Changing Direction
The administration of the Access to Information Act (AIA) and Privacy Act
The Department of National Defence
Table of Contents
|
Annual Report to Parliament, 1999-2000
|
Annual report to Parliament |
Section 72 of both the Access to Information Act (AIA) and the Privacy
Act requires that the head of every Government institution prepare and
submit to Parliament an annual report on the administration of the Acts
within the institution during each financial year. This is the seventeenth
Annual Report to Parliament on administering the Acts in the
Department of National Defence (DND) and the Canadian Forces (CF). |
Purpose |
The purpose of this annual report is to
describe how the Department administered Access to Information and Privacy
activities and fulfilled its responsibilities in relation to the Acts
during the period from April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000. |
ATIP combined administration |
With the exception of the Ombudsman's office,
one coordinator administers both the Access to Information Act and the
Privacy Act within the Department of National Defence (DND) and the
Canadian Forces (CF). |
Report format |
This annual report has been prepared using the Information MappingŪ
methodology. |
|
Overview |
Proclamation |
The Access to Information Act (AIA) and the Privacy Act (PA) were
proclaimed on July 1, 1983. |
Purpose of AIA |
The purpose of the Access to Information Act is to afford Canadian
citizens, permanent residents, and any person present in Canada the right
to access information contained in Government records, subject to certain
specific and limited exemptions. |
Purpose of the Privacy Act |
The purpose of the Privacy Act is to extend to individuals the right of
access to information about themselves held by the Government, subject to
specific and limited exemptions; and to protect individuals' privacy by
preventing others from having access to their personal information, and by
affording individuals substantial control over how their personal
information is collected, used and disclosed. |
Formal requests for rights of access |
In addition to establishing rights of access to Government information,
both Acts provide for a formal request mechanism that individuals may use
to exercise those rights. These mechanisms include:
- Time limits and other response obligations for the institutions
holding the information; and
- The procedure for lodging a complaint if an individual is not
satisfied with how the institution handled a formal request.
|
Granting informal access |
The statutes, regulations, and Treasury Board (TB) guidelines clearly
encourage institutions to afford individuals access to information to
which they are entitled without having to resort to the formal procedures
provided for in the legislation. The Access to Information and Privacy
Acts are intended to complement, not replace, other less formal
administrative procedures for obtaining government information. |
Importance of informal access |
Extensive use of informal access is recognized
by the Department of National Defence as an effective and simplified way
to further the principles of open government on which Access to
Information and Privacy (ATIP) legislation is based. |
|
Minister's responsibility |
The Minister of National Defence is responsible for controlling and
managing the Department, which includes the Canadian Forces, and for all
matters relating to national defence. |
Mission of the DND and the Canadian Forces |
The mission of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian
Forces is to defend Canada and Canadian interests and values while
contributing to international peace and security. |
Defence White Paper |
The 1994 Defence White Paper for DND/CF confirmed the requirement
to maintain multipurpose, combat-capable sea, land, and air forces to
protect Canadians and project their interests and values abroad. The
Department will remain focused on its personnel, placing strong emphasis
on Quality of Life issues and ensure that personnel receive the proper
training and equipment to enable them to carry out operational missions
without unnecessary risk.
|
Defence 2020
|
Defence Strategy 2020 marks a significant milestone. Starting from the
existing policy base set out in the 1994 Defence White Paper, the senior
leadership team has created a strategic framework for Defence planning and
decision-making to help guide the institution well into the next century.
In identifying the challenges and opportunities facing the Department and
the Canadian Forces, recognition is taken of the need for the Defence Team
to report on its activities to Parliament and the public in a manner that
is open, relevant, and understandable. Strong institutional support of
ATIP legislation and related administrative practices is being fostered in
the Department and the CF to ensure the values of openness and
transparency become, and remain, part of the organizational culture in the
21st century.
|
Departmental
organization |
Military and civilian components |
The Department's unique personnel structure is made up of two
separate components - one military and one civilian. This table depicts
the number of personnel in each component: |
|
Departmental Personnel Figures by Component
|
Military members: |
Regular force: 59,330 |
|
Primary Reserve force: 21,500 |
Civilian employees: 19,300 |
Total Military and Civilian Personnel: 100,130 |
|
Chain of command |
National Defence Headquarters (NDHQ) in Ottawa provides broad direction
for administration and operations, with specific execution being assigned
to the various elements of the Canadian Forces located across the country.
