Marketplace
Murmurs is a daily blog of consumer-related
news, thoughts and missives that cross
the minds and desks of the CBC News:
Marketplace staff... |
NOTE: Marketplace
Murmurs is taking a break while I'm away
on maternity leave. Thanks for being such
loyal readers, and for passing along your
tips and comments (please keep 'em coming – contact
Marketplace with your story ideas and feedback!)
~ Until next time, Tessa |
2006
Air Canada banning pets in passenger cabin
May 12, 2006
Air Canada will become the first
airline in Canada to ban pets from its cabins,
CBC News reports.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060512_cat.jpg)
Complaints from allergy sufferer
Joanne Silver led the Canadian Society of Allergy
Immunologists to write the president of Air
Canada last year, requesting the ban.
Silver and her children survived
a terrifying flight, all because of a cat underneath
the seat in front of her on a flight to Saskatoon
two years ago.
"I started to sneeze and get
itchy eyes and my throat seized up," Silver
recalled.
A passenger across the aisle
had his cat on his lap. "I said, 'Oh
no, I'm going to die.'"
The airline has decided to enforce
a permanent ban on pets in the passenger cabin
starting Sept. 18. Guide dogs will be
the only exception. Dr. Donald
Stark pushed for the changes after boarding
a flight to Vancouver along side a pet he is
allergic to.
"Usually when an attack starts
- even if the cat or animal is moved elsewhere
in the plane - we suspect the circulation will
transfer that animal protein dander throughout
the whole plane," the immunologist said. "So
that's a problem and once the attack starts
we know it will become more severe."
Three U.S. airlines have banned
pets. In Canada, Westjet advertises
its pet-friendly policy of allowing pets in
the passenger cabin, even though cats have
been known to escape or even disappear in an
aircraft.
Some pet owners say a long trip,
even in a ventilated, temperature-controlled
cargo hold, is traumatizing for their pets. But
allergy experts say that's nothing compared
with the feeling of being unable to breathe during
an asthma attack precipitated by someone else's
pet in the cabin.
via: CBC
News
related Marketplace stories: Airport
Safety, Testing
the skies, Small
plane safety
related murmurs: Airline
complaints range from bad attitudes to bland fruit cups, Are
airlines considering standing-room-only 'seats'?, Air
Canada hikes fares on higher fuel charges, Family
files discrimination complaint against Air Canada, Airlines
to post safety records, Lost
your luggage? You've got plenty of company, Want
an aisle seat? It'll cost you, Long
flights linked to blood clots, Passengers,
crew exposed to air travel toxins: UK investigation, Air
Canada scraps North American inflight meal, Air
Canada hikes fares to pay for fuel, When
airport passenger screening fails…, Investigation
highlights security concerns at Canadian airports, Lighters
to be banned on U.S. flights, matches still a go
murmur categories: travel, health
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism travel, airlines airplanes pets health allergies
posted by Tessa | 10:05 AM (ET) | Permalink
'Better for you' options are en vogue with food makers, but are
they just a fad?
May 11, 2006
Whole wheat is in, chocolate
bars and pop are out. At least that's the
message from food makers and marketers amid
concerns over childhood obesity and raising
diabetes rates. But how much substance is
behind that message, or is it merely the
latest bandwagon for the besieged food industry
to hop aboard?
Lawmakers are working on legislation
to ban junk food from schools, lawsuits are
being filed against fast food joints … as
the Christian
Science Monitor reports, there are changes
afoot, but many are wondering how meaningful
they are:
![](https://bac-lac.wayback.archive-it.org/web/20061101174523im_/http://cbc.ca/gfx/blank.gif) |
"While
Kraft is arguably the leader in this
area among major brands, others are rushing
to join them. PepsiCo has kept its traditional
products - and still advertises them
to kids - but has stepped up development
of its 'better for you' ones. General
Mills converted all its cereal to whole
grain (though some critics still cite
high sugar content), and also created
nutrition requirements for the products
it advertises to kids.
"'We believe our actions speak
louder than words, and that our advertising
demonstrates our commitment,' says
Tom Forsythe, a General Mills spokesman.
"But not everyone agrees, and
a few critics see all such changes
as mere window dressing that still
allows big companies to push junk food
on kids." |
More
from the Christian Science Monitor…
via: Environmental
Health News
related Marketplace stories: Cafeteria Confidential, Fat Grade, Junk
Food Addiction, Sugar Surprise
related murmurs: Disney
getting out of Happy Meals over obesity concerns, U.S.
schools to become pop-free, Teenage
girls prefer pop: nutrition study, 'Say
no to pop,' Nunavut residents told, European
companies say they'll stop pitching sugar drinks to kids, Student's
bill would junk unhealthy food in school cafeterias, Soft
drink sales dip in U.S. schools, Change
junk food ads aimed at kids: report, School
nutrition programs lead to trimmer students: study Arkansas
lawmaker wants to gut state’s ‘fat grade’ program
murmur categories: food, kids, health, advertising
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism food nutrition health diet children obesity
posted by Tessa | 12:03
PM (ET) | Permalink
Airline complaints range from bad attitudes to bland fruit cups
May 11, 2006
Air passengers filed about 20
per cent more complaints with the Canadian
Transportation Agency last year, griping about
everything from the attitude of airline employees
to lost baggage.
![](https://bac-lac.wayback.archive-it.org/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060227_airplane.jpg)
The federal watchdog, which deals
with complaints that can't be sorted out between
travellers and airlines, says in a new report
about to be released that it handled more than
1,300 issues in 2005.
A spokesman, Jadrino Huot, said
the agency successfully resolves more than
two-thirds of all complaints it hears, but
some are beyond its ability to fix.
He cited the example of one man
whose luggage was lost while he was travelling
from Halifax to Toronto. It was found four
days later – but neither the bag nor
the live lobsters it contained survived the
delay.
"There's not a lot we can do
about that, and that passenger will fall into
the category of not being happy with the settlement."
Passengers should be aware of
their rights, Huot said, but they should also
know their responsibilities, and that includes
not putting live crustaceans in their suitcases.
In another case, he said, "a
passenger wanted two round-the-world tickets
because the different melons all tasted the
same in his fruit cup."
Huot said the top source of complaints
was the attitudes of both ground staff and
crew members on planes.
In second place was anything
to do with flight disruptions, including delays
and cancellations. Complaints involving lost
and damaged baggage came in third.
Huot points out that the number
of complaints filed with the Canadian Transportation
Agency is small compared to the hundreds of
thousands of people who take flights in Canada
each year.
In many cases, he said, passengers
who file complaints are looking for an apology,
not compensation.
The 2005 complaints report is
due to be released in June.
In the past, the agency has dealt
with complaints that ended up changing airline
policy.
For example, it sided with a
man who said Air Canada should not have denied
his two sons the right to board a plane when
they arrived 45 minutes before their flight.
Staff had said the boys should have shown up
an hour in advance for the May 2005 flight
from Montreal to Edmonton.
Craig McIntyre had to buy
two full-fare tickets to let the boys travel
on a later flight.
Air Canada had to give him the
money for those fares after the agency's
ruling that passengers must be allowed to board
as long as they arrive at the departure gate
25 minutes before their flight's scheduled
departure.
via: CBC
News
related Marketplace stories: Airport
Safety, Testing
the skies, Small
plane safety
related murmurs: Are
airlines considering standing-room-only 'seats'?, Air
Canada hikes fares on higher fuel charges, Family
files discrimination complaint against Air Canada, Airlines
to post safety records, Lost
your luggage? You've got plenty of company, Want
an aisle seat? It'll cost you, Long
flights linked to blood clots, Passengers,
crew exposed to air travel toxins: UK investigation, Air
Canada scraps North American inflight meal, Air
Canada hikes fares to pay for fuel, When
airport passenger screening fails…, Investigation
highlights security concerns at Canadian airports, Lighters
to be banned on U.S. flights, matches still a go
murmur categories: travel, service
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism travel, service, airlines airplanes
posted by Tessa | 10:35
AM (ET) | Permalink
Improve safety measures for drugs during pregnancy, Health Canada
urged
May 10, 2006
Health Canada should change how
it determines which drugs are safe for pregnant
and nursing women, an obstetricians group says.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060510_pregnancy.jpg)
At any given time, more than
500,000 women are pregnant or breastfeeding
in Canada, according to the Society
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
(SOGC).
Sometimes taking a drug can endanger
a pregnant woman's life or harm her unborn
child. On the other hand, failing to take certain
medications may also lead to birth defects
or even death.
To strike a balance, "we recommend
that Health Canada develop a new drug review
strategy, and create a science advisory board
responsible for providing advice and recommending
guidelines on drug therapy in pregnancy and
breastfeeding," said Dr. Donald Davis, head
of the society.
Women are often left without
the benefits of medication during pregnancy
and nursing, a vulnerable time in their lives,
said Dr. Gideon Koren, founder of the Motherisk
program at Toronto's Hospital for Sick
Children.
Backs call for new standards
If there had been a
similar "lack of vigilance" for marketing cars,
class-action lawsuits would have been filed "long
ago," said Koren. "In pregnancy, somehow … we
behave to women, we as society, as if they
were slaves 400 years ago."
Koren supports the society's
call for new federal standards for drug evaluation
during pregnancy and lactation.
Out of the 200 calls Motherisk
receives each day, up to 40 are from women
who aren't doing well because their medication
was stopped without taking the effects
into consideration, he said. Some depressed
women are hospitalized or attempt suicide, Koren
added.
He also wants the federal regulator
to monitor the effects that drugs now
on the market are having on pregnant women.
Ashley Ortega, who is eight months
pregnant with her second child, isn't taking
any chances with medications, although her
doctor said some are okay.
"Nothing can be done later, right,
if the effect has been made already," said
Ortega. "So I would just rather not risk anything
or take anything."
via: CBC
Health & Science News
related CBC Indepth: Faint Warning: How Canada tracks dangerous
drugs
related Marketplace stories: Out in the Cold, A Hard
Pill to Swallow, Drug Marketing, Drug
Trials
related murmurs: One-third
of drug safety advisers in U.S. show conflicts of interest: study, New
guidelines should improve drug testing: FDA, Advocacy
group targets drug makers with satirical ad, Adverse
drug reaction database goes online, Drugs
killing thousands of seniors yearly
murmur categories: health
tags: consumers, consumer news, consumerism, health, pregnancy, drugs, medications
posted by Tessa | 18:36
PM (ET) | Permalink
HP Sauce to be made in Netherlands, not Britain
May 10, 2006
Preferred by the likes of the
Royal Family, Britain's beloved "brown sauce" will
soon be manufactured in the Netherlands.
U.S.-based Heinz
Co. has announced that it will shut
the Birmingham plant that makes HP
Sauce in March 2007, throwing 125 people
out of work.
The American company, which bought
HP Foods last year, said the move will improve
productivity.
MORE: BrownSauce.org ("Petition
to Save the Birmingham HP Sauce Factory")
A spokesperson for the Transport
and General Workers Union called the move a "savage
decision," saying they had been told the workers' jobs
would be safe.
Developed in the early 1900s
and first sold in 1903 under the HP brand,
HP Sauce holds a Royal Warrant, meaning the
product has been supplied to members of the
Royal Family. The Royal Arms insignia on the
bottle reads: "By Appointment ... Outfitters
to HM The Queen."
