Industry Canada / Industrie Canada
MenuSkip first menuSkip all menus
FrançaisContact UsHelpSearchCanada Site
HomeWhat's NewFrequently Asked QuestionsA-Z IndexSite MapPublications
Media Room
Information by Subject
Programs and Services
Online Forms
Publications
Catalogue of Published Materials
Corporate Publications
Special Reports
Newsletters
Publishing Toolbox
Industry Portfolio
Access to Information
Acronyms
Careers
Proactive Disclosure

Canada Business - Services for entrepreneurs Canadian Consumer Information Gateway Strategis

Smart Communities Program Management and Financial Control Audit

Audit and Evaluation Branch
Industry Canada

June 2003

Executive Summary

Background

The Smart Communities Program (SCP) is one of the six pillars of the connectedness agenda established by the federal government to make Canada the most connected nation in the world.

In June of 1999 the Minister of Industry announced the opening of a competition to fund twelve Smart Community Demonstration Projects, one in each province, one in the North and one in an Aboriginal Community. A national selection committee met throughout late 1999 and early 2000 to review 128 letters of intent and business plans submitted to Industry Canada by 46 organizations.

The final allocated funding totaled $55 million for the twelve demonstration projects and $5 million was allocated from O&M; funds to the funding of three complementary programs and program administration costs.

Objectives of the Audit

The focus of the audit of the SCP was on the management and financial control of the program. The objectives were to determine that:

  • Management has reasonable assurance that the program is well managed and has been implemented in a timely manner; and


  • Proper financial controls exist for the program.

Methodology and Approach

Interviews were conducted with the staff responsible for the program and those responsible for providing and controlling the financial assistance to the individual projects. The audit team reviewed business plans, project summaries, contribution agreements and modifications, as well as the web sites for all twelve projects. Specific samples were selected from all twelve projects for in-depth reviews of monthly claims, quarterly and annual reports, and evidence of regional monitoring.

Conclusions

  • Management has reasonable assurance that the program is well managed and has been implemented in a timely manner.

    Quarterly and annual reports have been submitted by all demonstration projects. Although reports were submitted late in the first year of the program or projects, the timing and the quality of the submissions have improved over the past year. The Smart Communities Program Directorate (SCPD) is receiving sufficient information to track the financial progress and results of individual demonstration projects on a regular basis.

    Although certain performance measurement results have been communicated in the quarterly and annual reports that have been submitted by the Demonstration Projects, performance measurement reports have been submitted for only seven of the twelve projects. The SCPD should ensure that performance measurement results are reported by all of the projects so that it has sufficient information to track the performance of the program as a whole.
  • There appears to be proper financial controls in place for the program. Claims are generally submitted and reviewed promptly by the SCPD providing pertinent and timely information to management. Due diligence has been exercised in the spending of the funds and the funds have been used for the purposes intended.

    Based upon our limited review of certain claims for all the projects there have been some expenses paid, though not of a material nature, where eligibility of the expense is questionable. The Smart Communities Demonstration Projects are generally managing the projects in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contribution agreements.

    Details of various costs are not submitted by the recipients as required by the monitoring guidelines for either actual supported costs or in-kind contributions. This has precluded SCPD officials from having the information to possibly challenge or question more elements of submitted claims.

Adobe Acrobat Version (PDF - 227KB - 16 pages)

Note: to read the PDF version, you need Adobe Acrobat Reader on your system. If the Adobe download site is not accessible to you, you can download Acrobat Reader from an accessible page. If the accessibility of PDF is a concern, you can have the file converted to HTML or ASCII text by using one of the access services provide by Adobe.



Date Created: 2004-06-10


Printer-friendly VersionPrinter-friendly Version

Date Modified: 2005-08-17 Top of Page Important Notices