Development and Society
Corporate Social Responsibility
- Bribery and Corruption
Seventh Report to Parliament (October 2, 2006)
Implementation of the Convention on Combating
Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions,
and the Enforcement of the Corruption of Foreign
Public Officials Act
Table of Contents
Background
Canada signed the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials
in International Business Transactions (the "OECD Convention")
on December 17, 1997 and deposited the instrument of ratification
with the OECD on December 17, 1998. On December 7, 1998, it adopted
implementing legislation in the form of the Corruption of Foreign
Public Officials Act (CFPOA), which received Royal Assent on December
10, 1998. The law came into force on February 14, 1999. The CFPOA
is the main vehicle for implementation of the OECD Convention and
is intended to give tangible expression to commitments made in the
OECD and to represent Canada's legislative contribution to the international
effort to fight corruption of foreign public officials. Section
12 of the CFPOA states that the Minister of Foreign Affairs shall
cause an annual report on the implementation of the OECD Convention
and the enforcement of the CFPOA to be laid before each House of
Parliament. This is the Seventh Report to Parliament under the CFPOA.
To date, 36 states have ratified the OECD Convention, including
all original members of the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International
Business Transactions ("the Working Group"). The Working
Group comprises the 30 member states of the OECD and six non-members
of the OECD: Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Slovenia and Estonia.
Annex A to this report contains information on the ratification
status of the OECD Convention. All current members of the Working
Group (including Canada) have had their implementing legislation
evaluated as part of the peer review process. Twenty six members
have also had their enforcement mechanisms evaluated as part of
the Phase 2 review. The following is a summary document based on
Member submissions to the OECD, of steps taken and planned future
actions by other participating countries to ratify and implement
the OECD Convention, current as of July,
2006:
All Phase
I and Phase II country reports can be found here.
Enforcement of the Corruption
of Foreign Public Officials Act (the "CFPOA")
Enforcement
In February 2005, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) appointed
a commissioned officer to provide functional oversight of its anti-corruption
programs. The corruption of foreign public officials is now specifically
referenced in the RCMP Commercial Crime Program’s mandate.
The RCMP has the capability to track CFPOA cases being handled by
the Force and is confident that credible allegations reported to
other law enforcement agencies or Canadian foreign missions will
be reported through to the RCMP.
The Trade Commissioner Service of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade Canada (DFAIT) has developed specific instructions to Canadian
missions abroad, including embassy personnel, concerning the steps
that should be taken where credible allegations arise that a Canadian
company or individual has bribed or attempted to bribe a foreign
public official. In April 2004, an internal committee was established,
chaired by the Chief Trade Commissioner, to consider and review
cases where Canadian individuals or companies have been found guilty
of bribery or corruption overseas and this committee would advise
the Minister responsible. To date no cases have been referred to
the Committee.
The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) has a Protocol
for Dealing with Allegations of Corruption which clearly states
that: "situations involving allegations of criminal activity
may require referral to police authorities or other actions which
are different from the procedures outlined in this Protocol",
and includes specific internal procedures for reporting allegations
of corruption to the relevant Director and of the Director of the
Internal Audit Division for appropriate action. The Protocol ensures
a thorough assessment of the allegations regarding CIDA financing
so that senior management can ascertain whether “credible
evidence” of a violation of the CFPOA has occurred. If the
allegations are substantiated, then informing law enforcement authorities
falls within the ambit of the Protocol. CIDA has in place a policy
that requires entities wishing to take part in CIDA development
projects to declare previous corruption-related offences (see Contracting).
In order to clarify its policy on bribery, in 2004 Export Development
Canada (EDC) introduced its Anti-Corruption Policy Guidelines (a
public document) which outlines the measures EDC will apply to combat
corruption, including a section on debarring companies convicted
of bribery as well as a section on disclosure to law enforcement
authorities. Furthermore, EDC developed a detailed internal procedural
document which outlines the process for disclosure to law enforcement
where there is credible evidence of bribery. EDC also developed
a detailed internal procedural document relating to the debarment
of convicted companies, and such process essentially provides that
any party who has been convicted of bribery will be debarred from
support until EDC is satisfied that they have taken appropriate
measures to deter further bribery. Such measures include replacing
individuals who have been involved in bribery; adopting an effective
anti-corruption program; submitting to audit and making the results
of such audit available. In 2006, under the auspices of the OECD
Export Credit and Credit Guarantees Group, EDC worked with export
credit agencies to enhance the OECD Action Statement on Bribery.