Made with tamarinds, dates and
spices, HP Sauce is said to be named after
the Houses of Parliament, where it was served
in the dining room.
via: CBC
News Online
murmur categories: brands/logos, food, miscellaneous
tags: consumers, consumer news, consumerism, HP Sauce, Britain, food, Heinz
posted by Tessa | 10:58 AM
(ET) | Permalink
Food giants crafting messages against bird flu panic
May 9, 2006
Some of the world's fast food
heavyweights are carefully creating marketing
campaigns to quell anxiety over the avian flu.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060509_chicken.jpg)
Advertising
Age reports that McDonald's, El Pollo
Loco, Popeyes Chicken & Buscuits, Subway
and KFC are all waging marketing programs
to reassure consumers that chicken is safe
to eat.
Says Ad Age:
![](https://bac-lac.wayback.archive-it.org/web/20061101174523im_/http://cbc.ca/gfx/blank.gif) |
Although
an avian-flu epidemic among birds --
let alone humans -- is a long way from
hitting America, marketers are moving
to ward off a wave of fear that could
have disastrous consequences for the
$50 billion retail poultry industry.
With producers Tyson Foods and Pilgrim's
Pride already suffering slower sales,
the race is on to educate the public
as ABC-TV prepares to air this week a
disaster drama about avian flu and the
U.S. government unleashes public service
announcements about the flu. |
America's chicken producers
are so nervous about the public's avian flu
fears that they tried to convince ABC to change
the word "bird" to "pandemic" in
the title of the network's made-for-tv movie
airing tonight, "Fatal Contact: Bird Flu
in America."
The lobbying failed, but the National
Chicken Council, which represents 95%
of the country's chicken producers, did manage
to convince the network to run a disclaimer
before the movie.
via: Advertising
Age
related Marketplace story: Flu's
Gold
related murmurs: KFC
planning 'standby' ads to respond to Avian flu, Tamiflu
sales halted as personal stockpiles grow, Canada,
U.S. heed WHO flu warning, prepare for pandemic
murmur categories: health/safety, food/drink, advertising/marketing
tags: consumers, consumer news, consumerism, avian
flu, KFC, bird flu, chicken
posted by Tessa | 10:33
AM (ET) | Permalink
Fraud artist sold fake insurance to nearly 150 Yukoners
May 9, 2006
A Whitehorse woman who pleaded
guilty Monday to insurance fraud against nearly
150 clients had a 'sinking feeling' every time
she heard a police, fire or ambulance siren,
according to her lawyer.
Crown counsel David McWhinney
told a territorial court that Joanne Walker
stole about $120,000 from unsuspecting Yukoners
between late summer 2004 and July 2005 through
her company, Territories Insurance Solutions.
She issued phoney insurance policies
and letters, and even forged pink cards for
automobile insurance.
Walker paid a couple of small
insurance claims out of her own pocket to keep
the scheme from being discovered.
But when one client went shopping
for a better deal, another insurance agent
noticed the policy Walker had forged was signed
by an insurance company president who had retired
years earlier.
The court heard that investigators
found Walker in her office talking to another
potential victim when they went to seize her
records.
Walker's lawyer, Bob Dick, said
the woman fully intended to run a legitimate
business, and was simply trying to pay the
bills until she could make a deal with legitimate
insurance companies.
She had a "sinking feeling" every
time she heard an emergency siren, Dick added.
McWhinney countered that she
was simply greedy.
Walker has now paid back more
than $30,000, Dick said, and is trying to sell
her home and turn over the money to the court
so she can stay out of jail.
Dick said she has found work,
and has been putting $500 of her $1,200 a month
salary into a restitution fund.
Territorial court Judge John
Faulkner said a large restitution settlement
could have a significant impact on his decision
on whether to send Walker to prison. He's given
her until the beginning of June to put the
deal together.
She is due back in court on
June 5 for sentencing.
via: CBC
News
murmur categories: scams, money
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism insurance fraud scam
posted by Tessa | 9:23 AM
(ET) | Permalink
Disney getting out of Happy Meals over obesity concerns
May 8, 2006
Walt Disney Co. is breaking
up with fast food powerhouse McDonald's;
the studio is cutting its cross-promotional
ties with the chain in an effort to distance
itself from fast food and its links to childhood
obesity.
The L.A.
Times reports that Disney will swallow
a lot of lost revenue with the move – under
the outgoing agreement, " McDonald's
paid $100 million in royalties and conducted
11 promotions a year for Disney films, videos
and TV shows, with seven aimed specifically
toward the young Happy Meal consumers. Disney
also agreed to let McDonald's set up shop
inside its theme parks."
The last cross-promotional
arrangement between Disney and McDonald's will
take place this summer, with the release of "Cars" and "Pirates
of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest."
via: Health
the House
related Marketplace stories: Cafeteria Confidential, Fat Grade, Junk
Food Addiction, Sugar Surprise
related murmurs: U.S.
schools to become pop-free, Teenage
girls prefer pop: nutrition study, 'Say
no to pop,' Nunavut residents told, European
companies say they'll stop pitching
sugar drinks to kids, Student's
bill would junk unhealthy food in school
cafeterias, Soft
drink sales dip in U.S. schools, Change
junk food ads aimed at kids: report, School
nutrition programs lead to trimmer students:
study Arkansas
lawmaker wants to gut state’s ‘fat
grade’ program
murmur categories: food, kids, health, advertising
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism nutrition health diet school children obesity
posted by Tessa
| 12:13 PM (ET) | Permalink
Computer company beats Beatles' suit
May 8, 2006
Apple Computer can use its apple
logo on the iTunes Music Store without infringing
the trademark of Apple Corps Ltd., the Beatles'
record company, a British judge ruled Monday.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060329_apple.jpg)
Apple
Corps, owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo
Starr, John Lennon's widow Yoko Ono and
the estate of George Harrison, had accused
the California computer company of violating
a 1991 deal.
That agreement, reached to resolve
a trademark lawsuit brought by the music company,
set out areas in which each company would be
able to exclusively use their respective apple-shaped
logos. Under the deal, Apple
Computer was not to enter the music business.
Apple Corps argued that the iTunes
Music Store, which uses the Apple Computer
logo, violated that deal. The company, led
by former Beatles road manager Neil Aspinall,
sought to prevent Apple Computer from using
its logo on iTunes, considered the world's
leading music download service.
Judge Edward Mann ruled that
the logo was used in association with the store,
not the music, and didn't violate the terms
of the agreement.
"I conclude that the use of the
apple logo ... does not suggest a relevant
connection with the creative work," Mann said
in his written judgment.
"I think that the use of the
apple logo is a fair and reasonable use of
the mark in connection with the service, which
does not go further and unfairly or unreasonably
suggest an additional association with the
creative works themselves."
Lawyers for Apple Computer had
argued consumers are smart enough to tell the
difference between the logos.
Apple Corps uses a shiny green
apple as its logo, while Apple Computer has
a stylized apple with a bite taken out.
"We are glad to put this disagreement
behind us," Apple Computers CEO Steve Jobs
said in a statement.
"We have always loved the Beatles,
and hopefully we can now work together to get
them on the iTunes Music Store," he said.
During the trial, Apple Corps
revealed that the firm is preparing the
band's catalogue to be sold online for the
first time.
Any partnership will have to
wait however, as Aspinall vowed to appeal,
saying the judge had reached "the wrong conclusion."
"We felt that during the course
of the trial we clearly demonstrated just how
extensively Apple Computer had broken the agreement," he
said.
The current case was the third
lawsuit Apple Corps had filed against the computer
company.
Apple Corps first sued the
computer company for trademark infringement
in 1978. They settled in 1981.
Apple Corps sued again in
1989, claiming that the ability of Apple computers
to play MIDI music files violated the previous
settlement. The two companies settled
out of court in 1991 for a reported $26 million
US.
via: CBC
Arts & Entertainment
related CBC Indepth: Copyright and
the web
related murmurs: Apple
Corps. aims to take bite out of Apple
Computers, Downloading
doesn't hurt business: Canadian Record
Industry Association study, Digital
music sales triple in 2005, Protect
consumers' digital rights, British MPs
urged, Several
lawsuits filed against Sony over rootkit
fiasco, Revenge
of the movie industry: Authorities shut
down file-swapping site, Labels
to appeal file-swapping decision, Music
copyright case heads to Supreme Court
murmur categories: logos/branding, technology
tags:
consumers consumer news consumerism copyright technology music downloading trademark branding Apple Beatles iTunes
posted by Tessa
| 11:10 AM (ET) | Permalink
No cancer risk from aspartame, EU food safety panel finds
May 8, 2006
The sugar substitute aspartame
does not seem to raise the risk of cancer,
a review
by European food safety experts concluded
Friday.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060508_sugar.jpg)
Last year, Italian researchers
said aspartame, a sweetener commonly used
in diet pop, was linked
to higher rates of lymphoma and leukemia
in rats.
The Italian findings led an independent
group of scientists to review research on the
topic for the European Food Safety Authority.
"Our conclusion on the basis
of all the evidence currently available to
us is that there's no reason to revise the
previously established ADI [acceptable daily
intake], nor at this stage … to
undertake any further extensive review of the
safety of aspartame," the body's Iona Pratt
told a news conference in Rome.
The ADI for aspartame in
Europe is 40 milligrams per kilogram of body
weight – the equivalent of consuming
80 packets of the sweetener per day.
Reviewers found aspartame did
damage rat kidneys, but said this would not
happen in humans.
They attributed health problems
in the lab rats to chronic health conditions
rather than the aspartame.
But the Italian scientist who
led the rat study said he stands by the findings,
noting other researchers didn't distinguish
between artificial sweeteners, measure lifetime
exposure, or use a comparison group of people
who never use sweeteners as a control.
"How do you do a study on humans
when aspartame is used in 6,000 products?" Dr.
Morando Soffritti, of the Bologna-based European
Ramazzini Foundation told Associated Press. "How
do you find a population that has never used
it?"
A spokesperson for UNESDA, an
industry association representing leading pop
manufacturers, welcomed the findings of the
EU review.
Care should be taken to avoid
confusing consumers about the findings of studies
that haven't been peer reviewed, Alain Beaumont,
the association's secretary-general, said.
via: CBC
Health & Science News
related Marketplace story: Stevia, Sugar
Surprise, Chasing
the Cancer Answer
murmur categories: food, health
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism aspartame cancer diet health food research
posted by Tessa
| 10:41 AM (ET) | Permalink
Toxic technology
May 5, 2006
The computer you're using
to read this will one day be nothing more
than a pile of garbage, contaminated with
heavy metals and toxic plastic.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060505_tech.jpg)
There's lead in the keyboard,
toxic flame retardants and antimony in the
circuit boards, cadmium in the battery and
the chips, all wrapped up in a casing of
plastic that will release more deadly substances – furans
and dioxins – when it's burned.
Environment
Canada estimates that computer waste in Canada – totalling
more than 67,000 tonnes in 2005 – put 1.1 tonnes of mercury, 4.5
tonnes of cadmium and 3,012 tonnes of lead into landfills in 2005.
CBC
News Online has a fascinating look at
the problem of obsolete technology being
thrown away – a problem made worse
by consumer demand for the newest, shiniest,
most powerful things.
via: CBC
News Online
related Marketplace story: High-tech
Trash
related murmurs: Where
do computers go to die?, Environmentalists
take Apple to task over iPod
murmur categories: home, technology, environment
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism technology computers environment e-waste
posted by Tessa
| 8:49 AM (ET) | Permalink
Are companies vying to control your home PC?
