AIR CARRIER ADVISORY CIRCULAR
|
|
|
Cargo Fire Training
PURPOSE
This Air Carrier Advisory Circular is intended to inform air operators of the
flight attendant crew member cargo fire training requirements for main deck
Class B cargo compartments.
BACKGROUND
On November 28, 1987, a South African Airways Boeing 747 "Combi"
went down in the Indian Ocean with a loss of 159 lives. The South African
government accident investigation found that there had been a major fire on board,
which developed within the main deck cargo compartment. It was determined that the
fire originated in a pallet containing computer equipment and caused the destruction
of the aircraft within approximately 15 minutes of the first fire alarm.
Following the accident, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted a
study which, together with subsequent tests, revealed that the existing cargo
compartment fire fighting procedures and the fire protection features were inadequate
and could result in loss of an aeroplane. Transport Canada, the FAA and the European
Joint Aviation Authorities then issued Airworthiness Directives introducing new
requirements for Class B compartments. The Airworthiness Directives also contained
information regarding training programs for crew members assigned cargo fire
responsibilities.
The Transport Canada Airworthiness Directive was subsequently cancelled and the
FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD) 93-07-15, which was found to provide an
acceptable level of safety in terms of smoke and fire protection, was adopted.
Regulatory approval of training programs is, therefore, required pursuant to FAA
AD 93-07-15. In December 1993, Transport Canada issued Cabin Safety Technical
Standard No. 107 entitled "Fire Fighting Training - Main Deck Class B
Cargo Compartments (FAA Airworthiness Directive 93-07-15)" as a training standard.
This training standard was subsequently revised in September 1994 and reissued.
DISCUSSION
The subject of cargo fire training arose again during the Canadian Aviation
Regulation Advisory Council (CARAC) process and as a result, the Commercial Air Service
Operations (CASO) Technical Committee approved a revised document entitled
"Cargo Fire Training
Standard" to more accurately reflect the intent of the training standard.
The revised document applies to the air operator training programs for flight attendant
crew members assigned cargo fire responsibilities on those aircraft types referred to
in FAA AD 93-07-15, operating in a passenger and cargo configuration
(Combi).
The revised document,
Cargo Fire Training Standard, supersedes Cabin Safety Technical
Standard No. 107. As agreed to at the last CASO Technical Committee
meeting on April 30 - May 1, 1996, the
Cargo Fire Training Standard is an interim measure until such time as this material
is incorporated into the Flight Attendant Training Standard, TP 12296.
The revised document,
Cargo Fire Training Standard, takes into account the limited fire fighting
intervention associated with options such as fire containment covers and halon
suppression systems provided for in the FAA AD, and will permit air operators to
develop their training programs on individual operating characteristics.
ACTION
Air operators affected by FAA AD 93-07-15 must be in compliance with the
revised document, "Cargo Fire Training Standard", by November 2, 1996.
These air operators are also urged to incorporate procedures in their Flight
Attendant Manual, in accordance with the Flight Attendant Manual Standard,
Part A, Section 2A.3 (Fire Fighting), and in their air operators
Operations Manual.
Effective immediately, Cabin Safety Technical Standard No. 107, entitled
"Fire Fighting Training - Main Deck Class B Cargo Compartments" (FAA
Airworthiness Directive 93-07-15), is cancelled.
A.J. LaFlamme
Director
Commercial and Business Aviation
Commercial & Business Aviation Advisory
Circulars (CBAAC) are intended to provide information and guidance regarding
operational matters. A CBAAC may describe an acceptable, but not the only,
means of demonstrating compliance with existing regulations. CBAACs in and of
themselves do not change, create any additional, authorize changes in, or
permit deviations from regulatory requirements. |
|