Modern
Management Action Plan
Introduction
The
federal government is undergoing rapid and significant change in the way it operates
and manages itself. The challenges of allocating resources, getting better value
for money, strengthening accountability among other challenges, led the government
to search for improved management practices. Modern comptrollership is a major
initiative to modernize management practices across the federal government and
follows the recommendations set out in the Report of the Independent Review Panel
on Modernization of Comptrollership in the Government of Canada. As indicated
in this report, the government will have successfully modernized management practices
when managers and organizations integrate these improved practices into their
everyday management, and demonstrate a strong capacity to use quality information
in decision-making. This
Modern Management Action Plan lays out the actions the National Round Table on
the Environment and the Economy intends to carry out in order to strengthen management
practices in those priority areas identified during the agency's Modern
Comptrollership Capacity Assessment. Background
In June 2001, the Honourable Lucienne Robillard, President of the Treasury Board,
announced that, following a three-year pilot phase, the Modern Comptrollership
initiative was extended to all federal departments and agencies. As the NRTEE
had already identified the need to strengthen some of its management practices,
the agency seized on this initiative in order to make these improvements in a
systematic and disciplined fashion. With funding and support provided by TBS,
the NRTEE established a modern comptrollership project management office in the
fall of 2001. This enabled the agency to manage and adapt the modern comptrollership
tools and implementation approach to the unique size and culture of the NRTEE.
Modern
Comptrollership is one of the government's key priorities. It is a management
reform focused on the sound management of resources and effective decision-making.
It goes to the heart of the Government of Canada's management framework as described
in Results for Canadians. This framework outlines the need for departments and
agencies to commit to excellence in four key areas: citizen-focused, values driven,
results oriented and responsible spending. In other words, they must be focused
on meeting the needs of Canadians. In order to do this, they need to apply sound
public service values and place significant emphasis on managing for results and
spending responsibly. Modern
Comptrollership is a progressive step on the continuum of management improvement
in the federal government, which is necessary because of increased demands by
Canadians for greater accountability, more relevance, and enhanced value-for-money
from government policies and programs. Modern
comptrollership is about ensuring that the current and future generations of federal
public service managers are equipped with the requisite skills, competencies and
understanding of their roles and responsibilities to function effectively in this
environment and that they are well supported by their organizations in terms of
the following four pillars and three enablers of modern comptrollership. Pillars
of Modern Comptrollership
Shared Values and Ethics support a regime of democratic, professional
and organizational and personal values that result in ethical behaviour, attitudes
and decisions. Shared values will be instrumental in supporting open, accessible,
values-driven and results-oriented operations.
Integrated Performance Information combine the most critical
financial and non-financial data and appropriate advice in support of decision-making,
results management and reporting. Mature
Risk Management is composed of a comprehensive framework that is integrated
into planning, decision-making and monitoring.
Rigorous Stewardship includes responsibilities to safeguard public
assets, to develop, operate and support key control systems, management processes,
infrastructure, standards and measures of success. Enablers
of Modern Comptrollership
Strategic Leadership refers to the commitment of creating and
sustaining a climate for change that fosters the integration of Modern Comptrollership
concepts for day-to-day decision-making. Ministers and Public Servants share responsibility
for this type of leadership that will result in the integration of values, people
and results. Motivated
People focuses on establishing a Public Service workplace that is learning,
challenging and rewarding environment, where employees exercise key competencies
and skills to achieve expected results. Clear
Accountability involves closer links with the community, increased transparency
and public confidence in accountability.
NRTEE
Commitment and Governance
On
September 21, 2001, the NRTEE's President and Chief Executive Officer confirmed
in writing to the Comptroller General of Canada the agency's commitment
to implementing the Modern Comptrollership Initiative. Following this commitment,
in the fall of 2001, the Round Table established a project management office to
oversee and guide implementation of the Modern Comptrollership Initiative. The
NRTEE received funding from TBS to support the hiring of an independent consultant
to manage this office on a part-time basis. The Round Table's Corporate
Secretary and Director of Operations is responsible for the oversight of the project
management office and provides overall direction for implementation of this initiative.
