well as, for years after 2000, the Part I tax paid on investment income in excess of the benchmark rate. The increase in this expenditure for 2002 and 2003 results from the increase in the difference between the Part I tax on investment income and the benchmark rate.24 New estimates are higher than previous publications, due to the availability of new data. The increase in the 1997 tax expenditure is due to a significant increase in the capital gains dividend distribution. The estimates are lower after 2000 to take into account the phased-in reduction in the general corporate income tax rate and the reduction in the capital gains inclusion rate.25 The impact of loss carry-overs can fluctuate significantly from year to year depending upon the amount of current and prior years’ losses and the availability of income against which to apply these losses.26 Patronage dividends are somewhat discretionary and vary from year to year. The lower tax expenditure in 1997 reflects lower patronage dividend distributions. The estimates are lower after 2000 to take into account the phased-in reductions in the general corporate income tax rate.27 The change between last year’s and this year’s estimates reflects improvements in the underlying data and in the forecast of economic activity.28 The cost of the Syncrude Remission Order ("Order Respecting the Remission of Income Tax for the Syncrude Project," P.C. 1976-1026, May 6, 1976 [C.R.C. 1978 Vol. VII, c. 794]) has not been estimated for this edition. The costs of this particular remission order are now published annually in the Public Accounts of Canada (ISBN 0-660-177792-7).29 The change between last year’s and this year’s estimates reflects improvements in the underlying data used to estimate the cost of the refund.- Table of Contents - Previous - Next - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|