In addition to providing a no-bribery declaration, exporters seeking
export credit agency (ECA)-backed support will now be required to
indicate whether they have been previously convicted of bribery,
and whether they have been debarred by the World Bank, the Asian
Development Bank, the European Development Bank or the African Development
Bank, for which the ECAs agreed to undertake enhanced due diligence.
Furthermore, ECAs agreed to ask for details about agents and commissions
should they deem it necessary as part of the due diligence process.
ECAs also agreed to do their part to raise awareness among their
exporting communities about the consequences of engaging in bribery
as well as to encourage them to develop, apply and document appropriate
management control systems that combat bribery.
Prosecution
There has been one successful prosecution under the Corruption
of Foreign Public Officials Act. Hector Ramirez Garcia, a U.S. immigration
officer who worked at the Calgary International Airport, pleaded
guilty in July 2002 to accepting bribes from Hydro Kleen Group Inc
(a company based in Red Deer Alberta). Garcia received a 6 month
sentence and was subsequently deported to the United States. Hydro
Kleen, its president and an employee, were charged under the CFPOA
with, among other things, two counts of bribing Garcia. Hydro-Kleen
entered a plea of guilty in the Court of Queen's Bench in Red Deer,
Alberta on January 10, 2005. The company admitted to one count under
s. 3(1)(a) of the CFPOA and were ordered to pay a fine of $25,000.
Two other charges against a director and an officer of the company
were stayed.
No other prosecution under the CFPOA was reported to the Department
of Justice by provincial Heads of Prosecution. Further there are
no federally-conducted prosecutions at this time.
Awareness Raising
As illustrated in previous annual reports, considerable efforts
have been made to make persons aware of the CFPOA. Officials continue
to make presentations at conferences and at various meetings in
Canada and consultations continue to take place with the provinces
and territories. More specific instances include:
-
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT) - In
the Spring 2005, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs announced
the intention to build a 21st century Foreign Ministry. Targets
were established to achieve this goal and one of the priority
items was to create a Values and Ethics Division, within the
Office of the Inspector General. The Values and Ethics Division
is the centre of expertise for DFAIT to assist employees in
developing a professional culture based on the Values and Ethics
Code for the Public Service. It aims to promote a solid culture
of values and ethics that inspires confidence in the services
provided by the Department to Canadians and in the relationships
with foreign interlocutors and governments with whom we interact.
The departmental website features material on bribery and corruption
as it relates to corporate social responsibility, including all
previous Annual Reports to
Parliament, DFAIT has been providing instructions and information
to all staff (local and abroad) on both the OECD Convention and
the CFPOA. The Seventh
Annual Report will also be made available on the departmental
web site.
Over the course of 2006 and in collaboration with stakeholders,
the government of Canada is organizing a series of roundtables across
the country to examine issues related to CSR and the Canadian extractive
industry. This multi-stakeholder process, entitled the National
Roundtables on Corporate Social Responsibility and the Canadian
Extractive Sector in Developing Countries, brings together experts
from civil society, industry, aboriginal communities and government.
At the conclusion of this process, the government will provide the
Canadian Parliament with a report, which presents recommendations
for government, NGOs, labour organizations, businesses and industry
associations on ways to strengthen approaches to managing the external
impacts of international business activities to benefit both businesses
and the communities within which they work. The discussion will
touch on a wide range of CSR-related
issues including corruption.
The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) entered
into force on December 14, 2005. Not only does this Convention adapt
some language from the OECD Convention, but by providing global
norms for the criminalization of bribery and for transnational cooperation
in related investigations, it is expected to complement enforcement
of the CFPOA. Canada signed UNCAC on May 21, 2004 and is currently
taking steps that would enable Canada to ratify.
The Department continues to provide training for its trade commissioners
and trade commissioner assistants on the CFPOA and the OECD Convention.
The Trade Commissioner Service (TCS) recently added the promotion
of corporate social responsibility (CSR), which includes counselling
Canadian businesses against engaging in foreign bribery, to its
list of roles and activities:
-
Horizons, one of the Department's trade-focussed intranet websites,
now provides information to Canadian trade commissioners on
how to counsel businesses abroad on the CFPOA and the risks
of bribery.
-
Trade Commissioners now receive information on CSR, including
the CFPOA, during ‘Serving our Clients’, a mandatory
training course for all trade commissioners preparing for an
overseas posting, which is also available to all trade staff
at headquarters.
