Canada Flag
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Government of Canada
  Skip to Content Area Skip to Side Menu
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home What's New About INAC News Room Site Map
Regional Offices Electronic Services Programs & Services Publications & Research Art, Culture & History

 PSAB

Printable Version

Flag of Canada

 

Comprehensive Claims
(Modern Treaties) In Canada

March 1996



Background of Comprehensive Claims

The Supreme Court of Canada in 1973 first recognized land rights based on Aboriginal title. Aboriginal title is based on an Aboriginal group's traditional use and occupancy of that land. Comprehensive claims are negotiated in areas where Aboriginal title has not been dealt with by treaty or by other legal methods.

In the 1973 Calder decision, the Nisga'a people of British Columbia claimed continued Aboriginal rights in their traditional territory. Although the court ruled against the case because of a technicality, its decision led the federal government to announce its willingness to negotiate land claims based on outstanding Aboriginal title.

In the mid 1970s, the Cree of James Bay went to court to stop the James Bay hydro-electric project. The Cree argued that they had title to the land that would be flooded by the project. They also argued that the project would threaten their traditional way of life by damaging the environment. After the Quebec Superior Court ruled in favour of the Cree, the federal and Quebec governments negotiated a comprehensive claim with the Cree and Inuit.

In 1986 the federal government announced a new comprehensive claims policy to respond to concerns expressed by Aboriginal groups. Historically, one problem with the treaty-making process had been that the federal government would only negotiate treaties if Aboriginal peoples accepted "extinguishment" of their Aboriginal rights and title. The new claims policy provided alternatives to blanket extinguishment. It also widened the scope of comprehensive claims negotiations to include offshore wildlife harvesting rights, sharing of resource revenues, an Aboriginal voice in environmental decision-making and a commitment to negotiate self-government.

What Are Comprehensive Claims?

Comprehensive claims settlements are negotiated to clarify the rights of Aboriginal groups to lands and resources, in a manner that will facilitate their economic growth and self-sufficiency. Settlements are intended to ensure that the interests of Aboriginal groups in resource management and environmental protection are recognized, and that claimants share in the benefits of development.

In order to achieve these objectives, settlement agreements define a wide range of rights and benefits to be exercised and enjoyed by claimant groups. These rights and benefits usually include full ownership of certain lands in the area covered by the settlement; guaranteed wildlife harvesting rights; guaranteed participation in land, water, wildlife and environmental management throughout the settlement area; financial compensation; resource revenue-sharing; specific measures to stimulate economic development; and a role in the management of heritage resources and parks in the settlement area.

The Steps in the Comprehensive Claims Process

The claims process begins when the federal government accepts an Aboriginal group's statement of claim and supporting materials. The federal government will accept the claim if the statement confirms that the group claiming:

  1. The Aboriginal group is, and was, an organized society.

  2. The organized society has occupied the specific territory over which it asserts Aboriginal title since time immemorial. The traditional use and occupancy of the territory must have been sufficient to be an established fact at the time of assertion of sovereignty by European nations.

  3. The occupation of the territory by the Aboriginal group was largely to the exclusion of other organized societies.

  4. The Aboriginal group can demonstrate some continuing current use and occupancy of the land for traditional purposes.

  5. The group's Aboriginal title and rights to resource use have not been dealt with by treaty.

  6. Aboriginal title has not been eliminated by other lawful means.

When the terms of the final agreement have been approved by all parties, the agreement is implemented by federal settlement legislation. The rights the Aboriginal group receives from the federal and provincial/territorial governments are protected by the Constitution and cannot be altered without the consent of the Aboriginal group.

Negotiations can often last many years, because the issues are complex and wide-ranging. Aboriginal groups may obtain loans from the government to hire professional and technical staff to help them prepare and negotiate their claims. Loans are interest free until the agreement-in-principle is signed, and are repayable after a final agreement has been reached.

Who's Involved in Negotiations?

Comprehensive claims are negotiated by three parties: the federal and provincial or territorial governments and the Aboriginal group. Provincial governments must participate in negotiations because most of the lands and resources involved in the settlement of claims fall under provincial jurisdiction.

Although lands and resources fall under federal jurisdiction in Yukon and the Northwest Territories, the territorial governments still participate fully in the negotiations and in how the land claims policy is applied.

Self-government arrangements are negotiable in tandem with claims negotiation in accordance with the federal government policy on the implementation of the Inherent Right.

Public and third-party interests are respected in negotiations and, if affected, are handled in a fair and just way. Federal negotiators must keep in touch with third parties whose legal interests are directly impacted by the issues being negotiated.

