I am pleased to present the Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Office of the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions (OSFI) for the years 2006-2007 to 2008-2009.
Canada is fortunate to possess one of the strongest financial systems in the world, which contributes to the strength and
innovation of Canada's economy, and protects the savings of individual Canadians. However, the environment - both
domestically and internationally - in which OSFI operates is fluid. Maintaining high confidence in the safety of money
entrusted to Canadian financial institutions and remaining a world-class prudential regulator with a modern supervisory
system figure prominently in OSFI's plans and priorities.
OSFI is the primary regulator of all federally incorporated financial institutions in Canada as well as federally
regulated private pension plans. As a separate unit within OSFI, the Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA) provides actuarial
and other services to the federal government. Above all, and without unduly restricting competitiveness, OSFI advances a
modern regulatory framework that contributes to public confidence in Canada's financial system. Such a framework also
benefits financial institutions in their dealings with Canadians and with counter-parties in Canada and abroad.
Effective mechanisms for evaluating risks to financial institutions and private pension plans, programs to promote sound
business and financial practices, and the capacity and willingness to intervene early to avoid or minimize prudential
problems in regulated financial institutions and pension plans will continue to be the key ingredients of OSFI's regulatory
and supervisory approach.
Financial institutions are operating in an increasingly complex and competitive international environment, which includes
more cross-border cooperation and reliance on OSFI by foreign regulators. OSFI faces more pressure to increase its
assessment of risks arising from offshore operations of Canadian financial institutions and to monitor their ability to
manage those risks. Increased complexity means institutions must adopt enhanced analytical techniques, risk-transfer
mechanisms and new control processes to keep pace with the inherent risks. OSFI plans to enhance its risk-based planning and
supervisory processes and will conduct a more formal review of its Supervisory Framework over the next two years.
The regulatory and legal environment is changing rapidly as institutions are faced with changes to accounting standards
and the implementation of Basel II. Basel II is a framework for a new set of standards for minimum capital requirements for
banking organizations. Basel II was released in June 2004 by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the prime body
bringing together supervisors and regulators of international banks from G-10 countries.
OSFI's challenge is to develop rules that are globally competitive, do not unduly impede the competitiveness
of Canadian financial institutions and ensure its regulatory framework remains prudentially sound.
|
|
Among the implications of the Basel II Framework, larger banks will be encouraged to adopt enhanced measures to guide
their internal assessments of capital needs. General principles must be translated into effective implementation approaches
in several areas, presenting a challenge to both institutions and OSFI to ensure implementation is done on a consistent
basis. The review and approval of applications will be enhanced and bank requests for interpretation or flexibility in
implementation will be a priority. A gap analysis between OSFI's Supervisory Framework and Basel II requirements will be
done and OSFI will continue discussions with its counterparts to deal with home/host implementation for foreign banks
operating in Canada and Canadian banks operating abroad.
Proposed accounting changes will add to risk and complexity and may have a significant impact on the financial position
and capital of financial institutions. Examples of the new rules include the use of fair value for assets, the impact of
hedge accounting, and international standards on insurance liabilities. OSFI will develop a prudential response to fair
value accounting and related reporting. It will also respond to revisions of the International Accounting Standard Board's
conceptual framework and insurance accounting overhaul, and will take regulatory and supervisory action as required.
Private pension plan sponsors continue to face some financial risk as low interest rates have reduced pension solvency
ratios, prompting questions about how to deal with under-funded plans. This is causing plan sponsors to reconsider the
viability of defined benefit plans. Key concerns from our perspective are that excessive relaxation of funding requirements
to assist sponsors could reduce protection for pensioners, or that rule changes could reduce incentives for plan
participants to solve problems. OSFI is allocating more resources to accelerate the approval process for plan changes and to
strengthen its intervention activity with problem plans. OSFI plans to develop more detailed policies and procedures for the
regulatory process. It will also participate in any government policy development related to defined benefit plans.