-
Trade Commissioners abroad incorporate CSR-relevant information
and material in the face-to-face briefings they give to Canadian
clients, which includes alerting clients to Canada’s efforts
to fight corruption in international business and the existence
of CFPOA.
-
Canadian Embassies have been participating in CSR seminars
in various regions and promote the CFPOA on numerous occasions.
-
Team Canada Inc has added links on the CFPOA to its Export
Source website and has referred to it in its Step by Step Guide
to Exporting.
-
Training - In 2004, the Trade Commissioner Service Renewal
Division (BOR) led the development of a comprehensive three-day
training course entitled "The Global Learning Initiative"
(GLI) which sought to strengthen the capacity of trade program
managers in their overall management competencies and skills
which was delivered to 116 trade program managers (who serve
at Canadian missions overseas) and 19 managers who work in regional
offices across Canada. This course has since been made mandatory
for all outgoing trade program managers. At the time of this
report, all trade program managers in missions abroad and all
directors and deputy directors at regional offices in Canada
have received this course, which features a number of case studies
with broad management issues dealing with Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR). DFAIT addresses issues of bribery and corruption within
the general framework of CSR.
-
Based on the success of the GLI, the need was identified to
develop a similar course for all trade staff, not just program
managers. As a result, "The Global Learning Initiative
for International Business Development Staff Abroad" course
(GLI-2) was developed which, inter alia, aims to reinforce Canadian
policies vis-a-vis CSR. At the time of this report, 724 Commercial/Economic
staff abroad have received the GLI-2 and the goal is to train
all 1000 Commercial/Economic staff abroad by the end of fiscal
year 2006/07.
-
As part of its "New Approach" to client service delivery,
the TCS has undertaken a process to articulate and implement
its purpose, vision and six core organizational values. In order
to communicate the organization's six core values effectively
to all employees, a learning tool was developed for managers
to use as a way to introduce the values to their teams and to
help them facilitate a meaningful and engaging discussion amongst
employees. The learning tool includes questions and scenarios
for teams to discuss regarding each of the TCS's six core values
which include, inter alia, issues relating to CSR. Currently,
all new trade commissioners, as part of their introductory training,
participate in a learning session where they are introduced
to the core values and are given practical exercises to apply
TCS core values in their future work.
- The TCS is in the process of finalizing a document entitled
“Integrity Guidelines” which seeks to provide specific
guidance and direction related to the core value of integrity.
This document will be made available to all trade employees.
-
Department of Justice - in 1999 issued a publication: The Corruption
of Foreign Public Officials Act: A Guide. The Guide has been
updated to reflect amendments to the Act and has been distributed
and posted on the Department of Justice web site. The Act continues
to be featured in Chapter
33 of the Department of Justice's Federal Prosecution Service
Deskbook. The Department of Justice is also participating
in the National Roundtables on Corporate Social Responsibility
and the Canadian Extractive Sector in Developing Countries,
referred to above.
-
The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) - has
been engaged in raising the awareness of anti-corruption issues
within the Agency for several years:
-
In June 2000, CIDA published two anti-corruption documents:
an "Anti-Corruption Primer", which articulates
the parameters of corruption, its impact on development,
and reviews donor strategies, and an "Anti-Corruption
Questions and Strategies" document, which focuses more
on developing bilateral programming approaches and lessons
learned;
-
In October 2003, CIDA included mention of the CFPOA and international
anti-corruption conventions in the Governance Orientation
Program for New Development Officers (NDOs) and Locally Engaged
Professionals (LEPs);
-
In December 2003 a paper entitled "Corruption and the
Development Challenge" was drafted which examines the
effects of corruption on the success of poverty reduction
and sustainable development strategies and highlights the
importance of donor harmonization;
-
In June 2004, CIDA circulated an "Anti-Corruption Scoping
Study" within the Agency which provides an overview of
anti-corruption policy and programming activity in the Agency;
-
On February 11, 2005, CIDA hosted a seminar on Corruption
and Development Effectiveness at its headquarters; and
- The Agency has added a link to the Act to its website.