CF regular and reserve-force personnel live, train, and work in every
province and territory of Canada, as well as at bases, stations, and
operational missions around the world.
As described in the Departmental Report on Plans and Priorities, the
Ombudsman's office became operational on16 June 1999. Established to act
as a neutral third party, independent of the military chain of command and
civilian management, the mission of the Ombudsman's office is to ensure
that all defence members are treated fairly by resolving individual
complaints and contributing substantial and long lasting improvements to
their welfare. Like the remainder of the Department, the Ombudsman is
subject to the Access to Information and Privacy Acts. To ensure the
confidentiality of information brought to his attention, however, the
Ombudsman has been given autonomy in ATIP matters related to his office.
Accordingly, a separate annual report will be tabled respecting the
administration of the Access to Information and Privacy Acts within the
Office of the Ombudsman. |
DND
organization chart |
Organization chart |
The following diagram shows the organization of National Defence as of
March 31, 2000. |
![DND organization chart](/web/20061215094420im_/http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/ati/rep99-00/images/org9900_sm_e.gif)
|
|
|
|
Departmental ATIP Co-ordinator |
At DND, the Director of Access to Information and Privacy (DAIP)
administers and co-ordinates the Access to Information Act and the Privacy
Act. The DAIP organization comes under the authority of the Assistant
Deputy Minister Finance and Corporate Services. DAIP seeks specialist
advice on legal, public affairs, and policy matters from other NDHQ
organizations as required. ATIP administration related to the office of
the Ombudsman is conducted separately and independently by the Ombudsman,
without reference to DAIP. |
Designation Order |
The departmental designation order for Access to Information and
Privacy reads as follows:
"The Minister of National Defence, pursuant to Section 73 of the
Access to Information Act and Privacy Act, hereby designates the person
holding the position of Director Access to Information and Privacy to
exercise the powers and functions of the Minister as the Head of the
Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces under the
Acts." A separate delegation provides the Ombudsman with the same
authorities, but for ATIP issues pertinent to that office.
|
DAIP's mandate |
The mandate of DAIP is to act on behalf of the Minister of National
Defence in enforcing compliance with legislation, regulations, and
government policy and create departmental directions, including standards,
in all matters relating to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy
Act. DAIP's authority in this regard extends to all elements of the
Canadian Forces and the Department National Defence - except for the
Office of the Ombudsman. |
Organization across DND/CF |
Within each subordinate headquarters, base, station, and unit, there is
a designated senior CF member or Departmental employee who is responsible
for local ATIP administration.
The national ATIP coordinator (DAIP) is responsible for ensuring that
these officers have the necessary policies and guidance. |
Part 2
The Year in Review
|
Ministerial Support |
In previous years, Departmental ATIP performance has been observed as
needing improvement. To begin changing this reality and the perceptions
associated with it, the MND wrote to the DM and CDS on 6 April 1999. In
this letter, the MND provided clear direction that AIA legislation be
complied with, not only to ensure respect for the law, but to reinforce
institutional openness and transparency and thereby contribute to the
public's confidence in the Department and the CF.
|
DAIP Organization
|
The ATIP organization at National Defence (DAIP) employs 32 civilian
and
9 military personnel. Contract personnel were engaged at various levels
during the year on an as required basis.
