SPECIAL STUDY

ON FEDERAL

FEMALE OFFENDERS

FROM 1995/96 TO 1999/00

July 2000

Français




Prepared by: Performance Measurement Division

National Parole Board




EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Female offenders are extremely under-represented within the federal offender population in comparison to male offenders. As of March 31, 2000, female offenders made up just 3.9% of the total federal offender population.

Over the past five years, federal female offenders have had a higher grant rate for day and full parole and unescorted temporary absence than their male counterparts. They were also more likely to be on conditional release and to successfully complete that release than male offenders were.

Female offenders were more likely to be serving sentences for either Schedule II or Schedule I non-sex offences than male offenders and less likely to be serving sentences for Schedule I sex offences.

Aboriginal female offenders were more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule I non-sex offences than other female offenders and were over-represented within the federal female offender population. They accounted for 14.6% of the female offender population compared to the Aboriginal proportion of the total Canadian population which was 2.8% in 1996. They had the lowest grant rate for day and full parole and were the least successful group on conditional release within the female offender population. They were also the only race group within the female offender population that was more likely to be incarcerated than on conditional release.

Black female offenders, who were significantly more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule II offences than other female offenders, were also over-represented within the female offender population. They accounted for 12.3% of the female offender population compared to the Black proportion of the total Canadian population which was 2.0% in 1996.1 However, they had the highest grant rate for day and full parole and were the second most successful group on conditional release within the female offender population.

Visible Minorities female offenders, who were significantly more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule II offences, were under-represented within the female offender population. They accounted for 3.6% of the female offender population compared to the Visible Minorities proportion of the total Canadian population which was 9.2% in 1996.1 They were the most successful group on conditional release within the female population.

Caucasian female offenders, who were more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule I non-sex offences, were also under-represented within the federal female offender population. They accounted for 59.7% of the female offender population compared to the Caucasian proportion of the total Canadian population which was 86.0% in 1996.1 They were more likely to be on conditional release than incarcerated.

  1. INTRODUCTION

This report provides information on the federal female offender population from 1995/96 to 1999/00. The following sections provide detailed information including race and offence profiles as well as grant rates and outcome rates for female offenders on conditional release during this period.

In reviewing this report, it is important to remember that caution should be exercised when interpreting statistics for female offenders given the small sample sizes in many areas.

2. RACE PROFILE OF FEDERAL FEMALE OFFENDERS

Female offenders comprised 3.4% (757) of the total average federal offender population of 22,173 between 1995/96 and 1999/00. This compares to their 51.3% proportion of the total Canadian population according to the 1996 Canadian population census. Female offenders were more likely to be on conditional release than male offenders (five year average 56.5% compared to 38.4%) and, of those on conditional release, almost 75% were on full parole.

However, the female offender population has been growing in recent years. While the total federal offender population has decreased 2.7% since 1995/96 (from 22,550 to 21,935), the total federal female offender population increased by 31.1% during the same period (from 649 to 851).

Table 1

Federal Female Offender Population by Race from 1995/96 to 1999/00

 

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Incarcerated

1646

43.5

326

59.1

145

31.1

47

34.3

954

42.2

174

47.1

Conditional Release

2140

56.5

226

40.9

321

68.4

90

65.7

1308

57.8

195

52.8

Total

3786

 

552

 

466

 

137

 

2362

 

369

 

% of the Total Population

 

 

14.6

 

12.3

 

3.6

 

59.7

 

9.7

 

* Other includes other, unknown and blank

While female offenders as a group continue to be significantly under-represented within the total federal offender population, female Aboriginal and Black offenders have been significantly over-represented within the female offender population.

In the 1996 Canadian population census, Caucasians represented 86% of the total population, Aboriginals 2.8%, Blacks 2% and Visible Minorities 9.2%.1 Within the federal female offender population, Caucasians represented 59.7% of the population, Aboriginals 14.6%, Blacks 12.3% and Visible Minorities 3.6%.

