The Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative
CALL FOR PROPOSALS
NOTE: THIS CALL FOR PROPOSALS IS NOW CLOSED. NO FURTHER
APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Information Guide for Applicants
SECTION 1: FACTS AT A GLANCE
SECTION 2: OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEW OF CALL FOR
PROPOSALS
SECTION 3: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
SECTION 4: GENERAL INFORMATION RELATING TO DEVELOPING AND COMPLETING
THE PROPOSAL, AND DETAILED INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPLETING
THE BUDGET SECTION
SECTION 5: OVERVIEW OF CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Appendix A: Procedures with respect
to Bill M-30
Appendix B: Strategic Communications
Framework Including Recommendations for Implementation
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Required Forms and Formats for Proposals
Download: Adobe PDF ·
RTF (Most word processors)
SECTION 1: FACTS AT A GLANCE
1. What is the purpose of the Call for Proposals?
This is a call for proposals to design, develop and deliver the
Canada Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative funded by the Social
Development Partnerships Program (SDPP), Social Development Directorate
(SDD), Social Development Canada (SDC), under the Voluntary Sector
Initiative (VSI)
The SDPP is a nationally delivered program that supports activities
of the social non-profit sector in line with Social Development
Canada's mandate. These activities are designed to promote the
generation and sharing of knowledge, and strengthen the capacity
of the social non-profit sector.
2. When was the Call for Proposals posted/distributed?
It was distributed on July 28, 2004.
3. What is the closing date?
The closing date is September 15, 2004, 4 p.m. (Eastern
Standard Time).
(Please note that proposals received after this date and time
will not be accepted.)
4. How do I know if my organization is eligible?
There are three mandatory criteria for this call for proposals.
To be eligible to apply for funding, an organization must meet
all three of the following criteria:
-
The organization must be an incorporated not-for-profit organization;
-
The activities of the organization must be related to social
development; and (see note: 2)
-
The organization must demonstrate that it has the capacity
to deliver a national communication campaign.
5. What information and documentation do I have to submit?
A proposal must be completed, signed and submitted in response
to this call for proposals. Your proposal1 should,
in order to be included in the Assessment and recommendation Process,
include the following sections of the "Required Forms and
Format for Proposal" (PDF
version, RTF (rich
text format) version) :
-
Part A: Mandatory Criteria
-
Part B: Application for Funding
-
Part C: Executive Summary
-
Part D: Description of Proposed Project
-
Part E: Workplan
-
Part F: Knowledge Dissemination and Evaluation Plan
-
Part G: Capacity to Complete the Project
-
Part H: Budget
-
Part I: Supporting Documentation
6. How do I submit my proposal?
Please send:
Two (2) hard copies of the proposal (One copy must be the originally
signed version. The signature block is included in the Application
for Funding Form ( (PDF
version, RTF (rich
text format) version))
And
One (1) electronic version (see: note 2) either on disk
enclosed with the hard copies or by e-mail to kyle.cyr@sdc-sdc.gc.ca
The two (2) hard copies of the proposal are to be sent to:
Kyle Cyr Policy Analyst Social Development Division Social Development
Department 5 Floor,140 Promenade du Portage Gatineau, Quebec K1A
0J9
Please note that both the hard copies and the electronic copy
must be received by the department prior to the closing date and
time of September 15, 2004, 4.p.m. (Eastern Daylight
Time)
7. What if I have any questions about the Call for Proposals
or developing my proposal?
You may submit questions to Kyle Cyr by phone (819) 994-1440.
SDC will make every effort to respond to all questions up until
the closing date and time.
8. What is the anticipated timing for processing proposals?
Our anticipated timeline (See note: 3) is:
Receipt of Proposals: September
15, 2004 Assessment of Proposals:
September 16 to September 30, 2004 Notification
of successful and unsuccessful applicants: October
2004 Negotiation of agreement with successful applicant:
November 2004
9. If your organization is located in Québec, you may be
subject to the Act Respecting the Conseil exécutif (L.R.Q.,
chapter M-30).
Under this provincial law, The Government of Canada cannot enter
into an agreement with an organization subject to the Bill until
approval is received from the Government of Québec.
Please see Appendix A: Procedures with respect to Bill M-30 (PDF
version,
RTF (rich text format) version)
for more information.
