CEPA 1999 Annual Report : April 2003 to March 2004
| TOC | Previous
| Next |
7 Controlling Pollution and Managing Waste (Part 7)
Part 7 provides the Minister with authorities to deal with substances
that have not been assessed or designated toxic under CEPA 1999 but have
the potential to harm the environment or human health.
7.1 Nutrients
Nutrients are defined as substances that promote the growth of aquatic
vegetation. Inputs of nutrients in the form of nitrogen and phosphorus
to aquatic ecosystems as a result of human activity can result in excessive
aquatic plant growth, depletion of oxygen and deleterious changes in abundance
and diversity of aquatic organisms. This "eutrophication"
process poses a serious threat to the biodiversity and health of coastal
waters in Canada as well as freshwater systems. CEPA 1999 provides the
authority to regulate nutrients in cleaning products and water conditioners
that degrade or have a negative impact on an aquatic ecosystem.
In May 2003, Environment Canada completed a draft scoping assessment
to evaluate the possibility of implementing a guidance framework on nutrient
management for the nearshore marine environment - specifically, estuaries.
Based on preliminary evaluation of data, the average nutrient concentrations
were found to be higher on the west coast, but more extreme concentrations
were found on the east coast. Work to develop the framework and address
the gaps identified in the scoping assessment is expected to assist with
management approaches, such as determination of critical load values or
threshold loading amounts.
In October 2003, Environment Canada completed a guidance framework entitled
Canadian Guidance Framework for the Management of Phosphorus in Freshwater
Systems. Although phosphorus is not directly toxic in fresh waters,
it does cause aesthetic impairments and can cause depletion of dissolved
oxygen. The phosphorus framework offers a tiered approach where phosphorus
concentrations should not exceed predefined "trigger ranges";
and phosphorus concentrations should not increase more than 50% over the
reference levels.
www.ec.gc.ca/ceqg-rcqe/English/whatsnew/default.cfm#sbs
7.2 Protection of the Marine Environment
from Land-Based Sources of Pollution
The Act provides authorities to issue non-regulatory objectives, guidelines
and codes of practice to help implement Canada's National Programme of
Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities.
These provisions are intended to supplement the authorities that exist
in other federal, provincial, territorial and Aboriginal government laws.
7.2.1 National Programme of Action
In 1995, Canada, together with over 100 maritime nations, adopted the
Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment
from Land-Based Activities. It is an international, non-legally binding
agreement that calls on countries to develop national and regional programs
of action to protect human health and prevent, reduce and control land-based
activities that threaten the health, productivity and biodiversity of
marine and coastal environments and associated freshwater systems. Canada
was the first country to release a National Programme of Action (NPA)
in June 2000.
Results from 2003-04 include:
- An inventory of existing pollution prevention and habitat protection
guidelines was completed (the inventory will be published on the NPA
website in 2004-05 and updated annually).
- A multistakeholder working group in New Brunswick published the guide
Best Management Practices: Marine Products Processing, which
describes pollution prevention approaches for dealing with raw product,
water and effluents in order to reduce environmental impacts caused
by the discharge of effluents (www.glf.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci-sci/effluents/bmp-e.html).
- A website (NPA Youth Zone) was developed to inform young Canadians
about the importance of the coastal and marine environment and about
impacts on this environment from land-based activities. This online
tool provides youth with information on contaminant and habitat-related
issues. The website offers information on how youth can play a role
in protecting the coastal and marine environment. Games on the website
are interactive and teach youth in an informative, yet fun, manner (www.npa-pan.ca/youth).
- The Atlantic Region published the report Management of Wastes
from Atlantic Seafood Processing Operations, which provides a better
understanding of the waste discharges and the potential impacts to the
environment from the over 800 seafood processing operations in the region
(www.dal.ca/aczisc/nparpt.pdf).
