![]() ![]() |
Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site | ||||
AAFC Online | Links | Newsroom | What's New | Site Index |
PFRA Online | Staff | Programs & Services | Offices |
Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Economics of shelterbeltsGrowing shelterbelts has long been considered an effective practice to reduce soil erosion. Recent research also shows that field shelterbelts increase crop yields. It is thus now possible to plan for increased crop yields using field shelterbelts. Other benefits of shelterbelts are enhanced wildlife habitat and a more scenic landscape. Although field shelterbelts will provide these yield benefits only when the trees are mature, the question arises, "Is it worth the effort and cost to nurse a shelterbelt through the first 10-15 years until the full yield benefits are realized?" A model that evaluates the costs and benefits of a field shelterbelt through its lifespan has been developed by staff at the PFRA Shelterbelt Centre at Indian Head, Saskatchewan. Costs and benefits are determined from the time of planting the belts to the time of their removal many years in the future. Evaluation software is available to agricultural extension workers and to those producers who are equipped with IBM type computers. Contact the PFRA Shelterbelt Centr at Indian Head, Saskatchewan for information. You can, however, determine the effect of mature shelterbelts by performing a few simple calculations which can then be used in a partial budget exercise. The calculations used in this exercise are based on shelterbelt designs recommended by the PFRA Shelterbelt Centre at Indian Head, Saskatchewan. Using other designs may alter the projected figures in this exercise. What is a Partial Budget?Partial budgets are useful planning tools for deciding how a change in a specific farming operation will affect farm costs and returns. Partial Budgeting is defined as the process of examining only those costs, returns and resource needs that change with a proposed adjustment. The cost, returns and resource needs of the business that are not affected by the proposed adjustment are ignored. In performing the partial budget for shelterbelts, you weigh the advantages against the disadvantages of the proposed change. Advantages resulting from the proposed change would be added revenue and/or reduced costs. The disadvantages to the proposed change would be any added costs involved in adopting the change, or any reduced revenues that would result from the change. Assumptions Involved in CalculationsShelterbelt DesignShelterbelt design will vary by area and objective. The three most common shelterbelt designs on the prairies are single row green ash, caragana and caragana green ash combined. Two other possible shelterbelt designs here are Scots pine, and multi-species multi-purpose shelterbelts primarily for wildlife habitat. Shelterbelt characteristics have been determined through research conducted by the PFRA Shelterbelt Center, Indian Head, Sask. are listed in Table 1 (page 10). Shelterbelt Effect on Crop YieldsResearch throughout the prairies has found that crops grown in fields protected by shelterbelts will yield better than crops grown in unsheltered fields. This is due to many interacting factors including less soil erosion, lower wind speed and evapo-transpiration and higher temperatures. For the five shelterbelt designs, the base yield increase (in percentage) for wheat is listed in Table 2 (page 10). Moisture Stress FactorShelterbelts give greater percent yield increases in areas where water is a limiting factor than in areas where water is not usually a problem. The benefits also depend on soil texture, which affects the water holding capacity of the soil. The more water a soil can retain, the better the crop yield. When calculating yield increases due to sheltered crops, there must be an adjustment to the calculation that takes into account soil texture and water availability. This adjustment has been determined through research on the prairies. It is called the Moisture Stress Factor. The factors for the common soils on the prairies are given in Table 3 Crop Response FactorCrops grown on the prairies are somewhat different in their natural ability to grow under sheltered conditions. Sensitive crops like sunflowers or canola will benefit more from sheltered growing conditions than drought-hardy crops like wheat. When calculating the yield benefits for crops grown under sheltered conditions, an adjustment must be made to compensate for these differences. These adjustments are called the Crop Response Factor and are given in Table 4. Using these assumptions work through the following five steps in preparing the partial budget to determine the economic effects of having mature shelterbelts on crop land in a typical year. This publication is one of a series intended to help producers assess the economic benefits of implementing conservation practices into their operation.
SUMMARYDesigning and implementing a field shelterbelt system for your farm can yield positive economic return in the long run. Aside from the economics of growing crops near shelterbelts, there are other factors to consider when deciding to incorporate shelterbelts into your farm operation. Such considerations are as follows:
The PFRA Shelterbelt web site contains additional information about the value of shelterbelts and software you can download to assist you in assessing the economic benefits of establishing shelterbelts. AcknowledgementsThis publication was prepared by PFRA by Branik Resource in Association with the Saskatchewan Advisory Council on Agricultural Economics. PFRA thanks the many reviewers who provided valuable comments in development of the economic fact sheets. |
|||||||
|