![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
I am pleased to have the opportunity to submit to Parliament, pursuant to subsection 72 (7) of the Canada Marine Act, the Annual Report on Port Divestiture and Operations 2000-2001. The importance of Canada’s ports to the national interest is clear. The public port system supports the safe and efficient movement of vessels and cargo, and is integral to regional economic prosperity. By divesting the smaller regional/local facilities to communities and other interested local groups, responsibility for decision making is given to the people best placed to gauge local requirements. This contributes to the development of a more effective and efficient port system with local accountability. I trust the information provided in this report will provide for a more thorough understanding of the port divestiture program and of the operation by Transport Canada of those public ports and regional/local public port facilities not yet transferred.
Port DivestitureThe National Marine Policy, announced December 14, 1995, outlines the Government of Canada’s intent to rationalize the Canadian Marine transportation system. One initiative within this policy framework is the port divestiture program. As of March 31, 2001, 390 of the 549 public ports and regional/local public port facilities originally operated by Transport Canada (71%) have been transferred, demolished or had their public harbour status terminated. The National Marine Policy divided ports into three categories:
CPA ports will not be discussed here, as they are regulated by Part I of the Canada Marine Act and thus fall outside the scope of this report. On April 18, 1996, Treasury Board approved the Minister of Transport’s request for divestiture authority and for the establishment of the Port Divestiture Fund, both of which facilitate the divestiture process. A separate Port Transfer Fund was also put in place to finance activities related to port divestiture. Details of these two funds are found later in this report. Treasury Board provided overall approval for port divestiture and several specific approvals that have given the program the flexibility required to divest ports to other departments, provincial governments and local or community interests. The Director General, Port Programs and Divestiture, exercises functional authority for the delivery of the port divestiture program in cooperation with regional divestiture teams across the country. This six-year program is scheduled to run until March 31, 2002. The port divestiture program follows a land and chattels transfer strategy that was also approved by Treasury Board. Key principles of this strategy ensure that:
There are six basic steps to port divestiture:
Transport Canada views this as a win-win situation. Public port divestiture allows communities to own their local facilities, control the use of these facilities, set their own tariff structures (if any), and determine the levels of service and maintenance required. As of March 31, 2001, a total of 390 of the 549 Port Programs and Divestiture facilities across Canada had been transferred or otherwise removed from the Transport Canada inventory.
The department has deproclaimed 256 public harbours since the start of this program. Of this number, 26 harbours were found only during archival research that took place subsequent to the publishing of the National Marine Policy and were, therefore, not part of the original 549 port sites identified. In addition, 19 of these public harbours were adjacent to port facilities that had already been divested and had therefore already been removed from the original inventory. Three Canada Ports Corporation ports - located in Churchill, MB, Port Colborne, ON and Prescott, ON - have been transferred. As well, Ridley Terminals Inc.(BC) became a parent Crown corporation. As of March 31, 2001, there were 89 sites where Letters of Intent had been signed with various local interests to start the divestiture negotiation process. Transactions were in progress at 64 of these sites, or at portions thereof. As of the same date, there were 125 regional/local and 34 remote sites across Canada remaining under the purview of Port Programs and Divestiture. Table 1 - Progress to Date by Region (as of March 31, 2001)
*Divested ports include those that have been deproclaimed or demolished. Note: This progress table may be found at Consolidated Revenue Fund receipts of $44,859 have been collected from the sale of ports in 2000-2001. In previous years, port sales yielded a total of $6,599,172, bringing the total for the entire program to $6,644,031.
Note: all financial figures presented in this report are based on forecasts for fiscal year 2000-2001 as at March 31, 2001. Transport Canada is facilitating the divestiture initiative with the six-year, $125 million Port Divestiture Fund, which is intended to ease the transfer process by reducing the initial financial impact of port transfers. This fund is used to provide assistance in bringing existing port property up to minimum safety or operating standards or to make lump-sum payments to facilitate the take-over of a port. It may also be used to cover a portion of costs incurred by the new owner or operator to achieve compliance with regulatory or insurance requirements, to fund feasibility studies or to reduce potential liability. Finally, the fund may be used to assist local groups, communities or other interests to take over a collection of ports and reduce costs by rationalizing infrastructure. If no interest is shown in negotiating the transfer of a facility, the port is offered for sale by public tender. If there is still no interest shown, a decision concerning the future need for the facility is then made by Transport Canada. The forecast expenditure of port divestiture funding for 2000-2001 was $46,697,000, bringing the total since the beginning of the program to $79,518,000 either disbursed or forecast for disbursal. A separate $40 million Port Transfer Fund, also funded from departmental resources, is used by Transport Canada to fund expenditures related to port divestiture. This fund covers such areas as land surveys, legal title searches, property appraisals, environmental assessments, the hiring of financial advisors and administrative expenses. Including the $5,974,000 forecast for expenditure in 2000-2001, a total of $33,270,000 of the Port Transfer Fund has been disbursed or earmarked for use since the beginning of the program. Table 2 - Port Divestiture Program Fund Expenditures (All figures in $000s)