- The Pacific Region completed a study on fish processing operations
to enhance understanding of the effects of contaminants discharged to
coastal waters.
www.npa-pan.ca
7.2.2 Regional Programme of Action for the Arctic
In response to the 1995 Global Programme of Action, Canada and seven
other circumpolar nations of the Arctic Council developed a Regional Programme
of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based
Activities in 1998 to address marine pollution issues in the Arctic.
During 2003-04, Canada continued to promote the implementation of the
program through its participation in the Arctic Council's Working Group
on Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment. Agreement was reached
to expand the program to better address land-based activities in the context
of sustainable development through collaboration with the other Arctic
Council Working Groups. A particular focus of the program is on regional
cooperation and capacity building to address priority pollution sources
in the Russian Federation. Of particular significance is the development
of an Arctic Council Arctic Marine Strategic Plan that will provide a
more coordinated and integrated approach to the management of the Arctic
coastal and marine environment. The plan will be presented to Arctic Council
Ministers for endorsement in November 2004.
www.pame.is/
7.3 Disposal at Sea
The Act includes provisions to prohibit the disposal of wastes at
sea within Canadian jurisdiction, and by Canadian ships in international
waters, unless the disposal is done under a permit issued by the Minister.
A permit for disposal at sea will be approved only if it is the environmentally
preferable and practical option. Incineration at sea is banned except
under emergency situations. CEPA 1999 provides additional controls on
disposal at sea, including:
- a ban on the export of a substance for disposal at sea;
- a list of six substances that may be considered for disposal at
sea (Schedule 5);
- an assessment framework for reviewing permit applications, based
on the precautionary principle, which must be followed (Schedule 6);
and
- a legal obligation for Environment Canada to monitor disposal sites.
7.3.1 Disposal at Sea Permits
In 2003-04, 89 permits were issued in Canada for the disposal of 3.88
million tonnes of waste and other matter. Most of this was dredged material
that was removed from harbours and waterways to keep them safe for navigation.
The number of permits issued has remained relatively stable since 1995.
The quantities permitted were lower than in 2002-03 but still remain well
within the range seen since the introduction of monitoring fees. Historically,
the quantity permitted has been greater than the actual quantity disposed
of at sea (often by 30-50%); however, with the monitoring fee for dredged
material and geological matter in place since 1999, the quantities permitted
now more closely reflect the actual disposed quantities.
Table 3 : Quantities Permitted (in tonnes) and Permits Issued
in Canada in 2003-04
Material |
Quantity permitted |
Permits issued |
Percentage of quantity |
Percentage of Permits |
Dredged material* |
|
40 |
|
|
Geological matter* |
|
3 |
|
|
Fisheries waste |
64 025 |
46 |
|
|
Vessels |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Organic |
200 |
1 |
|
|
Total |
3 883 625 |
90 |
100% |
100% |
* Dredged material and geological matter were
converted to tonnes using an assumed density of 1.3 tonnes per cubic metre.
Data accurate as of July 15, 2004, but additional ammendments are
possible until March 31, 2005.
Table 4 : Quantities Permitted (in tonnes) and Permits Issued
by Region in 2003-04
Material |
Atlantic |
Quebec |
Pacific and Yukon |
Prairie and Northern |
Quantity
permitted |
Permits
issued |
Quantity
permitted |
Permits
issued |
Quantity
permitted |
Permits
issued |
Quantity
permitted |
Permits
issued |
Dredged material* |
1 547 000 |
|
72 800 |
10 |
1 289 600 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
Geological matter* |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
910 000 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Fisheries waste |
61 625 |
43 |
2 400 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Vessels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Organic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
1 |
Total |
1 608 625 |
55 |
75 200 |
13 |
2 199 600 |
21 |
200 |
1 |
* Dredged material and geological matter were
converted to tonnes using an assumed density of 1.3 tonnes per cubic metre.
Data accurate as of July 15, 2004, but additional ammendments are
possible until March 31, 2005.
7.3.2 Monitoring Program
As required by CEPA 1999, disposal sites are monitored in order to verify
that permit conditions were met and that scientific assumptions made during
the permit review and site selection process were correct and sufficient
to protect the environment.
In 2003, field monitoring was conducted at 17 ocean disposal sites:
- five disposal sites in the Quebec Region (Pointe-Basse, Cap-aux-Meules,
L'Île-d'Entrée, Millerand and Grosse-Île in the Magdalen
Islands);
- one site in the Prairie and Northern Region (Churchill Harbour, Manitoba);
- six disposal sites in the Pacific and Yukon Region (Thormanby Island,
Five Fingers, Porlier Pass, Comox, Victoria and Point Grey in British
Columbia); and
- five disposal sites in the Atlantic Region (Saint John, Miramichi,
Yarmouth, Pubnico and Summerside).
Further details can be found in the Compendium of Monitoring Activities
at Ocean Disposal Sites, which is sent to permittees and submitted
to the International Maritime Organization annually.
www.ec.gc.ca/seadisposal/reports/index_e.htm#Compend
7.3.3 Regulations
The proposed Regulations Amending the Disposal at Sea Regulations
(Miscellaneous Program) were published on August 27, 2003 (see Appendix
A). The amendments are of a technical nature and are expected to have
a positive impact on the clarity of the regulations; they will have no
impact on the obligations or intent of those regulations.
7.3.4 London Convention and Protocol on Disposal
at Sea
Environment Canada's Disposal at Sea Program meets domestic waste management
objectives and enables Canada to fulfill its international obligations
on the prevention of marine pollution from ocean dumping. Canada has been
a party to the London Convention since 1976, meeting its obligations to
control disposal at sea, monitor disposal sites and report to the Office
of the London Convention. Canada is one of the few countries credited
with consistent reporting. Canada chaired the annual Consultative Meeting
of Parties in 2003 and will do so in 2004. In 2000, Canada acceded to
the 1996 Protocol to the London Convention, which is a more stringent
treaty limiting even further the type of material that can be considered
for ocean disposal. The Protocol also asks parties to implement the precautionary
approach, the polluter pay principle and a comprehensive assessment and
monitoring process that compares disposal options and looks for reduction
and reuse of wastes. It is hoped that this new Protocol will enter into
force in 2006. In 2003-04, Canada actively promoted the entry into force
at both the Meeting of the Scientific Group and the Consultative Meeting
of Parties.
Intersessionally, Canada and Germany began drafting, with the assistance
of a correspondence group from six other countries, "Guidelines for
the Sampling and Analysis of Dredged Material for Disposal at Sea."
The target completion date for this work was set at November 2005 and
will provide countries with a design and implementation guide on how to
sample and analyze sediment to ensure that only clean dredge material
is approved for open water disposal. Canada also worked with the Republic
of Korea to draft a module of the LC international training sets on waste
assessment, which will provide educational material to countries wanting
to accede to the Protocol. This training set will provide the basis upon
which countries can develop credible permit assessment and monitoring
procedures for their disposal at sea programs.
At the Consultative Meeting, Canada continued to chair a working group
developing compliance procedures and mechanisms for the 1996 Protocol.
Canada has considered the compliance procedures to be an important vehicle
to help ensure the effectiveness of the Protocol when it enters into force.
There is considerable debate over the structure of the compliance group
and who can trigger the compliance process. An interim report was generated:
"Preparation for the Entry into Force of the 1996 Protocol: Development
of Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms." Negotiations will continue
in 2004. The Protocol requires the procedures to be established no later
than two years after the entry into force of the Protocol.
7.4 Fuels
CEPA 1999 provides authorities for a performance-based approach to
fuel standards and allows for a range of fuel characteristics to be regulated
to reduce emissions. These regulations may distinguish between different
sources of fuels or the place or time of use of the fuel. There are also
provisions for regulations to establish a "national fuels mark,"
a trademark that could be used to promote a national standard for fuels
where certain characteristics may be desirable.
7.4.1 Regulations
The final Regulations Amending the Gasoline Regulations were published
on April 9, 2003 (see Appendix A). The regulations will allow an exemption,
until January 1, 2008, with respect to gasoline for use in competition
vehicles from the otherwise applicable restrictions on the concentration
of lead in gasoline specified in the Gasoline Regulations.
www.ec.gc.ca/CEPARegistry/regulations/default.cfm
7.5 Vehicle, Engine and Equipment Emissions
Under the Act, the Minister has authority to set emission standards for
on-road vehicles and engines. CEPA 1999 also includes authority to set
emission standards for off-road vehicles and engines, such as those found
in lawn mowers, construction equipment, hand-held equipment and recreational
vehicles. There are also provisions for regulations to establish a "national
emissions mark," a trademark that could be used to promote a national
standard for vehicles, engines or equipment where certain characteristics
may be desirable.
The On-Road Vehicle and Emission Regulations came into effect
on January 1, 2004, requiring all cars and light-duty trucks in Canada
to meet stringent Tier 2 emission standards.
The final Off-Road Small Spark-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations
were published on November 19, 2003 (see Appendix A).
The regulations establish emission standards for small spark-ignition
engines, which are typically gasoline- fuelled engines found in lawn and
garden machines (e.g. hedge trimmers, brush cutters, lawn mowers, garden
tractors, snowblowers), in light-duty industrial machines (e.g. generator
sets, welders, pressure washers) and in light-duty logging machines (e.g.
chainsaws, log splitters, shredders).
7.5.1 "Let's Drive Green"
Environment Canada, together with partners, holds Let's Drive Green sessions
across Canada each summer where motorists can have check-ups on their
vehicles' tailpipe emissions, tire pressure and gas cap seal. In 2003,
over 7000 vehicles were tested at 34 locations.
www.ec.gc.ca/transport/clinics.htm
7.5.2 Bus Inspection Program
During the summer of 2003, Environment Canada conducted a voluntary heavy-duty
diesel smoke-testing program, which offered free smoke testing for urban
transit bus and school bus fleets across Canada. While heavy-duty diesel
vehicles make up only a small percentage of the Canadian transportation
fleet, they produce about 30% of nitrogen oxides and about 19% of particulate
matter emissions from the entire transportation sector. In total, 2325
buses from 27 transit and school bus fleets were tested.
7.5.3 Emissions Testing
Environment Canada's Engine and Confirmatory Testing Program assesses
whether cars and trucks, off-road and on-road vehicles, engines and equipment
meet their prescribed emissions certification standards. In 2003, 66 light-duty
vehicles, involving numerous independent test sequences, 18 utility engines
and two heavy-duty engines were tested to assess emissions conformity
with standards.
7.6 International Air Pollution
The Minister has the authority to address Canadian sources of pollution
that contribute to air pollution in another country or violate an international
agreement that is binding on Canada. This section applies to the release
of substances that may not have been determined to be toxic under Part
5, but nevertheless contribute to international air pollution.
Before using the powers in this Part, the Minister must first consult
with the provincial, territorial or Aboriginal government responsible
for the area in which the pollution source is located. This consultation
will determine if that government is willing or able to address the problem.
The Minister may take the following action to reduce or prevent the pollution:
seek Governor in Council approval to require pollution prevention planning
from the source(s); recommend regulations to the Governor in Council;
or issue an interim order (for emergency situations).
Although no actions were taken under these provisions in 2003-04, the
following sections describe results from several international agreements
respecting air pollution.
7.6.1 Canada - United States Air Quality Agreement
Canada and the United States continued to meet their commitments pursuant
to the Air Quality Agreement to reduce emissions of several CEPA toxics,
including sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds.
