![Urban Sustainability](/web/20061209125412im_/http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/eng/images/ProgramTitles/Title_Urban1_E.jpg) ![Documents](/web/20061209125412im_/http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/eng/images/ProgramTitles/Title_Documents_E.jpg)
![Environmental Quality in Canadian Cities: The Federal Role (Adobe PDF version 3.0 MB)](/web/20061209125412im_/http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/Publications/HTML/Complete-Documents/SOD_Urban_E/Graphics/Urban_SOD_Banner_e.gif)
Chapter
6 - Areas for Further Exploration
In addition to the high-priority
measures, the Round Table has identified a number of areas that
warrant further, more detailed exploration before they could
be implemented within one to three years. |
These next steps include a range of additional tax
measures relating to renewable fuels and the energy efficiency of
dwellings and vehicles; further research on the impact of freight
transportation on urban environmental quality; and the exploration
of mechanisms within and among governments to ensure a more coherent
approach to urban sustainability in general.
Additional
fiscal measures
Establish R-2000
standards and incentives for retrofits
Establishing an R-2000 standard for retrofits would
help to improve the energy efficiency of older housing stock. As
outlined in the National Climate Change Program’s Buildings
Table Options Report,67
this would require development of an R-2000 retrofit guideline,
training and certification of R-2000 retrofit contractors, independent
evaluation and certification of R-2000 retrofits, program marketing,
and possibly financial incentives. Once developed and in place,
this new standard could be used to judge eligibility for the GST
rebate for energy efficiency renovations proposed above (see Recommendation
9, page 40).
Restructure tax on
vehicles according to emissions and explore more comprehensive and
rigorous mechanisms to discourage the purchase of SUVs and light
trucks
Taxes on vehicles should be restructured to
reflect the degree of the vehicle’s impact on the environment.
Heavy-polluting vehicles, such as SUVs and light trucks, are a significant
and fast-growing contributor to GHG emissions and should be more
actively discouraged.
More rigorous emissions controls should be the immediate
first step. But a more eco-rational tax regime—structured
according to vehicle fuel efficiency or kilometres driven, for example—could
reinforce the message. This could be achieved by introducing new
tax measures, such as a new vehicle emissions surcharge, or by modifying
any or all of several existing measures, such as the GST, the Heavy
Automobile Tax and the gas tax. Likewise, the GST on low-emission
vehicles could be reduced or eliminated to encourage higher levels
of take-up.
Provide tax incentives
for the use of renewable fuels
The federal government has recently begun to introduce
incentives for the production of energy from renewable sources (e.g.,
the Wind Power Production Initiative). However, there are no parallel
incentives to spur the demand for renewable energy. Such energy
can be more expensive until market sizes grow to the point where
economies of scale start to lower costs.
Develop environmental
performance standards for municipal infrastructure
As noted above, there are no commonly recognized
standards that indicate how various types of municipal infrastructure
perform from an environmental perspective. Such a set of standards—similar
perhaps to the EnergyStar system but assessing environmental impacts
beyond just energy use—would be extremely effective, given
the scale of investments in municipal infrastructure needed in the
coming years.
Priority
areas for further research
Explore the impact
of freight transportation
Parallel with the recent explosion in the use of
SUVs and light trucks is the fast-growing contribution of freight
transportation, particularly truck transport, to energy use and
GHG emissions. Yet relatively little is known about truck transport,
particularly in relation to urban areas. Truck transport is rapidly
becoming a significant urban environmental problem with global repercussions,
warranting more research to develop sound policy responses.
A more
coherent approach to urban sustainability
As powerful as fiscal policy can be in improving the
quality of the environment in Canada’s cities and beyond their
borders, it is only one part of a comprehensive approach. The NRTEE
recognizes that more effective coordination and cooperation within
the federal government, among federal, provincial and municipal
governments, and with the private sector is an essential part of
improving environmental quality and ensuring more effective use
of tax policy and program spending.
Develop a national
urban strategy
There is growing recognition of the role the federal
government plays—deliberately and unintentionally —in
shaping cities and urban environmental quality. This federal role
needs to be made more strategic, coherent and coordinated. As noted
in the Sgro report, a national urban strategy is needed. Beyond
outlining the federal government’s approach to the sustainability
of Canada’s cities, such a strategy should include a comprehensive
framework for implementing fiscal policy in support of improved
urban environmental quality. The recommendations put forth in this
report could be the starting point for the development of this framework.
Establish mechanism(s)
for coordinating action within the federal government and among
governments
The Round Table heard considerable support for a
mechanism or mechanisms to coordinate and advocate efforts across
federal government departments and agencies to improve urban sustainability.
There was also support for introducing a mechanism for working with
provincial and local governments on urban sustainability. Precedents
for multi-level coordination could be explored for their applicability.
The Vancouver Agreement, for example, coordinates different federal
departments and provincial and municipal agencies to improve conditions
in Vancouver’s Lower East Side. The Supporting Communities
Partnership Initiative, with a focus on homelessness, is another
example of multigovernmental coordination.68
The potential role of existing coordinating mechanisms, such as
the federal councils that coordinate multidisciplinary federal programs
on a regional basis, could also be explored.
Endnotes
67 National Climate Change Program (Marbek Resource
Consultants in association with Sheltair Scientific and SAR Engineering),
Buildings Table Options Report, Residential Sector, Final, revised
November 15, 1999.
68 Budget 2003 extended funding for the Supporting
Communities Partnership Initiative for another three years at $135
million per year.
Previous
Chapter 5:
High-Priority Recommendations |
![](/web/20061209125412im_/http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/eng/graphics/Buttons/Spacer-black.gif) |
|
![](/web/20061209125412im_/http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/eng/graphics/Buttons/Spacer-black.gif) |
Next
Chapter 7: Final Thoughts |
|