The project management office provides progress updates to the Corporate Secretary
and Director of Operations on an ongoing basis and all NRTEE modern comptrollership
reports and strategies are reviewed and approved by him prior to release or implementation.
NRTEE staff is kept informed and involved with priority action plan items through
specific training events and updates at monthly staff meetings. The
NRTEE has shown leadership on this initiative within the small agency community,
a community comprised of over 65 federal departments and agencies. The Corporate
Secretary and Director of Operations is a member of the Small Agencies Modernization
Council. The NRTEE is also leading a TBS Innovations Fund Performance Measurement
project involving the Canadian Transportation Agency and the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Agency. This project is designed to develop effective and efficient
tools and approaches to measure performance within small federal agencies with
very different mandates. NRTEE
Modern Management Action Plan Objectives The
key objectives of the NRTEE Modern Management Action plan are:
-
to summarize the findings and results of the NRTEE's Modern Comptrollership
Capacity Assessment; -
to identify the priority areas for improvement and the rationale for why other
areas do not require further improvement at this time; -
to provide a comprehensive plan for addressing priority areas for improvement,
outlining the linkage to the specific Modern Comptrollership elements and other
NRTEE management initiatives; -
to outline actions and initiatives currently underway; and -
to identify time frames, expected results and the person(s) responsible for key
activities. NRTEE
Capacity Assessment In
the summer of 2002, the NRTEE undertook a capacity assessment designed to provide
the agency with a baseline assessment of current management practices and to identify
opportunities for improvement. This was a self-assessment process based on the
TBS' KPMG Capacity Check tool comprised of 33 elements under the 7 broad
areas explained above, namely: The
NRTEE worked with the firm BDO Dunwoody to develop the approach that was used
in the capacity assessment. The assessment was completed in the summer of 2002,
with the final report delivered by BDO in December 2002. This NRTEE Modern Management
Action Plan is based on the findings and information gathered through this capacity
assessment process and as reported in the final Capacity Assessment report. NRTEE's
Capacity Assessment Approach The
TBS KPMG Capacity Assessment tool was designed and piloted on large departments
in the federal government. As many small federal departments and agencies do not
have the capacity, nor the infrastructure and resources, to support many of the
formalized, structured systems and processes outlined in the KPMG tool, the tool
was adapted to meet the specific and unique needs of the NRTEE. The following
is a summary of the approach that was used to adapt and apply this tool in order
to carry out NRTEE's capacity assessment: -
Develop
a Capacity Assessment Focus Group Guide
– Using the KPMG tool as a guide, the NRTEE developed a focus group guide
with specific questions to ascertain current management practices in relation
to each of the 33 capacity assessment elements. A question for each element was
included to determine if the current practice was sufficient and why/why not a
final question asked participants to assign a rating for each element. -
Determine Focus Group Participants
– In order to conduct a fair and valid process, the NRTEE established a
focus group to carry out this assessment. This group collectively made up over
25% of the total staff complement. This included all of the senior and middle
management team and representation from front line policy staff and administration.
The interim Chair of the NRTEE was also a member of the focus group. -
Conduct a Modern Comptrollership Information Session –
Although many staff utilize many of the modern management practices intuitively,
an information session was provided to the focus group participants prior to the
actual capacity assessment focus group meetings. This enabled the participants
to develop a clear and common understanding of each of the 33 elements and to
begin to think of them in relation to their work and experience. This resulted
in participants being better prepared to participate in a full and frank discussion
of these elements during the focus group meetings. -
Conduct Focus Group Meetings – The original plan was to
complete NRTEE's capacity assessment during a single, all-day focus group
meeting. However, given the full and comprehensive discussions that were taking
place during the initial meeting, a second focus group meeting was arranged to
complete the assessment. All of the participants actively and openly participated
in providing their perspectives and ideas to help assess current practices, identify
opportunities for improvement, and assign a rating for each of the elements. As
this assessment was done using a round table, collaborative approach it also served
to validate the findings and ratings. -
Draft and Finalize the Capacity Assessment Report – BDO
Dunwoody provided the NRTEE with a draft capacity assessment report in the fall
of 2002 followed by a final report in December 2002. Summary
of Capacity Assessment Findings The
