National Defence - Government of Canada
  Skip all menusSkip First Menu  Français  Contact Us   Help      Search      Canada Site
 ADM (Fin CS)        Defence Site   
,
ADM (Fin CS)
DAIP
Financial Publications
Pension Plan and Release Pay Benefits
DAOD's
QR&O's
CFAO's
ATIP
Taxes

ANNUAL REPORT TO PARLIAMENT, 1999-2000

Changing Direction

The administration of the Access to Information Act (AIA) and Privacy Act

The Department of National Defence

Table of Contents

Annual Report to Parliament, 1999-2000

Foreward

Annual report to Parliament

Section 72 of both the Access to Information Act (AIA) and the Privacy Act requires that the head of every Government institution prepare and submit to Parliament an annual report on the administration of the Acts within the institution during each financial year. This is the seventeenth Annual Report to Parliament on administering the Acts in the Department of National Defence (DND) and the Canadian Forces (CF).

Purpose The purpose of this annual report is to describe how the Department administered Access to Information and Privacy activities and fulfilled its responsibilities in relation to the Acts during the period from April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000.
ATIP combined administration With the exception of the Ombudsman's office, one coordinator administers both the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act within the Department of National Defence (DND) and the Canadian Forces (CF).
Report format This annual report has been prepared using the Information MappingŪ methodology.

Part 1
The Basics

Overview

Proclamation The Access to Information Act (AIA) and the Privacy Act (PA) were proclaimed on July 1, 1983.
Purpose of AIA The purpose of the Access to Information Act is to afford Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and any person present in Canada the right to access information contained in Government records, subject to certain specific and limited exemptions.
Purpose of the Privacy Act The purpose of the Privacy Act is to extend to individuals the right of access to information about themselves held by the Government, subject to specific and limited exemptions; and to protect individuals' privacy by preventing others from having access to their personal information, and by affording individuals substantial control over how their personal information is collected, used and disclosed.
Formal requests for rights of access

In addition to establishing rights of access to Government information, both Acts provide for a formal request mechanism that individuals may use to exercise those rights. These mechanisms include:

  • Time limits and other response obligations for the institutions holding the information; and
  • The procedure for lodging a complaint if an individual is not satisfied with how the institution handled a formal request.
Granting informal access The statutes, regulations, and Treasury Board (TB) guidelines clearly encourage institutions to afford individuals access to information to which they are entitled without having to resort to the formal procedures provided for in the legislation. The Access to Information and Privacy Acts are intended to complement, not replace, other less formal administrative procedures for obtaining government information.
Importance of informal access Extensive use of informal access is recognized by the Department of National Defence as an effective and simplified way to further the principles of open government on which Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) legislation is based.

Departmental mandate

Minister's responsibility The Minister of National Defence is responsible for controlling and managing the Department, which includes the Canadian Forces, and for all matters relating to national defence.
Mission of the DND and the Canadian Forces The mission of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces is to defend Canada and Canadian interests and values while contributing to international peace and security.
Defence White Paper

The 1994 Defence White Paper for DND/CF confirmed the requirement to maintain multipurpose, combat-capable sea, land, and air forces to protect Canadians and project their interests and values abroad. The Department will remain focused on its personnel, placing strong emphasis on Quality of Life issues and ensure that personnel receive the proper training and equipment to enable them to carry out operational missions without unnecessary risk.

Defence 2020

Defence Strategy 2020 marks a significant milestone. Starting from the existing policy base set out in the 1994 Defence White Paper, the senior leadership team has created a strategic framework for Defence planning and decision-making to help guide the institution well into the next century. In identifying the challenges and opportunities facing the Department and the Canadian Forces, recognition is taken of the need for the Defence Team to report on its activities to Parliament and the public in a manner that is open, relevant, and understandable. Strong institutional support of ATIP legislation and related administrative practices is being fostered in the Department and the CF to ensure the values of openness and transparency become, and remain, part of the organizational culture in the 21st century.

Departmental organization

Military and civilian components The Department's unique personnel structure is made up of two separate components - one military and one civilian. This table depicts the number of personnel in each component:

Departmental Personnel Figures by Component

Military members: Regular force: 59,330
  Primary Reserve force: 21,500
Civilian employees: 19,300
Total Military and Civilian Personnel: 100,130
Chain of command

National Defence Headquarters (NDHQ) in Ottawa provides broad direction for administration and operations, with specific execution being assigned to the various elements of the Canadian Forces located across the country. CF regular and reserve-force personnel live, train, and work in every province and territory of Canada, as well as at bases, stations, and operational missions around the world.

As described in the Departmental Report on Plans and Priorities, the Ombudsman's office became operational on16 June 1999. Established to act as a neutral third party, independent of the military chain of command and civilian management, the mission of the Ombudsman's office is to ensure that all defence members are treated fairly by resolving individual complaints and contributing substantial and long lasting improvements to their welfare. Like the remainder of the Department, the Ombudsman is subject to the Access to Information and Privacy Acts. To ensure the confidentiality of information brought to his attention, however, the Ombudsman has been given autonomy in ATIP matters related to his office. Accordingly, a separate annual report will be tabled respecting the administration of the Access to Information and Privacy Acts within the Office of the Ombudsman.

DND organization chart

Organization chart The following diagram shows the organization of National Defence as of March 31, 2000.

DND organization chart

DND/CF ATIP organization

Departmental ATIP Co-ordinator At DND, the Director of Access to Information and Privacy (DAIP) administers and co-ordinates the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. The DAIP organization comes under the authority of the Assistant Deputy Minister Finance and Corporate Services. DAIP seeks specialist advice on legal, public affairs, and policy matters from other NDHQ organizations as required. ATIP administration related to the office of the Ombudsman is conducted separately and independently by the Ombudsman, without reference to DAIP.
Designation Order The departmental designation order for Access to Information and Privacy reads as follows:
"The Minister of National Defence, pursuant to Section 73 of the Access to Information Act and Privacy Act, hereby designates the person holding the position of Director Access to Information and Privacy to exercise the powers and functions of the Minister as the Head of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces under the Acts." A separate delegation provides the Ombudsman with the same authorities, but for ATIP issues pertinent to that office.
DAIP's mandate The mandate of DAIP is to act on behalf of the Minister of National Defence in enforcing compliance with legislation, regulations, and government policy and create departmental directions, including standards, in all matters relating to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. DAIP's authority in this regard extends to all elements of the Canadian Forces and the Department National Defence - except for the Office of the Ombudsman.
Organization across DND/CF

Within each subordinate headquarters, base, station, and unit, there is a designated senior CF member or Departmental employee who is responsible for local ATIP administration.

The national ATIP coordinator (DAIP) is responsible for ensuring that these officers have the necessary policies and guidance.

Part 2
The Year in Review

Ministerial Support

In previous years, Departmental ATIP performance has been observed as needing improvement. To begin changing this reality and the perceptions associated with it, the MND wrote to the DM and CDS on 6 April 1999. In this letter, the MND provided clear direction that AIA legislation be complied with, not only to ensure respect for the law, but to reinforce institutional openness and transparency and thereby contribute to the public's confidence in the Department and the CF.

DAIP Organization

The ATIP organization at National Defence (DAIP) employs 32 civilian and

9 military personnel. Contract personnel were engaged at various levels during the year on an as required basis.

Caseload In FY 99/00 DAIP received 1,063 requests for information under the Access to Information Act, and 6,579 requests for personal information under the Privacy Act. Figures for FY 98/99 were 1031 and 9031 respectively. As indicated in the table below, FY 99/00 represents the first period in a number of years during which DND has made positive inroads into its backlog of AIA cases by responding to more requests than it received.
 
Fiscal Year Number of AIA 
Requests Received
Number of AIA 
Requests Responded To
FY 95/96 869 870
FY 96/97 942 882
FY 97/98 861 846
FY 98/99 1,031 885
FY 99/00 1,063 1,252

DND also aggressively targeted its longstanding backlog of Privacy Act requests during FY 99/00 by establishing a dedicated 'SWAT Team' to address them. This resulted in a reduction of unanswered requests from in excess of 4,000 in April 1998, to some 700 at the end of FY 99/00, of which less than half remain without a response within statutory time limits.