10. Information Teleconference
All applicants intending to submit a proposal under the Canada
Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative are encouraged to participate
in an information teleconference which will provide applicants
with an opportunity to ask questions and clarify issues related
to the call for proposals.
The teleconferences will be held on the following dates:
-
August 17, 2004 2 PM - 4 PM (EDT) in English;
-
August 18, 2004 2 PM - 4 PM (EDT) in French.
Applicants intending to participate should contact Kyle Cyr at
(819) 994 - 1440 or kyle.cyr@sdc-dsc.gc.ca
for dial-in information by August 13, 2004. If possible questions
should be forwared to Kyle Cyr in advance.
Notes:
1. Social Development is a broad term that encompasses the
diversity of the voluntary non-profit sector.
2. All required forms and formats and requests for supporting
documentation are included in the second document: Required Forms
and Format for Proposal.
3. This timeline is subject to change if an unusually large number
of proposals are submitted in response to the Call for Proposals.
SECTION 2: OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEW
OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS
This section provides information on the following:
- The Social Development Partnership Program (SDPP);
- Project title;
- Project background;
- Scope of work;
- Eligible organizations; and
- Project duration and funding available.
1. The Social Development Partnerships Program (SDPP)
This is a call for proposals to design, develop and deliver the
Canada Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative funded by the Social
Development Partnerships Program (SDPP), Social Development Directorate
(SDD), Social Development Canada (SDC), under the Voluntary Sector
Initiative (VSI)
2. Project title
The Canada Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative (CVSAI).
3. Project background
The voluntary sector contributes to Canada's way of life socially,
culturally, economically, and environmentally. It is one of three
pillars of Canadian Society along with the public and private
sectors. The voluntary sector provides opportunities for people
to participate in a very real way to improve the quality of life
and well-being of individuals, and that of the communities in
which they live.
In June 2000, the Government of Canada and the voluntary sector
joined forces under the Voluntary Sector Initiative (VSI) to strengthen
the capacity of the voluntary sector and improve its relationship
with the federal government. The VSI is jointly led and jointly
managed by the federal government and voluntary sector. Both sector
and government have established structures to lead their respective
work on VSI.
To carry out the work associated with these goals, the VSI established
six joint tables, of which the Awareness Joint Table was one.
At the end of its work in September 2002, the Joint Table approved
a framework, outlining the goal, intended results, audiences,
and approach for the Canada Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative
(CVSAI).
The agreed objective of the CVSAI is to:
- Position the voluntary sector in Canadian society so that
its contribution to Canada’s way of life is valued and
supported by individuals, communities, public and private sectors.
To guide the development of messages and tools for the awareness
initiative, the Awareness Joint Table commissioned EKOS Research
Associates Inc. to conduct a national survey of opinion leaders
(http://www.vsi-isbc.ca/eng/awareness/pdf/awareness_opinion_synthesis.pdf)
in the summer of 2002. The survey was designed to gauge opinion
leaders’ knowledge of the voluntary sector; to measure their
perceptions, opinions and attitudes about the voluntary sector’s
role, its capacity and effectiveness; and to measure their receptivity
to working with the voluntary sector. To complement this benchmark
research, the Awareness Joint Table also commissioned EKOS Research
to conduct a survey with a representative sample from the general
public.
In fall 2002, the AJT proposed the creation of a small steering
committee to provide ongoing oversight during the initiative’s
implementation, taking into account the spirit of collaboration
and partnership achieved to date between the government and the
voluntary sector. The committee is composed of 2 representatives
each from the government and the voluntary sector with a good
level of expertise in communications.
4. Scope of work
This is a call for proposals to design, develop and deliver the
Canada Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative (CSVAI) funded by
the Social Development Partnerships Program (SDPP), Social Development
Directorate (SDD), Social Development Canada (SDC), under the
Voluntary Sector Initiative (VSI)
The CSVAI is intended to enchance awareness of the voluntary
sector in Canadian society so that its contribution to Canada's
way of life is valued and supported by individuals, communities,
and the public and private sectors.