Table 2

Federal Female Conditional Release Population by Race from 1995/96 to 1999/00

 

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

Conditional Release

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Day Parole

335

15.6

54

23.9

41

12.8

14

15.5

184

14.1

42

21.5

Full Parole

1591

74.3

116

51.3

268

83.5

74

82.2

993

75.9

140

71.8

Statutory Release

214

10.0

56

24.8

12

3.7

2

2.2

131

10.0

13

6.7

Total Conditional Release Population

2140

 

226

 

321

 

90

 

1308

 

195

 

* Other includes other, unknown and blank

The Aboriginal female offender population has increased 117% since 1995/96 (from 70 to 152). As Table 1 indicates, they were the only female offender group that was more likely to be incarcerated than on conditional release. Of those on conditional release, just over half were on full parole.

The Black female offender population has increased 28.2% since 1995/96 (from 78 to 100). The Visible Minorities female offender population increased 194.1% during the same period (from 17 to 50). We are not sure why there has been such a large increase in the Visible Minorities female offender population. However, speculation is that more Visible Minorities females are choosing to identify themselves. Black and Visible Minorities female offenders were more likely to be on conditional release than incarcerated. Over 80% of those on conditional release were on full parole.

The Caucasian female offender population has increased 15.0% since 1995/96 (from 427 to 491). Like all the other groups, except Aboriginal female offenders, Caucasian female offenders were more likely to be on conditional release than incarcerated and most of those on conditional release were on full parole.

3. OFFENCE PROFILE OF FEDERAL FEMALE OFFENDERS BY RACE

Federal female offenders serving sentences for Schedule I non-sex offences were significantly more likely to be incarcerated than on conditional release between 1995/96 and 1999/00 while those serving sentences for Schedule II offences were significantly more likely to be on conditional release. Black and Visible Minorities female offenders were far more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule II offences while Aboriginal offenders were far more likely to be serving sentences for Schedule I non-sex offences.

Table 3

Federal Female Offender Profile by Race from 1995/96 to 1999/00

 

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Murder

Incarcerated

324

19.7

55

16.9

5

3.4

13

27.6

227

23.8

24

13.8

Conditional release

261

12.2

26

11.5

5

1.6

6

6.7

207

15.8

17

8.7

Total

585

15.4

81

14.7

10

2.1

19

13.9

434

19.2

41

11.1

Schedule I sex

Incarcerated

42

2.5

8

2.4

3

2.1

1

2.1

28

2.9

2

1.1

Conditional release

38

1.8

6

2.6

2

0.6

1

1.1

28

2.1

1

0.5

Total

80

2.1

14

2.5

5

1.1

2

1.5

56

2.5

3

0.8

Schedule I non-sex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incarcerated

725

44.0

197

60.4

33

22.7

13

27.6

409

42.8

73

41.9

Conditional release

586

27.4

138

61.1

18

5.6

13

14.4

378

28.9

39

20.0

Total

1 311

34.6

335

60.7

51

10.9

26

19.0

787

34.8

112

30.3

Schedule II

Incarcerated

368

22.4

53

16.3

95

65.5

20

42.5

148

15.5

52

29.9

Conditional release

980

45.8

42

18.6

284

88.5

66

73.3

483

36.9

105

53.8

Total

1 348

35.6

95

17.2

379

81.3

86

62.8

631

27.9

157

42.5

Non-scheduled

Incarcerated

187

11.4

13

4.0

9

6.2

0

0.0

142

14.9

23

13.2

Conditional release

275

12.8

14

6.2

12

3.7

4

4.4

212

16.2

33

16.9

Total

462

12.2

27

4.9

21

4.5

4

2.9

354

15.6

56

15.2

Grand Total

3 786

552

466

137

2 262

369

* Other includes other, unknown and blank

The offence profile of the federal female offender population from 1995/96 to 1999/00 shows that:

All female offenders

  • were least likely serving sentences for Schedule 1 sex offences

Aboriginal female offenders

  • were most likely serving sentences for Schedule I non sex offences
  • the number serving sentences for Schedule II offences increased from 4.3% of the total female Aboriginal population in 1995/96 to 27.0% in 1999/00 (from 3 of 70 to 41 of 152)

Black and Visible Minorities female offenders

  • were most likely serving sentences for Schedule II offences

Caucasian female offenders

  • were most likely serving sentences for Schedule I non-sex offences

 

4. GRANT RATES FOR FEDERAL FEMALE OFFENDERS

Federal female offenders had significantly higher grant rates for day parole, full parole and unescorted temporary absences than the total federal offender population between 1995/96 and 1999/00 (day parole 83.6% versus 68.9%; full parole 66.9% versus 40.7%; unescorted temporary absence 76.1% versus 63.1%).

In comparing the total female offender population, those females serving sentences for

Schedule I sex

  • had the highest grant rate for unescorted temporary absence

Schedule II

  • had the highest grant rates for day and full parole

Table 4

Conditional Release Grant Rates for Female Offenders from 1995/96 to 1999/00

 

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Day Parole Granted/ Directed/Continued

820

83.6

141

76.6

99

88.4

24

82.8

487

84.3

69

88.5

Full Parole Granted/Directed

672

66.9

92

48.7

126

85.1

20

87.0

366

65.7

68

78.2

Unescorted Temporary Absence Authorized

162

76.1

33

82.5

5

35.7

7

58.3

109

79.6

8

80.0

* Other includes other, unknown and blank

The table above indicates that:

  • Aboriginal female offenders had the lowest day parole and full parole grant rates of all the race groups from 1995/96 to 1999/00, but the highest grant rate for unescorted temporary absences;
  • Black female offenders had the highest day parole grant rate of all the race groups;
  • Visible Minorities female offenders had the highest full parole grant rate of all the race groups; and,
  • The grant rates for Caucasian female offenders were consistent with the total female offender population.

5. OUTCOME RATES OF FEDERAL FEMALE OFFENDERS ON CONDITIONAL RELEASE

Federal female offenders were more successful than their male counterparts on all types of conditional release (day parole 85.9% versus 82.2%; full parole 77.0% versus 68.7%; statutory release 63.7% versus 58.3%) over the last five years.

Outcome Rates by Race

Table 5

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Day Parole by Race

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

707

85.9

103

77.4

83

93.3

16

100.0

440

84.8

65

98.5

Revocation for Breach of Condition

75

9.1

19

14.3

4

4.5

0

0.0

52

10.0

0

0.0

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

31

3.8

9

6.8

1

1.1

0

0.0

21

4.0

0

0.0

Violent offences

10

1.2

2

1.5

1

1.1

0

0.0

6

1.2

1

1.5

Total recidivism

41

5.0

11

8.3

2

2.2

0

0.0

27

5.2

1

1.5

Total Completions

823

 

133

 

89

 

16

 

519

 

66

 

*Other includes other, unknown and blank

Table 6

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Full Parole by Race

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

436

77.0

35

56.4

84

85.7

12

92.3

266

76.9

39

83.0

Revocation for Breach of Condition

89

15.7

16

25.8

10

10.2

0

0.0

58

16.8

5

10.6

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

37

6.5

9

14.5

4

4.1

1

7.7

21

6.1

2

4.3

Violent offences

4

0.7

2

3.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

0.3

1

2.1

Total recidivism

41

7.2

11

17.7

4

4.1

1

7.7

22

6.4

3

6.4

Total Completions

566

 

62

 

98

 

13

 

519

 

47

 

*Other includes other, unknown and blank

Does not include those with life or indeterminate sentences

Table 7

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Statutory Release by Race

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

All

Aboriginal

Black

Visible Minorities

Caucasian

Other*

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

303

63.7

67

54.0

27

65.8

1

100.0

195

67.0

13

68.4

Revocation for Breach of Condition

124

26.0

43

34.7

10

24.4

0

0.0

66

22.7

5

26.3

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

38

8.0

14

11.3

4

9.8

0

0.0

20

6.9

0

0.0

Violent offences

11

2.3

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

10

3.4

1

5.3

Total recidivism

49

10.3

14

11.3

4

9.8

0

0.0

22

10.3

1

5.3

Total Completions

476

 

124

 

41

 

1

 

291

 

19

 

* Other includes other, unknown and blank

The revocation for breach of conditions rate for federal female offenders was lower than the rate for male offenders in all conditional release categories (day parole 1.4% less; full parole 1.0% less; statutory release 2.8% less).

Female offenders were also revoked less often for a new offence than their male counterparts, the differences being most dramatic in the full parole category (revocation for a non-violent offence 6.5% versus 12.3% for male offenders; revocation for a violent offence 0.7% versus 2.3% for male offenders).

Female Aboriginal offenders were less likely to successfully complete any form of conditional release and were more likely to be revoked for breach of conditions or a new non-violent offence then any other female offender race group.

Black and Visible Minorities female offenders had significantly higher successful completion rates on day parole and full parole than other race groups.

Caucasian female offender outcome rates were consistent with the total female offender population.

Outcome Rates by Offence Profile

Table 8

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Day Parole by Offence Profile

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

Murder

Schedule I sex

Schedule I Non-sex

Schedule II

Non-scheduled

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

91

94.8

11

84.6

217

79.8

290

91.5

98

78.4

Revocation for Breach of Condition

4

4.2

2

15.4

37

13.6

15

4.7

17

13.6

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

1

1.0

0

0.0

11

4.0

10

3.1

9

7.2

Violent offences

0

0.0

0

0.0

7

2.6

2

0.6

1

0.8

Total recidivism

1

1.0

0

0.0

18

6.6

12

3.8

10

8.0

Total Completions

96

 

13

 

272

 

317

 

519

 

Table 9

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Full Parole by Offence Profile

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

 

Schedule I sex

Schedule I Non-sex

Schedule II

Non-scheduled

 

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

 

 

9

64.3

104

71.7

239

83.3

84

70.0

Revocation for Breach of Condition

 

 

4

28.6

31

21.4

38

13.2

16

13.3

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

 

 

1

7.1

7

4.8

10

3.5

19

15.8

Violent offences

 

 

0

0.0

3

2.1

0

0.0

1

0.8

Total recidivism

 

 

1

1.7

10

6.9

10

3.5

20

16.7

Total Completions

 

 

14

 

145

 

287

 

120

 

Does not include those with life or indeterminate sentences

Table 10

Outcome Rates for Female Offenders on Statutory Release by Offence Profile

from 1995/96 to 1999/00

Results

 

Schedule I sex

Schedule I Non-sex

Schedule II

Non-scheduled

 

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Successful Completions

 

 

9

100.0

183

59.4

60

73.2

51

66.2

Revocation for Breach of Condition

 

 

0

0.0

93

30.2

16

19.5

15

19.5

Recidivism (revocations with offence)

Non-violent offences

 

 

0

0.0

22

7.1

6

7.3

10

13.0

Violent offences

 

 

0

0.0

10

3.2

0

0.0

1

1.3

Total recidivism

 

 

0

0.0

32

10.4

6

7.3

11

14.3

Total Completions

 

 

9

 

308

 

82

 

77

 

 Female offenders serving sentences for:

Murder

  • had the highest successful completion rate on day parole

Schedule I sex

  • had the highest successful completion rate on statutory release

Schedule I non-sex

  • were most likely to be revoked for breach of conditions while on any kind of conditional release
  • had the highest recidivism rate for new non-violent or violent offences in the day parole category

Schedule II

  • had the highest successful completion rate on full parole

Non scheduled

  • had the highest recidivism rate for a new non-violent offence in the full parole and statutory release categories