Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - Government of Canada
Skip to Side MenuSkip to Content Area
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New About Us Policies Site Map Home

Alternate Format(s)
Printable Version

Frequently Asked Questions about FIS

    Next

    Some questions that we often encounter...
    and the answers that we usually give:



    INDEX





  1. What is the Financial Information Strategy (FIS)?
  2. FIS is a government-wide initiative designed to enhance decision–making and accountability across government, and improve organizational performance through the strategic use of financial and non-financial performance information. The three key components of FIS are:

    Systems - the introduction of new modern integrated information systems;
    Policies - the adoption of full accrual accounting similar to what is practised in the private sector;
    People - a cultural change focussed on enhanced analysis and use of information.

    Accounting is only the starting point. The greater goal of FIS is to bring about all the attendant changes in systems, policies and people. Ultimately, FIS aims at nothing less than changing the culture of resource management in the Government of Canada.

    Index

  3. Will FIS be implemented by all Government of Canada Departments and Agencies?
  4. Yes, all Government of Canada departments and agencies as defined by Section 2 of the Financial Administration Act (FAA) will be required to implement FIS. Through the requirements of the FAA, crown corporations already practice FIS principles.

    Index

  5. When was FIS developed?
  6. The change to full accrual accounting, which is a key component of FIS, was announced in the 1995 Budget Plan of the Minister of Finance. In November 1995, Treasury Board Ministers approved FIS as a project.

    Index

  7. Why are we implementing FIS now?
  8. FIS is part of the overall reform and renewal of management within federal government under the umbrella of Modernization of Comptrollership. It is the foundation of the government's management framework, outlined in the April 2000 document Results for Canadians.

    FIS was developed primarily to yield improved information to help departments and agencies manage their resources and activities and report better information to Parliament on the costs of these activities.

    Index

  9. Is FIS just an accounting exercise?
  10. FIS is not so much about accounting as about accountable decision-making. Finance, Materiel and Real Property communities, Human Resources, Administrative and most other functional support groups are also affected by FIS. In fact, FIS will have an impact on everyone who is involved in any aspect of spending or in the management of resources. FIS will succeed only when program managers and other non-financial specialists become adept at using and applying good financial and non-financial performance information in their daily decision-making to improve accountability and organizational performance. Changes in systems, policies and people are all necessary for success. The key is not number crunching, but managing for results.

    Index

  11. What will change with FIS?
  12. The federal government will change from the modified accrual basis of accounting to the full accrual basis of accounting for the purposes of its financial statements. The major change for departments will be the adoption of full accrual accounting. Accrual accounting provides an information tool for managers. It focuses on a wider range of information on which to base decisions and measure program and operational results. By capturing information not previously reported, accrual accounting enhances analytical techniques that will allow a shift in focus from the purchase of inputs to the management of outcomes and results.

    Modern integrated financial and materiel systems are being adopted. Many new policies and procedures are being developed to guide users of the new systems and provide the kind and quality of information that managers need for good decision-making. New training and learning programs are also being developed to offer everyone the opportunity to shift to a new way of thinking, managing and focusing on responsible decision-making. FIS requires these changes because the emphasis is now on program and operational performance results. FIS goes far beyond a financial number-crunching exercise.

    Index

  13. How will FIS affect me?
  14. FIS will eventually have an impact on the work of managers of all kinds, finance officers, functional specialists, support staff, parliamentarians and the public, and departments:

    Managers: will have better financial and non-financial information for decision making. Managers will have to make the transition from being budget managers to business managers. Their actions and decisions will no longer be measured only on the impact of their current year budget, but on the impact of future operations.

    Financial Specialists: will have more active roles in supporting management decisions. They will become full business partners and play a key role in advising on strategic issues. They will analyze and assist managers in the interpretation of integrated management information.

    Materiel Management & Real Property Officers: will be required to keep track of ongoing changes in valuation to address issues such as: whether the level of investment in capital assets is appropriate; are assets close to being fully amortized; and are capital assets being effectively utilized. They will also need to differentiate between "repair" and "betterments."

    Human Resource and Benefits Specialists: will be able to make use of new information to better assess the full cost of personnel decisions.

    Administrative Officers and Financial Staff: will enter business transactions into the integrated finance and materiel system differently. The importance lies with properly coding financial transactions so they can be reflected appropriately in financial statements.

    Parliamentarians and the Public: will receive more relevant and timely financial information from departments and agencies.