To meet the challenges of change and complexity, OSFI will ensure that its human resources are appropriately aligned to
risk and priorities, including recruitment, training and succession plans. OSFI has slowed the pace of major new initiatives
to focus on change management and leadership management capabilities. Existing information management and technology
projects will be completed to fully capitalize on projected benefits and the development of new systems and enhancements
will be prioritized.
OSFI's activities form part of a modern infrastructure that supports Canada's financial system and economy. The vitality
of both is essential to improving the quality of life for all Canadians, which is the Government of Canada's enduring
priority.
"OSFI's Raison d'être"
Mandate
OSFI's legislated mandate was established in 1996 and changes are not expected in the 2006-2009 planning period. Under
the legislation, OSFI's mandate is to:
- Supervise federally regulated financial institutions and private pension plans to determine whether they are in
sound financial condition and meeting minimum plan funding requirements respectively, and are complying with their
governing law and supervisory requirements;
- Promptly advise institutions and plans in the event there are material deficiencies and take, or require
management, boards or plan administrators to take, necessary corrective measures expeditiously;
- Advance and administer a regulatory framework that promotes the adoption of policies and procedures designed to
control and manage risk;
- Monitor and evaluate system-wide or sectoral issues that may impact institutions negatively.
In meeting this mandate, OSFI contributes to public confidence in the financial system.
OSFI's legislation also acknowledges the need to allow institutions to compete effectively and take reasonable
risks. It recognizes that management, boards of directors and plan administrators are ultimately responsible and that
financial institutions and pension plans can fail.
The Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA), which is part of OSFI, provides actuarial services to the Government of
Canada.
Strategic Outcomes
Primary to OSFI's mission and central to its contribution to Canada's financial system are two strategic outcomes:
- To regulate and supervise to contribute to public confidence in Canada's financial system and safeguard from
undue loss. OSFI safeguards depositors, policyholders and private pension plan members by enhancing the
safety and soundness of federally regulated financial institutions and private pension plans.
- To contribute to public confidence in Canada's public retirement income system. This is achieved
through the activities of the Office of the Chief Actuary, which provides high quality, timely advice on the state
of various public pension plans and on the financial implications of options being considered by policy makers.
|
Resources
Financial Resources ($ millions)
2006-2007
|
2007-2008
|
2008-2009
|
$85.0
|
$88.6
|
$92.4
|
Human Resources Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)
2006-2007
|
2007-2008
|
2008-2009
|
459
|
459
|
459
|
Priorities
($ millions)
|
Type
|
Planned Spending
|
2006-2007
|
2007-2008
|
2008-2009
|
#1
Risk Assessment and Intervention
|
Ongoing
|
$50.1
|
$52.4
|
$54.8
|
#2
Rule Making
|
Ongoing
|
$15.2
|
$15.8
|
$16.4
|
#3
Approvals
|
Ongoing
|
$7.9
|
$8.1
|
$8.4
|
#4
Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Private Pension Plans
|
Ongoing
|
$5.2
|
$5.4
|
$5.6
|
#5
International Assistance
|
Ongoing
|
$1.9
|
$2.0
|
$2.1
|
#6
Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA)
|
Ongoing
|
$4.7
|
$4.9
|
$5.1
|
#7
Accounting Standards
|
New
|
Costs for this priority are included in the costs for Priority 2 above.
|
#8
Basel II
|
New
|
Costs for this priority are included in the costs for Priority 1 above.
|
#9
Governance and Reporting
|
Ongoing
|
Costs for this priority are included in the costs for Priorities 1-6 above.
|
#10
Resources and Infrastructure
|
Ongoing
|
Costs for this priority are included in the costs for Priorities 1-6 above.
|
OSFI's strategic outcomes, supported by our plans and priorities, are intrinsically aligned with broader government
priorities. A properly functioning financial system in which consumers and others, inside and outside Canada, who deal with
financial institutions have a high degree of confidence, makes a material contribution to Canada's economic performance. The
achievement of OSFI's strategic outcomes, which are shared by other institutional partners within government and the private
sector, provides an essential foundation for a productive and competitive economy. As such, it provides significant benefits
to Canadians.
The Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA) provides transparency regarding the Canadian public retirement income system
through the production and subsequent tabling before Parliament of regular actuarial reports on the Canada Pension Plan
(CPP), Old Age Security (OAS) program and public sector employee pension and insurance plans.
OSFI's activities and programs to enhance the safety and soundness of financial institutions are key to a regulatory
framework underpinning the financial system, which in turn is essential to remain competitive in the global economy.
In addition, OSFI supports the government's priority for the security of Canadians by contributing to the fight against
terrorism financing and money laundering. OSFI's focus relates to the provision of guidance and the supervisory review and
assessment of the adequacy of financial institution programs in complying with Anti Money Laundering/Counter Terrorism
Financing (AML/CTF) requirements.
OSFI supervises and regulates all federally incorporated or registered deposit-taking institutions (e.g., banks), life
insurance companies, property and casualty insurance companies, and federally regulated private pension plans. These 1,728
organizations managed a total of $2,720 billion of assets (as at March 31, 2005).
Federally Regulated Financial Institutions and Private Pension Plans & Related Assets
|
Deposit Taking Institutions
|
Life Insurance Companies
|
Property & Casualty Companies
|
Federal Private Pensions Plans
|
Total
|
Number of organizations
|
141
|
116
|
187
|
1,284
|
1,728
|
Assets $B
|
2,157
|
374
|
85
|
104
|
2,720
|
OSFI also undertakes supervision of provincially incorporated financial institutions on a cost-recovery basis under
contract arrangements with some provinces. Additional detail may be found on OSFI's website under About
OSFI/Who We Regulate.
OSFI was created in 1987 through the enactment of the Office of Superintendent of Financial institutions Act
(OSFI Act), and subsequently received a legislated mandate that clarified its objectives in the regulation and supervision
of federal financial institutions and private pension plans. The OSFI Act provides that the Minister of Finance is
responsible for OSFI. It also provides that the Superintendent is solely responsible for exercising the authorities provided
to him by the financial legislation, and is required to report to the Minister of Finance from time to time on the
administration of the financial institutions legislation.
OSFI's accountability framework is made up of a variety of elements. OSFI participates in established international
reviews jointly led by the World Bank/International Monetary Fund to determine whether OSFI is meeting internationally
established principles for prudential regulators. OSFI regularly conducts anonymous surveys of knowledgeable observers,
i.e., industry executives and professionals, on its operations, both on individual activities, and on broader issues such as
OSFI's contribution to public confidence and how OSFI compares to other regulators. Survey results are disclosed on OSFI's
website under About OSFI/Reports/Consultations.
OSFI consults extensively on its regulatory rules before they are finalized, with financial institutions, other
government agencies, and subject matter experts, among others. OSFI issues an annual report and has its financial statements
and related control processes audited annually. OSFI has implemented a range of measures that allow it to assess
performance.
OSFI is further strengthening internal audit and has plans in place for implementing the new Treasury Board policy on
internal audit. The internal audit group is conducting assurance audits based on a comprehensive five year risk-based plan.
Audit results are reviewed by the Executive and the Audit Committee at regularly scheduled meetings. In the 1st quarter of
2006 with the appointment of four external members, the Audit Committee will be independent of OSFI Management.
Primary to OSFI's mandate and central to its contribution to Canadians and Canada's financial system and retirement
income systems are its activities to contribute to public confidence in the safety and soundness of Canada's financial
system. For financial institutions and private pension plans, OSFI performs regulatory and supervisory functions through
activities such as evaluation of system-wide risks, promotion of sound business and financial practices through appropriate
rules and guidance, identifying institution-specific risks and trends, and intervening in a timely manner thereby protecting
depositors, policyholders and pension plan members from undue loss.
