Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Français Contact UsHelpSearchCanada Site
CIHR HomeAbout CIHRWhat's NewFunding OpportunitiesFunding Decisions
CIHR | IRSC
CIHR Institutes
INMHA Home
About INMHA
INMHA Funding
INMHA Showcase
INMHA Publications & Resources
Strategic Plan
Annual Reports
Newsletter
Research Reports
Workshop Reports
Other Publications
Archived News
INMHA Calendar of Events
Contact INMHA
 
INMHA > INMHA Publications & Resources > Workshop Reports

Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction (INMHA)

Report on the workshop on the suicide-related research in Canada - Montreal, February 7-8, 2003

This report was prepared for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Health Canada by Strachan-Tomlinson, Ottawa, Ontario. The report is a reflection of the workshop proceedings and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the CIHR or Health Canada.

Contents

Introduction

The Current Situation

Suicide-Related Research Themes

Cross-cutting Research Priorities

Potential Suicide-Related Research Themes

1. Data Systems: Improvement and Expansion

2. Evidence-based Practices

3. Mental Health Promotion

4. Multidimensional Models for Understanding Suicide-Related Behaviour

5. Spectrum of Suicidal Behaviours, including Suicide Attempters

6. Suicide in Social and Cultural Contexts

Implementation

A. Clinicians/Practitioners

B. First Nations, Inuit and Métis

C. Government

D. Non-Governmental Organizations

E. Researchers

Next Steps

Closing Remarks

Appendix #1: Participants

Appendix #2: Key Terms

Appendix #3: Acronyms

Appendix #4: A Strategic Research Framework

Introduction

The purpose of the Workshop on Suicide-Related Research in Canada, held in Montreal February 7-8, 2003, was to develop a national, collaborative agenda on research related to suicide in Canada. Specific objectives were:

  1. To review the range of suicide-related research in Canada and internationally
  2. To identify and establish themes that will guide suicide-related research over the next 10 years
  3. To support multidisciplinary collaboration in research and knowledge translation.

This workshop brought together 43 practitioners, researchers and representatives of non-governmental organizations, Aboriginal communities, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR1) and Health Canada for an exploratory consultation focused on the development of a national agenda on research focused on both suicide and suicide-related behaviour.

Dr. Kevin Keough, Chief Scientist, Health Canada, opened the workshop. He noted Health Canada's interest in good science as a basis for its mandate of improving the health of Canadians. He also commented on the continuing interest of Health Canada in suicide-related research. He noted that despite its small population, Canada has the same problems as larger countries in relation to suicide, but without the resources of those countries to address these challenges. This situation makes partnerships and linkages essential to Health Canada as a means to maximize research and science resources. "There is a need to focus on what we do best, to encourage others to do what they do best, and to find better ways to partner where partnership is the best way to achieve an objective." He noted the special role that the Canadian Institutes of Health Research play in both research funding and partnership development.

Dr Keough emphasized that Health Canada has the sixth largest health delivery system in the country via its role in relation to Aboriginal peoples2. He noted the significant challenges for his department in this area and the need to engage with other organizations and researchers to address this problem.

In closing, Dr. Keough thanked participants for taking the time to contribute their expertise to defining a national suicide-related research agenda.

Dr. Richard Brière, Assistant Director, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction (INMHA), welcomed participants on behalf of CIHR. He noted that this workshop was the result of a collaboration among Health Canada and six of the 13 CIHR Institutes, all of whom are looking forward to the workshop's outcomes.

Dr. Brière noted that the workshop was planned to encourage a diverse representation of researchers and other stakeholders covering the spectrum of suicide-related research. He emphasized the importance of this diversity: to a unique degree, suicide-related research crosses the CIHR pillars focused on applied clinical, health systems and services and societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations. Dr. Brière noted that the goal was to develop a research agenda that could be used as a basis for a CIHR-INMHA Request for Applications (RFA) in the manner of the agenda developed at the Canadian Tobacco Control Research Summit (April, 2002). He hoped that this workshop would provide participants with an opportunity to contribute to the development of both the RFA and a broader suicide-related research agenda for Canada.

The Current Situation

To help provide context for the workshop, participants shared their impressions of the three background documents prepared for the workshop:

Following are some key points that emerged during their discussions:

Given that these background documents were prepared for discussion purposes during this workshop, and the recognition by participants that they could be revised and expanded, Health Canada will consider options for their future use and reference.

Suicide-Related Research Themes

Participants worked in small groups to develop potential suicide-related research themes. These themes were further developed during plenary discussions. Participants also defined research priorities that cut across theme areas.

For the purposes of this workshop, themes were defined as suicide-related research areas or applications that are central to the reduction of suicide in Canada. Themes tend to cross disciplines, determinants of health and CIHR research pillars. They may vary in scope but should be focused enough to enable the identification of appropriate approaches or methodologies.

Cross-cutting Research Priorities

Potential Suicide-Related Research Themes

Participants developed the following potential suicide-related research themes (in alphabetical, not priority order).

1. Data Systems: Improvement and Expansion

The improvement and expansion of data systems depends on a strong classification system, reliability and the elimination of biases. Data should be comprehensive, e.g., include information on both completed suicides and suicidal behaviours.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

*

*

**

**

Comments:

B. Determinants of health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

*

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

*

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

*

Gender

*

Physical Environments

*

Culture

*

Comments:

Information variables are required from all categories; however, the problems vary for each determinant, e.g., the system or database needs to link correlates and outcomes to individuals in order to establish strengths of association.