-
Export Development Canada (EDC) - has been engaged in awareness-raising
of the OECD Convention and the CFPOA. Its activities include:
-
EDC has devoted an entire page on its website to corruption
and bribery, including links to the CFPOA, the OECD Convention
and the OECD Export Credits Group Action Statement on Bribery
and Officially Supported Export Credits;
-
EDC has developed an anti-corruption brochure that is systematically
distributed to its new customers to inform them of the potential
risks they face if exposed to corrupt business practices,
and to encourage the development of corporate best practices
in this area. With the recent enhancements to the OECD Action
Statement on Bribery, EDC will be updating this brochure
to reflect those enhancements, which will include encouraging
Canadian exporters to develop, apply and document appropriate
management control systems that combat bribery;
-
At various times in the last two years, EDC has written
to its customers to inform them about the OECD Convention
and the CFPOA. EDC will be undertaking another writing campaign
to all its current customers to inform them about the recent
enhancements made to the OECD Action Statement on Bribery;
and
-
In addition to the distribution of its brochure, EDC will
continue to exploit other opportunities to communicate to
customers and will do so, for example, via articles in its
quarterly magazine, ExportWise, and/or through industry
association trade publications.
-
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) - has developed a section in its
Audit Manual to deal with the application of section 67.5 of
the Income Tax Act as it relates to outlays and expenses incurred
as a result of bribery of foreign public officials. This provision
prohibits the deduction of outlays and expenses involved in
the bribery of foreign public officials. The Investigations
Manual, which previously referred to bribery offences under
the Criminal Code, has been revised to include a reference to
the CFPOA and a link to the section of the Audit Manual that
deals with the application of section 67.5 of the Income Tax
Act. The new section in the Audit Manual "Hot Off the Presses"
which is a weekly listing of new or revised material updating
the CRA Electronic Library changes.
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) - since March 2005 the
Force has included the issue of foreign bribery generally and
the CFPOA in particular to its training of all RCMP liaison officers
before they depart for their assignments overseas. While the RCMP
has had responsibility for CFPOA enforcement as a federal statute,
specific reference to the corruption of foreign public officials
in the Commercial Crime Program mandate is intended to raise awareness
of this responsibility among investigators.
The RCMP, together with the Department of Justice and the International
Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, provided
subject matter expertise to the Canada-China Procuratorate Reform
Cooperation Project’s Symposium on the Reform of Criminal
Justice.
Contracting
In 1999, CIDA implemented an anti-corruption clause in all contracts
and contribution agreements, as well as a Protocol for Dealing with
Allegations of Corruption, which outlines internal procedures for
assessing and reporting such allegations. In response to the Acres
International case, CIDA's Contracting Management Division (CMD)
introduced a new anti-corruption clause in its contracts in December
2003. This clause requires entities wishing to enter into a contract
or contribution agreement with CIDA to declare previous corruption-related
convictions and sanctions and that entities must confirm that, in
the three years prior to signing a contract or contribution agreement,
they have not been convicted of, and are not under sanction for,
any corruption-related offence. If an entity has been convicted
or is under sanction, it will have the opportunity to make representations
to CIDA, to show that steps have been taken to counter the problem.
However, CIDA reserves the right to accept, to accept conditionally,
or simply refuse to do business with an entity convicted of, or
sanctioned for, a corruption-related offence. In addition, CMD developed
a subsequent Protocol for entities found guilty of corruption, to
be implemented if/when an entity declares a previous corruption-related
offence involving activities funded by an organization other than
CIDA.
At Export Development Canada, exporters are asked to sign anti-corruption
declarations. The wording in the declarations may be different depending
on the product in question, but generally states: "We have
not been and will not knowingly be party to any action which is
prohibited by Canada's Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act".
Further, EDC’s insurance policies and loan documents include
clauses / representations and warrants against bribery.
Tax Deductibility
The Government of Canada and all provinces deny the tax deductibility
of outlays made or expenses incurred in the bribery of foreign public
officials.
Monitoring Implementation
of the OECD Convention
The OECD Convention aims to stop the flow of bribes and to remove
bribery as a non-tariff barrier to trade. The Convention and the
1997 Revised Recommendation of the OECD Council on Combating Bribery
in International Business Transactions provide for self and mutual
evaluation by members of the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International
Business Transactions (the "Working Group"). The aim of
the review exercise is to ensure the effectiveness of national instruments
to combat bribery and that all members enjoy a level playing field.
Evaluation Process
The evaluation takes place in two phases. Phase 1 is designed to
evaluate whether the legal texts through which participants implement
the Convention meet the standards set by it, as well as initial
actions to implement the 1997 Revised Recommendation. Phase 2 studies
and assess the structures put into place to enforce national laws
and determine their practical application.
