Intellectual Property Management Study authored by: Environment Canada
Report Year: 2006-2007 TBS file number: 12710 Classified as an Evaluation This report is available on the Environment Canada website.
Summary provided by Environment Canada
Background
An
evaluation was initiated because of concerns and risks posed by inconsistent
approaches and practices to Intellectual Property (IP) management across the
Department. The evaluation assessed Environment Canada’s (EC) Intellectual
Property policies and practices related to computer software and technologies
over the 1992 to 2006 period.
Key
Findings
EC’s IP policies, processes and institutional
arrangements support broad Government of Canada policies and requirements.
They do not, however, provide strategic
corporate direction to ensure that a) EC’s IP relates to the department’s
mandate, goals and priorities, and b) IP rights are considered early in the
science management, regulatory and policy processes.
The Department does not have a complete corporate
picture of its licensed or non-licensed IP.
While the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) monitors and catalogues
EC’s licensing agreements, EC does not track its non-licensed IP or the
environmental, economic, social and other benefits of its IP.
EC’s licenses and patents are protected to a degree
commensurate with the risk but
gaps in EC’s IP management functions and the
lack of decision-making processes and mechanisms expose the Department to risks
and lost opportunities.
For example,
without due attention to the wording of agreements, EC could a) restrict
the future use of IP arising from
collaborations or from IP that has been provided to a licensee or b) obligate
itself to ongoing support of transferred technologies (e.g., updates, continued
research).
In the absence of strategic corporate direction, EC’s
IP decisions are taken at the individual managerial level resulting in
inconsistent practices across the department. Often individual managers are not
trained in IP
management and make decisions based on their own experience with
limited awareness or involvement of the IPO.
Opportunities exist to re-position the Intellectual
Property management function within EC; EC scientists and
managers agree on the
need for a corporate strategy, guidelines, and increased involvement of IP
experts.
If the Department decides to
widen the scope and activities for IP management, resource requirements can be
expected to rise in the future.
Recommendations
1.
Departmental Management Services
Board, in collaboration with the Assistant Deputy Minister of Science and
Technology Branch, should establish a corporate Intellectual Property
management strategy
.
2.
DMS Board should a) develop
governance structures, mechanisms and processes to guide the implementation of
the corporate IP management strategy, b) clarify IP management roles and
responsibilities of the Intellectual Property Office, Legal Services, embedded
IP specialists, Delegated Authorities and EC
employees, particularly scientists
and researchers, and c) identify funding support to be provided to IPO,
embedded IP specialists and EC employees to manage EC’s IP.
3.
The Intellectual Property Office should a) develop supporting materials for
Delegated Authorities, b) deliver a mandatory training program for all
Delegated Authorities, and c) inform EC employees of the responsibilities of
public servants to manage Intellectual Property and the services offered by the
IPO.
Contact:
Director,
Evaluation
Audit
and Evaluation
Environment
Canada
(819)
956-7612
This study is associated with the following Strategic Outcomes: This study is associated with the following TBS Policy Topics: This study may be of interest to the following Parliamentary Committees:Any links to departmental websites are subject to change. Please contact us if you experience broken links.
|