For public pension plans, the activities of the Office of the Chief Actuary within OSFI contribute to confidence in the
retirement income system through the provision of accurate, timely information on the state of these arrangements and
options being considered by policy makers. The accountability framework for the OCA established by OSFI makes clear that the
Chief Actuary is the person solely responsible for the actuarial opinions made by the Office. More information is available
on OSFI's web site under the Office
of the Chief Actuary.
The following diagram shows how OSFI's activities, key outputs and expected results are linked to strategic outcomes.
Enlarge Image
1 Canada Pension Plan, Old Age Security, Canada Student Loans Program, and various public-sector pension
and insurance plans.
2 These activities are supported by organization-wide activities. These Corporate Services costs and FTEs
are allocated across the activities based on direct human resources costs.
Three program activities support OSFI's first strategic outcome to regulate and supervise financial
institutions and pension plans so as to contribute to public confidence.
-
Regulation and supervision of federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs)
This program activity is central to the achievement of OSFI's mandate to protect the rights and
interests of depositors and policyholders and to advance a regulatory framework that contributes to confidence in the
Canadian financial system. The three sub-activities of this program are:
- Risk assessment and intervention includes activities to monitor and supervise financial institutions,
monitor the financial and economic environment to identify emerging issues and intervene in a timely way to protect
depositors and policyholders, while recognizing that all failures cannot be prevented.
- Rule making encompasses the issuance of guidance and regulations, input into federal legislation affecting
financial institutions, contributions to accounting, auditing and actuarial standards, and involvement in a number
of international rule-making activities.
- Approvals of certain types of actions or transactions undertaken by regulated financial institutions. This
covers two distinct types of approvals: those required under the legislation applying to financial institutions, and
approvals for supervisory purposes.
There is a strong interrelationship among the three parts of this supervisory and regulatory program. The supervisory
function relies on an appropriate framework of rules and guidance. In some situations, regulatory approval is required
because a proposed transaction may significantly affect an institution's risk profile. Approving such a change involves
both a supervisory and regulatory assessment. Supervisory experiences often identify areas where new or amended rules
are needed.
As identified in OSFI's mandate, OSFI must also recognize the need for financial institutions to compete effectively.
The sustainability and success of regulated institutions is important for the long-term safety and soundness of the
financial system. As a result, OSFI needs to strike an appropriate balance between promoting prudence and allowing
financial institutions to take reasonable risks in order to compete and prosper.
-
Regulation and supervision of federally regulated private pension plans
This program activity incorporates risk assessment, intervention, rule making and approvals related to
federally regulated private pension plans under the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985.
-
International Assistance
OSFI supports initiatives of the Canadian government to assist emerging market economies to strengthen their regulatory
and supervisory systems. This program activity is largely funded by the Canadian International
Development Agency, and is carried out directly by OSFI and through its participation in the Toronto International
Leadership Centre for Financial Sector Supervision.
OSFI's second strategic outcome - to contribute to public confidence in Canada's public retirement income system -
is achieved through the activities of the Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA).
The OCA provides a range of actuarial services, under legislation, to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and some federal
government departments, including the provision of expert and timely advice in the form of reports tabled in Parliament. The
basic elements of this program include:
- Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security. The OCA estimates long-term expenditures, revenues and current
liabilities of the CPP and federal public-sector pension and insurance plans, long-term future expenditures for Old Age
Security programs, and prepares statutory triennial actuarial reports on the financial status of these programs.
- Other Public Pension Plans. The OCA prepares statutory triennial actuarial reports on the financial status of
federal public sector employee pension and insurance plans covering the federal Public Service, the Canadian Armed
Forces, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the federally appointed judges and Members of Parliament.
- Canada Student Loans. Since 2001, the OCA undertakes the actuarial review of the Canada Student Loans Program
by evaluating the portfolio of loans and the long-term costs of the program.