May 4, 2006
How much control do you have
over your home computer? You bought it, it's
sitting on a desk inside your home, you choose
what software installed on it, right?
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060504_computer.jpg)
Security expert Bruce Schneier
has a fascinating article that says you might
not have as much control over your home PC
as you might think (here's the article on his
blog – it originally appeared on Wired.com).
![](https://bac-lac.wayback.archive-it.org/web/20061101174523im_/http://cbc.ca/gfx/blank.gif) |
"How
much control do you really have over
what happens on your machine? Technically
you might have bought the hardware and
software, but you have less control over
what it's doing behind the scenes…
"There are all sorts of interests
vying for control of your computer.
There are media companies that want
to control what you can do with the
music and videos they sell you. There
are companies that use software as
a conduit to collect marketing information,
deliver advertising or do whatever
it is their real owners require. And
there are software companies that are
trying to make money by pleasing not
only their customers, but other companies
they ally themselves with. All these
companies want to own your computer."
|
Schneier goes on to list
examples of how companies are trying to gain
access to your computer, including:
- Entertainment
software: Late
last year, Sony BMG Music Entertainment
came under fire for putting
so-called spyware on some of its pre-recorded
CDs. The spyware, which secretly
installed itself when the music CD was
played on a computer, was created to
prevent people from copying music files.
- Internet security: Schneier
points to a recent story that the firewall
in Microsoft Vista will ship with
half its protections turned off. "Microsoft
claims that large enterprise users demanded
this default configuration, but that makes
no sense," says Schneier. "It's
far more likely that Microsoft just doesn't
want adware -- and (digital rights management)
DRM spyware -- blocked by default."
Read the full essay on Schneier's
blog.
via: Schneier
on Security
more CBC Indepth: Sony and the rootkit, Copyright and
the web
related murmurs: Music
consumers aren't the enemy: artists'
coalition, RIAA
sues computer-less family for
downloading music Downloading
doesn't hurt business: Canadian
Record Industry Association study, Several
lawsuits filed against Sony over
rootkit fiasco, Two
U.S. groups suing Sony over spyware
on CDs, Sony
releases list of infected CDs, More
than half a million computers
infected in Sony CD fiasco: researcher, Sony
recalling controversial CDs
murmur categories: home, technology, privacy
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism computers PC DRM copyright security Sony technology
posted by Tessa | 13:11 PM (ET)
| Permalink
U.S. schools to become pop-free
May 4, 2006
In an effort to combat
child obesity, about 35 million students
in the United States will no longer be able
to buy regular soft drinks at school.
Major beverage distributors and
anti-obesity advocates have reached
a deal, brokered by the William
J. Clinton Foundation, to restrict the
selection in vending machines.
Only water, juice and low-fat
milks will be sold in elementary and middle
schools.
In high schools, diet soda will
still be sold, as will unsweetened teas, sports
drinks and flavoured water.
Whole milk will no longer be
offered to any schools because of its high
calorie content.
The agreement should reach an
estimated 87 per cent of the school drink market,
said Susan Neely, the president and chief executive
officer of the American
Beverage Association.
Along with her group, the deal's
signatories include industry giants such as
Coca-Cola Co., PepsiCo Inc. and Cadbury Schweppes
PLC.
Nearly 35 million students nationwide
will be affected, said the Alliance
for a Healthier Generation, which worked
with Clinton's foundation and the American
Heart Association on the deal.
"This is really the beginning
of a major effort to modify childhood obesity
at the level of the school systems," Robert
Eckel, president of the American Heart Association,
told the Associated Press.
Canadian schools have taken similar
approaches with the Canadian soft drink industry,
which has voluntarily withdrawn carbonated
drinks from primary and middle schools across
the country.
via: CBC
Health & Science News
related Marketplace stories: Cafeteria Confidential, Fat Grade, Junk
Food Addiction, Sugar Surprise
related murmurs: Teenage
girls prefer pop: nutrition study, 'Say
no to pop,' Nunavut residents told, European
companies say they'll stop pitching sugar
drinks to kids, Student's
bill would junk unhealthy food in school
cafeterias, Soft
drink sales dip in U.S. schools, Change
junk food ads aimed at kids: report, School
nutrition programs lead to trimmer students:
study Arkansas
lawmaker wants to gut state’s ‘fat
grade’ program
murmur categories: health, food/drink, kids
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism nutrition health diet school children obesity
posted by Tessa | 11:19
AM (ET) | Permalink
Retail group 'baffled' by July 1 introduction date for GST cut
May 4, 2006
A group representing Canada's
retailers is upset with the federal government's
plan to introduce its GST cut on July 1.
Diane Brisebois, the president
and CEO of the 40,000-member Retail
Council of Canada, said she is "baffled
by the fact that the GST reduction will be
effective not only on Canada Day, a statutory
holiday, but also the fact that it is a Saturday."
"In many jurisdictions, most
stores must be closed on July 1 or face fines
for operating on a statutory holiday, with
some exceptions such as designated tourist
areas or where municipal bylaws permit, which
creates an unfair playing field and lots of
confusion for consumers," she said.
Brisebois added that retailers
may not be able to get technology and telecommunications
help on the long weekend if problems with the
switch to the lower tax rate occur.
The reduction of the goods and
services tax from seven per cent to six per
cent means retailers will have to adjust their
cash registers for the new tax rate.
Prior to the budget's announcement,
the Retail Council said it had lobbied for
the government to introduce the GST reduction
on a day of slower customer traffic, not a
Friday or a Saturday.
