1 |
Decision S-1059.84 | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: It is difficult to understand why two insured persons disentitled under s. 36 because incapable of work should be treated differently because one received worker's compensation. This anomaly should not be remedied by judicial intervention.
An insured who has received worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was disentitled under s. 36. | Other Issue(s): | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | interruption of earnings | conditions required | | | board of referees | legislative authority | purpose of ui system | | availability for work | applicability | necessary conditions | | board of referees | rules of construction | intent and object | | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | applicability |
| | |
Decision S-1071.84 | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: An insured who receives worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was not entitled under s. 36. |
| | |
Decision A-0649.86 Full Text | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: Not only does 9(7)(c) not treat equally situated persons unequally, it actually affords disabled persons who have received workers' compensation payments the same benefits under the Act that other disabled are entitled to, all else being equal. It does not offend the Charter. | Other Issue(s): | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | board of referees | special reasons | appealable | time for appeal to bor |
| | |
Decision 12837 Full Text | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: Refer to: A-0649.86 | Other Issue(s): | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | qualifying period | extension | maximum under 104 w. | board of referees | special reasons | appealable | time for appeal to bor |
| | |
Decision 11028 Full Text | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: According to CEIC, receiving compensation does not count if it must be repaid; suggested that case be adjourned while awaiting final decision of CSST. Request denied. Entitlement may be reviewed under 43(1) at proper time. | Other Issue(s): | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | applicability |
| | |
Decision A-1071.84 Full Text | Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | basic concepts | benefit periods | extension | workers' compensation | Summary: An insured who receives worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was not entitled under s. 36. |
| | |
1 |