capacity assessment process highlighted management strengths as well as areas
requiring improvement. The summary in Figure 1 indicates that the NRTEE is particularly
strong in the areas of Strategic Leadership, Shared Values and Ethics and Rigorous
Stewardship with further work required to strengthen management practices in the
areas of Mature Risk Management, Motivated People and Integrated Performance Information. Figure
1 – Summary of NRTEE's Capacity Assessment Result
Click
to enlarge figure
Details
of Capacity Assessment Results
The
Modern Management Action plan is built on the findings and opportunities identified
during the capacity assessment process. The following chart in Figure 2 outlines
the detailed results that make up each of the 7 areas summarized in Figure 1. Figure
2 – Detailed Results for Each Capacity Assessment Element
Click to enlarge figure
Moving
Forward
The NRTEE's capacity assessment process generated enthusiasm and buy-in
from middle management and front line staff. It also further strengthened senior
management's commitment to move forward and address areas and opportunities
for improvement. Following this process, senior management identified priorities
for improvement, with the objective of addressing all areas requiring further
improvement within an 18-month time frame. The
chart in Figure 3 outlines the Action Plan to address NRTEE's priority areas
for improvement. This chart outlines the specific NRTEE management initiatives,
the related planned activities, the linkage to the capacity assessment elements
and the priority ranking (high -completed or well underway between
Fall 2002 to Spring 2003 and medium - well underway or completed
between Spring 2003 and Spring 2004). This chart also details who is responsible
for each initiative/planned activity and the related timeframe.
Figure
3 – Action Plan
Management
Initiative: Continued leadership and commitment to modernizing NRTEE's
management practices |
- Planned
Outcomes
-
Coordinated and sustained commitment to continuously improve management practices
and processes
- Planned
Activities
- Continue
to maintain a Project Management Office to provide leadership, coordination and
guidance to senior and middle management
-
Continue to provide leadership within the small agency community (i.e. membership
on Small Agency Modernization Council; Small Agency Modernization Comptrollership
Group; leadership on a TBS Innovations Fund project on Performance Measurement)
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
-
1 – Leadership Commitment
-
2 – Managerial Commitment
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Development of new NRTEE Contracting and Hospitality policies
– two areas key to the NRTEE |
- Planned
Outcomes
- Improved
understanding of contract management
- Improved
databank of potential support specialists
Improved contract, program and resource
management - Planned
Activities
- Consult
with staff and TBS for input and feedback
- Draft
new policies
- Conduct
staff training on these new policies
- Make
required adjustments to the policies
- Implement
the new policies
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
-
3 – Strategic specialist support
- 18
– Specialist support
- 6
– Management of Partnerships
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Gene
Nyberg; Pierrette Guitard; Michael Hammond
- Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Continued implementation of NRTEE's integrated performance
measurement system | - Planned
Outcomes
-
Improved financial and non-financial information for decision-making and reporting
-
Improved program management
- Improved
accountability through identification of responsibilities in performance measurement
plans.
- Planned
Activities
- Continue
with the implementation in accordance with NRTEE's Performance Measurement
Implementation Plan, including:
-
Integrating performance measurement into the NRTEE's Program Management
methodology and Manual
-
Developing an organization-wide performance measurement plan and monitoring and
reporting on progress against this plan;
- Developing
Results Chains and Performance Measurement Plans for all of NRTEE's programs,
ensuring effective linkage to NRTEE's strategic outcomes and results; and
- Strengthening
the effectiveness and utilization of the ABC system in budgeting, monitoring and
reporting.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- Integrated
Performance Information: capacity assessment elements 20 –26
- 4
- Planning
- 5
– Resource Management
- 10
– Integrated management control framework
- 16
Clarity of responsibilities and organization
- 28
– Management tools and techniques
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Gene
Nyberg;Laurel Murray, Lisa Woodward
- Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Strengthen NRTEE's strategic planning and reporting |
- Planned
Outcomes
-
Implementation of horizontal, results-based planning, management and reporting
- Improved
resource allocation
-
Improve the relevance of internal and external reporting, linking resources, accountabilities
and planned strategic outcomes.
- Improved
accountability to Parliament and Canadians
- Planned
Activities
-
Develop a Results Chain for NRTEE to illustrate the linkage between NRTEE's
appropriation from Parliament and the strategic outcomes and results to be achieved
with these resources and mandate from Parliament.