Claims in British Columbia

Because most First Nations in BC have never signed treaties, the majority of the province remains subject to outstanding Aboriginal land claims. From the late 1800s, the BC government rejected the validity of claims, arguing that Aboriginal rights or title were extinguished before BC became part of Canada. If claims were found to exist, the province said they were entirely the federal government's responsibility. But in 1990, the government of BC reversed its decision.

In 1993, Canada, BC, and First Nations in the province established the British Columbia Treaty Commission (BCTC) to facilitate the negotiation of treaties. Its main functions are to assess the readiness of the parties (Canada, BC, and First Nations) to begin negotiation, allocate negotiation funding to Aboriginal groups, help obtain services to resolve disputes when requested, and monitor and report on the status of negotiations.

To date, the BCTC has accepted 48 statements of intent to negotiate, which represent 70 percent of First Nations in BC. The BCTC is currently determining the readiness of all parties to negotiate. To date, 30 negotiating tables have been declared ready. Framework agreements have been signed by the negotiators in the Gitanyow, Champagne and Aishihik, Sechelt, Gitxsan, Wet'suwet'en Ditidaht, Teslin Tlingit and Kaska Dena negotiations.

Descriptions of Comprehensive Claims

Ten comprehensive claims agreements have been settled since 1973 when the federal government's policy was announced.

  • The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) signed in 1975 was the first comprehensive claim to be settled followed by the Northeastern Quebec Agreement (NEQA) signed in 1978. Together these agreements gave the 19 000 Cree, Inuit and Naskapi of northern Quebec over $230 million in compensation, ownership over 14 000 square kilometres of territory, and exclusive hunting and trapping rights over another 150 000 square kilometres.

  • The Inuvialuit Final Agreement with 2 500 Inuvialuit in the western Arctic was signed in 1984. The settlement provided them with 91 000 square kilometres of land, $45 million to be paid over 13 years, guaranteed hunting and trapping rights, and equal participation in the management of wildlife, conservation and the environment, a $10 million Economic Enhancement Fund and a $7.5 million Social Development Fund.

  • The Gwich'in Agreement signed in 1992 provided the Gwich'in with approximately 24 000 square kilometres of land in the northwestern portion of the Northwest Territories and 1 554 square kilometres of land in the Yukon. In addition to these lands they will receive a non-taxable payment of $75 million to be paid over 15 years, a share of resource royalties from the Mackenzie Valley, subsurface rights, hunting rights, and a greater role in the management of wildlife, land and the environment.

  • The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement reached in 1993 with the Tungavik Federation of Nunavut is the largest comprehensive claim in Canada. The agreement will provide some 17 500 Inuit of the eastern Arctic with 350 000 square kilometres of land, financial compensation of $1.17 billion over 14 years, the right to share in resource royalties, hunting rights, and a greater role in the management of land and the environment. The final agreement committed the federal government to a process which divides the Northwest Territories and creates the new territory of Nunavut by 1999.

  • The Council for Yukon Indians representing 14 Yukon First Nations signed an Umbrella Final Agreement with the Government of Canada and the Yukon Territorial Government in 1993. The agreement sets out the terms for the final land claim settlements in the territory. Final land claim agreements were also reached with four of the First Nations: the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, the Teslin Tlingit Council and the First Nation of Na-cho Ny'a'k Dun. These agreements provide the four Yukon First Nations with financial benefits of $79 895 515, a land settlement of 17 235 square kilometres and participation in wildlife and other management boards. In addition to their land claim, the four First Nations also negotiated self-government agreements which give them more control over land use on settlement lands and greater authority in areas such as language, health care, social services and education.

  • The Sahtu Dene and Metis Agreement came into effect in 1994. The settlement provided the Sahtu Dene and Metis with 41 437 square kilometres of land (of which 1 813 square kilometres will include mineral rights), a share of resource royalties from the Mackenzie Valley, guaranteed wildlife harvesting rights, participation in decision-making bodies dealing with renewable resources, land-use planning, environmental impact assessment and review, land and water use regulations, and $75 million over 15 years.

  • The Nisga'a Agreement-in-Principle initialled February 15, 1996 calls for a $190 million cash settlement and the establishment of a Nisga'a Central Government with ownership of and self-government over 1 900 square kilometres of land in the Nass River Valley. It also outlines the Nisga'a ownership of surface and subsurface resources on Nisga'a lands and their entitlements to Nass River salmon stocks and wildlife harvests.

For in-depth descriptions of these settled and other ongoing claims, contact the Enquiries Kiosk.


This is one of a series of information sheets produced by the Communications Branch, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. For more information sheets on other topics, contact:

Public Enquiries Kiosk
Department of Indian Affairs
and Northern Development
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H4
Telephone: (819) 997-0380

QS-6047-0-EE-A1

Back to Index Page


  Last Updated: 2004-04-23 top of page Important Notices