Taking into account the spirit of collaboration and partnership
achieved to date between the government and the voluntary sector
through the VSI and the Awareness Joint Table (AJT), it is strongly
recommended that a joint government/sector advisory committee
be created to ensure continuity and to provide leadership to the
CVSAI. The Social Development Division (SDD) is responsible for
program and financial monitoring and contribution agreement administration.
The approach recommended by the VSI Awareness Joint Table involves
a two-level campaign that includes a national component that will
target national opinion leaders, parliamentarians, and the major
media; and a community-based campaign (local component) driven
by voluntary sector organizations using tools adapted from those
developed for the national campaign. The materials/tools that
are to be developed will serve both purposes and can be adapted
to meet the needs of specific organizations. Proposals should
take into considerations cost-effectiveness, synergies between
the national and community-based components, the potential to
generate public debate on the role of the voluntary sector in
Canadian society and strategic linkages/partnerships with key
national/regional voluntary sector organizations in order to strengthen
the capacity for delivering the proposed campaign.
5. Eligible organizations
There are three mandatory criteria for this call for proposals.
To be eligible to apply for funding, an organization must meet
all three of the following criteria:
-
The organization must be incorporated not-for-profit organization;
-
The activities of the organization must be related to social
development; and
-
The organization must demonstrate that it has the capacity
to deliver a national communications campaign.
6. Project duration and funding available
The work will commence on November 1, 2004 and must be completed
by March 31, 2006.
The maximum annual funding available from the CVSAI is $1,400,000
over 2 years.
SECTION 3: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
1. Overview of the Assessment and Recommendation Process
The Assessment and Recommendation process conducted by the Social
Development Directorate (SDD) is a multi-phase process designed
to ensure that the best overall proposal be recommended to the
Minister. The best overall proposal is one that will best
meet the proposed communication objectives outlines in the Strategic
Communications Framework document, contribute to achieving the
objective of the SDD and the specific funding priorities of this
call for proposals, with the greatest cost effectiveness.
To identify the best overall proposal, SDD has designed a comprehensive
assessment process that includes:
-
Consideration of three (3) Mandatory Criteria and five (5)
categories of Assessment Criteria (See 2 and 3);
-
Consideration and review by SDD Program Officers, a joint
government/voluntary sector Advisory Committee, Social Development
Canada (SDC) Senior Management and other relevant SDC officials;
and
-
Final approval by the Minister of Social Development Canada.
Table 1 summarizes the SDD Assessment and Recommendation Process.
Please note that during the assessment process, SDD may seek written
clarification from an applicant on technical details of complex
proposals. Applicants will be expected to respond to these technical
questions within a week of the request. Please note that such
communication will not be made in instances where basic information
has been forgotten or omitted, since it is the responsibility
of the applicant to ensure the submitted proposal is complete.
Table 1: Overview of the SDD Assessment and Recommendation Process
Step |
Completed by |
Objective |
Step 1
Review of Mandatory Criteria |
SDD Program Officials |
To identify those proposals that
meet/do not meet the mandatory criteria. Proposals that
do not meet the criteria will not be considered. |
Step 2
Detail Review # 1 |
SDD Program Officials |
To review and assess proposals against
the assessment criteria (see page 10) |
Step 3
Detail Review # 2 |
Awareness Initiative Advisory Committee |
If considered necessary due to the
complexity of the proposal, Awareness Initiative Advisory
Committee members will review and assess proposals against
the methodology-related assessment criteria. |
Step 4
Strategic Review |
Awareness Initiative Advisory Committee |
To review and assess the proposals
against the objective-related and overall quality-related
assessment criteria in terms of opportunities for synergy
and complementary initiatives (i.e. horizontal issues)
and avoidance of duplication or overlap with exiting and
already completed initiatives. |
Step 5
Analysis Review |
SDD Program Officers, SDC Senior
Management and other relevant SDC officials |
To review and analyze the results
carried out in steps 1 to 4 and to identify the proposals
to be recommended to the Minister |
Steps 6
Approval |
Minister of Social Development Canada |
To obtain approval for funding based
upon the Minister’s review of the recommendation |
Step 7
Notification of Results |
SDD Program Officials |
To notify applicants, in writing,
of the results of the review |
2. Mandatory Criteria
There are three mandatory criteria for this call for proposals.