C. Potential Research Questions3

D. Potential Methodologies

Discussion

2. Evidence-based Practices

Research on evidence-based practices includes the evaluation of interventions (ranging from clinical treatments, public education and professional/volunteer training to systems-level interventions, policy changes, and strategies for improving knowledge translation and uptake). The focus of evaluative studies can be broad, including the impact on practice and community responses. Research under this theme may also address the determination of what constitutes acceptable influence, and as such will likely use (and examine the use of) methodologies that extend well beyond Random Clinical Trials to include various qualitative and quantitative approaches as well as indigenous knowledge. Also eligible would be studies of how suicide research and the development of evidence-based practices are influenced by current peer review and ethics review processes, and research into the nature of evaluation in this subject area, including its intent and utilization.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

*

**

**

**

Comments:

B. Determinants of Health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

*

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

*

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

*

Gender

*

Physical Environments

*

Culture

*

Comments:

C. Potential Research Questions

D. Potential Methodologies

Discussion

3. Mental Health Promotion

The Mental Health Promotion theme includes components such as actualization, advancement, the development and dissemination of culturally and community-appropriate information. It also covers community capacity, community-based initiatives and cultural continuity at multiple levels, e.g., individual/family/community/ nations. Research topics include protective factors, risk factors and resiliency over the life span and address issues related to discrimination, care for the caregiver (the wounded healer), social competence, shame, stigma and the perception of mental illness. The focus is on a problem-solving approach that is based on efficacy and excellence and that acknowledges the need for growth and fulfillment of human potential. Positive psychology and the effects of social supports and isolation should also be considered under this theme.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

 

*

**

***

B. Determinants of health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

*

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

  

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

*

Gender

*

Physical Environments

*

Culture

*

Comments:

C. Potential Research Questions

D. Potential Methodologies

Discussion

4. Multidimensional Models for Understanding Suicide-Related Behaviour

Multidimensional models can be community- and theory-driven, but must be based on theoretical models and multi-dimensional approaches. Models must (a) address more than one factor and (b) explore interactions among factors. There is a need to encourage (but not require) interdisciplinary themes. The focus must be broader than suicide, i.e., it should cover the spectrum of suicide-related behaviour. Priority should be given to projects where design, methodology and measurement across different domains.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

*

*

*

*

B. Determinants of health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

*

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

*

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

*

Gender

*

Physical Environments

*

Culture

*

Comments:

C. Potential Research Questions

D. Methodologies

Discussion

5. Spectrum of Suicidal Behaviours, including Suicide Attempters

The spectrum of suicidal behaviours includes aborted, attempted and assisted suicide, attempts disguised as accidents, deliberate self-harm, euthanasia, the hastening of death through life-threatening or self-injurious behaviour, suicidal gestures, suicidal ideation and suicide threat. It includes non-fatal/sub-intentional attempts, premature death, risk behaviour, screening identification. There is a need for mutually-accepted operational definitions for terms such as parasuicide.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

*

*

*

*

B. Determinants of health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

*

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

*

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

*

Gender

*

Physical Environments

*

Culture

*

Comments:

C. Potential Research Questions

D. Potential Methodologies

Discussion

6. Suicide in Social and Cultural Contexts

The incidence of suicide in Canada varies dramatically as a function of institutional, regional, social, spiritual, cultural and political contexts. It is critical to develop new knowledge about how these contextual factors have an impact, not only on the incidence of suicide, but on determining what constitutes best practices in the prevention of suicide and in responding to suicide-related social and human problems.

The emphasis is on a) availability across institutions, regions and cultural/ethnic groups, and b) interactions between local and dominant values.

A. Research Pillars most relevant to this theme/area

Basic biomedical, e.g., genetic, molecular, cellular, tissue physiology

Applied clinical, e.g., drugs, devices, social intervention

Health systems, health services, e.g., health care quality, cost-effectiveness

Societal, cultural and environmental influences on health and the health of populations

*

**

***

****

B. Determinants of health most closely linked to this theme/area

Determinants

Check (*)

Determinants

Check (*)

Income and Social Status

*

Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills

*

Social Support Networks

**

Healthy Child Development

*

Education

*

Biology and Genetic Endowment

*

Employment/ Working Conditions

*

Health Services

*

Social Environments

***

Gender

**

Physical Environments

*

Culture

****

Comments:

C. Potential Research Questions

Research questions concerned with the theme of culture must emphasize variability across groups in suicide rates, attitudes, and values towards suicide or suicide recovery and what constitutes best intervention practices. Examples include:

D. Potential Methodologies

In addition to other more standard social science methodologies, cultural studies must make legitimate room for culturally appropriate methods that:

Knowledge transfer (in the sense of ongoing collaborative knowledge production involving the community) and collaborative community capacity building assume special importance in doing research with identifiable cultural groups.

Discussion

Implementation

For the purposes of this workshop, a community of interest in relation to implementation was a specific group of people who:

Communities represented at the workshop included:

Each of these groups discussed the nature of their community, potential benefits of a national strategy for their community, current strengths, supports and opportunities, challenges and recommendations, and contributions.