In a poll last month of its members,
the Canadian
Federation of Independent Business found
that adjusting for the change in the GST will
cost small- and medium-sized businesses, on
average, more than $500.
via: CBC
Business News
murmur categories: money
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism shopping GST taxes Canada
posted by Tessa
| 11:01 AM (ET) | Permalink
Levis putting RFID chips in clothing tags
May 2, 2006
Levi Strauss & Co.
has come under fire from a privacy group
for putting radio-frequency identification
chips (RFID) into consumers' pants. But as
Advertising Age reports,
the company says it is just testing the controversial
technology as a means of tracking inventory,
and that it's being entirely transparent
with customers about the tags and how they're
being used.
RFID tags are used to direct
or monitor the movement of products through
their distribution from warehouse to store
shelf. While some say consumer-level applications
of RFID are years away in North America, privacy
advocates worry that
the use of RFID technology will allow corporations
and governments to track people and their activities
through their belongings.
Consumers
Against Privacy Invasion and Numbering (CASPIAN),
a consumer/privacy advocacy group in the
U.S., has been an outspoken critic of RFID
chips.
"Companies like Levi
Strauss are painting their RFID trials as
innocuous," CASPIAN said in the statement,
adding "once clothing manufacturers
begin applying RFID to hang tags, the floodgates
will open and we'll soon find these things
sewn into the hem of our jeans. ... The problem
with RFID is that it's tracking technology,
plain and simple."
via: Advertising Age
related Marketplace story: Mining
Your Business
related Marketplace murmurs: RFID
shopping robots tested in Japan, RFID
tags to measure print audiences, Navigating
the supermarket: Study maps shoppers’ paths, RFID
could make your toothpaste sing, RFID
technology won’t be regulated in U.S., European
consumers worry about use of RFID, Pub-crawling
with Big Brother, Keeping
track of the kids ... with RFID
murmur categories: services, technology, privacy
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism shopping RFID Levis privacy technology
posted by Tessa | 11:09 AM (ET) | Permalink
Rein in baby video marketing: consumer group
May 2, 2006
Companies are deceiving
the public with the marketing and advertising
of so-called "educational toys," a consumer
group in the U.S. says.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060502_baby.jpg)
Campaign
for a Commercial-Free Childhood has
filed a complaint to
the Federal
Trade Commission against Baby
Einstein and Brainy
Baby, two of the leading producers
of videos for infants and toddlers, for
false and deceptive advertising.
related
Marketplace story: Bringing
Up Brainy
The group says the companies'
branding, advertising and websites mislead
parents and exploit their desire for what's
best for their children.
"Companies such as
Baby Einstein and Brainy Baby have capitalized
on parents' desires to give their very young
children a leg up on learning and development
by deceptively and falsely marketing their
videos as educational and beneficial for
infant development," says the complaint.
"These claims are
deceptive because no [supporting] research
or evidence exists [and] preliminary research
suggests that television is a poor tool for
educating very young children."
The group also asks that the
companies' advertisements, packaging and websites
for all baby videos prominently display the American
Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) recommendation
of no screen time for children under two.
via: Advertising Age
related Marketplace story: Bringing
Up Brainy
related Marketplace murmurs: Dissecting
the advertising onslaught on the young, Kids
spend more time with media that adults spend
at work: study
murmur categories: advertising, kids, logos/branding, activism
tags:
consumers consumer news consumerism advertising children education media parenting research
posted by Tessa | 10:35 AM (ET) | Permalink
Music consumers aren't the enemy: artists' coalition
May 1, 2006
A coalition of top Canadian musicians
and the industry group that oversees the Canadian
recording industry sent out opposing messages
Monday about the development of new copyright
legislation.
![](https://bac-lac.wayback.archive-it.org/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060320_cd.jpg)
Barenaked Ladies lead singer
Steven Page led a union of Canada's top
musicians at a Toronto news conference
Monday, as they demanded a seat at the table
when the federal government drafts new copyright
legislation.
Last week, Page, members of
indie group Broken Social Scene, veteran act
Blue Rodeo and other top artists such as Sarah
McLachlan, Avril Lavigne, Randy Bachman and
Sum 41 were among those who united to form
the Canadian
Music Creators Coalition.
"For a very long
time, we – as artists – have
allowed industry groups to speak on our behalf.
We want that time to stop," Page said
Monday.
Take cues from fans,
group says
The group opposes two major
initiatives that global recording industry
groups have used to battle music piracy: suing
music fans and placing copy-protection on albums
to make it difficult or impossible to transfer
the music onto digital music players.
Taking cues from music fans
and not fighting them is what should be done,
said Canadian singer-songwriter Andrew Cash.
"The music business
has spent so much creative energy and money
fighting instead of taking a look at what
fans are really doing and trying to find
a way to swim with it," Cash told CBC
News.
The artists' coalition is not
opposed to copyright reform, the members said
Monday.
However, they are advocating
a cooperative approach that incorporates emerging
technologies, rather than a combative plan
of attack.
"We cannot afford
to have an adversarial relationship with
our fans. New technology affords fans new
ways to listen to music. We as artists...
must adapt to that," Page said.
"To say, 'See you
in court,' and then, 'See you at Massey Hall,'
isn't going to work."
CRIA seeks tougher laws
against file-sharers
For the past few years, the Canadian
Recording Industry Association, which
represents the world's major international
record labels, has been pressuring the Canadian
Heritage Department to toughen the country's
copyright laws.
The group, which says it oversees
about 95 per cent of the recordings released
in Canada, would like to see the government
sign international treaties that, among other
things, would change the law to make it illegal
to share music files for free.
This would pave the way for
lawsuits against Canadians who share high volumes
of music files, similar to lawsuits launched
in the U.S., Australia and Europe.
Graham Henderson, president
of the CRIA, believes that such measures are
necessary to protect the industry.