    Departments: will be responsible for maintaining detailed accounting records. Departments will set up their own general ledgers, and keep their books in accordance with Treasury Board policies based on the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA).

    FIS will eventually have an impact on the work of managers of all kinds, finance officers, functional specialists, support staff, parliamentarians and the public, and departments:

    Managers: will have better financial and non-financial information for decision making. Managers will have to make the transition from being budget managers to business managers. Their actions and decisions will no longer be measured only on the impact of their current year budget, but on the impact of future operations.

    Financial Specialists: will have more active roles in supporting management decisions. They will become full business partners and play a key role in advising on strategic issues. They will analyze and assist managers in the interpretation of integrated management information.

    Materiel Management & Real Property Officers: will be required to keep track of ongoing changes in valuation to address issues such as: whether the level of investment in capital assets is appropriate; are assets close to being fully amortized; and are capital assets being effectively utilized. They will also need to differentiate between "repair" and "betterments."

    Human Resource and Benefits Specialists: will be able to make use of new information to better assess the full cost of personnel decisions.

    Administrative Officers and Financial Staff: will enter business transactions into the integrated finance and materiel system differently. The importance lies with properly coding financial transactions so they can be reflected appropriately in financial statements.

    Parliamentarians and the Public: will receive more relevant and timely financial information from departments and agencies.

    Departments: will be responsible for maintaining detailed accounting records. Departments will set up their own general ledgers, and keep their books in accordance with Treasury Board policies based on the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA).

    FIS will eventually have an impact on the work of managers of all kinds, finance officers, functional specialists, support staff, parliamentarians and the public, and departments:

    Managers: will have better financial and non-financial information for decision making. Managers will have to make the transition from being budget managers to business managers. Their actions and decisions will no longer be measured only on the impact of their current year budget, but on the impact of future operations.

    Financial Specialists: will have more active roles in supporting management decisions. They will become full business partners and play a key role in advising on strategic issues. They will analyze and assist managers in the interpretation of integrated management information.

    Materiel Management & Real Property Officers: will be required to keep track of ongoing changes in valuation to address issues such as: whether the level of investment in capital assets is appropriate; are assets close to being fully amortized; and are capital assets being effectively utilized. They will also need to differentiate between "repair" and "betterments."

    Human Resource and Benefits Specialists: will be able to make use of new information to better assess the full cost of personnel decisions.

    Administrative Officers and Financial Staff: will enter business transactions into the integrated finance and materiel system differently. The importance lies with properly coding financial transactions so they can be reflected appropriately in financial statements.

    Parliamentarians and the Public: will receive more relevant and timely financial information from departments and agencies.

    Departments: will be responsible for maintaining detailed accounting records. Departments will set up their own general ledgers, and keep their books in accordance with Treasury Board policies based on the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA).

    Index

  15. What are the benefits of FIS?
  16. The following are among the many significant benefits expected to ensue from FIS over time:

    Stronger focus on results based management: Managers will have a blend of financial and non-financial performance indicators that will not only indicate the results of past decisions, but also provide indicators on strategic priorities achievement, and key success factors;

    Integration of operational and financial information: Systems will now aim at tracking and integrating financial transactions and operating results, thereby minimizing rekeying and eliminating other manual intervention. Current systems provide managers with budget information not integrated financial management information;

    Improved asset management: Under FIS, managers will have to recognize all assets, including accounts receivable, physical assets and other long-term assets. Accrual accounting will also allow managers to identify ongoing costs, such as amortization and maintenance, of owning and operating assets. All this information will help managers ensure the most efficient use and disposal of assets. Better management of assets may contribute to better service delivery;

    Better identification and comparison of costs: Accrual accounting will provide managers with more complete costs of programs, which can be compared to program results. Once these costs are determined, managers can easily compare them from one accounting period to another, and with costs from other departments or private sector organizations. These comparisons will allow managers to measure their department's financial performance accurately;

    Other benefits: More timely and relevant departmental and government-wide reports; more informed decision-making.

    Index

  17. What is cash accounting?
  18. Traditional departmental accounting has been based on the need to satisfy appropriation requirements which has been primarily a cash basis of accounting. Cash accounting recognizes a transaction when funds are paid out of an appropriation authority or when funds are received. The main features of cash accounting are: during the year, expenditures are recorded when payment is made; capital expenditures are recorded when payments are made, similar to payments for goods and services; and during the year, revenue is recorded when funds are received. It should be noted that with cash accounting there is no recording of non-payment related expenses, such as amortization (depreciation).

