Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
Skip all menus (access key: 2) Skip first menu (access key: 1)
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home Media Room Subscribe What's New Department


Trade Negotiations and Agreements
Subscribe to our mailing list Print this Page Email this page
logo

Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)

Current FTAA Negotiations

Frequently-Asked Questions

What is the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and how did it start?

  • The idea of the FTAA was conceived in 1994. Negotiations started in 1998, with the goal of concluding an agreement by January 2005. The 34 democratic countries of the hemisphere are participating in the negotiations.

  • The proposed FTAA is an integral part of the broader Summit of the Americas process, complementing such Summit objectives as strengthening democracy, promoting human rights and finding ways to address a range of social and economic issues through hemispheric co-operation.

  • The FTAA is perhaps the most visible element of the Summit process, but its principal objectives of growth and development through enhanced economic integration are ultimately intended to reinforce the Summit’s broader objectives.

  • Canada hosted the Third Summit of the Americas in Quebec City in April 2001, and continues to play a significant role in the broader Summit process, most notably by forging consensus among the 34 members of the Organization of American States (OAS) on the holding of a Special Summit of the Americas, which will take place in January 12-13, 2004 in Mexico.

What are Canada's objectives for the FTAA Ministerial in Miami?

  • Canada will be seeking guidance and instructions from Ministers in support of a comprehensive, high-quality agreement that reaffirms the January 2005 deadline for the completion of the negotiations.

  • In addition, Canada will continue to promote transparency and accountability in the FTAA. For the third time, we will be seeking the agreement of the 34 Ministers to make public the latest version of the draft negotiating text.

  • Canada will also continue to pursue linkages between the FTAA process and elements of the broader Summit agenda, including labour and environment.

What is the status of FTAA negotiations?

  • Considerable progress has been made to date. Nevertheless, much work remains.

  • Canada remains strongly committed to the FTAA process and to negotiating, multilaterally, by January 2005, a comprehensive and high quality agreement, which is compatible with the WTO.

  • A comprehensive agreement refers to coverage of all nine subject areas originally mandated by Ministers, including the elimination of tariffs and trade barriers for agricultural and non-agricultural goods, and broad market access provisions for services, investment and government procurement.

  • We are also seeking parallel agreements on labour and environment, and to include appropriate environmental provisions in the FTAA itself.

What are the benefits of the FTAA to Canada?

  • The Americas region represents Canada’s most important market, and strengthening our economic ties with the region through the FTAA is a high trade policy priority.

  • The FTAA would create the world’s largest free trade area. With a combined gross domestic product (GDP) of more than $20.1 trillion, the FTAA would constitute about 40 percent of the world’s economic activity.

  • With international trade accounting for over 40 percent of Canada’s economy, we must grasp this opportunity to seek improved access to the growing markets of the region, to the benefit of Canadian consumers and businesses, both small and large.

  • The FTAA would provide rules that create a stable and predictable environment, which will encourage investment throughout the hemisphere.

  • As in past negotiations, Canada will preserve its ability to maintain or establish measures in sectors such as health, public education and social services.

  • Canada’s position is very clear: health, public education, social services are not negotiable.

  • Canada will also maintain its ability to protect the Canadian environment.

What benefits will the FTAA bring to smaller economies?

  • For small and emerging economies, the FTAA holds the promise of achieving sustainable economic growth and reinforcing their comparative advantage.

  • We recognize the particular challenges of smaller economies and support the provision of technical assistance, and, on a case-by-case basis, the inclusion of measures in the FTAA to ease the transition of smaller economies, provided these are specific and time-limited.

  • In June 2003, Canada announced that it will contribute $24 million to the Hemispheric Cooperation Program (HCP) to respond to trade-related technical assistance and capacity building needs as identified by participating countries themselves.

Is the Government negotiating away our health care system (medicare)?

  • Canada will not negotiate on health care in any of our trade initiatives.

  • Canada's trade obligations do not require us to privatize our health care system.

  • Whether and to what extent Canadian governments reform their health care systems is for Canadians themselves to decide.

  • We have preserved full policy flexibility for health care in all of our trade agreements. Canadian governments are free to maintain the programs, or make the reforms, that Canadians deem appropriate.

Will the FTAA negotiations affect the WTO TRIPS and access to medicines agreement?

  • Canada is very pleased with the August 30, 2003 decision of all World Trade Organization (WTO) Member countries regarding the Agreement on Trade related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and public health.

  • This historic decision will allow poor, developing countries to better access the medicines they need to treat serious public health epidemics like HIV/AIDS. At the same time, it will assure intellectual property protection essential for the ongoing development of new and better drugs.

  • Canada will ensure that the FTAA Agreement does not create an impediment to the implementation of the August 30, 2003 WTO decision in the Hemisphere.

Does Canada support the inclusion of health, public education and social services in the FTAA negotiations?

  • No. Canada's position on these issues is very clear: health, public education and social services are not negotiable.

  • As is the case in the NAFTA, Canada will preserve its right in the FTAA to adopt or maintain any measure for health, public education and social services that has a public purpose.

Will the FTAA services negotiations threaten Canada's ability to pursue cultural policy objectives?

  • Canada is committed to maintaining flexibility to pursue its domestic cultural policy objectives in the FTAA negotiations.