"For every legal
song or video file downloaded and paid for,
14 files are swapped without any compensation
of any kind," he told a lunchtime audience
at the Canadian Club in Toronto Monday.
"Canadians will continue
to steal other people's property until we
tell them it's wrong and find ways to stop
them."
Henderson also argued that artists
support this view, as he unveiled a public
service announcement that criticizes free music
file-sharing and features singer Alanis Morissette.
While some musicians agree to
make their music available for free to "seed
the marketplace," he said, "if in
Canada the only thing we're thinking about
is how to give it away, I think we're making
a mistake."
He urged Canadians to "respect
artists who want to be paid."
via: CBC Arts & Entertainment News
related CBC Indepth: Copyright and
the web
related Marketplace murmurs: RIAA
sues computer-less family for downloading
music Downloading
doesn't hurt business: Canadian Record
Industry Association study, Digital
music sales triple in 2005, Protect
consumers' digital rights, British MPs
urged, Several
lawsuits filed against Sony over rootkit
fiasco, Revenge
of the movie industry: Authorities shut
down file-swapping site, Labels
to appeal file-swapping decision, Music
copyright case heads to Supreme Court
murmur categories: technology
tags:
consumers consumer news consumerism DRM copyright technology music downloading research P2P
posted by Tessa | 17:06 PM (ET) | Permalink
Long-term study says benefits of eating fish outweigh mercury
risk
May 1, 2006
According to a new study,
the benefits outweigh the risks when it comes
to eating fish.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060501_fish.jpg)
In the past year, several studies
have shown higher than normal levels of mercury
in a variety of seafood. Mercury is a toxic
metal that can cause learning disabilities
in children and neurological problems in adults.
But a new study from the University
of Wisconsin-Milwaukee concludes that it is
more beneficial for healthy adults to keep
fish in their diets rather than avoid it .
Researchers spent 12-years looking
at Native Americans, who tend to eat 10 times
more fish than the average American. The study
found that the subjects had higher than average
levels of mercury in their bodies, but reported
few cases of illness or infection.
"There is a lot of
nutritional value in fish," John Dellinger,
professor of clinical laboratory sciences
in UWM’s College of Health Sciences,
said in a
statement. "It contains high protein,
vitamins and the fatty acid Omega 3."
Still, Dellinger cautions
that " mercury is harmful to people in large
doses, particularly to a developing fetus," and
that it remains unclear at which point levels
of mercury begin to contribute to illness in
otherwise healthy adults.
via: Environmental Health News
murmur categories: health/safety environment food/drink
related Murmurs: Tests
show mercury levels in seafood are 'high'
and 'pervasive,' Environmentalists
test Canadians for pollutants, How
many toxins are in you?
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism environment fish food pollutants chemicals toxins seafood mercury
posted by Tessa | 11:11
AM (ET) | Permalink
How to talk to a real person at Rogers Wireless
April 28, 2006
You're a Rogers Wireless
customer. You have a problem with your service – nothing
serious, nothing a quick chat with a customer
service representative can't fix. But circumventing
Rogers' automated voice phone system and
getting through to a living, breathing human
can be a heck of task.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060428_rogers.jpg)
All hail Peter Rukavina and
his generous tip
of the day:
As soon as you call Rogers' main
service number and you encounter the Rogers
Robot voice, just say "Other Options" when
he asks what you're calling about.
Rogers Robot should then ask
if you have an urgent issue. Say "Yes."
Ta-dah! Open Sesame! You're through
the maze and soon will be connected with a
living Rogers rep who will (hopefully!) be
able to solve your problem in a jiffy.
via: The
Consumerist
related Marketplace stories: Cellphone
Secrets, Underdogs, How
to Complain
related murmur: Complaining
101: How to reach a company's top dog, Fun
with telemarketers Cheating
the "Your call is important to us" system
murmur categories: activism services
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism complaining activism customer service
posted by Tessa | 11:28 AM (ET) | Permalink
Subliminal advertising (read this post) debate resurrected
April 28, 2006
Just when you thought it
was safe to watch television again…
A few decades ago there
was much anxiety over "subliminal advertising" – the
idea that companies were inserting rapid-fire
images and ideas into television and movie
content in the aim of subconsciously pushing
consumers' buy buttons.
(There was so much fear,
in fact, that the U.S. Federal Communications
Commission banned subliminal advertising
from the airwaves in 1974.)
The "research" behind
subliminal advertising was eventually
debunked and dismissed and the book was
closed on what many researchers deemed junk
science.
But this week researchers at
the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands
cracked it open again with a new study that
concludes that if conditions are right, subliminal
advertising can successfully promote a brand.
The researchers asked subjects
count letter B's on a screen – and flashed
a 23-millisecond message in the mix. One test
group was shown the words Lipton Ice; the other
was shown a meaningless jumble ("Nipeic
Tol"). After the test, more subjects from
the Lipton Ice group choose that beverage over
another popular drink (and the majority of
those from the jumbled group chose the other
drink).
More
from New Scientist…
via: MIT
Advertising Lab
murmur categories: advertising, miscellaneous
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism television TV advertising subliminal advertising research communications
posted by Tessa | 10:52 AM (ET) | Permalink
Should you buy travel insurance?
April 28, 2006
It's the last thing most of us
want to think of before we set out on that
eagerly anticipated trip, but it's an unfortunate
fact of travelling life that reality sometimes
doesn't follow the posted itinerary.
People have accidents. Or they
get seriously ill and end up in a hospital
far from home.
In that case, some of the best
medicine may be that travel health insurance
policy you were wise enough to buy before you
left.
