HTF 402 National First Nations Telehealth Research Project
Case Study: Berens River, Manitoba
Community description
Berens River is an Ojibway community of about 1800 members on
the northeastern shore of Lake Winnipeg, at the mouth of the Berens
River. It assumed governance of its health system in April 1999.
Berens River telehealth project
The needs assessment in Berens River was conducted in winter 1999
by the project officer; it was also informed by an existing survey
of health conditions in the community and services utilization
data. Following the needs assessment, the Berens River community
selected real-time video-conferencing applications to address diabetes
care and patient education, specialist consults with infectious
disease and psychiatric physicians, as well as continuing professional
education. Prior to the project, the community's telecommunications
access was limited to regular telephone service. For the project,
a satellite communication link was established with the Winnipeg
Health Sciences Center. Staff were trained and the system was deployed
in spring 2000, with the first encounter forms received in July
2000. During the implementation period, the community was in the
process of opening a new Health Center, resulting in the movement
of the satellite uplink and telehealth station in the fall of 2000.
Case study results
Utilization levels
Number and length of telehealth sessions
During the evaluation period, from July 2000 to mid-March 2001,
a total of 40 telehealth sessions were held: 8 for patient care
(infectious disease specialist and psychiatry consults), 10 for
diabetic care and education, 5 for diabetic education only and
17 for continuing professional education. A total of 17 unique
patients were seen: 6 in patient care, 7 in diabetes care and education
and 4 in diabetes education. Thirty-five percent of patients (6)
had repeat visits using telehealth.
The average number of visits per month was 4.5 with a high of
12 in November 2000. Visits lasted on average, about one hour (one
hour and three minutes according to the community encounter forms,
and one hour and eight minutes according to the remote encounter
forms). According to the remote site, 61% of sessions started on
time, and 11% of sessions had scheduling problems. This latter
proportion was 5% according to the community forms.
Types of care and education provided through
telehealth
The proportion of patient care visits for which
each type of personnel was present in the community and remote
locations are shown in the tables below.
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Patient Visits
(Community data)
Type of Personnel |
# of
telehealth
sessions |
% |
Patient |
18/18 |
100 |
Nursing station Nurse |
14/18 |
78 |
CHR |
0 |
|
Mental Health Worker |
0 |
|
Physician |
0 |
|
Translator |
0 |
|
Family Member |
0 |
|
Other (Health Care Aid 2, Nutrition Worker
2) |
4/18 |
22 |
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Patient Visits
(Remote sites data)
Type of Personnel |
# of
telehealth
sessions |
% |
Infectious disease specialist |
2/18 |
11 |
Psychiatrist |
2/18 |
11 |
Pediatrician |
0 |
|
Gynecologist/obstet. |
0 |
|
Nurse |
11/18 |
61 |
Health Educator |
0 |
|
Social worker, counselor |
0 |
|
Translator |
0 |
|
Family Member |
0 |
|
Other (Dermatologist 3, Diabetes Educator
4, Diabetic Nutritionist 6) |
13/18 |
72 |
For patient education, five individual sessions and 4 group sessions
were held, with participants ranging from 2 to 9 (total 32).
For continuing education, two individual and 12 group sessions
were held, with participants ranging from two to eight (total 51).
The types of participants present in the continuing education sessions
are shown in the tables below.
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Continuing Education
Sessions (Community Data )
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
Staff |
50 |
Community Members |
1 |
Translator |
0 |
Other (Health Care Aid Nurses, Nutrition
Worker) |
|
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Continuing Education
Sessions (Remote site data )
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
% |
Specialist |
0 |
|
Psychologist |
0 |
|
Diabetes Educator |
14/17 |
82 |
Other educator |
0 |
|
Nurse |
8/17 |
47 |
Social worker or counselor |
0 |
|
Translator |
0 |
|
Other (diabetic nurses, inhalant abuse
coordinator, psychiatrist)? |
4/17 |
23 |
For patient education, five individual sessions and 4 group sessions
were held, with participants ranging from 2 to 9 (total 32).
For continuing education, two individual and 12 group sessions
were held, with participants ranging from two to eight (total 51).
The types of participants present in the continuing education sessions
are shown in the tables below.
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Continuing Education
Sessions (Community Data )
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
Staff |
50 |
Community Members |
1 |
Translator |
0 |
Other (Health Care Aid Nurses, Nutrition
Worker) |
|
Berens River: Types of Personnel Present at Continuing Education
Sessions (Remote site data )
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
% |
Specialist |
0 |
|
Psychologist |
0 |
|
Diabetes Educator |
14/17 |
82 |
Other educator |
0 |
|
Nurse |
8/17 |
47 |
Social worker or counselor |
0 |
|
Translator |
0 |
|
Other (diabetic nurses, inhalant abuse
coordinator, psychiatrist)? |
4/17 |
23 |
The types of care provided in the patient and diabetic care and
education sessions are shown in the tables below, for the community
and remote locations.