Whenever a bill is introduced before Parliament that has a significant impact on the financial status of a public pension
plan falling under the statutory responsibilities of the Chief Actuary, the OCA must submit an actuarial report valuing the
impact to the appropriate minister. The OCA also provides actuarial information on the CPP to provincial governments, which
are the Plan's co-stewards. Meaningful steps have been taken since the late 1990s to strengthen the transparency and
accountability of actuarial reporting on the CPP. In particular, the frequency of actuarial reporting on the CPP has been
increased to every three years.
For planning purposes, OSFI conducts an annual assessment of the overall economic and financial conditions in Canada and
abroad that are key to the health of Canadian financial institutions. OSFI consults with the Bank of Canada and the
Department of Finance on their macroeconomic forecasts. In addition, OSFI's assessment reflects input from international
sources (such as the Financial Stability Forum and other regulators). These sources supplement information derived from
OSFI's own experiences with its regulatory and supervisory programs, and from assessments made from our internal Enterprise
Risk Management (ERM) activities.
Implications of the most likely scenario for the financial sector
Banks. Bank balance sheets are sound. For a number of banks the challenge is to continue to grow and earn targeted
rates of return in a highly competitive market. In seeking higher growth, or rates of return, banks may take on risks that
they will be challenged to either manage and/or provide for adequately, resulting in increased overall risk.
Life and Health Insurance Companies. Life insurers are benefiting from improved equity markets, however low
interest rates continue to be a challenge. The growth and profitability of annuity business is strong, while volume growth
on insurance products is relatively flat. With the growth in wealth management products and expansion internationally,
insurers will want to ensure that their risk management capabilities are commensurate with the increased risks being
assumed.
Property and Casualty (P & C) Insurance Companies. Although the P & C and reinsurance sectors have shown
improvement in recent years, the P & C sector remains inherently volatile. Renewed profitability could lead to more
intense competition and the under-writing of less profitable business.
Private pension plans. The financial and economic environment is deteriorating for defined benefit pension plans.
Low interest rates and changes to actuarial standards have added to solvency deficits. The number of plans on OSFI's watch
list is expected to rise. For some plans already on the watch list, the severity of solvency deficits will increase.
Challenges in administration of certain smaller defined contribution plans will continue.
Competitive landscape for financial institutions and private pension plans
Financial institutions are operating in an increasingly complex, international environment. There is greater interest in
increased cross-border cooperation and an increasing reliance on OSFI by foreign regulators. As a result, there is pressure
on OSFI, as supervisor of the consolidated operations of Canadian financial institutions, to increase its assessment of
risks arising from offshore operations and to monitor financial institutions' ability to manage those risks. OSFI must also
be aware of influences from the environment affecting foreign parents of Canadian financial institutions, which could
materially adversely affect Canadian operations.
The risks faced by financial institutions and financial products are becoming more complex. In response, institutions are
placing greater reliance on a variety of enhanced analytical techniques and risk-transfer mechanisms to better manage and
measure risk. The development of control processes to manage the new highly innovative products may not be keeping pace with
the inherent risk. All institutions are affected by this trend, but smaller institutions may face greater problems in
implementing the required internal controls and governance processes.
Globally, the regulatory and legal environment is changing rapidly. Within the next several years financial institutions
will be faced with changes to accounting standards, the implementation of Basel II, and changes in reporting requirements
resulting from the increased focus on corporate ethics. The financial, operational and reputational impact on financial
institutions if they are unable to manage these evolving regulatory and reporting requirements could be large.
Various events over the past few years have focussed the attention of financial institutions and regulators on their
ability to respond adequately in a crisis. As well, many jurisdictions, including Canada, have increased focus on the
detection and deterrence of terrorist financing and money laundering.
Private pension plans continue to generate considerable concern. The aging population in Canada and other jurisdictions
ensures that pension issues have a high profile. Some plan sponsors face financial and reputation risk. Low interest rates
have reduced solvency rates. As a result of questions on how to deal with under-funded plans, and questions regarding
surplus ownership, many sponsors are reconsidering the viability of defined benefit pension plans.
