|
|
|
Transit priority system: Planning and pilot project deployment
Community contextYork Region lies immediately north of the City of Toronto and extends northward to Lake Simcoe. Its total area of about 1,750 square kilometres is largely rural, although southern York boasts large urban concentrations. York (population 850,000) is the fastest growing region within the Greater Toronto Area. By 2026 it is expected to be home to almost 1.3 million people — a continued rate of fast growth that will strain the region’s transportation system and could cause traffic congestion on its major roads to reach unacceptable levels unless mitigating strategies are put in place.
Policy contextIn recent years, York Region has completed a number of major policy documents that emphasize the need to strengthen transit service as a vital part of a long-term community vision.
Rationale and objectivesThe pilot project’s rationale and objectives can be classified into several key areas. Provide conventional transit priority benefits. As congestion grows, both within and outside peak periods, intersection queue lengths will increasingly compromise public transit services. Transit travel times will grow as buses take longer to enter signalized intersections. As a result, some transit users may choose to travel by car instead, making congestion worse. ActionsThe scope of this project was to plan, design and deploy a transit priority system along selected transit routes in York Region. This scope was made more complex by several factors:
The major project tasks are summarized below. Project initiation. York Region retained a consultant team led by LEA Consulting Ltd., and invited GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission into the project as key stakeholders. Strategic vision and control strategy. The project team investigated the needs, strengths, and constraints of each pilot project stakeholder; reviewed the status of York Region’s transit system, traffic signal management system and other services; identified possible directions and goals; and defined a long-term vision and control strategy for the transit priority system. During the vision development, two major alternatives for structuring the transit priority system were considered: a system with centralized control (i.e. intersections operate under the real-time control of a central computer) and a system with distributed control (i.e. intersections operate independently but within parameters set by a central computer). The centralized control option, while ultimately more flexible and responsive, would require the creation of a new central traffic control system because York’s existing system does not operate in real-time. A distributed control approach, which can provide many of the benefits of centralized control but in a more incremental fashion, was therefore adopted for the pilot project. Evaluation of alternative routes. Pilot project stakeholders identified 16 transit route options for pilot project deployment. The project team subjected these 16 to a screening process that reduced the candidate list to six routes that were evaluated in greater detail. The criteria applied in the evaluation included traffic congestion levels, transit volumes and connections to GO Transit commuter rail services, the type of traffic signal controllers at affected intersections, the opportunity to test various types of transit priority applications, and the ability to base all affected buses in the same garage. The preferred route was identified as York Region Transit Route 85/85A, operating primarily in the 16th Avenue and Carville Road corridor. This route offered satisfactory transit volumes, upgradeable traffic signal controllers (avoiding the need for replacement), a connection to a GO Transit station, and the potential to introduce transit signal priority at a number of intersections with available funds. Evaluation of alternative technologies. The project team identified and evaluated available bus detection technologies for use in the pilot project. These included front-fire optical detection, side-fire infrared detection, vehicle-based transponder with in-road loop detection, radio frequency tags with roadside receivers, video image processing, ultrasonic detection, and automatic vehicle location (AVL) using global positioning systems. The preferred technology was identified as front-fire infrared optical detection due its cost, reliability, and proven performance in providing signal pre-emption for emergency vehicles. A preliminary cost estimate determined that 11 intersections and 50 buses could be equipped with the required technologies within the available pilot project budget. The evaluation did note that AVL using global positioning systems offers great potential flexibility and economies of scale in a centralized control environment, and recommended that it be re-evaluated when future work is undertaken on system-wide transit priority implementation. Design and specification. The route selected for the pilot deployment is the Carville Road/16th Avenue arterial corridor that runs east-west for about six kilometres between Bathurst Street and Highway 404 in the Town of Richmond Hill. The corridor is served by York Region Transit routes 85/85A, with frequencies of about 15 minutes in peak periods and about 30 minutes at other times. Transit priority will be implemented at all 11 signalized intersections along this corridor. Optical infrared emitters have been mounted on buses, and infrared detectors have been installed near the primary traffic signal head at each signalized intersection (one per approach direction). Some of the 11 traffic signal controllers have been upgraded, and some have been replaced. The deployment is intended to benefit buses with the least possible impact on established traffic patterns, and therefore did not require modifications to the centralized traffic signal management system or the existing signal timing plans at affected intersections. Thirty buses, all based out of the Richmond Hill garage and representing three different models and vintages (1989 New Flyer vehicles, 1999 Orion vehicles, and 2002 Thomas vehicles) may be assigned to these routes and will be fitted with optical infrared emitters.