|
Caseload |
In FY 99/00 DAIP received 1,063 requests for
information under the Access to Information Act, and 6,579 requests for
personal information under the Privacy Act. Figures for FY 98/99 were 1031
and 9031 respectively. As indicated in the table below, FY 99/00
represents the first period in a number of years during which DND has made
positive inroads into its backlog of AIA cases by responding to more
requests than it received. |
|
Fiscal Year |
Number of AIA
Requests Received |
Number of AIA
Requests Responded To |
FY 95/96
|
869
|
870
|
FY 96/97
|
942
|
882
|
FY 97/98
|
861
|
846
|
FY 98/99
|
1,031
|
885
|
FY 99/00
|
1,063
|
1,252
|
DND also aggressively targeted its longstanding backlog of Privacy Act
requests during FY 99/00 by establishing a dedicated 'SWAT Team' to
address them. This resulted in a reduction of unanswered requests from in
excess of 4,000 in April 1998, to some 700 at the end of FY 99/00, of
which less than half remain without a response within statutory time
limits.
|
Refinement to Team Structure |
The integrated Access and Privacy team structure reported last year was
refined during FY 99/00. Drawing from the Information Commissioner's
1997 review of this Department's Directorate of Access to Information
and Privacy (DAIP), and from a 1998 review by consultants engaged through
Consulting and Audit Canada (CAC), the four teams that were initially
created have been reduced to three. Emerging resource imbalances and
inequities in workload distribution have been corrected. Classification
levels of operational staff have been reviewed, and upgraded where
warranted. Additionally, DAIP management has been reduced by one Team
Leader; six additional ATIP analyst positions have been established; and
the over-reliance on contract employees has been stopped.
|
Improved
ATIP Case
Management |
Building on this foundation, DAIP has begun proactive management of
individual AIA case files to ensure that legally allowable and appropriate
extensions to response deadlines are claimed consistently, and
systematically. The same action is being taken with respect to requests
for personal information submitted under the Privacy Act. Although these
practices were commenced in earnest only in the latter part of FY 99/00,
the percentage of AIA cases completed within allowable time frames
increased from 35.7% for FY 98/99, to 47.8% for the FY 99/00. Similarly,
the number of Privacy Act requests responded to within allowable time
frames increased from 16.4% to 34.3% over the same period. Preliminary
figures for the first month of FY 00/01 show these improvements continuing
to accelerate, with 81.6 % and 51.3% of Access to Information and Privacy
cases respectively being completed on time.
|
|
The ATIP related software that was acquired
last FY contains sophisticated time and case management tools that have
contributed to the efficient processing of individual Access to
Information and Privacy Act requests by DAIP employees. The automated
reports capable of being generated using the same software have enabled
involved middle and senior management to identify and correct emerging
problems before they become obstacles to the Department's openness and
transparency objectives. As the issues of delay and deemed refusal are
dealt with, DAIP will explore ways to make still better use of technology
to improve its ATIP performance. |
Policy and Training |
Amendment to Section 67 of the AIA was proclaimed on 25 March 1999,
thus introducing penalties under criminal law for document falsification,
destruction, concealment, and other acts, where they are taken with the
intent to deny the right of access guaranteed by the AIA. This amendment
served as the catalyst for revision of existing policy guidance and
instruction applicable to the administration of the AIA in DND. As a
result, revised Departmental Administrative Orders and Directives (DAOD's)
were distributed electronically throughout the Department and the CF on 12
October 1999 via the institutional IntraNet where they have remained
readily available for the use and guidance of all Departmental employees
and CF members.
|
|
In last year's Annual Report reference was made to then recently
promulgated policy direction respecting informal employee access to
personal information. It was anticipated this policy would facilitate
local access to routine personal information by employees, and reduce the
number Privacy Act requests they had historically been obliged to make.