-
Integrate the NRTEE's budgeting process with the strategic planning and
realign the budgeting system to focus on the strategic outcomes and related activities
necessary to achieve these outcomes.
-
Restructure NRTEE'S Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) to focus on the
Round Table's strategic outcomes and the planned activities to be carried
out to achieve these outcomes. Ensure linkages between NRTEE strategic priorities
and the Government's priorities are clearly illustrated. This report will
also look to provide an overview of the performance indicators that will be used
to monitor and report on the achievement or progress towards the achievement of
these outcomes.
-
Restructure the NRTEE's Departmental Performance Report (DPR) to report
the agency's achievement or progress towards the achievement of its strategic
outcomes. This is a shift from the previous focus on activities and outputs to
a focus on outcomes and results.
-
Provide training to NRTEE staff to share and review the strategic outcomes and
results planned for the agency and discuss and review the linkages to NRTEE's
programs.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
-
4 - Planning
- 5
– Resource Management
- 19
– External reporting
- 20
– Integrated departmental performance reporting
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Gene
Nyberg;
Laurel Murray - Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Develop new NRTEE human resource policies and practices. Provide
staff training on the new policies and practices. |
- Planned
Outcomes
-
Improved clarity and understanding of key policies that impact or affect NRTEE's
staff
-
Improved clarity with respect to responsibilities and duties.
-
Improve the level of employee morale and satisfaction
- Planned
Activities
- Engage
an independent Human Resources consultant to examine NRTEE's existing human
resource policies and practices and to develop new policies and practices as required.
This will involve examining issues on both a macro level and on a micro level
– from employer/employee relations to staff recruitment, retention and staff
morale.
-
Assess current skills of staff and skills required to fulfill the clarified roles
and responsibilities and develop a plan to address skill gaps identified.
-
Examine the need for implementing performance agreements with middle management
staff (incl. Policy Advisors) and implement if deemed to be appropriate, effective
and practical for NRTEE.
- Provide
training to NRTEE staff on the new policies and practices.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- Motivated
People elements 11 – 15 inclusive.
- 16
– Clarity of responsibilities and organization
- 17
– Performance agreements and evaluation
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Timeframe
- Winter 2003
– late summer 2003
| Management
Initiative: Strengthen internal communications, increasing the opportunities
for staff to learn from one-another, input into the decision-making process etc.
| - Planned
Outcomes
-
A continuous learning and innovation environment
-
Improved business processes and practices
-
Improved knowledge management
- Planned
Activities
- Hold
weekly program meetings involving senior management, program and communication
staff to assess and discuss lessons learned and best practices.
-
Post all key meetings on a central, electronic NRTEE calendar with a corresponding
email notice to staff.
-
Provide cost-effective opportunities for staff to attend NRTEE plenary meetings.
- Hold
a retreat with all staff on an annual basis to address key issues and initiatives.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- 27
– Business process improvement
- 15
– Valuing people's contributions
- 29
– Knowledge management
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
-
David McGuinty; Gene Nyberg; Edwin Smith
- Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Undertake further work to determine the extent to which NRTEE
requires a formal risk management framework or strategy and staff training required
in this area. | - Planned
Outcomes
- Strong
risk management practices utilized by NRTEE ‘s senior and middle management
(including Policy Advisors) staff on an ongoing basis.
- Planned
Activities
- Develop
a risk management profile for the agency, including current practices and process
to manage strategic and other key risks (i.e. operational, financial, human resources
etc.).
-
Determine the extent to which formal policies, practices, strategies and frameworks
are required to meet the NRTEE's needs in this area. Develop and implement
the required tools in this area, ensuring they are integrated with NRTEE's
planning, management and reporting processes.
- Determine
the needs and approach to effectively provide staff training on NRTEE's
risk management practices and processes. Provide required training.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- 9
– Integrated risk management
- 10
– Integrated management control framework
- 28
– Management tools and techniques
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Gene
Nyberg, Laurel Murray
- Timeframe
- Spring 2003
– Spring 2004
| Management
Initiative: Undertake further work to determine the extent to which NRTEE
requires a formal values and ethics framework and the training required in this
area | - Planned
Outcomes
-
Common understanding of NRTEE's values and ethics and management practices
and behaviours reflect these values and ethics.