Berens River: Types of care provided in the patient and diabetic
care and education sessions (Community Data)
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
% |
Specialist Consult |
3/18 |
17 |
To discuss or confirm diagnosis |
6/18 |
33 |
To follow up on previous visit |
9/18 |
50 |
To discuss case management |
13/18 |
72 |
Other (diabetic education, exercise, gestational
diabetes) |
3/18 |
17 |
Prenatal Care |
1/18 |
6 |
Other patient care (nutrition) |
0 |
|
Berens River: Types of care provided in the patient and diabetic
care and education sessions (Remote site data)
Type of Personnel Present |
# of
individuals |
% |
Assessment/ Diagnosis |
9/15 |
60 |
Treatment/management |
13/15 |
87 |
Information/ education |
10/15 |
67 |
Follow up |
2/15 |
13 |
Other |
0 |
|
Other patient care |
0 |
|
According to the community encounter forms, in 11 of 18 patient
care visits, follow-up was required, 7 with telehealth and 4 without.
According to the remote forms, eleven of 15 visits required follow
up with telehealth, 1 without telehealth, and 1 with a patient
transfer.
According to the community forms for patient care visits, without
telehealth, 2 patients would have received no services at all,
and three patients would have been transferred. For diabetic care
and education visits, seven patients would have received no services
at all, three would have waited until services came to Berens River,
and four patients would have been transferred. Of the total 18
patient care visits for which this information was complete, 44%
of visits resulted in avoiding a transfer.
For the diabetes education sessions, the table below shows
the topics covered.
Berens River: Topic covered in diabetes care and education sessions
Type of Intervention |
# of sessions
in which each
occurred |
% |
Diabetes Education |
14/14 |
100 |
Diet/nutrition |
13/14 |
93 |
Smoking |
5/14 |
36 |
Insulin |
7/14 |
50 |
Foot Care |
5/14 |
36 |
Hypertension |
3/14 |
21 |
Exercise |
11/14 |
79 |
Alcohol |
2/14 |
14 |
Glucose monitoring |
12/14 |
86 |
Counselling |
1/14 |
7 |
Other |
0 |
|
Other patient education (alternative foods,
obesity, gestational diabetes, effect of meds) |
7/14 |
50 |
Finally, for the continuing education sessions, the table below
indicates the topics covered.
Berens River: Topic covered in continuing education sessions
Topics covered during session... |
# of sessions
in which
covered |
% |
Mental health |
1/17 |
5 |
Diabetes for renal failure |
2/17 |
12 |
Foot Care |
3/17 |
18 |
Gestational Diabetes |
1/17 |
6 |
Nutrition |
6/17 |
35 |
FSS, alcohol, solvent abuse |
1/17 |
6 |
Organization/ Planning |
3/17 |
18 |
Technical performance
The proportion of visits with each type of technical problem,
for the community and remote sites, is shown in the tables below.
Berens River: Technical problems (Community data)
Type of Technical Problems |
# of sessions
in which each
occurred |
% |
Establishing Communication |
5/38 |
13 |
Maintaining Communication |
3/39 |
8 |
Operating the camera |
3/39 |
8 |
Sound quality |
5/39 |
13 |
Visual quality |
0/39 |
|
Other problems |
3/39 |
8 |
Berens River: Technical problems (Remote data)
Type of Technical Problems |
# of sessions
in which each
occurred |
% |
Establishing Communication |
13/34 |
38 |
Maintaining Communication |
11/34 |
32 |
Operating the camera |
5/33 |
15 |
Sound quality |
7/34 |
21 |
Visual quality |
1/39 |
3 |
Other problems |
0/22 |
|
Acceptability of telehealth to patients and communities
According to the key informant interviews among community respondents,
telehealth is generally well-accepted in the community. No patient
refused to use telehealth, although some did not keep their appointments.
According to one of the specialists interviewed, patients seem
to find telehealth a little strange at first but then quickly get
used to it. The positive reaction is echoed in the 15 completed
patient satisfaction questionnaires, for which the data are summarized
below in terms of numbers of dissatisfied patients.
Berens River: Proportion of dissatisfied patients (scores 0,1,2
together)
Questionnaire item |
# of responses |
% |
General Health |
8/15 |
53 |
Length of time to get an appointment with
telehealth |
2/15 |
13 |
Length of time waiting in the office at
telehealth |
4/15 |
27 |
Length of time with the specialist you
saw |
3/15 |
20 |
The explanation of your condition by the
specialist |
1/15 |
7 |
The explanation of your treatment by the
specialist |
1/15 |
7 |
The thoroughness, carefulness and skillfulness
of the specialist you saw |
2/14 |
14 |
The courtesy, respect, sensitivity and
friendliness of the specialist you saw |
0 |
|
How well the staff here respected your
privacy |
0 |
|
How well the staff here answered your
questions about the equipment |
1/14 |
7 |
How well the staff here treated you with
respect |
0 |
|
Your overall treatment experience at telehealth |
0 |
|
All patients stated they would use telehealth again, and all stated
they would recommend it to others.
