Flag of Canada
Service Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home        
   
Services for you


  

About the Index


  

How to use the Index


  

Issues Search


  

Last Fifty Cases Posted


  

Case Search


  

Judge Search


  

Claimant Search


  

Digest


  

Jurisprudence Library

 

THE INDEX OF JURISPRUDENCE
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE DIGEST OF BENEFIT ENTITLEMENT PRINCIPLES


Summary Search Results...


1
Decision S-1059.84     
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
It is difficult to understand why two insured persons disentitled under s. 36 because incapable of work should be treated differently because one received worker's compensation. This anomaly should not be remedied by judicial intervention. An insured who has received worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was disentitled under s. 36.
Other Issue(s):Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
interruption of earnings conditions required    
board of referees legislative authority purpose of ui system  
availability for work applicability necessary conditions  
board of referees rules of construction intent and object  
basic concepts benefit periods extension applicability

Decision S-1071.84     
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
An insured who receives worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was not entitled under s. 36.

Decision A-0649.86    Full Text
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
Not only does 9(7)(c) not treat equally situated persons unequally, it actually affords disabled persons who have received workers' compensation payments the same benefits under the Act that other disabled are entitled to, all else being equal. It does not offend the Charter.
Other Issue(s):Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees special reasons appealable time for appeal to bor

Decision 12837    Full Text
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
Refer to: A-0649.86
Other Issue(s):Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts qualifying period extension maximum under 104 w.
board of referees special reasons appealable time for appeal to bor

Decision 11028    Full Text
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
According to CEIC, receiving compensation does not count if it must be repaid; suggested that case be adjourned while awaiting final decision of CSST. Request denied. Entitlement may be reviewed under 43(1) at proper time.
Other Issue(s):Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts benefit periods extension applicability

Decision A-1071.84    Full Text
Issue:Sub-Issue 1:Sub-Issue 2:Sub-Issue 3:
basic conceptsbenefit periodsextensionworkers' compensation
Summary:
An insured who receives worker's compensation in the supplementary phase of the benefit period is entitled to an extension even if he was not entitled under s. 36.

1
     
   
Last modified :  2005-11-24 top Important Notices