Rules affecting FRFIs continue to change, particularly those related to accounting and controls in financial statements.
These changes could add to the volatility of earnings and may not always be adequately covered by current risk management
practices. Domestic and international policy initiatives to which OSFI will be responding during the planning period
include:
The evolving global regulatory environment. This will continue to put pressure on OSFI to develop rules that are
globally competitive. This includes developing rules that do not unduly impede the competitiveness of Canadian financial
institutions that operate globally, while ensuring that OSFI's regulatory framework remains prudentially sound.
Accounting changes. Developments in accounting rules and the pressure for global harmonization of accounting and
auditing standards are expected to continue. Some of the proposed changes are complex and may significantly impact the
financial position and capital of financial institutions. Examples of new rules include the use of fair value for assets,
the impact of hedge accounting and international standards on insurance liabilities.
Basel II. The new international capital framework will have major implications for financial institutions and
OSFI. In particular, the new framework will encourage larger banks to use enhanced measures of business performance to drive
their internal assessments of capital needs. The result may be changes to the business mix of some banks as they adjust to
the new capital rules and balance the risks and rewards in their portfolios. This initiative is also leading regulators and
insurers to consider the development of more risk-based capital calculations for use in the future.
Canadian banks and OSFI are well advanced with implementation efforts, but continued focus and ongoing work are required,
particularly on qualifying for the more complex Advanced Internal Ratings-Based (AIRB) approach to calculating capital. The
new capital framework and events in the market also require banks and regulators to better focus on the measurement and
management of operational risk and its relation to capital.
There are several areas where general principles must be translated into effective implementation approaches, often in
the absence of detailed rules or widely accepted industry practice. There are significant challenges for banks and
supervisors in achieving effective implementation on a reasonably consistent basis. Enhanced cross-border cooperation, which
is essential for effective implementation, is another challenge facing regulators and financial institutions in all
countries. The College of Supervisors, in which OSFI is an active participant, will play an important role in enhancing
international supervision.
Private pension plan issues. This includes the funding of deficits on termination, court decisions on the
treatment of surplus and increased concern by pension plan sponsors that the current regulatory and legislative regime is
not conducive to defined benefit plans. A risk is that pressure for excessive relaxation of funding requirements to assist
sponsors could reduce protection for pensioners, or that rule changes could reduce incentives for plan participants to solve
problems.
On May 26, 2005, the Department of Finance released a consultation paper on Strengthening the Legislative and
Regulatory Framework for Defined Benefit Pension Plans. The paper sought views on how to balance the interests of
private pension plan sponsors and plan members, and raised a number of key questions, including some related to surplus
ownership; funding rules; requirements to void plan amendments that reduce a plan solvency ratio below a prescribed level;
requirements to fully fund a plan on termination; and the treatment of pensions under insolvency. At the same time, many
other organisations and jurisdictions have been consulting with stakeholders and developing proposals on how to improve the
regulatory framework for defined benefit pension plans in order to promote the security of pension benefits while assuring
the viability of the defined benefit pension plan system. We have been working closely with the Department of Finance,
analyzing submissions and developing potential policy proposals.
Other legislative and/or government policy initiatives. Some initiatives on the horizon that have implications for
OSFI are:
- The 2006 legislative review of financial institution statutes; and
- Increased demands on government entities for accountability and improved management practices, in particular the Public
Service Modernization Act.
There is considerable uncertainty regarding the direction these initiatives might take, as well as their timing. In all
cases, OSFI will contribute to the development and implementation of any legislative proposals for the financial sector
which the federal government brings to Parliament, while focusing on prudential issues consistent with OSFI's mandate.
The environment within which OSFI operates presents an array of challenges to the achievement of its mandate and
objectives. While many of these challenges are consistently present, the extent to which they present a risk to OSFI's
objectives varies depending on economic and financial conditions and the financial industry environment. OSFI's ability to
achieve its mandate depends on the timeliness and effectiveness with which it identifies, evaluates, prioritizes, and
develops initiatives to address areas where its exposure is greatest.