A. Clinicians/Practitioners

This community represents service providers who are at the front-line of the health care system and the "receiving end" of knowledge transfer. Some practitioners are active participants in research endeavours, while others are completely outside and may have a certain skepticism towards research. The community is diverse and multidisciplinary: geographically, its members practice in a variety of locations and there is great variability in terms of numbers. Demand always exceeds resources, an issue that leads to problems related to overwork and burn-out. Mental health resources are consistently under-resourced both in terms of funding and practitioners. Some of the professions within the community have governing standards.

Potential Benefits of a National Research Strategy for this Community

Group members concluded that this community has a lot to gain from effective research.

Current Strengths, Supports and Opportunities

Research Agenda: Challenges and Recommendations

Challenge

Recommendations

Recruitment of subjects for research, e.g., ethical challenges

  • Build relationships among researchers and clinicians to increase level of trust.

  • Compensate practitioners for participating in research.

Skepticism among service providers related to research relevance, timeliness, context-specificity.

  • Develop stronger partnerships between researchers and practitioners.

  • Involve practitioners in defining research questions.

  • Increase the emphasis on translation of research, e.g., communicating findings in other media besides research journals.

  • Provide opportunities for clinicians to raise questions and open channels of communication, e.g., through a "knowledge-broker."

  • Identify a "research foreman" to oversee implementation of knowledge transfer.

What This Community Can Contribute

B. First Nations, Inuit and Métis

This community includes all First Nations, Inuit and Métis populations5, e.g., youth elders, men and women in urban, rural, remote, and transient settings, as well as language-speakers vs. non language-speakers and Aboriginal mental health researchers. It recognizes the differences among different nations of Aboriginal people on one reserve or in one location, e.g., Six Nations: Mohawk, Cayuga, Oneida, Seneca, Tuscarora, and Onondaga.

The community also includes Aboriginal peoples who are living according to their tradition and those who may be regarded as "westernized" or "Christianized." The federal government relates to this community through Health Canada, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC), Justice Canada, Solicitor General, National Defence, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Department of Veteran Affairs and their partners. At the provincial/ community level, the community relates to provincial departments responsible for education, children's services, health, mental health and addictions services, as well as Justice, Solicitor General, Human Resources Development (Social Services), Regional Health Authorities and Regional Children's Authorities.

Research funding for the community comes through CIHR and its scientific institutes led by the INMHA which chooses its partners to consult (for example, CIHR-IAPH/CIHR-IGH, etc.). Other funders include the Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH).

It is essential for federal, provincial and territorial (F/P/T) governments to work together to make this research agenda a national success.

Potential Benefits of a National Research Strategy for this Community

Current Strengths, Supports and Opportunities

Research Agenda: Challenges and Recommendations

Challenges

Recommendations

Finding out what works

  • Conduct solution-focused, "lived experience" research to understand what facilitates healing for suicidal Aboriginal people.

Lack of Aboriginal mental health researchers

  • Structure research initiatives to focus on capacity building in First Nations communities, e.g., First Nations research assistants, co-investigators, collaborators.

Knowledge Transfer

  • Ensure that knowledge transfer is done in a practical, culturally relevant way that makes it accessible and useful in First Nations communities.

Impact of Privacy Legislation, PIPEDA, Health Information Act and others on research

  • Address barriers to research and to implementation, e.g., among F/P/T, RCMP, Military, Solicitor General and Justice.

  • Recognize different world views among communities. The right of communities to be healthy should be considered a value that trumps privacy legislation, which restricts ability of researchers to have easy access to data and to share it.

Ethics Review process (EAB) related to suicide research

  • Foster an understanding of differing world views

  • Encourage community-based and driven research and the community's interest in setting research questions.

Peer review process, especially in Aboriginal communities

  • Open the peer review process to a wider group of reviewers so that Aboriginal knowledge, understanding and ethical views are considered as part of a transparent process that possesses excellent peer-reviewed, evidence-based research.

Systemic issues related to data collection

  • Work with communities to address issues related to discrimination and marginalization.

Competing priorities and political will among F/P/T governments

  • Encourage coordination of government priorities at all levels.

Gate keepers

  • Encourage openness and collaboration.

Capacity to do research in and with Aboriginal communities.

  • Train more Aboriginal people to develop the skills to conduct research in and with their communities

  • Provide funding and resources to facilitate training.

Overwhelmed and under-resourced front-line workers

  • Provide increased support and adequate training to front-line workers to handle complex and distressing situations.

  • Ensure that knowledge transfer is helpful and culturally appropriate.

  • Change universities' evaluation processes for researchers, e.g., 25% should be based on how well researchers' findings were returned back to the community.

Multi-disciplinary approaches

  • Involve all subgroups within a community.

Lack of adequate resources and services

  • Develop a resource book in conjunction with the community.

What This Community Can Contribute

Involvement of First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities in developmental stages is crucial. Suicide is an issue of very serious concern in and among Aboriginal communities so it is important that the CIHR and Institute of Aboriginal Peoples' Health continue to be involved in the development of any RFA/RFI and that, as policy and research develop, Aboriginal people continue to be involved. The views of Aboriginal health professionals, scientists and researchers should be heard together with participation by CIHR and IAPH.