Evaluation. Before-and-after evaluation studies were undertaken to quantify the pilot project's impacts on travel times and the delays experienced by buses and general traffic in the pilot project corridor. Expansion plan and guidelines. Guidelines for extended application of the pilot project technologies have been documented to ensure effective knowledge transfer within York Region and to other interested communities. ResultsBefore-after studies were completed shortly after the transit priority measures went into operation. Data on bus travel times, intersection delays and schedule adherence, as well as on delays incurred by other traffic, were used to assess the impacts of the pilot project. The evaluation suggested that the transit priority measures generally enabled buses to traverse the corridor with greater average speed and less delay. Transit travel times decreased by 15% eastbound and were unchanged westbound in the morning peak period, while they decreased by 4% eastbound and 9% westbound in the afternoon peak period. Delays to buses at signalized intersections decreased by 21% eastbound but increased by 44% westbound in the morning peak period, while they decreased by 24% eastbound and 13% westbound in the afternoon peak period. After transit priority implementation, buses in the corridor generally seemed to be on or ahead of schedule more often. Buses that started behind schedule also seemed to recover lost time more easily. General traffic delays at three intersections in the corridor were found not to increase noticeably for either east-west or north-south movements. ParticipantsThe main participants in this project included:
ResourcesThe total value of the pilot project was $500,000, of which $250,000 was provided by Transport Canada through the Deployment and Integration strategy of its ITS Plan. York Region provided $235,000, and LEA Consulting contributed $15,000 of “in kind” consulting services. York’s financial contribution was drawn from its 2002 and 2003 capital and operating budgets. A breakdown of proposed expenditures into key project components is given below:
TimelineMarch 2002. Project funding approved by Transport Canada August to November 2002. Reports on strategic vision and control strategy, options for transit signal priority function and control, and the evaluation of alternative routes and detector/controller technologies May 2003. Start of design and specification process July 2003. Start of procurement process January 2004. Start of installation June 2004. Start of operation July 2004. Completion of evaluation Lessons learnedAt the time of writing, York Region’s transit priority pilot project is being installed and a performance evaluation is some time away. However, some lessons learned may be drawn from work to date. They include:
Next stepsThe most immediate application of lessons learned during the pilot project will be in Quick Start, the first phase of York Region’s rapid transit plan
that will begin operation in 2005. Quick Start included transit priority
measures as part of a sophisticated real-time transit management system in four
key transit corridors. It will give priority to buses conditionally, based on
their adherence to a defined schedule (i.e. buses that are behind schedule will
be given priority, while those ahead of schedule will not). |
|
Transport Canada |
Pacific Region |
Prairie & Northern Region |
Ontario Region |
Quebec Region |
Atlantic Region |
About us |
Our offices |
Organization and senior management |
Departmental publications |
Programs and services |
Acts |
Regulations |
[More...] |
Media room |
Advisories |
Contacts |
e-news |
News releases |
Photo gallery | Reference centre |
Speeches |
[More...] |
Emergencies |
Emergencies and crises |
Emergency preparedness |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Air |
Our offices |
Passengers |
Pilots |
Flight instructors |
Maintenance technicians |
Commercial airlines |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Marine |
Our offices |
Small commercial vessels |
Large commercial vessels |
Pleasure craft |
Marine security |
Marine infrastructure |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Rail |
Our offices |
Safety at railway crossings |
Rail infrastructure |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |