Strategic plan for Quebec's Organic
Food Sector
2004-2009
Credits:
This strategic plan was produced by the Filière biologique du Québec,
with financial assistance from the Quebec Department of Agriculture, Fisheries
and Food (MAPAQ) through its ConcertAction program
Project coordination and drafting of plan:
Alain Rioux, strategic planning and project management consultant
Research and plan drafting support:
Sylvie Petitpas, communications consultant
Project follow-up:
Robert Beauchemin, chair, Filière biologique du Québec
Arthur Marcoux, secretary, Filière biologique du Québec, MAPAQ, Direction
de l'innovation scientifique et technologique
Alain Roy, deputy regional director, MAPAQ, Direction régionale de l'Estrie
Geneviève Blain, general secretary, Fédération d'agriculture biologique
du Québec
Christiane Chabot, delegate, Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors
Strategic reflection:
Participants in strategic reflection phase (Appendix 1)
Decision-making:
Members of the Table filière biologique du Québec (Appendix 2)
Graphic design and computer graphics:
infografik DESIGN COMMUNICATION
Table of contents
FOREWORD
1. INTRODUCTION
2. A STRATEGIC PLAN EMPHASIZING GROWTH
2.1 The strategic planning process
2.2 Vision
2.3 Growth objectives
2.4 Development directions
2.5 Implementation of the plan
3. REGULATORY FRAEMWORK FOR THE ORGANIC DESIGNATION
3.1 Context
3.2 Situation in Quebec
3.3 Elements of strategic reflection
3.4 Direction, objectives and strategies
4. ORGANIZATION OF MARKETING
4.1 Context
4.2 Situation in Quebec
4.3 Elements of strategic reflection
4.4 Direction, objectives and strategies
5. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
5.1 Context
5.2 Situation in Quebec
5.3 Elements of strategic reflection
5.4 Direction, objectives and strategies
6. FINANCIAL SUPPORT
6.1 Context
6.2 Situation in Quebec
6.3 Elements of strategic reflection
6.4 Direction, objectives and strategies
7. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
7.1 Context
7.2 Situation in Quebec
7.3 Elements of strategic reflection
7.4 Direction, objectives and strategies
References
Appendix 1 - PARTICIPANTS IN THE STRATEGIC
REFLECTION PHASE
Appendix 2 - MEMBERS OF THE TABLE FILIÈRE BIOLOGIQUE
DU QUÉBEC
The Filière biologique du Québec promotes the development and expansion
of Quebec's organic food sector in a spirit of cooperation and joint action.
Part of its mandate is to ensure that the sector has access to strategic
planning that reflects its members' needs and aspirations.
The planning process that led to the formulation of the second strategic
plan for the sector was a great opportunity for us to pool our knowledge
and share our needs. It resulted in the establishment of priorities for
the sector over the next five years, taking account of the international
and provincial contexts. It has also given representatives of each link
in the organic food system an opportunity to exchange ideas on development
objectives and constraints for each link. Such exchanges were based on
the standards and values that are the foundation of sector development.
A consensus was reached on concrete measures in the five development
directions retained (regulatory framework, organization of marketing,
professional and technical support, financial support and genetically
modified organisms). The application of regulations requires, more than
ever, the greater participation of all the links in the system. A review
of the business links between Quebec stakeholders is needed to ensure
that marketing is organized properly. Professional and technical support
is essential to increase market sourcing by Quebec products. Lastly, in
a context in which organic food firms in many countries benefit from significant
development subsidies, financial support must be increased to maintain
the competitiveness of Quebec organic products on the world stage. Regarding
the threat of genetically modified organisms to the development of Quebec's
organic food sector, participants were unanimous in emphasizing the need
for realistic short-term solutions.
As chair of the Filière, I am proud to present this second strategic
plan, the primary objective of which is to significantly increase the
production, processing and marketing of organic products from Quebec.
I believe that the participation of all the partners in the sector is
essential to make the plan into an effective collective development tool.
The cooperative efforts that went into producing the plan demonstrate
that the sector has acquired the maturity required to implement the plan.
The organic designation is the first reserved designation to be instituted
in Quebec. In many respects, the organic sector is a pioneer in this area.
Quebec society as a whole has a responsibility to support the successful
development of the organic sector, so that the experience gained paves
the way for other reserved designations. The support given will also help
the organic food sector to fully assume its responsibilities to consumers,
who are increasingly open to products with a reserved designation.
I, myself, am convinced that the second strategic planning exercise for
the sector will help to mobilize all individuals interested in supporting
the development of Quebec organic foods. By working together, we will
be able to successfully implement the strategies mapped out in this new
plan.
Organic foods are a product of organic agriculture. Organic agriculture
is based on agricultural planning and management practices that aim to
create healthy ecosystems and ensure sustainable productivity. Weeds and
pests are controlled without using synthetic pesticides and herbicides
but by maintaining a diversity of interdependent life forms that ensure
a balanced ecosystem. Insects and diseases can be controlled by promoting
balanced host-predator relations, increasing populations of beneficial
insects, using biological controls and crop control agents, and carrying
out the mechanical elimination of pests and damaged portions of plants.
In organic farming, soil fertility is maintained and improved through
a system that maximizes biological activity in the soil, in order to provide
plants and animals with essential nutrients as well as to conserve soil
resources. The use of chemical fertilizers is prohibited because it usually
disturbs biological soil activity. Crop selection and rotation, water
management and the recycling of crop and livestock residues are basic
practices in organic farming. Owing to a combination of all these elements,
organic products are generally recognized as healthy food produced in
a healthy environment.
Polls in Quebec and elsewhere show that consumers are more and more aware
of food quality and increasingly link their health to the food they eat.
This is why many consumers now chose to buy organic products. The fact
that organic production is associated with environmental sustainability
is also increasing consumer interest in organic products. As a result,
in Quebec, the organic food sector is recognized as a well-differentiated
and promising market niche that should be developed further.
Worldwide, the current demand for a number of organic products is outstripping
supply. In Quebec, the strong demand is bringing new players into the
market, accentuating the need to reconsider support and funding for the
sector. In a business environment favourable to its growth, the organic
sector must be ready to overcome the significant challenges posed by greater
market sourcing.
Quebec certainly has a number of strengths that it can draw on to face
the new market realities. The sector now has everything it needs to accelerate
its development, due to extensive know-how acquired over more than three
decades by organic producers and processors, a certification system recognized
in a number of markets and the ability of all the major players in the
system to work together successfully.
The first strategic plan for Quebec's organic sector dates back to 1994.
The numerous changes that have occurred since then prompted the updating
and renewal of the strategic plan. Consequently, the Filière biologique
du Québec initiated the process to review the plan, which resulted in
the 2004-2009 strategic plan. The new plan should provide the sector with
a better overall vision of its development and greater cohesion in its
actions.
- triple, in five years, the number of organic farms and transitional
farms in Quebec;
- increase fivefold, by 2009, the value of organic products processed
in Quebec;
- increase fivefold, in five years, the value of Quebec organic food
products sold in domestic markets;
To ensure that the 2004-2009 strategic plan accurately reflects the needs
of the sector, the Filière biologique du Québec decided to get a number
of representatives of the different links in the system involved in the
planning process. The four phases of the process consisted of a context
analysis phase, consultation phase (involving roughly 550 people), strategic
reflection phase (involving roughly 60 people) and a decision-making phase
involving the members of the Table filière biologique. Participants in
the planning process emphasized the importance of never losing sight of
the cornerstone of organic farming, which is to produce high-quality food
in an environmentally sustainable way.
The consultations and exchanges that took place during the strategic
planning exercise revealed a number of common elements on which the vision
of the sector's future would be based. Process participants clearly expressed
their desire to have Quebec's organic food sector recognized for:
- its positive contribution to the environment and health;
- the integrity of the organic designation;
- the wide variety of its products and the accessibility to products
in the Quebec market;
- the dynamism of its leaders in the Canadian and export markets.
In accordance with the sector's vision for its future, five major objectives
were set for growth:
- increase to 80%, by 2009, the degree of consumer confidence in the
organic designation in Quebec;
- triple, by 2009, the value of exports of Quebec organic products.
These growth objectives are collective in nature and do not involve in
any way an individual commitment from partners or firms. Given the growth
of the organic sector in recent years, it is realistic to expect the sector
as a whole to achieve these objectives.
To be able to measure the progress made in achieving these objectives,
indicators must be identified for each growth objective by the beginning
of the implementation phase.
The Filière biologique du Québec conducted a survey of 550 people representing
each of the links in the organic food system to determine their primary
concerns and take them into account in strategic planning for 2004-2009.
A total of 495 responses on development issues were received, 44% of which
referred to the organization of marketing; 26%, professional and technical
support; 14%, financial support and 10%, the regulatory framework. An
additional issue was central to the concerns expressed by the representatives
of all the links in the system: the widespread use of transgenic crops,
which represents a significant threat to the development of the organic
sector.
The five major challenges identified in the consultations were translated
into the following development directions:
- improve the implementation of the regulatory framework for the organic
designation in Quebec;
- develop local and regional marketing structures and facilitate access
to international markets;
- increase professional and technical support to established and transitional
organic firms;
- improve financial support to the organic food sector;
- mitigate the potential negative impacts of GMOs on the quality of,
and trade in, organic food.
The Filière biologique du Québec is responsible for coordinating the
implementation of the 2004-2009 strategic plan for the organic food industry.
The Filière must ensure that the strategies enumerated in the plan are
implemented by the partners who are in the best position to carry them
out. Consequently, it will interview representatives of the organic farming
community, governments and organizations that could potentially be involved
in implementing the plan. In addition, the new strategic plan should be
used to guide financial support provided to the industry.
Partners must translate their involvement into an implementation plan,
which will determine who is responsible for each strategy and set deadlines
for each. In addition, the plan must include indicators for monitoring
the progress made in achieving growth and strategic objectives. The results
achieved under the plan will be described in an annual report to be submitted
to the Filière biologique du Québec. The report will be disseminated as
widely as possible to partners associated with the development of the
sector, eventually allowing the strategic plan to be updated if required.
By adopting this method of implementing the plan, partners have chosen
to pool their efforts and resources for the greater good of the entire
sector. The plan will be implemented in a spirit of cooperation and joint
action.
In recent years, the increasing quantity of organic products from around
the word and particularly the increased number of points of sale has made
consumers much more demanding in terms of the integrity of organic labelling.
This is why the control of the organic designation is so important to
ensure the credibility of organic foods.
Internationally, the Codex Alimentarius Commission has adopted a set
of guidelines, entitled Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling
and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods. These guidelines outline
the minimum standards that must be met for a food product to be considered
organic in most countries of the world. However, the Codex Alimentarius
Commission has not yet set standards for organic maple syrup production,
which complicates the regulatory framework for this type of production,
so important in Quebec.
Between 50 and 60 countries have regulations on certification requirements
for organic agricultural and food products or are in the process of adopting
such regulations. In December 2002, the United States adopted its National
Organic Program, under which certification is mandatory. In the European
Union, regulations stipulate that minimum standards must be met, and each
country has its own standards which must be at least as strict as the
general rules and accompanied by provisions for mandatory certification.
In Asia, regulations have traditionally been few and far between, although
the situation is changing rapidly. In Japan, regulations effective April
2001 set strict national standards for the organic food industry, reducing
the size of the organic food market from $3 billion US in 2000 to $250
million US in 2001. The upgrading of Japanese standards to bring them
in line with international ones has meant increased differentiation of
organic and nonorganic products. China is in the process of adopting its
own regulations for the organic food sector.
The Canadian government has not yet adopted regulations to make certification
mandatory. A voluntary Canadian standard for organic agriculture was established
in June 1999, which is administered by the Standards Council of Canada.
Certification bodies are not required to be accredited but should, in
principle, meet or exceed the voluntary Canadian standard, which is currently
being updated.
In terms of product labelling, there are no Canadian standards that specifically
cover organic food. Organic labelling standards therefore vary depending
on the individual certification body but always involve the organic food
content. In addition, all food sold in Canada is subject to the provisions
of the Food and Drugs Act, Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act and regulations
on specific products under the Canada Agricultural Products Act. These
laws and regulations have provisions forbidding the mislabelling of food.
For organic food, authority over labelling under these laws and regulations
is fairly limited in actual fact. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency
(CFIA) does very little verification of the labelling of organic foods
and the degree of action taken varies depending on the province. For example,
in Quebec, the CFIA does not act to control the labelling of organic foods
while, in other provinces, it has initiated proceedings in several cases.
The role of the Canadian government and its agencies with respect to compliance
monitoring of organic food is therefore very limited. This can be explained
in part by the regulatory vacuum.
3.2.1 ACCREDITATION SYSTEM
An Act respecting reserved designations creates a framework in Quebec
for the recognition and protection of designations given to agricultural
and food products, including organic products. Under the Act, the Quebec
Accreditation Board (QAB) has a mission to provide accreditation to certification
bodies, make recommendations to the Minister regarding the recognition
of designations and monitor how the latter are used.
In December 1999, the QAB was specifically mandated to control the use
of the organic designation, which became a reserved designation in February
2000.
Quebec's regulatory framework for organic agriculture is more advanced
than those in the other provinces. The QAB adopted the Quebec Organic
Reference Standards, which are equivalent to, if not stricter than, those
adopted by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The QAB reviews and updates
these standards every year. It is responsible for accrediting various
certification bodies based on these standards and ISO Guide 65 on requirements
for product certification.
QAB accreditation gives certification bodies the right to grant in Quebec
certificates of organic conformity to firms that produce, process or package
agricultural and food products to be sold with the organic designation.
Up to now, the QAB has accredited six certification bodies for Quebec
products. Over 20 other agencies have been recognized by the QAB as being
qualified to certify products imported into Quebec. Certification ensures
consumers that the food they buy was produced and certified according
to international standards.
The granting of a certificate of conformity to a firm involves five steps.
If a firm wants to obtain organic certification, it must first request
from the certification body of its choice the latter's standards concerning
production and processing principles and methods. Applicants must then
submit their own production and processing specifications to the certification
body. If the specifications meet the standards, the certification body
will conduct an on-site audit to ensure that the firm's production system
actually conforms to the approved specifications and whether the organic
standards are being met. The certification body will then render its decision
based on the audit results. When a firm is issued a certificate of conformity,
it obtains the right to use the certification body's trademark. The name
of the certification body must appear on the product label, while the
certification body's logo is optional.
3.2.2 CONTROLLING THE USE OF THE RESERVED DESIGNATION
To perform its mandate of controlling the use of the organic designation
in the province of Quebec, the QAB administers a monitoring program which,
since 2000, has targeted mainly Quebec products. Until recently, requirements
for products from outside Quebec have been limited to including the certification
body's name on the label. Beginning on July 1, 2003, products from outside
Quebec must meet the requirements of the new Quebec product entry acceptance
program and therefore be certified by an organization accredited or recognized
by the QAB. Regardless of the origin of the product, the party ultimately
responsible for marketing the product in Quebec is required to comply
with QAB requirements.
Offenders are identified through a complaint management system. To follow
up on a complaint, QAB representatives must visit the retailer and file
a report, identifying the party ultimately responsible for marketing the
product targeted by the complaint. Generally, this party is the one considered
to be in violation of the Act.
If the QAB representative deems the complaint to be well founded, he
or she will communicate with the offender to require that steps be taken
to correct the situation. If the problem is not corrected, the QAB will
transfer the case to the Quebec Attorney-General for legal action. In
the case of legal action, the process may be long as in any other judicial
proceedings. In 2002, over 40 complaints were filed against offenders.
In most cases, offenders corrected the situation after having been notified
by the QAB.
Despite these positive results, the complaint- management based control
system has a few weak areas. In three years, the context has evolved to
the extent that changes must be made to the current system to increase
the rate of compliance among products sold to consumers. The number of
retail outlets has also increased from a few hundred in 2000 to several
thousand in 2003, resulting in increased monitoring requirements. The
QAB does not have the resources required to respond to these growing needs.
Furthermore, the Act does not give the QAB the inspection authority it
needs to enter infraction sites closed to the public (processors that
export products or wholesalers that repackage products). In these cases,
the QAB is forced to transfer the case to the Quebec Department of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food (MAPAQ) for investigation. If the results of the investigation
are conclusive, MAPAQ will transfer the case to the Attorney-General for
legal action. The fact that legal action leading to possible conviction
is a fairly long process has led a number of organic sector stakeholders
to question the deterrent effect that such a system can have in the short
term.
However, despite problems with the monitoring system, almost twice as
many Quebecers have confidence in organic labelling (organic designation)
(51%) as Canadians in the rest of the country, according to a Leger Marketing
survey carried out among 1,500 adult Canadians from June 4 to 9, 2002.
The mandatory enforcement of the Act respecting reserved designations
(compared with the voluntary nature of federal standards) could explain
in part these results. Up to now, the willingness of most players in the
Quebec organic market to comply with the current regulatory control system
has no doubt helped to strengthen the confidence of Quebec consumers.
The regulatory framework is essential to the development of organic agriculture
since the future of this type of agriculture depends on consumer choices
on one hand and, on the other, the ability of the different links in the
chain to maintain a system in which consumers have confidence.
The consultation and reflection phases revealed the fact that representatives
of the production, processing, distribution and retail sectors all shared
the same concern over the degree of control provided by the regulatory
framework. The current regulations are the cornerstone of the sector's
development.
In Quebec, MAPAQ has supported the development of the QAB and its programs
during the last three years through direct funding arrangements and the
organic agricultural support program. The organic sector now has the structure
required to control the use of the organic designation. However, due to
the rapid growth of the sector and the entry of new firms at all links
in the system, even greater coordination efforts are required to ensure
that those enforcing the regulations are able to perform their roles properly.
Changes are required in the monitoring system, which currently is based
on a complaint management system, so that it responds better to the current
situation and the needs of industry and the public.
The growing interest of firms and consumers in organic foods, along with
the diversity and quantity of these foods on grocery shelves, means that
consumers need to know more about their nature and characteristics, and
certification and labelling methods. A number of stakeholders have cited
the lack of information available in these areas. Action must be taken
quickly to ensure that the paucity of information does not generate mistrust
in the integrity of organic food.
Sector representatives have also highlighted small producers' and processors'
needs for financial support to obtain certification. Currently, firms
bear the entire financial burden of certification and it would be beneficial
to develop cost-sharing methods to allow these firms to compete with their
counterparts in other countries.
Regarding certification bodies, two serious problems have been raised.
The first is the wide range of existing standards, which slows down the
annual administrative process of recognizing standards. Certification
bodies believe that they have to invest far too much effort to obtain
recognition and would like uniform standards to facilitate their work.
The second problem is the difficulty that certification bodies have in
retaining experienced auditors, given the seasonal nature of the work
and the poor pay. Again, solutions will have to be found for this in the
near future.
DIRECTION NO. 1: IMPROVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FOR THE ORGANIC DESIGNATION IN QUEBEC
Strategic objective no. 1
Increase knowledge among all the players in the organic food system on
the implementation of the regulatory framework by:
1. establishing a communications strategy for consumers and the system
in general on controlling the use of the designation and the responsibility
of each link in the system in this area;
2. identifying and training those responsible for carrying the organic
issue forward in each organization that is involved in implementing the
regulatory framework.
Strategic objective no. 2
Ensure the integrity of the use of the organic designation by:
1. clarifying the mandate and responsibilities of the QAB, MAPAQ and
CFIA in monitoring products with an organic designation;
2. increasing government support to ensure a system for controlling the
use of the organic designation that is better adapted to the realities
of the Quebec market;
3. finding ways for each link in the system to assume responsibility
for compliance and the traceability of organic food sold in Quebec;
4. asking MAPAQ to ensure that the Filière biologique du Québec becomes
a party to the development plan for reserved designations;
5. strengthening, if required, directives and regulations arising under
the Act respecting reserved designations.
Strategic objective no. 3
Facilitate production and processing firms' access to organic certification
by:
1. studying existing cost-sharing arrangements in Europe and the United
States and taking account of the impact they have had, in the medium term,
on the organic food sector;
2. developing a formula adapted to Quebec's needs that is competitive
with existing formulas in the US and Europe;
3. making organic certification standards uniform in Quebec;
4. developing tools or systems for tracing organic products to help firms
manage certification.
Strategic objective no. 4
To achieve more consistent audit quality, increase auditors' expertise
and better retain their know-how by:
1. giving auditors access to affordable training that takes account of
the complexity of their task;
2. helping to find and implement ways to improve auditors' working conditions
based on the needs they have expressed.
A significant increase in the demand for organic food products worldwide
coincides in part with concerns raised by the public over the problems
linked to mad cow disease in Europe and the increased use of genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) in food. These issues, which have been reported
widely in the media, have helped increase consumers' awareness of the
links between health, the environment and food quality.
Although the demand for organic food has matured in Europe, it is only
at the beginning of its growth cycle in North America. Although organic
food has been available on North American markets for 40 years, it was
of limited importance until the late 1990s.
During the past decade, North American consumers' concerns with food
safety and security have substantially increased. As environmental concerns
have come to the fore, this has created a situation conducive to strongly
stimulating the demand for organic food in North America.
The international context has therefore favoured the sustained growth
of markets for the past ten years in the organic food sector (over 20%
annually). Currently, the forecast is for roughly 30% annual growth in
North America in the next few years, while the net growth for the food
industry should be less than 2%. Indeed, rapid sustained growth can be
expected in a number of organic production sectors. This situation is
of increasing interest to new players, opening the door to new business
opportunities and requiring the better organization of marketing.
The cornerstone of international trade in organic products is the recognition
of certification programs, which is done on a reciprocal country-to-country
or government-to-government basis, based on mandatory standards. However,
in Canada, organic labelling is based on a voluntary standard, which hinders
recognition by other countries. This situation is causing problems for
Quebec exporters of organic products, who operate under rigorous mandatory
standards.
Nevertheless, Quebec exports are faring relatively well, due to the recognition
of Quebec certification programs by importing nations' certification bodies.
Although Quebec organic products technically meet the requirements of
importing countries, changes expected in 2005 could have serious repercussions
on Quebec exports. At that time, exporting countries will be required
to be on a list of third countries operating under mandatory standards
in order to export to Europe or Asia.
Thanks to the pioneering work done by Quebec's organic sector, the province
has developed a level of expertise that can sustain significant development
in the sector. These pioneers gradually succeeded in positioning their
organic products with retailers specializing in natural products and health
foods. These retailers have expanded over the years and are taking advantage
of the growing demand for organic products in Quebec.
In 2002, Quebec's three main retail food chains adopted market development
plans for organic food in their supermarkets. Organic food is no longer
considered a fad but rather a legitimate market niche with a promising
future. Loblaws is planning to double, in 2003, the number of organic
products offered in its grocery stores, from 150 to 300 products. Metro
is also working to introduce or widen the range of organic products in
its stores, while Sobeys has been continually increasing the shelf space
devoted to organic products.
Even though these major distribution networks are taking on growing importance
in organic markets, some producers still prefer formulas involving shorter
distribution networks. Sales of organic food baskets through the community
supported agriculture (CSA) network, the Réseau de l'agriculture soutenue
par la communauté, are a good example. In 2002, this network, which comprises
over 40 farms, accounted for 3% of the market for organic products. According
to the organization Équiterre, the CSA system provides farmers with sales
revenues that are 25% greater than those from other distribution networks.
For consumers, this system ensures access to healthy, locally produced
food at competitive prices.
In recent years, supply management initiatives have also been introduced
in Quebec and appear to provide good results. They are paving the way
for an examination of new ways of supplying markets.
It is important to remember that exports account for most organic food
sales in Quebec, while domestic demand is met mainly through imports.
Until very recently, most organic foods produced in Quebec were exported
due to the lack of accessible distribution networks domestically. Except
for direct sales (from producer to consumer), individual organic producers
are often unable to meet the requirements of Quebec's domestic market.
When a strong interest arises in developing the Quebec market, it will
be imperative to create networks to rapidly disseminate information and
to create regional structures to be able to supply greater volumes to
Quebec markets.
In addition, many producers would clearly like to sell more of their
products for processing, to avoid being overdependent on seasonal markets.
Processors, for their part, would like to have consistent access to Quebec
products. The time seems ripe, therefore, for establishing new commercial
links benefiting both parties.
In recent years, Quebec consumers have been warned about the importance
of eating high-quality food. Now they are trying to become better informed
about food production. Similarly, the mass arrival of organic products
on grocery store shelves has prompted consumer interest in organic farming.
They want to know more about the difference between organic and other
types of food.
Representatives of various links in the organic food system, who have
contacts with the public, have confirmed consumers' need for more information
and their own inability to respond to this need as individuals. In addition,
Quebec consumers appear to be increasingly interested in finding out the
origin of the food products they buy: this information is reassuring to
them. This is why some stakeholders are lobbying for a logo indicating
that organic products come from Quebec. They believe that the logo must
contain a reference to the reserved designation and should not exclude
certification marks, which guarantee compliance with standards. In addition,
although the logo could have a local connotation, it should not preclude
exports.
Internationally, the recognition of QAB-accredited certification bodies
by the U.S. National Organic Program (NOP) is facilitating trade with
the United States. The same flexibility does not exist, however, with
European and Aisian countries. By 2005, a country will have to be on the
list of third countries to be able to export to Europe and Japan. To be
included on the list, the competent authority-i.e., the government of
the country in question-must request official recognition. The fact that,
up to now, the Canadian approach has been based on voluntary standards
and therefore does not meet international criteria has made it difficult
to position Canadian organic products in European and Japanese export
markets. This situation could worsen in 2005 if solutions are not found
soon.
The Canadian Organic Coalition, formed in 2002, is lobbying for a mandatory
certification system for Canadian organic products. This change in direction
in the industry in the rest of Canada could modify the Canadian negotiating
position with the European Union.
DIRECTION NO. 2 - DEVELOP LOCAL AND REGIONAL MARKETING STRUCTURES AND
FACILITATE ACCESS TO INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
Strategic objective no. 1
Increase the supply of Quebec organic products on local and regional markets
by:
1. proposing structured business get-togethers for the different links
in the organic system at strategic points in the year, in cooperation
with organizations such as Aliments Québec and the Quebec Agri-Food Export
Club;
2. when supplying distribution networks, putting a priority on those
that favour Quebec organic foods in their purchasing and sales strategies;
3. supporting producers' groups and promoting regional organizations,
so that they can become points of convergence for supplying markets and
disposing of surpluses;
4. evaluating the possibility of establishing an organization to market
Quebec organic food;
5. creating a specific place for organic products in existing marketing
agreements whenever possible;
6. establishing joint strategies for transporting organic products that
benefit both producers and retailers.
Strategic objective no.2
Increase processing of organic products in Quebec by:
1. disseminating more information to Quebec processors on the potential
of the processed organic food market, along with information that could
facilitate their transition to the organic sector;
2. targeting products in which Quebec already has recognized expertise
and for which the cost-benefit ratio of processing in Quebec would be
advantageous;
3. establishing, at fixed times of the year, a list of the needs of Quebec
processors along with the prices they offer, as well as a list of available
products and prices by production sector;
4. establishing arrangements that will ensure a regular supply to certain
processing plants.
Strategic objective no. 3
Develop a concerted strategy to promote Quebec organic foods on both domestic
and export markets by:
1. developing a communications campaign to differentiate Quebec organic
products;
2. carrying out a concerted campaign of promotional and public relations
activities to better position Quebec organic products on the different
markets;
3. evaluating the impact and usefulness of a unique logo or signature
with a significance to Quebec consumers;
4. providing, if appropriate, Quebec organic products with a unique logo
or signature.
Strategic objective no. 4
Facilitate access by Quebec organic firms to export markets through Canadian
regulations that comply better with international requirements by:
1. intensifying pressure by the Filière biologique du Québec on the Canadian
government, to encourage it to develop a regulatory tool that harmonizes
with provincial tools;
2. supporting, where appropriate, the work of the Canadian Organic Coalition,
which is calling for mandatory Canadian regulations for the organic food
sector.
During the past decade, organic producers in Europe and the United States
have received more technical and professional support than their Canadian
(and Quebec) counterparts. Furthermore, these regions' support structures
are better established than they are here, which is a factor that works
against Quebec competitiveness.
Despite this, the low level of professional and technical support provided
to the organic sector has not prevented Quebec producers and processors
who are convinced of the soundness of organic farming methods from pursuing
the organic option. Currently, there are over 700 organic producers and
roughly 100 organic processors in Quebec.
Current market signals, which point to a sustained growth in demand for
organic products, bear out the perseverance and determination of these
entrepreneurs. Due to the favourable context, organic firms can now hope
to obtain better professional and technical support from governments and
the rest of the community in coming years.
Currently, the demand for most organic products exceeds the supply. In
addition, export prices are higher than domestic ones and the exchange
rates are favourable to Quebec producers. Therefore, exports offer significant
added value. In addition, due to the vagaries of the weather in 2002 in
Europe and the United States, the competition from these two regions will
be less intense over the short term. These factors will increase Quebec
farmers' interest in organic agriculture and may also help encourage organic
start-ups.
However, three to five years from now, new organic producers will find
it harder to get established, as markets expand and downward pressure
on prices begins. In addition, more organic produce will begin arriving
from emerging nations. China, for example, is currently attempting to
break into the North American market with low-priced organic products
of variable quality.
Other countries, such as Brazil, India and Argentina, are doing the same,
putting increased pressure on some Quebec products with a high growth
potential such as protein crops.
In Quebec, the need for professional and technical help affects established
organic firms, firms that want to convert to organic agriculture and new
firms planning to engage in organic production.
5.2.1 SUPPORT TO FARMING ENTERPRISES
Established organic firms need support to grow and are also highly sought
after by new firms and transitional firms needing help. The growing needs
of new and transitional firms are posing an increasing problem, both for
the producers who are constantly asked for assistance and the firms needing
help.
In the case of farming enterprises that are in the process of converting
or plan to convert to organic farming, access to adequate support during
the transition phase is a major challenge for the sector. Quebec standards
universally require a transition period of three years. These three years
are a critical time for firms, which risk having their income decrease
without their products necessarily gaining added value.
The ideal process in Quebec to encourage farm producers to convert to
organic agriculture consists of a fair amount of outreach, adequate training,
customized professional and technical support and a number of trial runs
allowing the firm to convert gradually to organic forming.
The Fédération d'agriculture biologique du Québec (FABQ) is the largest
organization of organic producers in the province, with close to 200 members.
Established in 1989, the FABQ joined the Union des producteurs agricoles
(UPA) in 2001. Its mission is to represent organic producers and act to
promote organic farming in the agricultural community and among governments,
consumers and various stakeholders.
The Quebec government, through the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries
and Food (MAPAQ), provides professional and technical support to the organic
sector, through a network of organic farming extension agents in 13 regions.
The agents' role is to ensure the effective dissemination of information
on organic farming and liase with other partners in the sector. They also
promote an awareness of organic agriculture among farm producers and provide
technical information. However, the department's consulting services are
still not oriented towards organic agriculture to any degree.
MAPAQ also supports the operations of 23 technical support clubs (clubs
d'encadrement technique or CET). Along with the Conseil de développement
de l'agriculture du Québec, it also provides financial support to 80 agri-environmental
clubs (clubs agroenvironnementaux or CAE). Although the mandate of these
clubs does not include a specific organic farming component, they have
assisted in facilitating the gradual transition of a number of farming
enterprises to organic agriculture.
The cultural practices encouraged in these clubs allow producers to gain
confidence in certain production methods similar to those advocated in
organic farming. In 2002, the technical support and agri-environmental
clubs provided support to roughly 200 of the province's 700 organic farms.
Among the members of the agri-environmental clubs are 50 transitional
farms, as well as 20 established organic farms. Two of these clubs specialize
completely in supporting organic farms, while two technical support clubs
involved in organic dairy farming provide support to 56 dairy farms. There
is also an agri-environmental club specializing in maple sugar production,
with 35 members who are established organic producers and 15 who are in
transition. These clubs therefore provide very significant technical and
professional support to organic producers and transitional firms.
5.2.2 INFORMATION ON ORGANIC SECTOR
Quebec's organic farming centre, the Centre d'agriculture biologique
du Québec (CABQ), plays a key role in disseminating specialized information
through its magazine
Bio-bulle and its Web site. It also produces La Rubrique biologique,
a strategic watch bulleting focusing on the organic agriculture industry;
the information gathered provides a real benefit to the sector by assisting
in strategic planning. In addition, CABQ produces the RUAAB, a directory
of firms and associations in Quebec's organic sector.
In terms of specialized references for the organic sector, the Agri-info
bookstore in St. Hubert offers a wide variety of documents and a reference
service for producers.
In February 2003, the FABQ produced the first general guide on converting
to organic agriculture in Quebec, which was widely disseminated to firms
and stakeholders. The guide meets very important basic needs. However,
in the future, specialized guides targeting specific production sectors
will be needed to meet more specific needs.
In terms of technical information, Quebec's reference centre on the agricultural
and agri-food industry, the Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire
du Québec (CRAAQ), has developed a Web site on organic farming, which
is available through Quebec's agricultural web-ring, Agri-Réseau.
These worthwhile and promising initiatives should be followed closely
and merit active participation.
5.2.3 TRAINING
The current demand for agricultural training comes mainly from established
producers wanting customized training. The network of agricultural trainers,
funded by Emploi Québec and regional institutions, plays an important
role in organizing courses to respond to these needs.
Since 1987, the Victoriaville CEGEP has offered a DCS program in the
organic cultivation of fruits and vegetables under a program called Managing
and Operating Farm Enterprises. The demand for courses specifically on
organic livestock production is still very weak, which often hinders institutions
from offering new courses in this area.
In addition, the Collège de Sherbrooke is working to develop a 400-hour
Attestation of Collegial Studies program for firms wishing to convert
to organic agriculture and for young people working on farms that are
interested in the sector. This training could then be offered throughout
Quebec through the Quebec Department of Education.
At the university level, the situation is slowly changing. No Quebec
university currently offers formal courses in organic agriculture as part
of its regular curricula. All too often, the degree to which future farmers
become aware of organic methods depends on the professor's interest in
organic farming.
In addition, there is an increasing need for training in management,
trade, financing and marketing as they apply to the organic sector. Receiving
training in these areas surely provides an excellent basis for firms'
success.
5.2.4 RESEARCH
There is only one institution in Canada that has a mandate to carry out
research in organic agriculture: the Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada,
established in July 2001, at the Nova Scotia Agricultural College. In
2002, it received $914,700 in federal funding. In Quebec, a committee
formed recently by the organic agriculture committee of CRAAQ, is currently
studying research and development avenues that will help meet the needs
of Quebec firms. For the time being, Quebec firms rely on the results
of US and European studies to demonstrate the credibility of organic foods
in relation to conventional ones. In the short term, however, basic research
on organic agriculture must be increased.
The lack of professional and technical support for the organic farming
sector in Quebec has limited access to the sector and has forced producers
to integrate the various facets of support directly into their own activities.
This lack of organized support has also forced established producers
to shoulder much of the responsibility of responding to the needs of firms
starting up or in transition. The substantial increase in these needs
in recent years has resulted in corresponding pressures on experienced
producers. It is imperative, therefore, to develop a formula that recognizes
the contributions of these producers in the sector's development so that
they are fairly remunerated, to ensure that their expertise can continue
to be accessed. To supplement this expertise, tools must be developed
to provide a structure for information needed by firms wishing to convert
to organic farming.
The transition period, which usually takes three years, is a critical
time for these firms. To reduce the risks to these firms and maximize
their chances of success, all forms of professional and technical support
must be increased.
Support in the form of consulting services is also critical to the sector's
future. Producers currently use mostly group consulting services. Stakeholders
would like to see better knowledge networking and to see the services
offered and available resources complement each other better. They would
also like to see ways to better disseminate information on the expertise
developed up to now by consultants.
Training is also key in the development of organic production. Changing
training needs, which have accompanied the growth of the sector, now require
that the training offered be better coordinated and more widely accessible.
In addition, management and marketing parameters that are indispensable
to a firm's success must be included in training offerings.
In the area of technology transfer and research, sector representatives
have stated clearly that there are weaknesses both in the organization
of technology transfer and the development of basic research. They hope
that the means to remedy these shortcomings will be put in place quickly.
DIRECTION NO. 3 - INCREASE PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO ESTABLISHED
AND TRANSITIONAL ORGANIC FIRMS
Strategic objective no. 1
Increase access by start-up and transitional firms to the expertise and
knowledge of experienced organic producers by:
1. assessing model farm programs like those in Europe;
2. developing a model farm program adapted to the Quebec context;
3. ensuring funding for the model farm program, with full recognition
for the contributions of participating firms;
4. ensuring that the network of model farms allows technical and economic
data to be collected, particularly on production costs;
5. popularizing and disseminating the results from the model farm program;
6. ensuring that the model farm program has a system of organized tours
(for which farms are remunerated);
7. establishing, where appropriate, a mentoring or sponsorship program.
Strategic objective no. 2
Develop tools to facilitate the transition to organic agriculture by:
1. establishing, for each region, a list of farms likely to convert to
organic farming;
2. developing transition kits for the main types of crops and livestock
produced, taking account of all phases from production to marketing;
3. producing, updating and making accessible documents containing economic
data by production sector, to help producers better evaluate transition
costs for their farm.
Strategic objective no. 3
In the area of technical and professional support to the organic sector,
increase knowledge networking by:
1. producing and distributing a directory of organizations and individuals
providing support to the organic sector, including their special areas
of expertise and roles;
2. organizing formal discussions for the exchange of views between stakeholders,
to improve their knowledge and skills;
3. providing more technical information on the Agri-Réseau Web site,
to create a databank that organic farms can use as a reference tool;
4. establishing and widely disseminating a list of current and upcoming
projects that could affect support to firms.
Strategic objective no. 4
Increase group consulting services to established and transitional organic
firms by:
1. asking for collaboration from leaders of agri-environmental and technical
support clubs to serve organic firms better;
2. strengthening the network of extension agents (MAPAQ and Financière
agricole) dealing with organic agriculture;
3. ensuring linkage between services offered by the different clubs,
consulting groups and MAPAQ organic farming extension agents;
4. organizing, by region and production sector, clubs' consulting services
to organic firms;
5. developing consulting services for organic firms in management, marketing
and quality control of organic products.
Strategic objective no. 5
Increase the interest in training offerings in the organic sector by:
1. producing and widely disseminating a directory of the training programs
available;
2. coordinating available training offerings so that they are more accessible;
3. developing training programs in management and marketing specifically
concerning organic production;
4. encouraging educational institutions to integrate specialized courses
in organic agriculture in post-secondary agricultural training programs;
5. discussing with organizations providing training in food-related areas
(Ordre des diététistes, Association des détaillants alimentaires, etc.)
the possibility of including sections on organic products in their programs.
Strategic objective no. 6
Organize technology transfer to farms and develop basic research in organic
agriculture by:
1. mandating an organization or committee to define research and technology
transfer priorities in close collaboration with producers;
2. informing producers and processors on the process for obtaining tax
credits for research and providing support to them during the process;
3.initiating basic research conducted at certified organic sites where
all interactions are present and are taken into account;
4. looking at the possibility of joining forces with an existing foundation
or setting up a new foundation to raise funds for research in the organic
sector;
5. creating a list of firms interested in technology transfer and determining
methods for working with them;
6. setting up a watch program to monitor production techniques and the
development and characteristics of organic foods;
7. disseminating the data collected and synthesizing the data by specific
subject.
During the last two decades, a number of European countries and several
US states have become aware of the environmental and economic benefits
of organic agriculture and have instituted policies to provide financial
support for this type of farming.
On December 17, 2002, an action plan was submitted to the European Council
of Ministers, consisting of activities to publicize organic products,
information campaigns targeting the food service industry, the removal
of obstacles to direct distribution, the improvement of the consulting
services offered to producers' associations, funding for regional agricultural
programs supporting organic agriculture, improvement of the EU's statistical
databases on production and the improvement of the control and accreditation
of organic certification bodies.
In the United States, the 2002 Farm Bill provides for substantial aid
to the organic farming industry. Included in the Farm Bill are such programs
as the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program and many measures
to encourage research, including a provision allowing the organic industry
to establish a national voluntary research and promotion program. This
program will allow organic farmers to redirect some of their income to
research and promotion activities specifically involving the organic sector.
Although, before 2002, European organic farmers received more subsidies
than their US counterparts, the new Farm Bill could reverse this trend
in coming years.
Canada currently has no policies to support the development of the organic
sector. Stakeholders in the organic community hope that the recent strategic
planning for the organic agriculture and food sector will lead to the
formulation of policies that include significant finanical measures for
the sector. In the summer of 2001, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada announced
$1.4 million in funding to producers of organic products, through the
Canadian Adaptation and Rural Development Fund and the Canadian Agriculture
and Food International (CAFI) Program. This should provide Canadian organic
firms with better market access and allow them to increase their knowledge
of organic agriculture. The funding was used to produce handbooks on organic
agriculture, to organize the International Federation of Organic Agriculture
Movements World Congress and to create the Organic Agriculture Centre
of Canada at the Nova Scotia Agricultural College in Truro, Nova Scotia.
In 2001, Quebec's organic sector received $350,000 in funding under federal
programs.
In Quebec, as in other places around the world, pressure from citizens
to mitigate the negative environmental impacts of traditional agriculture
has prompted the government to adopt a sustainable agriculture policy.
The policy has resulted in significant funding for various environmental
issues and has also helped the government and agricultural community to
become aware of the benefits of both sustainable agriculture and organic
farming. However, up to now, the recognition of organic agriculture has
not led to a specific policy for the sector or to direct funding measures
for organic firms.
Sustained pressure from the Filière biologique du Québec, Union des producteurs
agricoles (UPA) and the FABQ has prompted MAPAQ to establish, in cooperation
with sector stakeholders, a program to support the development of organic
agriculture, the Programme de soutien au développement de l'agriculture
biologique. The program has three components, based on development thrusts
defined by a working group established by the department. They consist
of support for the certification system, for monitoring and control of
the organic designation, for skills transfers to firms and for marketing
adapted to the organic sector. The MAPAQ program received $1 million in
funding for the 2002-2003 fiscal year. The program was renewed for $1
million a year for the next two fiscal years. MAPAQ has several other
programs which provide funding to the organic sector without targeting
it specifically such as the joint action support program reserved for
"Filière" organizations.
MAPAQ also funds access to consulting services through technical support
and agri-environmental clubs. It pays 55% of the annual fees of technical
support club members and 33% of the fees of agri-environmental club members;
the latter receive matching funding from the Conseil de développement
de l'agriculture du Québec.
The Financière agricole du Québec is currently establishing a network
of 23 liaison offers who will be better able to deal with requests from
the organic sector. Organic firms have access to funding, income stabilization,
and crop insurance programs, as well as a net income stabilization account.
Evaluation criteria used in funding programs still do not accurately reflect
the needs of organic firms and insurance programs are not adapted to the
organic sector.
In the area of farm insurance programs, the Financière agricole has decided
to look at various avenues for dealing with the organic sector, which
involve adapting existing insurance programs or creating a new program.
The organic sector now includes a substantial number of firms, enough
to envisage a separate program. Growth of the sector will therefore be
a determining factor in the issue of financial support.
To deal with the lack of financial support, some organic producers have
developed a system of direct access for consumers, which allows farms
to finance part of the year's production costs in advance.
The Quebec and federal governments are increasingly emphasizing health
and environment issues. Surprisingly, the organic sector, which provides
undisputed benefits to society in both areas, does not benefit from policies
promoting its development or from more substantial funding programs.
This seemingly contradictory situation suggests that the links between
health, the environment and organic agriculture are still not obvious
enough to governments to induce them to invest more in the sector's development.
Therefore, it is crucial, in the short term, that the sector clearly demonstrates
these links. This effort should also include demonstrating the benefits
of organic production for economic development. The time is ripe for such
a campaign, since market pressure has made the governments and the community
more receptive to consideration of the sector's financial needs.
The Quebec government provides different types of funding to the organic
sector through various programs, including one dedicated to supporting
organic agriculture. However, one program alone cannot meet the widely
divergent needs in the sector. The current environment, in which the role
of organic agriculture is being increasingly recognized, provides a powerful
incentive for the sector to get organized and seek the additional funding
it needs for its development from other government programs.
On the federal side, financial support is still very limited, if not
bordering on inexistent. Industry representatives hope that significant
trade pressures will prompt the government to establish a support structure
competitive with that in other countries. Such support is vital for the
sector's positioning on export markets. Under the new Agricultural Policy
Framework, which will govern all future actions of Agriculture and Agri-Food
Canada, no budget has been set aside for organic agriculture.
DIRECTON NO. 4 - IMPROVE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THE ORGANIC FOOD SECTOR
Strategic objective no. 1
Increase the motivation of the Quebec government and the Union des producteurs
agricoles to support the development of the organic sector by:
1. conducting a study that clearly demonstrates the social, economic
and environmental benefits that will accrue from developing organic agriculture;
2. conducting a global market study to guide the development of support
programs for the organic sector in Quebec;
3. improving statistical databases on Quebec's organic sector, particularly
data on the attainment of growth objectives defined in the strategic plan;
4. ensuring that the organic sector's financial needs are recognized
in the federal Agricultural Policy Framework.
Strategic objective no. 2
Develop measures by which the income security and crop insurance programs
run by the Financière agricole can be better adapted to the needs of the
organic sector by:
1. modifying eligibility requirements for existing programs by taking
account of organic production methods and marketing methods for organic
products;
2. carrying out studies on production costs for Quebec's main organic
products;
3. ensuring that these study results are acknowledged and taken into
account in the various support programs.
Strategic objective no. 3
Increase farm financing consultants' knowledge of the special features
of organic agriculture by:
1. disseminating information on production costs to consultants;
2. organizing training programs for consultants on financing for organic
firms.
Strategic objective no. 4
Provide financial support for the implementation of the 2004-2009 strategic
plan for the organic food sector in Quebec by:
1.determining the priority of projects to be carried out;
2. setting up high priority projects;
3.determining the main funding sources for each project and submitting
the projects to the funding programs in question;
4. increasing pressure on the Canadian government to establish financial
support programs for the organic sector;
5. establishing a link between the priorities in the Filière biologique
du Québec strategic plan and the strategic plan for the Canadian agriculture
and agri-food sector in order to obtain financial support for joint needs,
based on the Agricultural Policy Framework.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be defined as plants, animals
or microorganisms in which the genetic material has been altered using
biotechnology to confer characteristics that do not occur in nature.
The total area of cropland planted with transgenic crops around the world
increased from 2.6 million hectares in 1996 to over 50 million in 2001.
No fewer than 13 countries are involved in this type of production, with
the largest producers consisting of the United States, Argentina, Canada
and China. The transgenic production of these four countries represents
99% of the world's harvest of transgenic crops. The United States alone
produces 69% of the world total.
Although the tilled area planted with GMO crops increased rapidly from
1996 to 1998, the rate slowed significantly after this. This is due to
various factors, including the reluctance in some markets to buy these
products and lower profitability for farmers than was originally predicted.
Despite this slowdown, significant research is being carried out in this
sector, which is dominated by a handful of large agri-food firms.
Assessing the environmental risks of GMOs is not easy. So many variables
come into play that effects not seen in the laboratory may be observed
in crops in the field and, conversely, problems observed in the lab may
turn out to be inconsequential in the field. Many experts believe that,
in all cases, not only must absolute risks be assessed, but a comparison
must be made with other cultural methods that could be substituted to
achieve the characteristics or improvements that appear to be caused by
the use of GMO crops.
In North America, the contamination of nontransgenic organisms with GMOs
through naturally occurring wind or insect pollination is threatening
both crop and seed production as well as the grain trade, to the point
of handicapping our farmers on international markets. North American products
are losing ground abroad, because genetic contamination occurring through
natural pollination is impossible to prevent. North American (US and Canada)
exports to Europe and Asia have dropped significantly since consumers
in those areas are reluctant to buy products containing GMOs.
In Canada, agencies that assess and license transgenic crops and new
foods are under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Current laws
and regulations on genetic engineering in Canada contain no limitations
or restrictions to control genetic pollution, which is a growing threat,
particularly to organic farming in Canada. This situation has already
made it impossible to produce organic canola in Canada, and soybeans and
wheat could soon suffer the same fate if action is not taken soon.
7.2.1 QUEBEC'S POSITION
In general, Quebec consumers are worried about the introduction of GMOs
in the environment and the food supply. The moratorium on GMOs in the
European Union and the gradual implementation of European regulations
on the labelling and traceability of foods containing GMOs has only increased
Quebec consumers' mistrust in this respect. A number of organizations
and experts in Quebec concerned by GMOs are demanding that the government
provide reliable information on the impact of these crops on the environment.
There are also demands that genetically modified food be specifically
labelled.
In November 2000, Quebec was the first province in Canada to support
the adoption of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The main objective
of the protocol is to ensure that the transboundary movement of living
modified organisms (LMOs) does not have an adverse effect on the conservation
and sustainable use of biological diversity, given the risks to human
health as well. The protocol aims to protect biodiversity and regulate
the international trade in living modified organisms (LMOs).
In Quebec, the Department of the Environment has been given the mandate
to propose measures to protect the environment from GMOs.
7.2.2 ISSUES IN QUEBEC
According to Quebec's council on science and technology (Conseil de la
science et de la technologie du Québec), the issues around the use of
GMOs in Quebec fall under five major categories: scientific, social, economic,
political and ethical issues.
Scientific issues around GMOs involve the need to develop expertise in
Quebec in the scientific fields linked to GMOs and to develop other agricultural
technologies that provide the same benefits as those originally targeted
when developing GMOs but not the adverse effects. The environmental impacts
of GMOs on Quebec ecosystems and their socio-economic impacts must also
be taken into account by the scientific community.
Social issues around GMOs involve the need to provide the general public
with basic information on GMOs that is up to date and impartial and to
hold structured consultations to allow citizens to express their concerns
regarding GMOs.
Economic issues include the importance of evaluating the economic advantages
of currently grown GMO crops compared with other types of production.
The Conseil believes it is essential to conduct business intelligence
on an international scale to take advantage of potential opportunities
to develop specific market channels in certain markets, both GMO and non-GMO.
Political issues involve recognizing the rights of all parties involved.
According to the Conseil, Quebec must receive assurance from the federal
government that agencies the are involved in licensing and controlling
GMOs are carrying out their respective duties compently, transparently
and rigourously. In addition, Quebec must have access to its own advisors
providing guidance in strategic matters, hence the importance of building
expertise and intelligence-gathering capability on the GMO issue within
the Quebec government.
Lastly, ethical issues involve the legitimacy of human intervention on
the foundations and resolution of the controversy, corporate concentration
in the seed industry, the patentability of living organisms, the equitable
sharing of costs and benefits and reconciling collective and individual
interests.
It has now become evident that large-scale genetic contamination has
already affected non-transgenic production in Quebec. Transgenic crops
have harmed not only trade but, in many cases, the ability of the North
American agricultural sector to compete in foreign markets. Genetic contamination
represents a major threat to organic agriculture since the use of genetic
engineering is prohibited in organic farming.
Consequently, the Filière biologique du Québec plans to give priority
to the GMO issue, to prevent our organic sector from losing its competitiveness.
To do this, the Filière must formulate a clear position on protecting
Quebec's organic sector from GMOs. The Filière also intends to find ways
to protect the integrity of organic products and promote these methods
to the Quebec and federal governments. The Filière would like both levels
of government to acknowledge that GMOs pose a very serious threat to the
development of organic agriculture and to act quickly to deal with the
problem. Lastly, in partnership with other organizations in Quebec and
the rest of Canada, the organization plans to support demands to protect
non-transgenic crops, particularly organic ones, from the negative impacts
of GMOs.
DIRECTION NO. 5 - MITIGATE THE POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF GMOs ON
THE QUALITY OF, AND TRADE IN, ORGANIC FOOD.
Strategic objective no. 1
Develop ways of maintaining the organic food sector's competitiveness
on markets with respect to GMOs by:
1. documenting, for each link in Quebec's organic food system, the risks
of organic products being contaminated with GMOs;
2. comparing the situation in Quebec with the situation in the countries
that are our main competitors;
3. adopting a policy position agreed on by the entire sector;
4. bringing together representatives of each link of the organic system
to define concrete ways of protecting organic products from contamination
by transgenic crops;
5. promoting these methods with the federal and Quebec governments.
Strategic objective no. 2
Intensify demands to protect organic crops from the threat represented
by GMOs by:
1. demanding that the Quebec government declare a moratorium on the use
of transgenic crops in Quebec;
2. demanding that the Quebec government carry out an impact study on
the effects of transgenic crops on the development of the organic sector
in Quebec;
3. joining in Quebec and Canadian efforts to better control the use of
GMOs.
Strategic objective no. 3
Adapt business practices to take account of the impact of genetic contamination
on some products by:
1. promoting greater awareness among buyers of the effects of indirect
genetic pollution on some crops;
2. bringing producers, processors, certification bodies, exporters and
government representatives together to establish business practices that
take account of the impacts of genetic contamination extrinsic to and
independent of firms' operations;
3. requesting that the Codex Alimentarius Commission enact provisions
that take account of the impacts of transgenic crops;
4. developing methods to reduce the financial risks faced by organic
producers due to genetic contamination.
1. AgroExpert (2003), Guide de transition en agriculture biologique,
Fédération d'agriculture biologique du Québec, 44p. 2. Beauchemin, R.
(2002), Notes pour allocution au Colloque sur l'agriculture biologique,
édition 2002, 6 p.
3. Centre d'agriculture biologique du Québec (2002), La rubrique biologique,
vol. 1, no 1à 9 et vol 2 no 1, http://www.cab.qc.ca
4. Commission du Codex Alimentarius (1999), Directives concernant la
production, la transformation, l'étiquetage et la commercialisation des
aliments issus de l'agriculture biologique, CAC/GL 32.
5. Conseil d'accréditation du Québec, Normes biologiques de référence
du Québec, cahier VI, janvier 2001, http://www.caqbio.org/francais/normebiologique.htm
6. Conseil d'accréditation du Québec, Directives relatives à l'usage
de l'appellation biologique, 2000, http://www.caqbio.org/francais/directives.htm
7. Conseil d'accréditation du Québec (2003), Rapport annuel 2002, 19
p.
8. CRAAQ, La transition vers l'agriculture biologique, Colloque sur l'agriculture
biologique du 6 décembre 2002, résumé des conférences.
9. DATAMONITOR (2001), Next generation organics 2001, DMCM0026, 144 p.
10. Encyclopédie de l'AGORA (février 2003), dossier Agriculture biologique,
http://agora.qc.ca/mot.nsf/Dossiers/Agriculture_biologique
11. Équiterre (2002), Actes du colloque sur l'agriculture soutenue par
la communauté, 43 p. www.equiterre.qc.ca
12. Gouvernement du Canada (2001), Le marché des aliments biologiques
au Japon, Ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce international,
http://sea.agr.ca/asia/f3208.htm
13. Gouvernement du Canada (2001), Le marché des produits biologiques
au Royaume-Uni, Ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce international.
http://sea.agr.ca/europe/f2955.htm
14. Gouvernement du Canada (2000), Le marché des produits alimentaires
naturels et biologiques des États-Unis, Ministère des Affaires étrangères
et du Commerce international. http://sea.agr.ca/europe/f2955.htm
15. Gouvernement du Québec (1996), Loi et règlements sur les appellations
réservées, http://www.caqbio.org/francais/loi_appelationreservee.htm
16. Gouvernement du Québec (2002), OGM et alimentation humaine: impacts
et enjeux pour le Québec, Conseil de la science et de la technologie,
23 p. http://www.cst.gouv.qc.ca/ftp/OGM/MEMENTO-OGM.pdf
17. MAPAQ (2002), Programme de soutien au développement de l'agriculture
biologique, 9 p.
18. Option consommateurs (2001), La mise en marché des produits issus
de l'agriculture biologique, Rapport final, Bureau de la consommation,
Industrie Canada, 42 p.
19. Radius publicité - Promotion (1994), Plan stratégique de développement
- Filière biologique au Québec, 50 p.
2o. Rioux, A (2003), Renouvellement du plan stratégique du secteur biologique
du Québec, Rapport synthèse de la phase de consultation, 50 p.
21. Rioux, A (2003), Renouvellement du plan stratégique du secteur biologique
du Québec, Journée de réflexion stratégique du 27 février 2003, document
de soutien, 18 p.
22. Rod Mac Ray (ed), Plan stratégique pour le secteur agricole et agroalimentaire
canadien, version finale, Centre de l'agriculture biologique du Canada,
39 p. http://www.nsac.ns.ca/pas/staff/rma/index.htm
23. Worthington, V (2001), Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional
fruits, vegetables and grains, The journal of alternative and complementary
medecine, volume 7, numéro 2, pp. 161-173.
Participants et participantes à la phase de réflexion stratégique
1. Beauchemin, Robert, La Meunerie Milanaise inc.
2. Beauregard, Pierre, La Grande Ruche
3. Bédard, Josée, Provigo inc.
4. Blain, Geneviève, Fédération d'agriculture biologique du Québec
5. Blouin, Chantal, La Financière agricole du Québec
6. Boudreau, Janick, Sobeys Québec
7. Bouffard, Denis-Paul, Conseil d'accréditation du Québec
8. Brault, Danielle, MAPAQ -Montérégie Est
9. Brown, Robbie, Aliments naturels Tau
10. Chabot, Christiane, Conseil canadien de la distribution alimentaire
11. Champigny, Christian, Fédération d'agriculture biologique du Québec
12. Chénier, Marc, Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
13. Cossette, Christiane, MAPAQ - Bas-Saint-Laurent, secrétaire d'atelier
14. des Marchais, Sylvye, Agence canadienne d'inspection des aliments
15. Deschênes, Benoit, Centre d'agriculture biologique du Québec
16. Désilet, Germain, Fromagerie l'Ancêtre inc.
17. Dewavrin, Thomas, Les Huiles d'Amérique
18. Dion, Suzanne, Suzanne Dion inc., animatrice principale
19. Dufour, Sylvain, Fruits d'Or
20. Duhamel, Paul-Guy, Ordre professionnel des diététistes du Québec
21. Éthier, Isabelle, Agronome et consultante, animatrice d'atelier
22. Fontaine, Luc, MAPAQ-Estrie, secrétaire d'atelier
23. Fortin, Carole, Association québécoise des fruits et légumes
24. Fréchette, Julie, Certification Québec-Vrai
25. Gaudet, Pierre, Fédération d'Agriculture biologique du Québec
26. Gauthier, Guy, Syndicats des producteurs de grains biologiques
27. Gélineau, Claude, ITA de La Pocatière
28. Gionet, Lucie, Union des producteurs agricoles
29. Girouard, Benoit, Union biologique paysanne
30. Gravel, France, Garantie bio - Ecocert
31. Halde, Gilbert, Syndicat des producteurs de lait biologique
32. Hétu, Diane, Association des détaillants en alimentation du Québec
33. Huot, Marie-France, Option consommateurs
34. La France, Denis, CEGEP de Victoriaville
35. Lambert, Francine, MAPAQ - Direction de la transformation et des
marchés
36. Laverdière, Doris, Notaire et m.f.a., animatrice d'atelier
37. Legault, Christian, AgroExpert inc.
38. Letarte, Francine, La Grande Ruche
39. Letellier, Hélène, Avocate et médiatrice, animatrice d'atelier
40. Levesque, France, Collège de Sherbrooke
41. Mailhot, Jean-Pierre, MAPAQ - Direction générale de l'alimentation,
Direction des services à la clientèle
42. Marcoux, Arthur, MAPAQ - Secrétaire de la Table filière biologique
43. Marmen, Simon, Clubs conseils en agroenvironnement
44. Mimeault, Roger, Pro Organics
45. Mullier, Patrice, La Financière agricole du Québec
46. Nault, Serge, Syndicats des producteurs de grains biologiques
47. O'Breham, Richard, Mycoflor inc.
48. Paré, Frédéric, Équiterre
49. Périard, Marc Aux mille et une saisons inc.
50. Romanoff, Robert, Aliments naturels Tau
51. Roy, Alain, MAPAQ - Direction régionale de l'Estrie
52. Roy, Claire, MAPAQ- Secrétaire d'atelier
53. Roy, Pierre, MAPAQ - Direction des politiques commerciales
54. Samson, Réal, Ferme Samson et fils
55. Semmelhaack, Richard, OCIA-Québec
56. St-Vincent, Yves, Syndicat des producteurs de viandes bovines biologiques
57. Turgeon, Nicolas, MAPAQ - Direction de l'innovation scientifique
et technologique
58. Van Geenhoven, Jacques, Rachelle-Béry
59. Vary, Johanne, MAPAQ - Centre-du-Québec, secrétaire d'atelier
60. Verly, Pierre, Association Manger Santé, producteur agricole
Members of the Table filière biologique du Québec
1. Robert Beauchemin, Président de la filière, Meunerie Milanaise inc.
2. Pierre Gaudet, Vice-président de la filière, président de la FABQ
3. Arthur Marcoux, Secrétaire de la filière, MAPAQ
4. Denis-Paul Bouffard, Conseil d'accréditation du Québec
5. Christiane Chabot, Déléguée par le Conseil canadien de la distribution
alimentaire
6. Marc Chénier, Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
7. Benoit Deschênes, Centre d'agriculture biologique du Québec
8. France Gravel, Garantie Bio - Ecocert
9. Denis La France, CEGEP de Victoriaville
10. Christian Legault, AgroExpert inc.
11. Richard O'Breham, Mycoflor inc.
12. Frédéric Paré, Équiterre
13. Alain Roy, Représentant du MAPAQ
14. Réal Samson, Ferme Samson et fils
15. Richard, Semmelhaack OCIA-Québec
|