CBC
News Online has the skinny on whether
you should buy travel insurance, what is/isn't
covered and questions you should ask when
your shopping around for the best plan. More
here.
via: CBC
News Online
related Marketplace stories: Airport
Safety, Testing
the skies, Small
plane safety
related murmurs: Family
files discrimination complaint against Air Canada, Lost
your luggage? You've got plenty of company, Long
flights linked to blood clots
murmur categories: travel, money, health
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism travel insurance health personal finanace
posted by Tessa | 10:21
AM (ET) | Permalink
Are airlines considering standing-room-only 'seats'?
April 27, 2006
As airlines join
the chorus of complaints about rising
fuel costs, one aircraft manufacturer is
reportedly shopping around an idea to cram
more bodies onto flights: a standing-room-only
section.
The New York Times reports that
Airbus has been quietly making a pitch for
a standing section on flights, in which passengers
would be "propped against a padded backboard,
held in place with a harness… The result
is an additional six seats on a typical Boeing
737 for a total of 156, and as many as 12 new
seats on a Boeing 757 for a total of 200."
Airbus flatly denies that
it's developed a standing-room-only proposal,
with one spokesperson telling
CNN that the NYT report is "crap."
via: BoingBoing
related Marketplace stories: Airport
Safety, Testing
the skies, Small
plane safety
related murmurs: Air
Canada hikes fares on higher fuel charges, Family
files discrimination complaint against Air Canada, Airlines
to post safety records, Lost
your luggage? You've got plenty of company, Want
an aisle seat? It'll cost you, Long
flights linked to blood clots, Passengers,
crew exposed to air travel toxins: UK investigation, Air
Canada scraps North American inflight meal, Air
Canada hikes fares to pay for fuel, When
airport passenger screening fails…, Investigation
highlights security concerns at Canadian airports, Lighters
to be banned on U.S. flights, matches still a go
murmur categories: travel
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism travel Airbus airlines airplanes fuel
posted by Tessa | 11:46
AM (ET) | Permalink
One-third of drug safety advisers in U.S. show conflicts of interest:
study
April 26, 2006
Industry ties are common among
advisers to the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration's panels, but their
votes wouldn't change the overall decision
to approve or reject a new drug, a new study
suggests.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060426_drug.jpg)
A consumer group, Public
Citizen's Health Research Group, reviewed the
financial ties of 221 panellists at regulatory
meetings from 2001 until 2004.
Of the nearly 3,000 panellists
appointed based on their drug expertise, 28
per cent disclosed a financial relationship
with the company making the drug under review
or a competitor, the consumer group reports
in Wednesday's issue of the Journal of the
American Medical Association.
The FDA is not required to follow
the recommendations made by outside experts
on approving a new drug, although it usually
does.
The review of common conflicts
of interest found:
- 19 per cent of consulting
involved over $10,000.
- 23 per cent of contracts
or grants exceeded $100,000.
- 30 per cent of investments
were over $25,000.
For all three types of involvement,
excluding those with conflicts would have reduced
the margin by which a drug was approved at
the majority of meetings, but the majority
opinion would remain the same, the team concluded.
"Ideally, all panels of scientific
experts advising a federal decision making
body would be free of financial conflicts of
interest with the affected companies," the
authors wrote.
"Certainly, advisory committee
members who have conflicts of interest with
higher dollar values should not be allowed
to participate."
For those with smaller conflicts
of interest, the study's authors recommend
full disclosure several days before the meeting.
The FDA weighs potential conflicts
of interest of panellists against their expertise,
a spokeswoman said.
"The FDA is committed to a strict
code of ethics and transparent process," Susan
Bro said in a statement.
Reviewing drugs on the
market
The analysis did not include
panel meetings in February 2005 on the safety
of COX-2 inhibitors such as Vioxx, which has
been linked to heart problems. It was recalled
by its manufacturer in 2004.
On Tuesday, congressional investigators
recommended the FDA gain the power to review
the safety of prescription drugs that are already
on the market.
"[The] FDA lacks clear and effective
processes for making decisions about and providing
management oversight of, post-market safety
issues," said the report by the Government
Accountability Office.
via: CBC
Health & Science News
related CBC Indepth: Faint Warning: How Canada tracks dangerous
drugs
related Marketplace stories: Out in the Cold, A Hard
Pill to Swallow, Drug Marketing, Drug
Trials
related murmurs: New
guidelines should improve drug testing: FDA, Advocacy
group targets drug makers with satirical ad, Adverse
drug reaction database goes online, Drugs
killing thousands of seniors yearly
murmur categories: health
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism medicine health FDA drug testing drug marketing
posted by Tessa | 9:33
AM (ET) | Permalink
Common pesticide linked to cancer
April 25, 2006
What you might be spraying on those pesky
dandelions could be doing more harm than good.
![](/web/20061101174523im_/http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/murmurs/gfx/20060425_pesticide.jpg)
A new study, published in the
journal Paediatrics
and Child Health, says Canada's
most popular weed killer – 2, 4-D – is "persuasively
linked" to cancer, neurological impairment
and reproductive problems.
That contradicts findings
from the federal Pest
Management Regulatory Agency, which says 2,
4-D is safe to use if consumers follow directions.
via: Toronto Star
related CBC News Indepth: Pesticides
related Marketplace stories: Chasing
the Cancer Answer, The
Pesticide Debate
related murmurs: Quebec
implements toughest pesticide rules in
North America, U.S.
streams contaminated with pesticides:
report, Environmentalists
test Canadians for pollutants, How
many toxins are in you?, Mud
flies in pesticides turf war, No
ban planned for 2,4-D: Canada's pesticide
regulator
murmur categories: home, health, environment
tags: consumers consumer news consumerism pesticides gardening Canada environment health toxins home
posted by Tessa | 9:40
AM (ET) | Permalink
MURMUR
ARCHIVES »
RSS: Subscribe to CBC News: Marketplace Murmurs
»
|