Phase 1 involves the review of each member country's implementing
legislation to determine if it meets the requirements of the OECD
Convention. All 36 members of the Working Group have undergone Phase
1 reviews.
Where a country's implementing legislation has been found not
to meet the standards of the OECD Convention, a Phase 1bis examination
is conducted to determine if legislation implemented in response
to the initial Phase 1 review meets OECD Convention standards. To
date, only Hungary and the United Kingdom have received Phase 1bis
examinations. All Phase
1 reviews are available on the OECD's web site..
During the Phase 2 examination, the Working Group evaluates, among
other things, member countries' enforcement and implementation of
their foreign bribery legislation. Phase 2 examinations involve
the completion of a questionnaire by the reviewed country followed
by an on-site visit by members of the OECD Secretariat and lead
examiners from two other OECD countries. These on-site visits constitute
a major aspect of the evaluation process, and include meetings with
government representatives as well as informal exchanges of views
with representatives of the private sector and civil society. (Each
examined country is consulted on the best manner of obtaining input
from the private sector and civil society.)
Following an on-site visit, the Secretariat, in consultation with
the lead examiners, drafts a preliminary report. The Working Group,
meeting in plenary, then reviews and adopts the report which is
later transmitted to the OECD Council.
Finland was the first country to be evaluated under Phase 2 in
2002. Since then, the Working Group has also reviewed, and approved,
Phase 2 reports for 25 countries, including Canada. All Phase 2
examinations of current members are expected to be completed by
the end of 2007.
Canada's Phase
1 Evaluation
The Working Group reviewed Canada's implementing legislation, July
8-9, 1999 and concluded that the CFPOA met the requirements set
by the Convention. The Working Group also noted that some issues
may benefit from further examination during the Phase 2 evaluation.
These include the exemption of reasonable expenses incurred in good
faith, Canada's choice not to establish nationality jurisdiction
with respect to bribery of foreign public officials, payments to
secure performance of any act of a routine nature from the purview
of the offence, and sentencing courts’ discretion in imposing
fines.
Canada's Phase
2 Evaluation
At its June 17-19, 2003 meeting, the OECD Working Group on Bribery
approved the report on the evaluation of Canada's enforcement of
its laws against foreign bribery. Overall, the report is positive
in its evaluation of Canada's fight against corruption. However,
the report makes recommendations which, in the opinion of the Working
Group, would further improve Canada's capacity to fight corruption.
These recommendations deal with the measures to prevent and detect
foreign bribery and measures to prosecute and sanction it. The Report
also identifies issues requiring follow-up by the Working Group
because of insufficient practice at the time the evaluation was
conducted to assess Canada's performance.
The OECD post-Phase 2 follow-up procedure required Canada to provide
information on its follow-up actions at a meeting of the Working
Group in March 2005, one year after the publication of the Phase
2 Report on Canada in March 2004, and a more detailed report after
two years. Canada provided an oral update at a Working Group meeting
on March 17, 2005 and provided a detailed written report at the
meeting of March 2006.
Canada's Oral Update of Implementation of the Recommendations
of the Phase 2 Examination
On March 17, 2005 Canada provided the OECD Working Group on Bribery
with an oral update on progress made in the implementation of the
recommendations arising out of Canada's Phase 2 examination. The
Chair of the Working Group indicated that Canada had made impressive
strides in the area of awareness-raising and enforcement. However,
he cited areas concerning which Canada would be asked to provide
more information:
-
Recommendation 4a) of the Phase 2 examination which recommended
that Canada consider the introduction of amendments to the Canada
Business Corporations Act (CBCA) to prohibit the making of off-the
books accounts and transactions and the use of false documentation.
-
Recommendation 6c) regarding the establishment of nationality
jurisdiction. The Working Group noted that since the Canadian
Phase 2 examination many other common-law countries have adopted
nationality jurisdiction for the foreign bribery offence. It
nevertheless recognized that the Convention does not require
members of
the Working Group to establish nationality jurisdiction for
bribery of foreign public officials. Canada, therefore, complies
with the Convention as regards jurisdiction.