- Planned
Activities
-
Undertake a review and assessment of NRTEE's values and ethics practices,
and develop a clear statement/framework of the agencies core values and ethics.
-
Communicate these values and ethics to all staff and NRTEE members and provide
related training or briefings if required.
-
Ensure a process is in place and communicated to all staff to communicate and
address ethical dilemmas and monitor any trends in this area.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
-
Gene Nyberg, Laurel Murray
- Timeframe
| Management
Initiative: Implement a system to effective track and safeguard NRTEE's
assets | - Planned
Outcomes
-
Improved management and safeguarding of assets.
- Planned
Activities
- Install
new Basset Pro database software package in Finance.
-
Input all capital assets (those >$1,500) and attractive assets below this threshold
into the database and affix related asset with a new bar code.
- Using
the portable scanner, scan all assets in the database so as to enable them to
be audited and tracked on an ongoing basis.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- 31
– Management of assets.
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Timeframe
- Capital Assets:
Jan.- March 2003; - All
other assets to be tracked:
April – June 2003 |
Management
Initiative: Develop and maintain a comprehensive manual of key NRTEE policies
and practices | - Planned
Outcomes
-
A common and clear understanding of NRTEE's key policies and practices,
including program management, finance, administration and human resources.
An effective training and orientation tool for new employees and NRTEE members. - Planned
Activities
- Review
and update all key NRTEE program management, finance and administration policies.
-
Consolidate the human resource policies and practices that come out of the Human
Resources initiative outlined above.
-
Modify the policies and practices to provide a common look and feel (i.e. consistent
electronic medium such as MS Word, common layout etc.).
- Maintain
this 'living' document electronically so as to enable this manual
to be readily accessed by all staff as required and to be updated on an ongoing
basis.
- Link
to Capacity Assessment Element(s)
- 29
– Knowledge management
- 16
– Clarity of responsibilities and organization
- Priority
Ranking *
- Responsibility
- Gene
Nyberg, Michael Hammond
- Timeframe
|
As previously
noted, the chart in Figure 3 is intended to illustrate NRTEE's plan to address
the priority areas for improvement identified through the agency's capacity
assessment. To this end, the plan covers 29 (or 88%) of the 33 capacity assessment
elements. The following summary outlines the rationale for not specifically covering
the remaining 4 elements in this Action Plan:
Capacity
Assessment Element | Rationale
for Not Addressed in the Action Plan |
7 – Client
relationship management | The
NRTEE has very strong and effective client relationship management practices currently
in place and additional practices are not considered necessary at this time. |
30
– Accounting practices | As
part of the implementation of FIS, the NRTEE developed a comprehensive set of
accounting polices to reflect the proper accounting treatment of financial transactions.
These policies were used as a model to assist other small agencies and departments
within the FreeBalance cluster group. | 32
– Internal Audit | Given
the very small size of the agency, combined with the fact that the NRTEE is audited
to its own level of materiality on an annual basis, a separate internal audit
unit and related processes are not considered necessary at this time. If required,
the NRTEE would call upon the OAG to conduct a special audit. |
33
– External Audit | As
the OAG conducts an annual audit and issues an audit opinion on the NRTEE, further
attention is not required in this area. | Measuring,
Monitoring and Reporting Progress
In
order to effectively manage and report on the NRTEE's Modern Management
Action Plan, specific performance indicators will be developed for the Management
Initiatives and Planned Outcomes. NRTEE's project management office will
monitor progress on an ongoing basis. Progress reports will be provided to senior
management on a monthly basis and more frequently as required. The Corporate Secretary
and Director of Operations will provide progress reports to the NRTEE's
President and CEO on a bi-annual basis and more frequently as required. The NRTEE
will also provide Treasury Board (TBS) with progress reports on an annual basis
and more frequently as requested or required to keep the central agency abreast
of key issues. The NRTEE will also report key management improvement plans and
expected results in the agency's Report on Plans and Priorities. Results
achieved, or progress towards results, will be reported in the Round Table's
Departmental Performance Report.
|