Note: Previous year figures reported for the Port Divestiture Fund have changed following an adjustment to reflect policy changes on the source of funds for environmental remediation projects. * Forecast expenditures as at March 31, 2001. The Port Divestiture Fund figure includes $2,660,200 that has been set aside for sites where Agreements to Transfer were signed prior to March 31, 2001 but actual transfers will not take place until the new fiscal year. The 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision regarding Delgamuukw vs. the Queen in Right of British Columbia has had an impact not only on the department’s ability to pursue specific divestiture activities, such as public port divestiture, but also on government-wide land transfer activities. This ruling has affected port transfers all across the country with the greatest effects felt in Ontario and British Columbia. In some cases, First Nations claims have been registered in the courts. Transport Canada has developed a negotiator’s consultation model that requires the Crown to determine the possible existence of legitimate aboriginal rights or title before moving on to conclude a transaction. In many cases, some level of consultation is required prior to proceeding with divestiture. Where there are major issues to be resolved, departmental negotiators may need to seek the consent of the affected First Nations before a divestiture transaction can be finalized. The Transport Canada consultation model is intended to provide a mechanism to identify First Nations issues and provide for the appropriate response. The use of this model enables departmental transactions, including the divestiture of ports, to proceed, albeit more slowly than was expected when the program began in 1996. The provinces wish to protect their key ports and their positions are not always in full agreement with the National Marine Policy. In some cases, Port Programs and Divestiture facilities are located on waterlots that are subject to reversionary clauses with the province. Without the province’s willingness to rescind these reversionary clauses, the divestiture program cannot proceed. Some sites are located on Provincial Crown land which must be returned to the Province as a part of the divestiture process. The Province, in turn, must issue tenure to the local entities acquiring Transport Canada facilities. In other places, municipalities must have provincial approval before negotiating with the federal government. Finally, in other cases, provincial Orders in Council are necessary. These various requirements increase the length of time it takes to divest a port. Transport Canada currently makes payments in lieu of taxes to municipalities at port sites across the country. These payments are made on the land and facilities but not on the associated wharves and marine structures. Once these port facilities are transferred to a local entity, however, direct taxation of the eventual owners will reflect the value of the land and the replacement value of the facilities. This could mean a significant municipal tax increase for new owners adding to the financial expenses and difficulties for local regional/local port operators. That is, the resulting need to increase fees because of the tax burdens may well drive away port business. Resolving this issue is under the control of the provincial government and solutions must be worked out between new owners and their local municipalities. Transport Canada performs a facilitation role here by seeking municipal and provincial cooperation on the matter wherever possible. In the absence of any change in this municipal taxation policy, the successful divestiture of some of the larger regional/local public ports is expected to be problematic. Transport Canada’s port policies and programs are aimed at the development of a ports system that:
The program is administered by Transport Canada’s Port Programs and Divestiture Directorate in cooperation with regional offices located in Dartmouth, NS, Quebec City, QC, Toronto, ON and Vancouver, BC. Local port administration varies according to local operations. Three sites - Cap-aux-Meules, QC, Victoria, BC, and Charlottetown, PE. - are supervised by full-time public servants. In most cases, Transport Canada is represented locally by appointees who are compensated on a commission basis from fees collected from port users. These individuals, known as harbour masters and wharfingers, are appointed by the Minister of Transport. Their degree of activity is in direct correlation to traffic demands. The Public Harbours and Port Facilities Act has now been replaced by the Canada Marine Act (CMA). As a result, the Minister of Transport may now fix public port fees without proceeding through the regulatory process. Departmental officials continue, however, to consult and notify users and stakeholders of any public port fee adjustments. Under the CMA, the Minister may fix fees to be paid in respect of:
Transport Canada publishes a tariff schedule for all charges except lettings. Typical charges include:
If Transport Canada must undertake improvements specifically for the benefit of a major user, the department may supplement or replace these tariffs with negotiated contracts designed to improve the overall rate of cost recovery on investment. Note: Information regarding public port fees is available at: http://www.tc.gc.ca/programs/ports/menupublicportfees.htm Revenue and Expenditures for 2000-2001
Expenditures and revenues are shown in $000s and are forecasts as Total revenue net of commissions for the program in 2000-2001 is forecasted to be $13.4 million. Under the terms of their appointment, harbour masters and wharfingers receive a set commission rate on tariff revenues collected from their respective ports. The remaining funds are vote-netted against operating and maintenance expenditures. In 2000-2001, approximately 100 harbour masters and wharfingers represented Transport Canada at its public ports. For those appointees receiving commissions, the average annual commission paid was $12,340. Appreciation must be expressed to all appointees who provided sound port administration to the benefit of their community and to the credit of the federal government. The divestiture of Transport Canada-owned regional/local ports, as described in the first section of this report, is intended to take place over a six-year period ending March 31, 2002. As the department has publicly stated, the annual budget for maintenance repairs at public ports in conjunction with this program will be reduced annually as facilities are divested. The limited Transport Canada port maintenance funding available is intended for urgently needed safety-related items only. Before the start of this program, the department was spending approximately $22 million per year for maintenance repairs. Because only safety-related repairs under the port divestiture program are funded, and since there are now fewer facilities to fund, a total of just $5,925,000 was allocated for port maintenance for 2000-2001. Over the same period, forecast expenditures covering both port maintenance and other standard operational requirements totaled $14,891,000. With respect to future year requirements, provisions will be based on the number of sites remaining in the Transport Canada inventory at that time. Capital expenditures during the year were limited to Harrington Harbour, QC, Port Stanley, ON and Churchill, MB. Other urgent safety-related minor capital expenditures were also made at various sites across the country.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
|
Transport Canada |
Pacific Region |
Prairie & Northern Region |
Ontario Region |
Quebec Region |
Atlantic Region |
About us |
Our offices |
Organization and senior management |
Departmental publications |
Programs and services |
Acts |
Regulations |
[More...] |
Media room |
Advisories |
Contacts |
e-news |
News releases |
Photo gallery | Reference centre |
Speeches |
[More...] |
Emergencies |
Emergencies and crises |
Emergency preparedness |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Air |
Our offices |
Passengers |
Pilots |
Flight instructors |
Maintenance technicians |
Commercial airlines |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Marine |
Our offices |
Small commercial vessels |
Large commercial vessels |
Pleasure craft |
Marine security |
Marine infrastructure |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Rail |
Our offices |
Safety at railway crossings |
Rail infrastructure |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |