![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMISSIONER'S DIRECTIVECLASSIFICATION OF INSTITUTIONS
[
Policy Objectives |
Classification of Institutions |
Classification within Institutions |
Inmate Behaviour |
Security Requirements |
Minimum Security Institutions |
Medium Security Institutions |
Maximum Security Institutions |
Special Handling Units |
Annex A - Security Classification of the Service's Institutions ]
1. To create environments in which:
CLASSIFICATION OF INSTITUTIONS 2. The Service shall classify its institutions, with the exception of community offices, as minimum security, medium security, maximum security, maximum security (special handling unit) and multiple level security. Community Correctional Centres are classed as minimum security, but due to their role in the community they are not required to conform to all minimum security standards. The institutions and their classifications shall be set out in Annex A of this directive. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of the region shall review annually the security levels of the institutions to ensure that they are consistent with the regional inmate population profile. CLASSIFICATION WITHIN INSTITUTIONS 4. Institutions may be operated as multi-level institutions as directed by the Commissioner or if they are remote from other regional institutions. Within these institutions, distinctions may be made between programming and privileges extended to the different security levels. 5. At all security levels, inmates are expected to abide by the established rules and regulations of the Service and the institution, and to respect the rights of others such that their behaviour does not impact negatively upon the security and liberty of others. 6. Behavioural norms define expected behaviour for inmates at each security level. The degree to which individual behaviour compares to these expectations suggests to staff the need for appropriate intervention strategies designed to motivate the inmate to change his or her behaviour. In some circumstances, these strategies may include transfer to a more appropriate security level. 7. Security measures in place at any institution shall reflect the degree of control required to maintain the good order of the institution and to protect staff, inmates and the public. Objectives 8. The minimum security institution will:
Behavioural Norms 9. Minimum security inmates should:
Security 10. The perimeter of a minimum security institution will be defined but not directly controlled. Inmate movement and association will be regulated but with little or no staff supervision. Arms will not be retained in the institution. 11. The medium security institution will:
Behavioural Norms 12. Medium security inmates should:
Security 13. The perimeter of a medium security institution will be well-defined, secure and controlled. Inmate movement and association will be regulated and generally supervised. Although arms will be retained in the institution, they will not normally be deployed within the perimeter. Objectives 14. The maximum security institution will:
Behavioural Norms 15. Maximum security inmates should:
Security 16. The perimeter of a maximum security institution will be well-defined, highly secure and controlled. Inmate movement and association will be strictly regulated and directly supervised. Arms will be retained in the institution and may be deployed within the perimeter. Objectives 17. The special handling unit will:
Behavioural Norms 18. Special handling unit inmates should:
Security 19. The perimeter of a special handling unit will be well-defined, highly secure and strictly controlled. Inmate movement and association will be strictly regulated and rigidly controlled. Arms may be deployed within the perimeter. Acting Commissioner, Original signed by : ANNEX A
|
ATLANTIC REGION | |
Name | Security Classification |
Institutions Atlantic Dorchester Nova Institution for Women Shepody Healing Centre Springhill Westmorland Community Correctional Centres Carlton Annex Community Correctional Centre Carlton Community Correctional Centre Newfoundland and Labrador Community Correctional Centre Parrtown Community Correctional Centre |
Maximum Medium Multi-level Multi-level Medium Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum |
QUEBEC REGION | |
Name | Security Classification |
Institutions Archambault Federal Training Centre Regional Mental Health Centre Regional Reception Centre 1 Cowansville Donnaconna Drummond Joliette Institution LaMacaza Leclerc Montée Saint-François Port-Cartier Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines Community Correctional Centres Hochelaga Community Correctional Centre Laferrière Community Correctional Centre Marcel Caron Community Correctional Centre Martineau Community Correctional Centre Ogilvy Community Correctional Centre Sherbrooke Community Correctional Centre |
Medium Minimum Multi-level Maximum Medium Maximum Medium Multi-level Medium Medium Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum |
1 Includes Special Handling Unit
ONTARIO REGION | |
Name | Security Classification |
Institutions Bath Beaver Creek Collins Bay Fenbrook Institution Frontenac Grand Valley Institution for Women Isabel McNeill House Joyceville Kingston Penitentiary Millhaven Pittsburgh Regional Treatment Centre Warkworth Community Correctional Centres Hamilton Community Correctional Centre Keele Community Correctional Centre Portsmouth Community Correctional Centre |
Medium Minimum Medium Medium Minimum Multi-level Minimum Medium Maximum Maximum Minimum Multi-level Medium Minimum Minimum Minimum |
PRAIRIES REGION | |
Name | Security Classification |
Institutions Bowden Bowden Annex Drumheller Drumheller Annex Edmonton Edmonton Institution for Women Grande Cache Grierson Centre Okimaw Ohci Healing Lodge Pê Sâkâstêw Centre Regional Psychiatric Centre Riverbend Rockwood Saskatchewan Penitentiary Stony Mountain Willow Cree Healing Lodge Community Correctional Centres Oskana Community Correctional Centre Osborne Community Correctional Centre |
Medium Minimum Medium Minimum Maximum Multi-level Minimum Minimum Multi-level Minimum Multi-level Minimum Minimum Multi-level Medium Minimum Minimum Minimum |
PACIFIC REGION | |
Name | Security Classification |
Institutions Ferndale Fraser Valley Institution Kent Kwìkwèxwelhp Healing Village Matsqui Mission Mountain Pacific Institution Regional Treatment Centre William Head Community Correctional Centres Chilliwack Community Correctional Centre |
Minimum Multi-level Maximum Minimum Medium Medium Medium Multi-level Multi-level Minimum Minimum |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() |
Last Updated:
2004.12.03
|