Canadian Food Inspection Agency Canada
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home What's New Acts and Regulations Site Map
Food Safety Animal Health Plant Protection Corporate Affairs

bullet Plant Products
bullet Plant Biosafety
bullet Acts and Regulations
bullet Notices of Submission Project
bullet Decision Documents
bullet Regulation of Plants with Novel Traits
- Overview
- Confined Release
- Unconfined Release
- Assessment Criteria
bullet Contacts

Plants > Biotechnology / PNTs > Perspectives on Novelty 

Unintended effects from non-rDNA plant breeding

Alan McHughen
University of California
Riverside, Ca 92521

Printer-friendly PDF version


Assumption:

GE is inherently higher risk than non-GE

  • GE is "unnatural"
    • Nature does not mix genes across species
    • Conventional breeding -- ditto –
    • GE invariably spans the "species barrier"

Natural inter-species gene flow

  • Wheat
  • Agrobacterium
  • Various Brassicas are inter-fertile
  • Retroviruses

Conventional breeding interspecies

  • Wheat chromosome engineering (esp. rye)
  • Tomato with 100+ L. peruvianum genes
  • Triticale
  • Potato hybrids (e.g. S. brevidens)

GE need not involve "foreign" DNA

  • Flavr Savr tomato
  • High oleic soybean
  • RNAi applications
  • "Self-cloning"
  • Within species DNA transfer
    • Genomics guided breeding
    • (Xa21 in rice)

Unintended effects: non-rDNA

  • Potato with high solanine (several)
  • Celery with excessive psoralen
  • Tomatoes with high tomatine
  • Kiwifruit with allergens
  • Squash with high curcurbitacin
  • Likely many unknown, unnoticed and undocumented.

Environmental damage caused by:

Source Example of problem Prior regulatory scrutiny
  Entire Genotypes  
Naturally occurring invasions Ordinary Successions none
Unintentional introductions Russian thistle in NA none
? Intentional introduction; Purple loosestrife; Eurasion milfoil low/none
Intentional introductions,
Unintended displacements
Prickly Pear cactus in Australia
 Johnsongrass in NA
low
Intentional introductions,
Intentional displacements
Soybean in NA low
  Single Genes  w
Intentional introductions Rht genes in wheat low/moderate
intentional displacements: Canola from rapeseed moderate
GMOs None recorded high

Similar products, similar risks ?

HT Canola Group
Sulfonylurea 2. ALS/AHAS inhibitor
Trifluralin 3. Mitotic inhibitor
Bromoxynil 4. PGR
Triazine 5. Photosynthetic inhibitor
Glyphosate 9. EPSP Synthase inhibitor
Glufosinate 10. Glutamine Synth. Inhibitor

Conclusion

  • Unexpected effects can occur with any method of breeding
  • Unexpected result does not by itself invoke hazard
  • Inter-species gene transfer is common and innocuous
  • Risk analysis demands a consideration of:
    • the host species,
    • the novel trait, and
    • the environment in which it will be released.
  • Method of breeding is immaterial



Top of Page
Top of Page
Important Notices