Letter to the Editor of the Globe and Mail In the column of March 13 published in the Globe and Mail under the title “The Kirpan Decision isn’t welcome in Quebec,” several issues were raised that warrant some clarification. The column states that it is illogical to be able to bring a dagger in schools when travelers cannot board a plane with small manicure tools, even if stored in the luggage compartment, away from passengers. The Supreme Court has determined that in a school, reasonable safety, not absolute safety, is the norm, and that absolute safety would in fact undermine the universal right to a public school system. The Court also established that the context of an airplane was quite different from that of a school. With respect to the possibility that a kirpan could be stolen by another student and used as a weapon, the Court determined that, with all the restrictions now imposed, it would be more difficult for a student to try to steal a kirpan than to find another dangerous tool within the school grounds. The Court reiterated that accommodation must be taken seriously and that all efforts must be made to fully understand the situation and the associated risks before rejecting particular accommodation. It also made it clear that a practice can be forbidden or suspended if it precludes an appropriate level of safety or any other objective essential to a free and democratic society. This decision does not automatically apply to other circumstances, even if the issues appear similar. The Supreme Court only ruled on the case brought before it. Robert W. Ward Secretary General Canadian Human Rights Commission
|