Skip all menus (access key: 2)Skip first menu (access key: 1)Indian Claims Commission
Français
Contact Us
Search
Employment Opportunities
Site Map
Home
About the ICC
Media Room
Links
Mailing Lists
Indian Claims Commission
December 6, 2006
/Home /About the ICC /History of the ICC and Specific Claims in Canada /Recent Developments
About the ICC
Members of the Commission
Mandate
ICC's Independance and Impartiality
ICC's Inquiry and Mediation Processes
History of the ICC and Specific Claims in Canada
ICC Highlights
Operational Overview
About Our Logo
 src=
 src=
 src=
Media Room
 src=
 src=
 src=
Publications
 src=
 src=
 src=
Claimsmap
 src=
 src=
 src=
Email Alerts

Printable Version Printable Version
Email This Page Email This Page

Recent Developments

1995

The Supreme Court hands down its decision in the Apsassin case. In its decision, the Court contemplates a number of scenarios when a pre-surrender fiduciary duty would come into effect: when a band’s understanding of the terms of surrender is inadequate; where the conduct of the Crown has tainted dealings in a manner that makes it unsafe to rely on the band’s understanding and intention; where the band has abnegated its decision-making authority in favour of the Crown in relation to the surrender; and where the surrender is so foolish or improvident as to be considered exploitive.

1997

In the Delgamuukw case, the Supreme Court finds that to disallow First Nations’ oral history and tradition as evidence would put an impossible burden of proof on aboriginal peoples, since that is the way First Nations kept records. The Court also directly addresses the definition of aboriginal title; it finds that a First Nation has a right to claim “aboriginal title” to lands that it has used in order to maintain its traditional way of life. Aboriginal title comes from a nation’s use and occupancy of the land for generations; it is therefore a communal right that cannot be held by an individual.

1999

The Supreme Court hands down the Marshall decision. Given the language contained in a treaty between the Crown and the Mi’kmaq and Maliseet communities in New Brunswick, the Court finds that Donald Marshall Jr did have a right to earn a “moderate livelihood” from selling his catch of eels.

2001

The First Nations Governance Initiative is introduced by the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), Robert Nault, on the Siksika First Nation in Alberta. The package of legislation contains the Specific Claims Resolution Act, which would create the Canadian Centre for the Independent Resolution of First Nations Specific Claims. The new Centre would replace the Indian Claims Commission.

In August, Phil Fontaine is appointed Chief Commissioner of the ICC.

2003

In June, Mr Fontaine resigns as Chief Commissioner and is replaced by Renée Dupuis.

In November, the Specific Claims Resolution Act is adopted and receives Royal Assent, but the legislation is not proclaimed.

2004In July, Order-in-Council amendment PC 2004-858 designated the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada as the appropriate minister for the ICC for purposes of the Financial Administration Act.

An Early Land Claims Chronology

Events Leading to the Creation of the Commission



Last Updated: 2006-11-20 Top of Page Important Notices