Public Works and Government Services CanadaCanada wordmark
Skip navigation links
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
PWGSC Home About PWGSC Services Canadians Businesses
Acquisitions

Edmonton Workshop Summary

The views and recommendations contained on this page are those of the participants at the OSME consultations. These opinions are not necessarily those of the Government of Canada.

October 13, 2005

Theme Concern Suggestion
1. Regional considerations are not sufficiently taken into account A. Procurement decisions are too consolidated and centralized i. Decentralise and recognise regional capacity
ii. Involve the regions in national procurement decisions
B. SMEs do not have the scale/capacity to supply whole country iii. Retain regional methods of supply
C. Headquarters are prevented from sourcing in the regions iv. Add flexibility into restrictions on buying by region
D. Bilingualism imposes a high cost v. Lower or eliminate the standard bilingualism requirements
2. Cost of supplying the government is too high E. RFPs impose high costs onto suppliers vi. Limit RFPs to over $100k
vii. Use RFP-lite for under $100k with qualified suppliers and sole source process
F. Contracting decisions are opaque, leading to greater proportional cost for suppliers viii. Create a feedback mechanism for failed bidders
ix. Share more information about number of bidders, results, etc.
3. Complexity G. SOs and SAs are too complex x. Create new, better methods of supply
xi. Simplify the contracting language
xii. Reduce, consolidate and improve contract terms and conditions
xiii. Eliminate "phantom" SOs
H. MERX xiv. Reduce the cost of MERX and the cost incurred in monitoring MERX
xv. Make MERX more user friendly
I. "Boilerplate" language results in less clarity, not standardization xvi. Write specific, functional RFPs instead of precise technical specifications
J. There is confusion within and without government about how procurement works xvii. Improve communication to procurement officers; educate government staff
xviii.Include performance measures on procurement in all DM performance contracts
xix. Eliminate deviation between policy and procedure
xx. Develop a comprehensive supplier preparation guide for sub-contracting
xxi. Follow the principles of Simplicity, Integrity, Adherence, Consistency
4. "One size fits all" approach K. Problems with "commodity" categorisation xxii. Ensure the categories are meaningful, exclusive and comprehensive
xxiii. Ensure the categories are updatedxxiv. Change the term "commodity"
xxv. Create three main categories: major capital, commodities/goods, services (high & low)
L. SMEs do not have a voice in formation of procurement strategies Ensure SMEs are systematically represented at the table (e.g., commodity councils)
M. The playing field should be level for SMEs xxvii. Rotate through the list of SO holders rather than giving all the business to a handful of suppliers
xxviii. Eliminate unreasonably low prices on SOs and SAs (e.g., "median rate")
5. Socio-economic benefits N. Exclusive focus on price will not serve the public interest xxix. Consider a product's full life cycle cost, not just the purchase price
xxx. Consider value for money more than price
O. Procurement should be a tool for economic development xxxi. Marry procurement policy with industrial regional benefits
xxxii. Promote innovation through procurement; Create a "first buyer" programme for new technologies
P. Aboriginal businesses xxxiii. Maintain the Aboriginal set aside

Top of page