C. Government

The government community includes primary F/P/T stakeholders such as Health Canada, CIHR, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Statistics Canada, provincial/territorial governments, Assembly of First Nations. Other F/P/T government stakeholders include the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Justice Canada, RCMP and the Solicitor General, social services departments, Human Resources and Development Canada, Department of National Defence, Department of Veterans Affairs, central agencies, Treasury Board, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and other public research funders, and departments of education.

Policy and program development and administration, including research program development through CIHR, are important activities of this community. Jurisdictional issues are recognized as potentially problematic to a national research agenda.

Potential Benefits of a National Research Strategy to this Community

Current Strengths, Supports and Opportunities

Research Agenda: Challenges and Recommendations

Challenges

Recommendations

Privacy legislation limiting access to data

  • To be developed

Coordination across many partners and jurisdictions, e.g., dual responsibilities; problem of dual advocacy

  • Develop program level linkages

  • Bring key issues to decision makers at higher levels.

Competing priorities in the face of many demands, e.g., ensuring political will and buy-in

  • Continue to build awareness and networks.

  • Share the best available information.

  • Build on emerging opportunities.

Increasing research funding

  • Build inter-Institute support.

  • Foster partnerships and networks.

First Nations, Inuit and Métis buy-in

  • Consult with First Nation, Inuit and Métis leaders and organizations.

  • Build capacity in First Nation, Inuit and Métis communities.

What This Community Can Contribute

collaboration with researchers and other partners

-facilitation of meetings like this one

-in-kind support for development of research proposals, e.g., data support, expertise

-network building, e.g., bringing researchers and other stakeholders together across Canada.

D. Non-Governmental Organizations

This community serves common groups of people/stakeholders and has a public service role (e.g., to constituent communities, practitioners and researchers) as a broad-based community voice. Non-government organizations (NGO) have a common interest in health prevention/promotion and in the continuum of mental illness. They function as part of a larger health care team and have a special role as distributors and disseminators of information. Their activities include advocacy and fundraising. NGO are often volunteer-based, which helps stimulate a creative, innovative and self-starting environment. They deliver a message and support its development, but are not necessarily a part of the research (e.g., NGO generally do not have direct links to universities).

Potential Benefits of a National Research Strategy to this Community

Current Strengths, Supports and Opportunities

the current political climate favours strategic development, e.g., there is interest in putting together larger national interests and efforts and moving towards a national strategy; associations such as CASP and the Canadian Alliance on Mental Health and Mental Illness (CAMIMH) are calling for a national suicide prevention strategy

Research Agenda: Challenges and Recommendations

Challenges

Recommendations

Adequate funding for individual projects and research institutes. NGO can't currently access research funding as they're not directly attached to a university.

  • Leverage the NGO capacity for brokering relationships among partners and shareholders.

  • Act as a catalyst: develop a compelling case for funding support in this area.

Coordination among CIHR, CIHI, Health Canada, and Statistics Canada

  • Decide on long-term leadership for this initiative, e.g., future planning beyond an RFA.

F/P/T Jurisdictional Issues

  • Hold intergovernmental meetings to discuss issues related to effective F/P/T relationships and how to address them.

What This Community Can Contribute

capacity for dissemination of results and knowledge transfer

experience in advocacy and fundraising

the ability to mobilize compelling case stories/profiles to speak on behalf of those affected by suicide.

E. Researchers

The research community includes researchers, universities, student populations, non-university affiliated researchers, support staff, research associates and administration. It is a diverse community that has (a) different cultures, backgrounds and social and professional organizational structures, and (b) different needs and drives, depending on whether or not a researcher is regarded as "established."

There is considerable competition within the community. At the same time, members share common research needs and a commitment to suicide-related research in Canada. They also share a belief in the value of enquiry, of searching for evidence that will help to reduce suicide in Canada.

Research is both Canadian and multi-national. The broader community includes more "contemporary" community-based research. The demographic is largely white, male and middle-aged, but this may be changing. Research Ethics Boards play a role in ethical issues.

Potential Benefits of a National Research Strategy to this Community

Current Strengths, Supports and Opportunities

Research Agenda: Challenges and Recommendations

Challenges

Recommendations

Foster a collaborative, suicide-related research environment in Canada that is multi-site, multi-regional, multidisciplinary and links research at all levels.

  • Establish collaborative networks and multi-site research centres.

  • Provide long-term funding for the development and support of consortia and collaborative projects.

  • Support cross-site training.

  • Expand international collaboration and open funding possibilities with collaborative research in other countries.

  • Incorporate qualitative and quantitative research.

  • Develop integrated francophone and anglophone research teams.

  • Maintain balance among the pillars of research.

Ethical Issues

  • Develop guidelines to address ethical issues in working with people at risk, e.g., facilitate protocol development through REBs.

Evaluation

  • Facilitate the process of evaluation, e.g., find competent evaluators, particularly for proposals submitted in French.

The academic reward system does not support some necessary activities such as knowledge transfer.

  • Revise CIHR grant awards to recognize this situation.

  • Work with universities to evaluate the importance of these activities.

Grant mechanisms do not facilitate the formation of community research partnerships

  • Facilitate funding to communities to work with and engage researchers to develop projects.

