|
|
![Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)](/web/20061213005133im_/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/gfx_common/pphb.gif)
![Diabetes in Canada](/web/20061213005133im_/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/dic-dac99/fig/diabet_e.gif)
National Statistics and Opportunities for Improved Surveillance,
Prevention, and Control
LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT NATIONAL DATA SOURCES
Our current information on diabetes and its risk factors is limited
by a number of factors, summarized below.
Limitations on Diabetes Information
- Incomplete Data Sources
Diabetes is generally diagnosed and treated in physicians' offices,
from which data collection is difficult. Data from hospitalization
records capture only people with more severe diabetes. Therefore,
the prevalence of diabetes in the Canadian population is underestimated
by current data sources. Most "national" data sources are also geographically
incomplete in that they exclude the territories.
- Survey Data Are Unsubstantiated
There are limitations to survey data because the presence of diabetes
is based on self-report. Some people with diabetes do not report having
diabetes when questioned; conversely, some report diabetes when they
do not have the condition.
- Inability to Capture Undiagnosed Diabetes
Survey data do not detect people with undiagnosed diabetes unless
a blood sample is taken. Administrative databases (such as physician
billing databases) do not identify these people either.
- Inaccurate Mortality Data
Mortality data are limited, in that diabetes is often not cited
as the underlying cause of death in cases of death due to the complications
of diabetes.
- Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Undifferentiated
Most data sources do not differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2
diabetes.
- Small Samples in National Surveys Population surveys have not
had an adequate sample size nationally to allow comparison on a subprovincial
or sometimes even provincial level.
- Lack of Aboriginal Data
Aboriginal status has not been included as a variable in most national
surveys. Some reserves were not included in the Aboriginal Peoples
Survey 1991, with the result that roughly 58,000 potential respondents
had no opportunity to be included in the sample.
- Different Methodologies in National Surveys
National health surveys that have been conducted over the past 20
years differ in their methodologies such that comparison of diabetes
prevalence over time is limited.
Limitations on Risk Factor Information
- Lack of National Risk Factor Surveillance System
Canada does not have an established national risk factor surveillance
system comparable to the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System
(BRFSS) in the United States. However, a similar risk factor surveillance
system is currently in development at the Laboratory Centre for Disease
Control, Health Canada.
- Physical Measures in Few National Surveys
Few national surveys in Canada incorporate physical measures, such
as blood pressure or weight, and none on the scale of the National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States.
Thus, our data on known or potential risk factors, such as hypertension
and central deposition of fat, are limited.
- Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reports
Reliance on self-report for data on risk factors such as obesity
and physical inactivity introduces the possibility of a social desirability
bias in the results (i.e., respondents claim to be thinner and more
physically active than they actually are), with the result that survey
data on these risk factors are probably inaccurate.
[Previous] [Table
of Contents] [Next]
|