The 27% decrease in Privacy caseload figures suggests that structured
marketing of this policy, combined with vigorous compliance monitoring is
having the intended result. |
|
On 1 April 1998 the Department began development and delivery of formal
ATIP education. In the two years that have passed, generic and custom
designed ATIP courses, briefings, and information sessions have been
delivered to more than 2,500 members and employees. This has relieved the
pressing need for ATIP training that had accumulated in some parts of the
institution, and enabled the delivery of future training to become
increasingly proactive, 'outreaching', and systematic. To this end,
all Departmental Assistant Deputy Ministers, their Canadian Forces
counterparts, and other members of the institution's senior management
team have been asked to identify the ATIP training needs of their
respective organizations for programming and delivery by DAIP during FY
00/01. This shift to proactive training and sensitization is a significant
departure from past practices and is expected to increase institutional
awareness of federal Access to Information and Privacy laws - resulting
in greater compliance with them. |
DND/CF Reading Room |
DND began providing an informal access service in FY 95/96 that enabled
individuals to request and receive copies of records requested by, and
released to previous applicants - without having to submit a separate
formal AIA request themselves. While the informal process does not confer
the rights of complaint that accompany formal requests, steadily
increasing numbers of individuals have opted for the informal method of
access as evidenced by the following table. |
|
FY |
Formal requests received |
Informal requests received |
% of total requests represented by informal
requests |
1995-96 |
869 |
57 |
5.9% |
1996-97 |
942 |
80 |
7.8% |
1997-98 |
861 |
130 |
13.3% |
1998-99 |
1,031 |
422 |
29% |
1999-00 |
1,063 |
541 |
33% |
|
|
National Defence has lead the Public Service in applying Web-based
technology to provide Canadians with information respecting records
released under the AIA. To improve the delivery of informal access
services, for example, the Department began posting synopses of many of
its closed AIA cases to the Internet in 1997. Not only has this initiative
successfully enabled the delivery of these services to sharply increasing
numbers of Canadians as indicated in the table above; it has provided
tangible evidence of the department's commitment to the principles of
openness and transparency. |
|
Transparency |
Looking ahead to the coming year, DND plans to build on progress that
it has made to date in the areas of openness and transparency.
Consideration will be given, for example, to expanding the existing
Departmental Access to Information Web Site to include not only synopses
of closed AIA cases as is the present case, but to possibly include
electronic copies of the released documents as well. Related to options
that will be explored in this regard, are those that have to do with
electronic receipt of and reply to, Access to Information Act requests -
and, where indicated, electronic payment of chargeable fees. |
Management of Information Holdings |
As has been observed recently by the Information Commissioner, an
institution's ability to respond fully and completely to AIA requests is
heavily dependent on the quality of its information management practices.
Like all other institutions, DND is in the process of migrating from an
exclusively paper environment to one that is electronic. While the ability
to respond fully to AIA requests should not be the only reason for an
institution to manage its information assets effectively, Departmental
ATIP staff have already begun acting as catalysts for managed change to
existing DND information and records management practices. |
Privacy Policy and Direction |
With the promulgation of revised and updated AIA related DAODs,
attention will be focussed on the production of similarly renewed policy
direction respecting Privacy Act, and its administration within DND and
the CF. Chief among the objectives of these DAODs will be the delivery of
clear direction respecting the not only the right of access granted in the
Privacy Act, but clear direction respecting the collection, use,
disclosure, and retention of personal information under the control of the
Department and the CF. |
Training and Education |
Departmental ATIP staff will continue to provide specialized and
institutionally unique ATIP training to address the requirements of
individual organizational elements. At the same time, emphasis will
continue to be placed on the delivery of basic threshold ATIP knowledge to
all members of the Defence Team. The use of alternative media in
delivering ATIP educational messages will also be explored during the
coming year. Awareness of those organizational elements that have received
ATIP training may be coupled with ATIP performance measurement across the
institution to help senior managers assess the extent of institutional
compliance with ATIP legislation. |
Part 4 - Statistics
|
|
Report on the access to information act
Report on the privacy act
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
|
This is an alphabetical list of abbreviations and acronyms used in this
report.
AIA:
|
Access to Information Act
|
ATIP:
|
Access to Information and Privacy
|
CAC:
|
Consulting and Audit Canada
|
CDS:
|
Chief of the Defence Staff
|
CF:
|
Canadian Forces
|
DAIP:
|
Director or Directorate of Access to Information and
Privacy
|
DM:
|
Deputy Minister
|
DAOD:
|
Defence Administrative Order and Directive
|
DSCDS:
|
Defence Subject Classification & Disposition System
|
DND:
|
Department of National Defence
|
FY:
|
Fiscal year
|
MND:
|
Minister of National Defence
|
NDHQ:
|
National Defence Headquarters
|
PA:
|
Privacy Act
|
TB:
|
Treasury Board
|
|