What This Community Can Contribute

Next Steps

Participants emphasized the importance of collaborative action on recommendations in this report.

Closing Remarks

Dr. Rémi Quirion, Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction, thanked the group for their energy and passion at this important first meeting. He emphasized that this was the beginning of the process and hoped that he could count on participants to help move it forward, e.g., through talking to others in the community to get their buy-in.

Dr. Quirion confirmed that CIHR will develop an RFA on suicide-related research once funding becomes available in the next fiscal year and asked participants to provide their advice when the draft RFA is developed. He also encouraged participants to explore other ways in which CIHR could be helpful, e.g., through the open competition for knowledge transfer grants, by suggesting other types of grants such as training grants or community alliance programs, or the cross-cutting initiative on intentional and unintentional injuries, which includes suicide and related behaviours. He suggested that the new CIHR concept of Centres for Health Innovation might be useful to the area of suicide-related research, as well as other possible avenues of funding such as the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the National Centres of Excellence program. He emphasized that Aboriginal peoples are particularly important to CIHR; INMHA and IAPH will be holding a joint Institute Advisory Board meeting in June, 2003. In closing, Dr. Quirion acknowledged the importance of collaboration and mutual support in furthering the Canadian health research agenda in suicide.

1 A list of acronyms used in this report can be found in Appendix #3.

2 For the purposes of this report, "Aboriginal peoples" includes First Nations, Inuit and Métis

3 Research questions are not in priority order.

4 Participants discussed perspectives on gender and identity and noted a need for clarification of the relationship between the two.

5 This section represents a summary of individual submissions by Aboriginal participants. These participants recognized the diversity of their cultures and expressed discomfort with the idea of speaking for their communites. This summary should not be viewed as representative of the views of the entire Aboriginal community.

Appendix #1: Participants

Dr. Roger Bland
Professor, Psychiatry
University of Alberta
Room 1E7.07
Walter McKenzie Centre
8440 112th Street
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7
Tel: (780) 407-6570
Fax: (780) 407-6672
E-mail: roger.bland@ualberta.ca

Ms. Michele Bourque
Programs Officer
Mental Health and Addictions Division
First Nations and Inuit Health Branch
20th Floor, Room B2016
Jeanne Mance Building
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Tel: (613) 957-1477
Fax: (613) 954-8107
E-mail: Michelle_Bourque@hc-sc.gc.ca

Dr. Richard Boyer
Centre de recherche Fernand-Séguin
7331 Hochelaga (Unité 218)
Montréal, Québec H1N 3V2.
Tel : (514) 251-4015 Ext. 2344
Fax : (514) 251-5404
E-mail: Richard.Boyer@umontreal.ca

Dr. Jean-Jacques Breton
Child Psychiatrist/Researcher
Rivière-des-Prairies Hospital
Fernand-Séguin Research Centre
7070 Perras Boulevard
Montréal, Québec H1E 1A4
Tel:(514) 323-7260 ext: 2290
Fax: (514) 323-4163.
E-mail: jj.breton.hrdp@ssss.gouv.qc.ca

Dr. Richard Brière
Assistant Director
Institute of Neurosciences
Mental Health and Addiction
Douglas Hospital
6875 Lasalle Blvd.
Verdun, Québec H4H 1R3
Tel: (514) 761-6131 ext. 3930
Fax: (514) 888-4060.
E-mail: richard.briere@douglas.mcgill.ca

Dr. Jean Caron
Psychosocial Division
Douglas Hospital Research Centre
6875 Lasalle Blvd.
Verdun, Québec H4H 1R3
Tel: (514) 761-6131 ext 3445
Fax : (514) 762-3049
E-mail: jean.caron@douglas.mcgill.ca

Dr. Francois Chagnon
Assistant Director
Centre for Research and Intervention
on Suicide and Euthanasia (CRISE)
University of Quebec in Montreal
305 Christin Street, Room DS4815
Montréal, Québec H2X 1M5
Tel: (514) 987-3000
E-mail: chagnon.francois@uqam.ca

Dr. Michael Chandler
CIHR & MSFHR Investigator
Professor, Department of Psychology
The University of British Columbia
2136 West Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4
Tel: (604) 822-2407
E-mail: chandler@interchange.ubc.ca

Dr. John Cutcliffe
Chair of Nursing
University of Northern British Columbia
3333 University Way
Prince George, British Columbia V4N 2Z9
Tel: (250) 906-0013
E-mail: dr.johnr@shaw.ca

Mr. Norman D'Aragon
Executive Director
First Nations Suicide Prevention Association,
164 Seigniory. Apt. 806
Pointe-Claire, Québec H9R 1K1
Tel: (514) 693-5577
Fax: (514) 693-5586
E-mail: ndaragon@sympatico.ca

Dr. Simon Davidson
Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics
Department of Psychiatry
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
401 Smyth Road
Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1
Tel: (613) 737-7600 Ext. 2723
Fax: (613) 737-2257
E-mail: Davidson@cheo.on.ca

Ms. Helen Gardiner
Evaluation Services Manager
Research and Evaluation Program
Alberta Mental Health Board
Northland Professional Building
#206-4600 Crowchild Trail N.W.
Calgary, Alberta T3A 2L6
Tel: (403) 297-4599
Fax: (403) 297-4617
Email: helen.gardiner@amhb.ab.ca