Canada’s Phase 2 Follow-Up Report
In March, 2006, Canada presented its Written Follow-Up to the Phase
2 Report and the Working Group issued its response on June 21, 2006.
The Working Group found that Canada had made important steps in
a number of areas to implement the recommendations adopted by the
Working Group, including further raising awareness of the foreign
bribery offence and the OECD Convention, efforts in the area of
co-ordination among law enforcement authorities, strengthening accounting
and auditing legislation, and developments in the area of reporting
and detecting foreign bribery offences, as well as statistics gathering
for sanctions for the offence.
The Working Group expressed concern over the grounds for which
Canada can choose not to prosecute the foreign bribery offence “in
the public interest” and over the lack of nationality jurisdiction
for the offence, and encouraged Canada to adopt a policy of debarment
for applicants convicted of foreign bribery in the context of public
tenders. The Working Group also expressed surprise at the paucity
of prosecutions under the CFPOA.
Canada's Activities
as Lead Examiner
Canada and Italy were lead examiners in the Phase 2 review of
France and Canadian officials participated in the on-site visit
of France from June 23 to 27, 2003. The report
on France was adopted at the Working Group's October 2003 meeting.
Canada and France were lead examiners in the Phase 2 review of
the United Kingdom and Canadian officials participated in the on-site
visit of the UK from July 19 to 23, 2004. The report
on UK was adopted at the Working Group's March 2005 meeting.
Annex A - OECD Convention
on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International
Business Transactions - RATIFICATION STATUS
Country |
Deposit of instrument ratification/accession |
Entry into force of the Convention |
Implementing Legislation |
Argentina |
February 08, 2001 |
April 09, 2001 |
November 10, 1999 |
Australia |
October 18, 1999 |
December 17, 1999 |
December 17, 1999 |
Austria |
May 20, 1999 |
July 19, 1999 |
October 01, 1998 |
Belgium |
July 27, 1999 |
September 25, 1999 |
April 03, 1999 |
Brazil |
August 24, 2000 |
October 23, 2000 |
June 11, 2002 |
Bulgaria |
December 22, 1998 |
February 20, 1999 |
January 29, 1999 |
Canada |
December 17, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
February 14, 1999 |
Chile |
April 18, 2001 |
June 17, 2001 |
October, 2002 |
Czech Rep |
January 21, 2000 |
March 21, 2000 |
June 09, 1999 |
Denmark |
September 05, 2000 |
November 04, 2000 |
May 01, 2000 |
Estonia |
November 23, 2004 |
January 22, 2005 |
|
Finland |
December 10, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
January 01, 1999 |
France |
July 31, 2000 |
September 29, 2000 |
September 29, 2000 |
Germany |
November 10, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
February 15, 1999 |
Greece |
February 05, 1999 |
April 06, 1999 |
December 01, 1998 |
Hungary |
December 04, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
March 01, 1999 |
Iceland |
August 17, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
December 30, 1998 |
Ireland |
September 22, 2003 |
November 21, 2003 |
November 26, 2001 |
Italy |
December 15, 2000 |
February 13, 2001 |
October 26, 2000 |
Japan |
October 13, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
February 15, 1999 |
Korea |
January 04, 1999 |
March 05, 1999 |
February 15, 1999 |
Luxembourg |
March 21, 2001 |
May 20, 2001 |
February 11, 2001 |
Mexico |
May 27, 1999 |
July 26, 1999 |
May 18, 1999 |
Netherlands |
January 12, 2001 |
March 13, 2001 |
February 01, 2001 |
New Zealand |
June 25, 2001 |
August 24, 2001 |
May 03, 2001 |
Norway |
December 18, 1998 |
February 16, 1999 |
January 01, 1999 |
Portugal |
November 23, 2000 |
January 22, 2001 |
June 09, 2001 |
Poland |
September 08, 2000 |
November 07, 2000 |
February 04, 2001 |
Slovak Republic |
September 24, 1999 |
November 23, 1999 |
November 01, 1999 |
Slovenia |
September 06, 2001 (accession instrument) |
November 05, 2001 |
January 23, 1999 |
Spain |
January 4, 2000 |
March 04, 2000 |
February 02, 2000 |
Sweden |
June 08, 1999 |
August 07, 1999 |
July 01, 1999 |
Switzerland |
May 31, 2000 |
July 30, 2000 |
May 01, 2000 |
Turkey |
July 26, 2000 |
September 24, 2000 |
January 11, 2003 |
United Kingdom |
December 14, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
February 14, 2002 |
United States |
December 08, 1998 |
February 15, 1999 |
November 10, 1998 |
|