OSFI's enterprise risk management (ERM) program has identified several key risks to the achievement of its mandate and
objectives. As part of the ERM process, the effectiveness of existing risk mitigation strategies has been assessed, taking
into account both the current and expected environment. Where additional mitigation is required, and OSFI can have an
impact, action will be developed on a priority basis during the current planning period. Other key risks rated as cautionary
were assessed to be appropriately managed but will be monitored to ensure risk mitigation remains on track.
OSFI's ERM framework divides risks into external and internal categories. The external risk category consists of economic
and financial conditions, financial industry environment, OSFI legal environment and catastrophic events. External risks
arise from events that OSFI cannot influence, but must be able to monitor in order to mitigate the impact of, should they
occur. The internal risk category consists of risks that can broadly be categorized as people, processes, systems, and
culture. The key risks are discussed below.
External risks that are strategically important in the immediate future
Complexity in the financial industry
Increased complexity in the financial industry, coupled with the competitive nature of global markets, presents challenges
to regulators. The growing participation of Canadian financial institutions in foreign markets challenges OSFI's ability to
implement an effective consolidated supervisory framework. Increased risk is evident in several areas, including reputation
risk associated with the use of complex products in both the banking and insurance industries.
Accounting and Capital
OSFI needs to be better positioned to understand the impact of, and address the potential implementation challenges of,
evolving accounting and capital regimes. These changes will have important implications for OSFI and regulated financial
institutions. OSFI must ensure that high priority Canadian issues are considered by Canadian and international committees
and dealt with appropriately.
Basel II
As in other jurisdictions, OSFI faces significant challenges in implementing the Basel II capital framework. In its
supervision, OSFI must balance the need for quality implementation, which achieves the benefit of the framework, with
adequate flexibility to recognize the challenges faced by institutions. OSFI must also ensure that its approach is
comparable to that in other major jurisdictions.
Financial crime
Financial crime and the financing of terrorism are receiving greater attention by regulators than was the case a few years
ago. Additional requirements are likely to be put in place for Canada to remain compliant with international norms. OSFI's
reviews also indicate a need for further improvement in institutions' practices. OSFI is increasing its resources in
assessing financial institutions' ability to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing. These relatively new
programs need to be closely monitored to ensure they meet the expectations of OSFI, Canada, and the international community.
Doing a highly credible job that is substantially compliant with international norms is important for the reputation of both
Canadian financial institutions and OSFI.
Private pension plans
The current environment creates challenges for OSFI in meeting its mandate to regulate and supervise private pension plans.
OSFI's resources will be simultaneously called on to contribute to changes in pension rules, while dealing with a backlog of
pension approvals.
Internal Risks that are strategically important in the immediate future
People Risks
OSFI faces a continual challenge to hire and retain staff with the relevant skills, knowledge and experience. To function as
an effective regulator in a rapidly changing and complex environment, OSFI requires staff with the ability to perform
in-depth analyses and apply judgement, within short timeframes, on complex issues where the solution is not always
clear-cut. The extent and pace of change both internally and externally have put stress on staff and on OSFI's ability to
implement change. Continual progress needs to be made in upgrading internal processes and managing change.
Systems Risks
OSFI continues to make significant systems investments to support communications and information requirements and increase
efficiency, flexibility and effectiveness of its core supervisory and regulatory processes. The challenge is to get the full
benefit from these investments and to identify and implement further systems development needs in selected areas.
Based on the above considerations the following priorities have been identified. These priorities are tied to the program
activities OSFI undertakes and contribute directly towards achieving OSFI's strategic outcomes.
Program Priorities
PRIORITIES
|
DESCRIPTION
|
Priority #1
Risk Assessment and Intervention
Accurate risk assessments of financial institutions and timely, effective intervention and feedback.
|
- Operate an effective prudential supervisory system by allocating resources to higher risk/impact
institutions/activities.