Ms. Gina Girard
Researcher Psychologist
Mental Health Services
Hédard Robichaud Building
22 St-Pierre Blvd. East
Caraquet, New Brunswick E1W 1B6
Tel: (506) 726-2954
Fax: (506) 726-2422
E-mail: gina.girard@gnb.ca

Dr. Phil Groff
Manager, Research Development & Evaluation
SmartRisk
Suite 401, 790 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1N8
Tel: (416) 596-2718
Fax: (416) 596-2700
E-mail: pgroff@smartrisk.ca

Ms. Margaret Herbert
Acting Chief, Injury and Child Maltreatment Section
Health Surveillance and Epidemiology Division
A.L. 0701D
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L2
Tel: (613) 952-2217
Fax: (613) 941-9927
E-mail: margaret_herbert@hc-sc.gc.ca

Dr. Marnin J. Heisel
Senior Instructor of Psychiatry (Psychology)
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
Department of Psychiatry
300 Crittenden Blvd.
Rochester, New York 14642-8409
Tel: (585) 275-8025
Fax: (585) 273-1082
E-mail: Marnin_Heisel@URMC.Rochester.edu

Ms. Mary Jardine
National Executive Director
Parkinson Society of Canada
4211 Yonge Street, Suite 316
Toronto, Ontario M2P 2A9
Tel: (416) 227-9700 ext. 230
Fax: (416) 227-9600.
E-mail:mary.jardine@parkinson.ca.

Mr. Rick Kennedy
Director, Marketing and Development
Canadian Mental Health Association
2160 Yonge Street, 3rd floor
Toronto, Ontario M4S 2Z3
Tel: (416) 484- 7750
Fax: (416) 484-4617
E-mail: rken@cmha.ca

Dr. Kevin Keough
Chief Scientist
Health Canada
Office of the Chief Scientist
Tunney' Pasture
Ottawa, On K1A 0K9
Tel. (613) 941-3003
Fax (613) 941-3007
Email: megan_davis@hc-sc.gc.ca

Dr. Laurence J. Kirmayer
Professor & Director
Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry
McGill University
Editor-in-Chief
Transcultural Psychiatry. Director
Culture & Mental Health Research Unit
Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry
Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital
4333 Cote Ste. Catherine Road
Montréal, Québec H3T 1E4
Tel: (514) 340-7549 Office (M W F)
Fax: (514) 340-7503
E-mail: laurence.kirmayer@mcgill.ca

Dr. Antoon Leenaars
Psychologist
Private Practise
880 Ouellette Avenue, Suite 7806
Windsor, Ontario N9A 1C7
el: (519) 253-9377
Fax : (519) 253-8486
E-mail: draalee@wincom.net.

Dr. Alain Lesage
Centre de recherche Fernand-Séguin
Hôpital L-H Lafontaine
Unité 218, 7401 Hochelaga
Montréal, Québec H1N 3M5
Tel: (514) 251 4015 ext. 2365
Fax : (514) 251 5404
E-mail: alesage@ssss.gouv.qc.ca

Dr. Paul Links
Professor of Psychiatry
University of Toronto
Arthur Sommer Rotenburg
Chair in Suicide Studies
St. Michael's Hospital
30 Bond Street, Suite 2010, 2 DS
Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8
Tel: (416) 864-6099 ext. 2689
Fax: (416) 864-5996
E-mail: paul.links@utoronto.ca

Mr. Tom Lips
A/Manager
Senior Policy Advisor
Mental Health Promotion Unit
Health Canada
AL1907C1
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B4
Tel: (613) 954-8662
Fax: (613) 946-3595
E-mail: tom_lips@hc-sc.gc.ca

Ms. Allison MalcolmProgram Consultant
Mental Health Promotion Unit
Health Canada
AL1907C1
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B4
Tel: (613) 954-8662
Fax: (613) 946-3595
E-mail: Allison_Malcolm@hc-sc.gc.ca

Dr. Yang Mao
A/Director
Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control
Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division
Health Canada
AL 0601C1, Room 1367
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L2
Tel: (613) 957-1765
Fax: (613) 941-2057
E-mail: Yang_Mao@hc-sc.gc.ca

Ms. Heather McCormack
Senior Policy Analyst
First Nations And Inuit Health Branch
Health Canada,
21st Floor, Room 2157C,
Jeanne Mance Building,
Tunney's Pasture
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Tel: (613) 957-1096
ax: (613) 957-1118
E-mail: heather_mccormack@hc-sc.gc.ca.