In June 2004 in Quebec City, the Parties reviewed progress on the Ozone
Annex implementation and, with stakeholders, discussed the emission reductions
expected and charted the ozone air quality levels that will serve as benchmarks
for future reviews of progress to meet the ozone air quality standards
in each country. In 2003-04, Parties to the Ozone Annex:
- helped to reduce the effects of transboundary air pollution on Canadians
- the 2004 Progress Report on the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement,
for the first time, describes the progress on implementing the emission
reduction measures committed to by Canada and the United States in the
Ozone Annex; and
- implemented a Border Air Quality Strategy. This intiative will increase
Canada - United States cooperation to reduce cross-border air pollution
by undertaking three major pilot projects. Activities under this strategy
included:
- identifying measures to reduce air emissions and address transboundary
pollution in southwestern British Columbia and northwestern Washington
State;
- exploring the development of a coordinated airshed management
approach for southeastern Michigan and southwestern Ontario; and
- exploring the feasibility of emissions trading for nitrogen oxides
and sulphur dioxide emissions caps and cross-border trading.
The joint projects are being completed in cooperation with provincial,
state and other stakeholders. The implementation of the pilot projects
fulfills a pledge made by the two countries in January 2003, under the
Canada - United States Border Air Quality Strategy.
In addition, through this Strategy, Health Canada is collaborating with
Environment Canada, U.S. researchers, non-governmental organizations and
academic researchers to examine the effects of transboundary air pollution
on human health, with a particular focus on vulnerable populations. Health
Canada is involved in two major health research pilot projects: the Great
Lakes Basin Airshed Management Framework in southwestern Ontario (focus
on Windsor and Detroit) and the Georgia Basin/Puget Sound International
Airshed Strategy in southwestern British Columbia. The studies were
designed to address major knowledge gaps in the understanding of the health
effects of air pollution in the airsheds. These health studies will contribute
to the development of a transboundary strategy for coordinated airshed
management and will support governments during future international negotiations
on improving air quality.
www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/can_us/canus_links_e.cfm
7.6.2 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants entered into
force on May 17, 2004. The Convention seeks the elimination or restriction
of the production and use of all intentionally produced persistent organic
pollutants (POPs). As well this Convention aims to minimize and, where
feasible, eliminate the releases of unintentionally produced POPs, including
such CEPA toxics as dioxins and furans and hexachlorobenzene. Under the
Convention, stockpiles of these chemicals must be managed and disposed
of in a safe, efficient and environmentally sound manner.
In 2003-04, Environment Canada completed guidelines on best available
techniques for thermal metallurgical sectors and other sources of POPs.
The Government of Canada conducted public consultations on developing
a national implementation plan for the Convention. The plan will build
on existing and planned domestic actions. Several current initiatives
under CEPA 1999 will contribute directly to Canada's ability to meet its
obligations, such as revisions to polychlorinated biphenyls and hazardous
waste regulations and development of the Virtual Elimination List.
7.6.3 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Convention on Long-Range Transport of Air Pollution
Parties to this 25-year-old Convention include Canada, the United States
and many European countries. The Protocol aims to cut emissions of substances
of concern including CEPA toxics such as sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides,
particulate matter and mercury from industrial sources (iron and steel
industry, non-ferrous metals industry), combustion processes (power generation,
road transport) and waste incineration. It sets limits for emissions from
stationary sources and suggests best available technologies, such as special
filters, scrubbers or mercury-free processes, to achieve these limits.
To date, eight protocols have been negotiated, which deal with acid rain,
smog, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals. Canada has
ratified two sulphur protocols and one protocol on nitrogen oxides, which
address acid rain, as well as the protocols on POPs and heavy metals.