Within the community, it was suggested that many community members
are not yet aware of the telehealth service, and that more publicity
could be carried out.
Quality of care delivered through telehealth
According to nursing station staff, telehealth has improved quality
of care because of quicker access to specialists, especially in
terms of diagnostics. A comment was made that for psychiatry consults,
the lack of physical proximity hindered empathetic responses. No
other positive or negative impacts on quality of care were noted.
According to the data provided on the encounter forms for diabetes
education (a proxy measure of quality of care), the issues most
often addressed were diet, exercise and glucose monitoring. The
topics most infrequently addressed were counselling/social support,
hypertension, and alcohol consumption.
Impacts on patient outcomes
The diabetes education program has, in the eyes of both community
and local diabetes workers, improved patient knowledge of nutrition
issues (dietary fibre, sugar substitutes). Similarly, one key informant
felt that the psychiatric services have improved patient outcomes
because of decreased waiting time. However, the nursing staff stated
that the main factor in determining patient outcomes was the competency
of the staff involved, rather than the equipment. Moreover, remote
providers felt that turnover in staff had greater (negative) impact
on patient outcomes than the telehealth technology. Other key informants
noted that the lack of continuity in staff has created general
problems for quality of basic care (such as lack of dispensation
of prenatal vitamins, although stocked) that telehealth cannot
address.
Through the continuing professional education program, workers
in the community are able to access information on a variety of
topics. There were however mixed views about the value of this
for community personnel: some felt that it was a valuable source
of information for local staff which could indirectly improve patient
outcomes, while others felt it was not well-adapted to their needs.
Impacts on access to health within the community
The telehealth program in Berens River has, according to the key
informants interviewed, improved access to health services within
the community, in particular to specialist care and to information
about diabetes management. It does not seem to have produced changes
in the overall approach to self-determination of health within
the community: telehealth is seen as an adjunct or complement to
existing services, which patients have the choice to use. One specialist
interviewed echoed this view stating that face-to-face services
are preferable, and that telehealth should be viewed as a complement
to existing services rather than a substitute.
Organizational, administrative and human resource issues
The main organizational issue for the Berens River telehealth
project has been the turnover in key nursing, medical and mental
health staff. These changes coincided with the transfer of health
governance to the community, and were followed by a period of little
or no nursing service or by short-term personnel. Although a community
health representative was designated as the telehealth coordinator
early in the implementation period, the lack of stable personnel
disrupted existing relationships with secondary/tertiary providers
and affected uptake of telehealth.
In general, once established or re-established, for patient care
and education, the linkages with remote sites have evolved positively
throughout the course of the evaluation period. Although secondary
and tertiary providers of all forms of service acknowledged that
there have been some frustrations and difficulties, the linkages
have generally gone smoothly.
Scheduling difficulties have been minimal, although tertiary providers
attribute this to the pilot nature of the program and the low usage
levels. Appointment cancellations are a problem for some of the
tertiary providers and practitioners, although it is recognized
that failure to keep appointments is also a problem in FTF services.
The key informant interviews showed that another difficult issue
lies in the availability of other forms of specialist expertise
for which telehealth services could be offered. Staff expressed
frustration that some of their more pressing needs for access to
specialists through telehealth (for example, in radiology) were
not being met because of lack of participating specialists in the
remote site.
The telehealth system seems to have little impact on the nursing
station in terms of information flow and storage. In terms of other
administrative issues, staff turnover has required additional training
but no other issues or impacts were noted.
Linkages within provincial health systems
According to the key informants interviewed, there are no other
significant telehealth initiatives in Manitoba, so this is a new
model. It is felt, however, that the future model should work toward
integrating telehealth services within the regional health authorities,
as is the case for the diabetes education program, rather than
work through the Health Sciences Centre. This will provide greater
integration within the provincial system.
In terms of integration into the provincial health care system
in general, respondents felt that some new linkages had been created,
notably with the regional diabetes education program and between
psychiatric services and the solvent abuse worker.
Cost effectiveness
The level of usage in Berens River is as yet too low to make any
valid statements about cost-effectiveness of telehealth. Practitioners
in the remote sites expect that while some travel costs may be
reduced, the increased access to care may increase overall costs.
Sustainability
Nursing centre and remote staff stated that the key to sustainability
and eventual health impacts in the community lies in the stabilization
of the local health care system and the provision of good clinical
and preventive care with or without telehealth. One key informant
maintained that the same problems would be faced in achieving health
impacts even if specialists were available to fly in to the community
regularly; another felt that the social issues facing the community
would not be solved through provision of more ineffective preventive
measures. Other informants mentioned that the success of education
intervention in particular depends on the ability to effect broader
changes in the community as a whole; for example, in the availability
of the health foods that the diabetes education program encourages
patients to eat, exercise opportunities, etc.
|