Dr. Rod McCormickAssociate Professor
Department of Education and Counselling Psychology
2125 Main Mall
Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4
Tel: (604) 822-6444
Fax: (604) 822-2328
E-mail: rod.mccormick@ubc.ca

Dr. Brian Mishara
Director
Centre for Research and Intervention on Suicide and Euthanasia (CRISE)
University of Quebec in Montreal
C.P. 8888 Succursale centre-ville
Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8
Tel: (514) 987-4832
E-mail: mishara.brian@uqam.ca

Dr. Barb Paulson
Department of Education Psychology
University of Alberta
6-102 Education North
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G5
Tel: (780) 492-5245
E-mail: barb.paulson@ualberta.ca

Dr. Michel Preville
Professeur agrégé
Département des sciences de la santé communautaire
Université de Sherbrooke
Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Sherbrooke
1036 rue Belvedere sud
Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 4C4
Tél : (819) 821-1170 Ext. 2636
Fax: (819) 829-7141
E-mail: mprevill@courrier.usherb.ca

Dr. Rémi Quirion
Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addictions
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Douglas Hospital Research Centre
6875 Blvd Lasalle
Verdun, QC H4H 1R3
Tel. 514-761-6131 ext 2934
Email: quirem@douglas.mcgill.ca

Dr. Richard Ramsay
Faculty of Social Work
University of Calgary
2500 University Dr. N.W.
Professional Faculties Building, Room 3256
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Tel: (403) 220-4218
Fax: (403) 282-7269
E-mail: ramsay@ucalgary.ca

Ms. Danielle Saint-Laurent
Coordonnatrice de l'Unité connaissance-surveillance
Institut national de santé publique
945 rue Wolfe, 3e étage
Sainte-Foy, Québec G1V 5B3
Tél: (418) 646-5754
Tél: (418) 650-5115 poste 5700
E-mail: danielle.st.laurent@inspq.qc.ca

Dr. Monique Séguin
Professeur
Université du Québec en Outaouais
283 Blvd. Alexandre Taché
Hull, Québec J8X 3X7
Tél: (819) 595-3900 ext. 2260
Fax: (819) 595-2250
E-mail: danielle.st.laurent@inspq.qc.ca

Ms. Bronwyn Shoush
Director, Aboriginal Justice Initiatives (AJI)
Alberta Justice
Solicitor General
10th floor, J.E. Brownlee Bldg.
10365-97th Street
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3W7
Tel: (780) 422-2779
Fax: (780) 427-4670
E-mail: bronwyn.shoush@gov.ab.ca

Dr. Michel Tousignant
Professor
CRISE
Université du Québec à Montréal
305 Christin Street
Room DS4815
Montréal, Québec H2X 1M5
Tel: (514) 987-3000 Ext. 4846
E-mail: tousignant.michel@uqam.ca

Dr. Gustavo Turecki
Director
McGill Group for Suicide Studies
Douglas Hospital
McGill University
6875 LaSalle Blvd.
Verdun, QC H4H 1R3
Tel. (514) 761-6131 Ext. 2369
Fax: (514) 762-3011
E-mail: gustavo.turecki@mcgill.ca

Mr. Phil Upshall
President
Mood Disorders Society of Canada
Suite 736, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, Ontario N1G 4W4
Tel: (519) 824-5565
Fax: (519) 824-9569
E-mail: mdsc-sthc@sympatico.ca

Ms. Gayle Vincent
Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention
c/o Centre for Suicide Prevention
#320-1202 Centre Street S.E.
Calgary, Alberta T2G 5A5
Tel: (403) 245-3900
Fax: (403) 245-0299
E-mail: gayle@suicideinfo.ca

Mr. Robert Watt
Director
Ajunnginiq Centre (Inuit)
National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO)
56 Sparks Street, Suite 400
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5A9
Tel: (613) 237-9462
Fax: (613) 237-1810
E-mail: rwatt@naho.ca

Dr. Cornelia Wieman
CENSUS
Centre for Suicide Studies
Douglas Hospital
McGill University
449 Onondaga Townline Road
Caledonia, Ontario N3W 2G9
Tel: (519) 445-2143
Fax: (519) 445-2529
Cell: (905) 520-1933
E-mail: tinel@sympatico.ca

Dr. Jennifer White
Consultant
Apt. 202, 1285 West 11th Ave.
Vancouver, B.C. V6H 1K6
Tel: (604) 874-6310
Email: jenhumewhite@hotmail.com

Ms. Loretta Wong
Team Lead
Research Planning and Resourcing
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
410 Laurier Avenue W.
9th Floor, AL 4209A
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W9
Tel: (613) 954-0526
Fax: (613) 941-1040
E-mail: lwong@cihr.ca.

Mr. Gregory Zed
Schizophrenia Society of Canada
30 Moffat Ave
Sussex, New Brunswick E4E 1E8.
Tel: (506) 432-2046
Fax: (506) 432-2046
E-mail: greg.zed@gnb.ca

Consulting Group:
Strachan-Tomlinson and Associates
31 Euclid Avenue
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 2W2
Tel: (613) 730-1000
Report on Questionnaires: Paul Tomlinson
Facilitation: Dorothy Strachan
Meeting Report: Peter Ashley

Appendix #2: Key Terms

Collaboration: is a process through which parties who see different aspects of a problem can constructively explore their differences and search for solutions that go beyond their own visions of what is possible. Collaboration involves joint problem solving and decision making among key stakeholders in a problem or issue.

Four features are critical to collaboration:

  1. the stakeholders are interdependent

  2. solutions emerge by dealing constructively with differences

  3. decisions are jointly owned

  4. stakeholders assume collective responsibility for the future direction of the domain.

In collaboration it is common to have:

Collaboration is a distinctly different process than coordination and cooperation.