- Conduct timely risk assessments and interventions and provide clear reports and recommendations to FRFIs.
- Recommend appropriate changes in FRFI practices and processes.
|
Priority #2
Rule Making
A balanced, relevant regulatory framework of guidance and rules that meets or exceeds international minimums.
|
- Communicate and consult effectively with financial institutions and the industry during the rule development
process.
- Contribute effectively to international regulation and standard setting.
|
Priority #3
Approvals
A prudentially effective, balanced and responsive approvals process.
|
- Operate a timely, clear and transparent approvals process for legislative and non-legislative approvals.
|
Priority #4
Regulation and Supervision of Federally Regulated Private Pension Plans
Accurate risk assessments of pension plans, timely and effective intervention and feedback, a balanced relevant
regulatory framework, and a prudentially effective and responsive approvals process.
|
- Conduct timely risk assessments and interventions and provide clear reports and recommendations to supervised
plans.
- Communicate and consult constructively and effectively with the pension plan industry during the development of
regulations, rules and other guidance.
- Operate a timely, clear and transparent approvals process for private pension plans.
- Work closely with the Department of Finance in the development of proposals for and the analysis of any changes
to federal legislation that could impact federally regulated pensions.
|
Priority #5
International Assistance
Contribute to awareness and improvement of supervisory and regulatory practices for selected foreign regulators
through the operation of an International Assistance Program.
|
- Provide technical assistance with on-site examination processes, legislative drafting, development /organization
of supervisory agencies, risk-based capital regimes and improving supervision systems.
- Work to improve supervisory cooperation and coordination amongst supervisors.
- Assist selected jurisdictions to prepare their Financial Sector Assessment Program self-assessment.
- Continue to play a role in the governance, program development and delivery of the Toronto International
Leadership Centre for Financial Sector Supervision.
|
Priority #6
Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA)
Contribute to financially sound federal government public pension and other programs through the provision of expert
actuarial valuation and advice.
|
- Provide high-quality and timely reports such as: triennial Actuarial Reports in respect of the Canada Pension
Plan (CPP); the Old Age Security program; public service pension plans established under various acts.
- Prepare actuarial reports that are tabled in Parliament in respect of the CPP, for example, when certain bills
are introduced and when amendments are made to certain other public sector pension plans.
|
Priority #7
Accounting Standards
Participate in and monitor international work on conceptual changes to accounting standards.
|
- Develop a prudential response to the change to fair value accounting and revise related regulatory reporting as
needed.
- Respond to revision of the International Accounting Standards Board's conceptual framework and insurance
accounting overhaul.
- Take regulatory and supervisory action to respond to these changes, including updating staff knowledge of
evolving standards.
|
Priority #8
Basel II
Ensure that OSFI is in a position to review and approve applications that are submitted for approval under the Basel
II capital framework.
|
- Implement a process and an organizational structure to manage Basel II projects.
- Respond in a timely manner to bank requests for interpretation or for flexibility in implementation.
- Monitor major banks, and periodically update their boards of directors and senior executives on OSFI's
assessment of their ability to comply with Basel II.
- Complete a gap analysis between OSFI's supervisory framework and Basel II requirements.
|
Program Support Priorities
PRIORITIES
|
DESCRIPTION
|
Priority #9
Governance and Reporting
High-quality internal governance and related reporting.
|
- Ensure that OSFI is well managed in accordance with the accountability expectations of Parliament, the Treasury
Board Secretariat and the federal Management Accountability Framework.
- Enhance the internal audit function.
- Review the performance measurement framework.
|
Priority #10
Resources and Infrastructure
Resources and infrastructure necessary to support supervisory and regulatory activities.
|
- Develop and implement cost-effective information management systems that contain relevant, accurate and timely
internal and external data.
- Maintain a robust technology infrastructure that meets acceptable security and performance standards.
|
|