    Index

  19. What is modified cash accounting?
  20. In federal departments there has been a progression, for more than 30 years, from cash to modified cash accounting, the system currently in use in departments and agencies. This system recognizes transactions on a cash basis during the year (i.e. expenditures are recorded when paid, and revenues are recorded when cash is received) and the set up of unpaid accounts and/or receivables at year-end (i.e. "Payables at Year End" (PAYE) and/or "Receivables at Year End" (RAYE). Under this system, capital acquisitions are treated as expenditures when payment is made. This type of accounting is used to satisfy appropriation requirements.

    Index

  21. What is full accrual accounting?

Full accrual accounting records expenses as incurred, recognizes revenues as earned and capitalizes fixed assets. It is the method of accounting most commonly used in the private sector and is gaining acceptance internationally in the public sector.

It should be noted that departments will still be required to account for transactions in accordance with the legislative requirements for appropriations. By collecting financial information on both a full accrual basis and a modified cash basis all reporting requirements will be satisfied.

More...

Index

  1. What are assets, liabilities and net assets?

    Assets:

    Within the context of government operations, examples of assets include: cash, receivables, inventory for resale, loans, investments, advances, prepaid expenses, inventory of supplies, and real properties. Assets are normally the result of past transactions or events and from which future economic benefits may be obtained. Assets are what the department "owns" (land, buildings, equipment) and what is "owed to" the department such as accounts receivable, loans and advances.

    Liabilities:

    Liabilities are obligations, or what the department owes, arising from past transactions or events, the settlement of which may result in the transfer or use of assets, or the provision of services or other economic benefits in the future. Examples of liabilities include accounts payable, accrued liabilities, allowances for employee benefits, capital lease obligations, and deferred revenue.

    Net Assets/Liabilities:

    In the Canadian Government, net assets/liabilities, sometimes referred to as equity or fund balances, are the residual interest in assets or liabilities after liabilities are deducted from assets.

    (Additional material is available in the CICA Handbook, the PSAB Handbook and Treasury Board Accounting Standard 1.2)

    Index

  1. What are capital assets and amortization?

In the past, the government was required to take an inventory of its capital assets but did not have to record their cost on its financial statements. Capital assets, (for example property, plant and equipment and software) are identifiable assets that meet all of the following criteria:

  • are held for use in the production or supply of goods, the delivery of services or to produce program outputs;
  • have a useful life extending beyond one fiscal year and are intended to be used on a continuing basis; and
  • are not intended for resale in the ordinary course of operations.

For the government, capital assets have the following characteristics:

  • beneficial ownership and control clearly rest with the government;
  • the asset is used to achieve government objectives; and
  • risks and benefits of ownership clearly rest with the government (as is the case of capital leases).

Property, plant and equipment and software are capital assets that are considered tangible capital assets by PSAB. Intangible properties are assets that lack physical substance. Examples of intangible properties include brand names, copyrights, franchises, licenses, patents, subscription lists, and trademarks. Intangible assets are not being capitalized at this time.

Cost is the amount of consideration given up to acquire, construct, develop, or better a capital asset and includes all costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, development or betterment of the capital asset including installing it at the location and in the condition necessary for its intended use.

Net carrying amount of a capital asset is cost less both accumulated amortization and the amount of any write-downs. Residual value is the estimated net realizable value of a capital asset at the end of its useful life to an enterprise. Salvage value is the estimated net realizable value of a capital asset at the end of its economic life. Salvage value is normally negligible. Useful life is the estimate of either the period over which a capital asset, or component thereof, is expected to be used by an enterprise; or the number of production or similar units that can be obtained from the capital asset by the enterprise. The economic life of a capital asset may extend beyond its useful life to an enterprise. The life of a capital asset, other than land, is finite, and is normally the shortest of the physical, technological, commercial and legal life.

Amortization should be recognized in a rational and systematic manner appropriate to the nature of a capital asset with a limited life and its use by the enterprise.

    Index

  1. What is materiality?

Materiality is the term used to describe the significance of financial statement information to decision-makers. An item of information, or an aggregate of items, is material if it is probable that its omission or misstatement would influence or change a decision. Materiality is a matter of professional judgement in the particular circumstances.

(Material taken from CICA Handbook Section 1000)

More...

Index
 
    Next