Coordination
formalized, defined relationships among organizations

Cooperation
informal trade-offs and agreements established in the absence of formal rules

Collaboration
an emergent and evolving process of building substantive agreement

Both coordination (formalized process) and cooperation (informal process) often occur as part of a collaborative process. Once initiated, collaboration creates a temporary forum within which participants can seek consensus about a problem, invent mutually agreeable solutions and develop collective actions for implementation.

Barbara Gray. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. Jossey-Bass Publishers, London, 1989, 5. Adapted.

Community

Consensus

Substantial agreement. The degree of consensus that has been achieved is measured by asking participants to express one of the following positions:

Silence is not interpreted as consent.

Key questions to determine consensus are:

If unable to answer "yes" to these questions, a participant is asked,

Innovation

The degree to which new approaches are used for solving problems and exploiting opportunities in research, and/or the degree to which the research will focus on new types of important or potentially important issues. (See also the Industry Canada Paper "Achieving Excellence" at http://www.innovationstrategy.gc.ca/)

Innovative Research

Research initiatives which produce something new that will have a significant impact in an area.

Knowledge Translation (KT)

Within a complex system of interactions, knowledge translation (KT) is the process that transfers research results from knowledge producers to knowledge users for the benefit of Canadians. Moving beyond the traditional domain of academic publication, it comprises three interlinked components: knowledge exchange, synthesis, and ethically sound application. The goal of KT is to improve health processes, services, and products as well as the health-care system itself. It employs broad-based and often interactive mechanisms of uptake, dissemination, and debate and entails a complex set of interactions among producers, users and contexts. (CIHR)

Network

Individuals, groups and organizations working collaboratively in support of mutually agreed-upon goals, principles and benefits.

Partnership

For the purpose of this workshop, a partnership is a relationship involving two or more parties who have agreed to work collaboratively toward the goal of addressing an issue or a set of issues. A partnership requires the sharing of power, work, support, resources and information with others. A partnership accrues benefits to each partner while fostering an achievement of ends which are mutually acceptable. Three common types/levels of partnership are: principal, collaborating and consulting.

Stakeholders

Stakeholders are organizations or individuals who have a strong interest in the success of the strategic research agenda.

Appendix #3: Acronyms

ACPS Association canadienne de prevention du suicide
ACS Association québécoise de suicidologie
AFN Assembly of First Nations
AFSP American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
AHFMR Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
CAMHI Canadian Alliance on Mental Health and Illness
CASP Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention
CCDPC Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control (Health Canada)
CCHS Canadian Community Health Survey
CCSA Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse
CDC Center for Disease Control (US)
CFPC College of Family Physicians of Canada
CHEO Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
CHSRF Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
CIES Cenre d'information et d'éducation sur le suicide
CIHI Canadian Institute for Health Information
CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health Research
CMHA Canadian Mental Health Association
CNA Canadian Nurses Association
CPG Clinical Practice Guidelines
CPHA Canadian Public Health Association
CQRS Conseil québéois de la recherché sociale
CRISE Centre for Research and Intervention on Suicide and Euthanasia/Centre de recherché et d'intervention sur le suicide et l'euthanasie
CRSH Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines
ECT Electroconvulsive therapy/électroconvulsothérapie
ERIC Educational Resources Information Centre
FAS/FAE Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal Alcohol Effects
FNIHB First Nations and Inuit Health Branch, Health Canada
F/P/T Federal/Provincial/Territorial
FRSQ Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec
FTE Full Time Equivalent
GEREQ Quebec Electronic Data Management and Clinical Site Network
HC Health Canada
HRDC Human Resources and Development Canada
HSFC Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
IAPH Institute of Aboriginal Peoples' Health
INAC Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
INMHA Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
INSMT Institut des neurosciences, de la santé mentale et des toxicomanies
IRSC Instituts de recherche en santé au Canada
ISA Institut de la santé des Autochtones
IT Information Technology
ITK Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami
MHPU Mental Health Promotion Unit, Health Canada
MLA Member of the Legislative Assembly
MNC Métis National Council
MP Member of Parliament
MRC Medical Research Council
MSSS Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux
NAHO National Aboriginal Health Organization
NGO Non-government Organization
NIH National Institutes of Health (US)
NSSP National Strategy for Suicide Prevention
OCAP Ownership, Control, Ownership and Possession
OMS Organisation mondiale de la santé
ONG Organisme non-gouvernmental
PIPEDA Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
RCMP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
RCTs Randomized Clinical Trials
REB Research Ethics Board
REFIPS Réseau international francophone de prevention des traumatisms et des accidents
RFA Request for Applications
RFI Request for Information
RFP Request for Proposal
RSSS Réseau de la santé et des services sociaux
SAF/EAF Syndrome de l'alcoolisme foetal/effets de l'alcoolisme foetal
SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
SC Santé Canada
SIEC Suicide Information and Education Centre
SPAN Suicide Prevention Advocacy Network
SSHRC Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
UPSM Unité de la promotion de la santé mentale
VRQ Valorisation-recherche Québec
WHO World Health Organization

Appendix #4: A Strategic Research Framework

A. Themes

For the purposes of this workshop, themes are suicide-related research areas or applications that are central to the reduction of suicide in Canada. Themes tend to cross disciplines, determinants of health and CIHR research pillars. They may vary in scope but should be focused enough to enable the identification of appropriate approaches or methodologies.

B. Implementation

Created: 2003-10-03
Modified: 2003-10-06
Print