  • Pending the development of a new legal instrument on cultural diversity, Canada's position is to continue its traditional approach to bilateral and regional agreements and seek a general exemption for culture as in its free trade agreements with Chile, Israel and Costa Rica.

  • This new international instrument on cultural diversity would set out clear ground rules allowing states to maintain policies that promote their cultures while also respecting the rules of the international trading system and ensuring markets for cultural exports.

  • The FTAA is one of many important fora in which Canada can promote a coherent approach to multilateral efforts undertaken to ensure cultural diversity.

  • Canada has proposed language for the FTAA preamble that recognizes the importance of cultural diversity and has encouraged FTAA countries to involve themselves in the process of developing a new Convention on cultural diversity that is now underway in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Do investment rules give special rights to foreign companies?

  • No. Investment rules do not exempt foreign investors from domestic laws of the host country.

  • Foreign investors are required to obey all Canadian laws and regulations (e.g., labour and environmental standards).

What is Canada’s position on investor-state dispute settlement in the FTAA negotiations?

  • Canada supports effective investment protection provisions, and transparent and efficient dispute settlement procedures in the FTAA.

  • Canada continues to collaborate with its NAFTA partners to promote clarity and transparency in the investor-state dispute settlement procedures.

  • Canada will work to ensure that the FTAA investment chapter incorporates these improvements.

  • Free trade agreements and investment-protection agreements generally provide for a mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes. Such a dispute settlement mechanism is essential and ensures that disputes are settled on the basis of mutually agreed rules, rather than through size or political might.

Will the FTAA result in lower environmental standards?

  • Canada is undertaking a national environmental assessment of the FTAA negotiations. The assessment takes into account Canada’s framework of policies and legislation for the protection of the environment.

  • Canada will retain the right to maintain strong environmental policies and regulations in the FTAA. Based on the Initial environmental assessment, the FTAA's environmental impacts are expected to be minimal.

  • Canada has negotiated environmental co-operation agreements alongside the NAFTA and its free trade agreements with Chile and with Costa Rica. These agreements promote mutually supportive trade and environment policies and sound environmental management through a combination of national obligations and commitments to environmental cooperation and capacity building.

  • Canada is seeking a parallel agreement on environment, and to include appropriate environmental provisions in the FTAA itself.

Will Canada’s FTAA obligations cover bulk water?

  • Nothing in any of Canada’s international trade obligations affects Canada’s ability to regulate water as a natural resource.

  • Water in its natural state is a natural resource and is not a good for the purposes of trade agreements. Only when water becomes a good is it subject to trade disciplines dealing with trade in goods.

  • As is the case in the NAFTA, Canada will preserve its right in the FTAA to enact measures to protect the integrity and safety of water resources.

How will the FTAA promote labour conditions, democracy and human rights?

  • The FTAA is an integral component of the Summit of the Americas process. The FTAA process directly reinforces and complements the objectives of the Summit, including by helping to raise living standards and improve working conditions in the Hemisphere.

  • Canada has been at the forefront of addressing social issues in tandem with trade liberalization, for example through our positive experience with agreements on labour and environment alongside free trade agreements such as the NAFTA and Canada Chile. These models are relevant to the FTAA process.

  • Canada is of the view that there is a relationship between the FTAA and the Inter-American Democratic Charter, and is considering ways to give this relationship effect.

  • At the Quito Ministerial last year, Ministers asked to receive a report of the Working Group on Labour Dimensions on the Summit of the Americas, which had been established by the Inter American Conference of Ministers of Labour to examine, among others, questions of globalization related to employment and labour.

  • Ministers of Labour for Canada, Mexico and Brazil have agreed to present the report to the Trade Ministers in Miami. Canada is pleased with this development as it underscores the important relationship of trade and labour issues.

How has the outcome of the WTO Ministerial in Cancún affected the FTAA negotiations?

  • There are connections between the negotiating agenda for the WTO and FTAA, but it is too early to determine the impact of the Cancun Ministerial on the FTAA.

  • While the cornerstone of Canada's trade policy agenda remains the WTO, we believe that the FTAA can yield trade and investment benefits faster in the short term than the WTO at this time.

Are Canadians being kept in the dark on the FTAA negotiations?

  • No. Openness and transparency are fundamental to the way in which Canada approaches trade negotiations.

  • Canada’s position for all trade negotiations is developed by the Government of Canada in partnership with provincial and territorial governments, and reflects the results of extensive consultations with Canadian stakeholders, including Parliamentarians and citizens.

  • These consultations are an important part of the Government’s overall commitment to ensure that Canada’s position continues to reflect the interests of all Canadians.

  • Canada’s position and proposals in each negotiating area can be found on the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade’s FTAA web site.

How is Canada promoting openness in the FTAA negotiations?

  • Canada championed the creation of the FTAA Committee of Government Representatives on the Participation of Civil Society, which plays an important role at the hemispheric level in bringing the views of civil society directly to the attention of negotiators and trade ministers.

  • Canada successfully pushed for the public release of the first and second versions of the draft consolidated text of the FTAA Agreement, and will seek the same at the Miami Ministerial.

  • Canada’s long-standing efforts to instil a new culture of transparency in trade negotiations are taking hold in the region.


Last Updated:
2005-12-19

Top of Page
Important Notices