To be eligible to apply for funding, an organization must meet
all three of the following criteria:
-
The organization must be incorporated not-for-profit organization;
-
The activities of the organization must be related to social
development; and
-
The organization must demonstrate that it has the capacity
to deliver a national communications campaign.
Please note that failure to meet the Mandatory Criteria will
result in disqualification from further consideration.
3. Assessment Criteria
If a proposal meets the Mandatory Criteria, it will then be assessed
against the following five categories of Assessment Criteria.
-
Objectives and intended results;
-
Capacity to complete the project;
-
Approach and workplan;
-
Budget; and
-
Overall quality of the proposal.
-
Objectives and Intended Results will be reviewed and assessed
against the following criteria:
Assessment Criteria |
Additional Comment regarding information to be provided
in proposal |
How criteria will be assessed |
Objectives of the proposed project |
Demonstrate that the project meets the objectives of
the Canadian Voluntary Sector Awareness Initiative and
is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Social
Development Partnerships Program, the Voluntary Sector
Initiative, and the Social Development Directorate. |
Clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the project
objectives |
Linkages |
Explain linkages between the objectives and intended
results of the proposed project and the funding priorities
in this call for proposals. |
Clarity, completeness and reasonableness of the explanation
of the link. |
Intended beneficiaries of this proposed project |
Address multiple levels of beneficiaries who will
benefit from increased knowledge and awareness of the
voluntary sector (such as comunities, public and private
sector opinion leaders, etc.
) |
The quality, completeness, reasonableness and appropriateness
of the explanation. |
Need for this proposed project |
Explain actions and or research undertaken to identify
or determine the need for this project and or the gap
being addressed. (e.g. consultation with membership, stakeholders,
expert opinion, findings of literature, review, etc.) |
The quality and completeness and reasonableness/appropriateness
of the evidence of the need for this project. |
Added value of the proposed project |
Describe how/why this project is an important one
that will provide value added to the voluntary sector.
(e.g. explain how/why the proposed project is innovative,
creative and or how it works toward new or enhanced knowledge,
tools or approaches, how and why it avoids duplication
of other initiatives/project currently under with the
social development community. |
The quality and completeness and reasonableness/appropriateness
of the explanation. |
Project deliverables (i.e. output level results) |
Describe the products (or outputs) to be produced
by the project. (e.g. report, training tools, events,
etc.) |
The appropriateness and reasonableness of the products
to be produced by the project. |
Intended results (i.e. immediate and longer term results
and impact of the project. |
Identify short and longer term results/impact of the
project, including national relevance and significance. |
Clarity, reasonableness and completeness. |
2. Capacity to Deliver will be reviewed and assessed against
the following criteria:
Assessment Criteria |
Additional Comment regarding information to be provided
in proposal |
How criteria will be assessed |
Subject matter experience/expertise of the organization,
project staff and partners |
Explain and detail extent of subject matter experience/expertise
of the organization, project staff and partners as evidenced
by education and in-field or other work experience |
The extent, quality and appropriateness/relevance
of the information provided |
Project delivery capacity/experience of the organization,
project staff and partners |
Explain and detail extent of project delivery experience/expertise
of the organization, project staff and partners as evidenced
by previous projects completed and or in-field or other
work experience (Do not repeat same information as above,
refer to above section if required)
With respect to previous project experience, please limit
description to 3 projects, and include the following information:
name of project, name of funder(s), approximate date conducted,
approximate cost of project, objectives, results achieved,
and your thoughts on the degree of success of the project.
Please note: If you have never done business with HRDC/SDC
and or if you have not undertaken any projects with the
department in the last 5 years, please attach three (3)
letters of support. These letters of support should be
from appropriate and credible sources that can attest
to the ability of your organization (and proposed personnel)
to carry out this proposed project. |
The extent, quality and appropriateness/relevance
of the information provided |
Accountability of the lead organization |
Explain the governance structure of your organization
(e.g. authority structure, how organization is accountable
to its membership, and or anything that illustrates that
your organization is a democratic one) |
The extent, quality and appropriateness/relevance
of the information provided |
Project management experience/expertise of the lead
organization; and |
Project management experience/expertise can be demonstrated
by # of years experience, # of projects, qualifications/certifications,
brief description of approach to project management and
quality control, etc.) |
The extent and appropriateness/relevance of the information
provided |
Financial administrative/ management experience/expertise
of the lead organization |
Financial administrative/management capacity can be
demonstrated by describing for example the size of your
accounting group, the # of persons (and position of these
persons) authorized to approve expenditures in your organization,
the type and nature of the financial-related by-laws for
your organization, whether or not there are official financial
policies and procedures for your organization; whether
or not your organization's financial statements are audited,
and or any other information that demonstrates solid financial
management ) |
The extent and appropriateness/relevance of the information
provided
|
3. Approach and workplan will be reviewed and assessed against
the following criteria:
Assessment Criteria |
Additional Comment regarding information to be provided
in proposal |
How criteria will be assessed |
Detailed workplan |
Describe tasks and/or activities in chronological
order, allocation of tasks between personnel and between
lead organization and partner organizations (if any),
timeline and milestones.
Also explain:
Why this approach is thebestapproach in terms of effectiveness
and efficiency
What types of risks/challenges may be encountered and
how these risks/challenges will be managed (for example,
perhaps the project will be faced with many technical
or system issues, logistical/co-ordination or scheduling
issues, geographic issues, timeline constraints, etc.)
The extent to which partners will be involved in project
activities (or if no partners are involved, the reasonableness
of the rationale for not including partners) |
Clarity, quality, completeness, appropriateness and
reasonableness/feasibility of proposed workplan
Consistency with objectives and intended results of the
proposed project |
Dissemination strategy |
Explain what dissemination strategy will be undertaken
to ensure the results of the project have broad and long-lasting
impact. Include description of approach, scope of strategy,
lead responsibility, intended audience(s), timeline, etc.) |
Clarity, quality, completeness, appropriateness and
reasonableness/feasibility of proposed strategy |
Performance measurement |
Describe approach to monitoring, measuring, evaluating
and reporting on the progress and results of your proposed
project, including proposed performance indictors/measures |
Clarity, quality, completeness, reasonableness/feasibility
of the proposed approach/plan |
4. Assessment Criteria related to Budget
Budget will be reviewed and assessed against the following criteria:
-
The level of detail and accuracy of the proposed costs (including
in-kind contributions), by fiscal year;
-
The reasonableness of proposed costs for the overall project
(including costs related to the dissemination strategy, measuring
and monitoring results of the project and, if relevant, the
evaluation of the project);
-
The consistency of the budget with the proposed activities
and intended results described in the workplan;
-
The extent to which the budget reflects due regard for the
economical and prudent use of contribution funds (e.g. makes
use of existing resources, facilities and equipment, proposed
costs reflect fair market value, etc.);
-
Extent to which the costs of the proposed project will be
cost-shared with other partners/co-funders; and
-
Extent to which there are other federal government programs
that provide significant funding to the type of proposed project.
5. Assessment Criteria related to Overall Quality of the Proposal
The Overall Quality of the Proposal will be assessed against
the following criteria:
-
Potential for this project to significantly contribute to
the objectives and priorities of the program;
-
Extent to which the proposed project is creative, innovative
and or cutting edge;
-
Quality, clarity and conciseness of the entire package; and
-
Practicality and feasibility of the proposed project.
SECTION 4: THIS SECTION PROVIDES GENERAL
INFORMATION RELATING TO DEVELOPING AND COMPLETING THE PROPOSAL,
AND DETAILED INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPLETING THE BUDGET SECTION
1. General Instructions
a) As detailed in the Required Forms and Format for Proposals
document (PDF version,
RTF (rich text format)
version) , your proposal should include the following in order
to be included in the Assessment and Recommendation Process:
-
Part A: Mandatory Criteria (Recommended length 1 page)
-
Part B: Application for Funding (Recommended length 2 pages)
-
Part C: Executive Summary (Recommended length 1 page)
-
Part D: Description of Proposed Project (Recommended length
4 pages)
-
Part E: Workplan (Recommended length 4 pages)
-
Part F: Knowledge Dissemination and Evaluation Plan (Recommended
length 4 pages)
-
Part G: Capacity to Complete the Project (Recommended length
2 pages)
-
Part H: Budget (Recommend 1 page per fiscal year, plus additional
2 pages)
-
Part I: Supporting Documentation
b) Please complete your proposal electronically.
c) Please note that all information requested is required
to support the Assessment and Recommendation Process (described
in Section 3). Therefore, before submitting your proposal, please
check to ensure your proposal is complete and that your have answered
each question and attached all requested supporting documentation.
d) Your proposal must be complete, but it must also be concise.
The recommended length per section is noted above in (a). Please
note that it is expected that a reasonable size font (e.g. 10
to 12 point) will be used to avoid difficulty in reading and reviewing
the proposal.
e) As you complete your proposal, please ensure you refer to
Section 3: The Assessment and Recommendation Process for helpful
hints on what type of information to include for each assessment
category and criteria.
f) Please ensure that one of the two hard copies you submit is
the original signed version. (The signature block is included
in the Application for Funding Form.)
2. Information related to completing Part H: Budget
When preparing Part H: Budget, please bear in mind the following:
a) The budget must include only eligible cost (See 3 below)
b) The cost related to wages must be broken out on the basis
of an hourly rate.
The budget must be broken down by fiscal year, based on your
anticipated need for the funds. Please note that it is very important
to be as accurate as possible in determining the amount and timing
of your anticipated costs since it is very difficult for the department
to re-allocate approved funding from one fiscal period to the
next.
c) The budget for each year must include three columns:
- The amount to be paid for (or contributed by) the applicant
and cost-sharing partner(s), if any;
- The amount request from SDD; and
- The total amount.
3. Eligible and Ineligible expenses
The proposed budget must include only eligible expenses. Eligible
expenses include the following:
Direct Expenses
-
Actual new (incremental) costs incurred directly to carry
out activities described in the workplan;
-
Actual new (incremental) costs incurred to provide the required
operational support to personnel directly involved in delivery
of the project. (for example, necessary office facilities,
equipment and supplies for the direct program personnel identified
in the work plan).
Indirect Expenses
-
Expenses incurred by the organization's administrative functions
and infrastructure to support the delivery of the project,
but not related directly to the execution of the project work
plan, or to the direct project personnel, may be included.
Examples of such expenses might include, for example, communications
(telephone, fax,) and other office expenses. The basis of
determining an appropriate allocation of such costs must be
reasonable.
Ineligible Expenses
-
Costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal;
-
Fees of any kind, including contingency fees, used to pay
for third parties assisting the applicant in obtaining SDC
funding (i. e., lobbyists of any kind); and
-
Costs incurred before an agreement is approved and signed
by the Government of Canada.
Please ensure ineligible expenses are not included in your budget.
SECTION 5: OVERVIEW OF CONTRIBUTION
AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Once the Minister has approved a proposal, the department will
enter into negotiations to develop a contribution agreement. The
contribution agreement is a legal contract that sets out such
details as amount of funding to be provided, timing of payments,
objectives to be achieved, etc. Much of the information included
in the contribution agreement will be taken from the proposal
submitted by the applicant.
The following Table provides an overview of the types of terms
and conditions that will be included in a contribution agreement.
Lobbyists
-
If an individual within your organization
or a third party lobbying SDC on your behalf with
respect to the funding requested in this application
meet the definition of lobbyist as defined by the
Lobbyist Registration Act, but is not registered
as a lobbyist with the Lobbyist Registration Branch
you are responsible for making the appropriate
arrangements with Industry Canada.
Former public servants
Payment of Funds
-
Contribution funding is usually
provided on the basis of reimbursement of eligible
contribution expenses. In some instances, advance
payments are allowed.
-
The payment of contribution funds
will be made quarterly or monthly, based upon the
approved contribution budget, the dollar value of
the project and satisfactory financial and progress
reports;
-
Any revenues generated by the project
will be used to reduce the amount of the federal contribution;
-
The Department will recover any
overpayments, unexpended balances and disallowable
or inadmissible expenses reimbursed under the contribution
agreement.
Reporting and Other Requirements
-
The applicant is required to maintain
financial and other records to demonstrate due diligence
throughout the project.
-
Organizations are required to submit
both financial and progress reports to the department
throughout the duration of the agreement. These reports
must address
both the organization as well as any
third party organizations to which they provided funding
under the contribution agreement;
Audit and other Requirements
-
The organization will allow the
Department or its representatives full access to all
information, records, documents, and personnel necessary
to conduct such audits and/or evaluations.
|