Test Procedures to Determine the Mechanical Hazards of Toys
- Reasonable Forseeable Use -
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as PDF, MP3 and WAV files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
(89K)
Product Safety Reference Manual
Book 5 - Laboratory Policies and Procedures |
Effective
2001-11-30
|
Part B: Test Methods Section, Method
M-01.1 |
Amendment
#29
|
1 Scope
1.1 This method describes procedures for
performing the Reasonable Foreseeable Use tests on toys described
in item 13 of Part II of Schedule I to the Hazardous Products Act
(HPA) to determine if they meet the applicable requirements set
out in the Hazardous Products (Toys) Regulations and if the product
will withstand the everyday use and abuse that a child will submit
it to during daily play. Since the numerical values of performance
measures are based upon regulatory requirements, the tolerances
for these values have been chosen such that no test parameter is
applied to the product that results in a more severe condition than
that specified in the regulation.
2 Applicable Documents
2.1 The Hazardous Products Act (HPA).
2.2 HPA, Hazardous Products (Toys) Regulations (C.931) hereinafter
referred to as the Regulations.
2.3 Test Method M00.1 Test Procedures to Determine Mechanical
Hazards -Small Components-.
2.4 Test Method M00.2 Test Procedures to Determine Mechanical
Hazards -Sharp Edges-.
2.5 Test Method M00.3 Test Procedures to Determine Mechanical
Hazards -Sharp Points-.
2.6 PSL Project Report 2001: 0624 New Method: TEST PROCEDURES
TO DETERMINE THE MECHANICAL HAZARDS OF TOYS - REASONABLE
FORESEEABLE USE.
2.7 Toy Classification Guidelines prepared by the Consumer Product
Safety Bureau.
3 Sampling
3.1 The following test procedure should
be conducted on the number of specimens provided or received.
4 Apparatus
4.1 Drop Tester with adjustable heights
(see Figure 1).
4.2 Tape Measure with a precision of 1 mm.
4.3 Concrete slab with the upper surface covered with a 3 mm
(1/8 inch) nominal thickness vinyl composition, asbestos-free floor
tile meeting US Federal Standard SS-T-312B or ASTM F1066-95A. The
minimum dimension of the concrete slab is 600 mm X 600 mm X 60 mm.
4.4 Clamps suitable for grasping components of the toys.
4.5 Force gauge with a precision of at least 0.1 N.
4.6 A stopwatch with a precision of 0.1 sec.
5 Testing Procedure
5.1 Determine the age for which the toy
is intended. (Check the Sample Record Sheet, noting if the inspector
has requested the toy be tested for over or under 3 years of age
or whether an age classification has been conducted by the Consumer
Product Safety Bureau).
5.2 Drop Test:
5.2.1 Adjust the height of the drop platform:
If the toy is for use by children under 3 years
of age, adjust the height of the drop platform to 1.372 m (1.367
± 0.005 m) above the impact surface. If the toy is for use
by children 3 years of age or over, adjust the height of the drop
platform to 0.914 m (0.909 m ± 0.005 m) above the impact
surface.
5.2.2 Place the toy on the drop platform
in an orientation most likely to cause damage and drop the toy onto
the tile-covered concrete slab.
Note: For battery-operated toys, the recommended batteries shall
be in place during the drop test. If no specific type of battery is recommended,
the heaviest battery that is generally available shall be used.
5.2.3 Inspect the toy for any damage that
occurred as a result of the drop. If damaged, perform tests M00.1,
M00.2 and M00.3 (tests for Small Components, Sharp Edges and Sharp
Points respectively) on any detached part or component, or on any
edge or point that has become exposed as a result of the drop. Discontinue
drop testing on the damaged sample element if a non-compliance is
observed. Place it aside for push/pull testing and proceed with
drop testing the remaining sample elements.
5.2.4 If undamaged or if no non-compliance is observed, repeat
steps 5.2.2 and 5.2.3
until a total of four (4) drops have been performed. If parts or
components separate or detach before the last drop and no non-compliance
is observed, place all pieces of the damaged toy back on the drop
platform. Ensure to place the toy on the drop platform in a different
orientation prior to each drop and ensure also that the sequence
of drop orientation be varied for subsequent sample elements (i.e.,
if a drop in a particular orientation of a previous sample element
caused a non-compliance, drop test the subsequent sample element
using one of the remaining different drop orientations first to
see if the toy could be damaged and expose a hazard upon impacting
in a different orientation).
5.3 Results
5.3.1 Record the details of any damage to each sample element.
5.4 Push/Pull Test:
5.4.1 Apply a push or pull force of up
to but not exceeding 44.5 N within 5 seconds and maintain the force
for 10 seconds on a part or component of the toy, using a clamp
suitable for grasping or by applying the force directly with the
force gauge.
Note: Use a pull force of 44.5 N (42.5 N ± 2 N) when
testing the security of the protective tip on projectiles. If unable to apply a pull force,
or the tip is able to withstand the required pull force, attempt to push the tip
off with the same force and record the results in the Supplementary Information section of the report.
5.4.2 Observe if the part or component
broke or detached and the force required to cause the damage.
5.4.3 Repeat steps 5.4.1 and 5.4.2
for the remaining parts or components of the toy that are suspected
of being separable, or sharp if damaged. Do not test parts or components
that are not amenable to further disassembly and for which an adjacent
area on that same part or component has already been pushed/pulled.
5.5 Results
5.5.1 Record the details of any damage to each sample element.
5.6 Small Components, Sharp Points, Sharp Edges:
5.6.1 Determine if the toy or any of the parts or components
that detached can be completely enclosed in the Small Parts Cylinder
or if they have any sharp edges or sharp points. Refer to Test Methods
M00.1, M00.2 and M00.3 respectively.
6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
6.1 Ensure that all measuring instruments
are functional and are calibrated with traceability to national
or international standards.
6.2 Testing and the results obtained according to this method
include uncertainty associated with the:
- uncertainty of any or all calibrations by an accredited calibration
laboratory of the apparatus stated and used in this method,
- standard uncertainty or standard deviation of a series of
repeated
measurements with the force gauge (documented in the Equipment
Record binder),
- a coverage factor (k = 2) to express an expanded uncertainty
(U = kuc, where uc is the combined standard
uncertainty) for a level of confidence of approximately 95%,
assuming normal distribution (Reference: General Guidelines
for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Accredited
Laboratories’ Measurement Results, CLAS Reference Document
5, May 1999).
7 Test Report
7.1 The test report should contain the
following information:
7.1.1 A description of the product to include, brand, style,
country of origin, photo and UPC.
7.1.2 The number of sample elements tested.
7.1.3 The age range for which the toy has been classified.
7.1.4 The height of the drop platform and the orientation of
the toy on it prior to each drop.
7.1.5 The results of the tests (conducted in the sequence presented
in section 5 of this test method) with specific
details for any non-compliances or potential problems observed.
7.1.6 The analyst's name and signature, as well as the name(s)
and signature(s) of the reviewer(s).
![Typical Drop Test Device](/web/20061214013636im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/images/hecs-sesc/prod-test-essai/method/engin-ingen/M_01_1-image.gif)
|