Canada is meeting or exceeding its emission reduction obligations for
sulphur and nitrogen oxides. Under the POPs protocol, Canada actively
contributed to scheduled reassessments of substances and continues to
prepare information on potential substances for future addition to the
Protocol. Under the heavy metals protocol, Canada is committed to reducing
its total annual emissions from major sources identified of each of cadmium,
lead and mercury by at least 50% of 1990 levels by 2011. Data from 2002
indicate that Canada has already met this obligation.
www.unece.org/env/lrtap/welcome.html
7.6.4 United Nations Environment Programme Mercury
Programme
The long-term objective of the Mercury Programme is to facilitate national,
regional and global actions to reduce and eliminate anthropogenic uses
and releases of mercury and mercury compounds, thereby significantly reducing
the global adverse impacts on health and the environment from these toxic
compounds. Canada contributes financial resources and technical expertise
to the program and is engaged in a range of domestic, bilateral and regional
activities that support its goals of identifying populations at risk from
mercury exposure, minimizing exposure through outreach and reducing anthropogenic
mercury emissions and releases.
www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/
7.7 Control of Movement of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Recyclable Material and of Prescribed Non Hazardous Waste for Final Disposal
The Minister has the authority to enact regulations governing the
export and import of hazardous waste, including hazardous recyclable materials.
The Act also provides authorities to introduce regulations on the export
and import of prescribed non-hazardous waste for final disposal; require
exporters of hazardous wastes destined for final disposal to submit export
reduction plans; and set criteria that the Minister may consider in refusing
to issue an export, import or transit permit if the waste or recyclable
material will not be managed in a manner that will protect the environment
and human health. Provisions that require the Minister to publish notification
information for exports, imports and transits of hazardous waste and hazardous
recyclable material are also included in CEPA 1999.
7.7.1 Exports and Imports of Hazardous Wastes
During the 2003 calendar year, more than 7000 notices were processed
for proposed imports, exports and transits of hazardous wastes and hazardous
recyclable materials representing over 30 000 waste streams. During the
same period, over 43 600 manifests were processed for tracking individual
shipments approved and permitted under CEPA 1999.
In 2003, Canadian transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and hazardous
recyclable material totalled 738 662 tonnes, a decrease of nearly 25 000
tonnes from the 2002 yearly total. Canadian imports totalled 417 368 tonnes,
down from the approximately 423 000 tonnes reported in 2002. Exports decreased
as well by nearly 6% from 340 261 tonnes in 2002 to 321 294 tonnes
in 2003.
Based on the annual 2003 statistics for transboundary movements, nearly
97% of Canadian imports came from the United States, with the remainder
coming from Europe, as hazardous recyclable materials destined for metal
recovery operations. Shipments for recycling, which reduce reliance on
primary resources and benefit Canadian industry, represented more than
half of all of the imports. Batteries, metal-bearing wastes and manufacturing
residues consist of the majority of imports of hazardous recyclable material
into Canada. Other hazardous waste imports included liquors from metallurgical
processes and residues from oil refining destined for disposal operations.
Imports of hazardous waste for recycling were destined to five provinces,
with Ontario and Quebec continuing to receive the vast majority of all
imports into Canada. Nearly all imports of hazardous waste for final disposal
were destined for Ontario and Quebec, with small quantities imported into
British Columbia and Alberta.
www.ec.gc.ca/tmb/resilog/eng/resinews.htm
7.7.2 Regulations
The proposed Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclable
Material Regulations were published on March 20, 2004 (see Appendix
A). The regulations provide authorities to assist the Minister in
protecting Canada's environment and the health of Canadians from the risks
posed by the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and hazardous
recyclable materials through exports from and imports into Canada and
to implement Canada's international obligations. The proposed Regulations
will revoke and replace the Export and Import of Hazardous Wastes
Regulations adopted in 1992.
www.ec.gc.ca/CEPARegistry/regulations
Figure 2: Imports and Exports of Hazardous Wastes, 1991-2003
Table 5: Hazardous Waste Management in Canada
|
Imports |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Recycling (tonnes) |
269 067 |
281 458 |
237 069 |
193 266 |
189 110 |
Total imports (tonnes) |
662 893 |
560 032 |
499 758 |
423 067 |
417 368 |
|
Exports |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Recycling (tonnes) |
205 962 |
236 338 |
237 873 |
238 596 |
205 356 |
Total imports (tonnes) |
267 931 |
323 370 |
313 362 |
340 261 |
321 294 |
|