Refinement to Team Structure

The integrated Access and Privacy team structure reported last year was refined during FY 99/00. Drawing from the Information Commissioner's 1997 review of this Department's Directorate of Access to Information and Privacy (DAIP), and from a 1998 review by consultants engaged through Consulting and Audit Canada (CAC), the four teams that were initially created have been reduced to three. Emerging resource imbalances and inequities in workload distribution have been corrected. Classification levels of operational staff have been reviewed, and upgraded where warranted. Additionally, DAIP management has been reduced by one Team Leader; six additional ATIP analyst positions have been established; and the over-reliance on contract employees has been stopped.

Improved

ATIP Case

Management

Building on this foundation, DAIP has begun proactive management of individual AIA case files to ensure that legally allowable and appropriate extensions to response deadlines are claimed consistently, and systematically. The same action is being taken with respect to requests for personal information submitted under the Privacy Act. Although these practices were commenced in earnest only in the latter part of FY 99/00, the percentage of AIA cases completed within allowable time frames increased from 35.7% for FY 98/99, to 47.8% for the FY 99/00. Similarly, the number of Privacy Act requests responded to within allowable time frames increased from 16.4% to 34.3% over the same period. Preliminary figures for the first month of FY 00/01 show these improvements continuing to accelerate, with 81.6 % and 51.3% of Access to Information and Privacy cases respectively being completed on time.

The ATIP related software that was acquired last FY contains sophisticated time and case management tools that have contributed to the efficient processing of individual Access to Information and Privacy Act requests by DAIP employees. The automated reports capable of being generated using the same software have enabled involved middle and senior management to identify and correct emerging problems before they become obstacles to the Department's openness and transparency objectives. As the issues of delay and deemed refusal are dealt with, DAIP will explore ways to make still better use of technology to improve its ATIP performance.
Policy and Training

Amendment to Section 67 of the AIA was proclaimed on 25 March 1999, thus introducing penalties under criminal law for document falsification, destruction, concealment, and other acts, where they are taken with the intent to deny the right of access guaranteed by the AIA. This amendment served as the catalyst for revision of existing policy guidance and instruction applicable to the administration of the AIA in DND. As a result, revised Departmental Administrative Orders and Directives (DAOD's) were distributed electronically throughout the Department and the CF on 12 October 1999 via the institutional IntraNet where they have remained readily available for the use and guidance of all Departmental employees and CF members.

  In last year's Annual Report reference was made to then recently promulgated policy direction respecting informal employee access to personal information. It was anticipated this policy would facilitate local access to routine personal information by employees, and reduce the number Privacy Act requests they had historically been obliged to make. The 27% decrease in Privacy caseload figures suggests that structured marketing of this policy, combined with vigorous compliance monitoring is having the intended result.
 

On 1 April 1998 the Department began development and delivery of formal ATIP education. In the two years that have passed, generic and custom designed ATIP courses, briefings, and information sessions have been delivered to more than 2,500 members and employees. This has relieved the pressing need for ATIP training that had accumulated in some parts of the institution, and enabled the delivery of future training to become increasingly proactive, 'outreaching', and systematic. To this end, all Departmental Assistant Deputy Ministers, their Canadian Forces counterparts, and other members of the institution's senior management team have been asked to identify the ATIP training needs of their respective organizations for programming and delivery by DAIP during FY 00/01. This shift to proactive training and sensitization is a significant departure from past practices and is expected to increase institutional awareness of federal Access to Information and Privacy laws - resulting in greater compliance with them.

DND/CF Reading Room

DND began providing an informal access service in FY 95/96 that enabled individuals to request and receive copies of records requested by, and released to previous applicants - without having to submit a separate formal AIA request themselves. While the informal process does not confer the rights of complaint that accompany formal requests, steadily increasing numbers of individuals have opted for the informal method of access as evidenced by the following table.

FY

Formal requests received

Informal requests received

% of total requests represented by informal requests

1995-96

869

57

5.9%

1996-97

942

80

7.8%

1997-98

861

130

13.3%

1998-99

1,031

422

29%

1999-00

1,063

541

33%

 

National Defence has lead the Public Service in applying Web-based technology to provide Canadians with information respecting records released under the AIA. To improve the delivery of informal access services, for example, the Department began posting synopses of many of its closed AIA cases to the Internet in 1997. Not only has this initiative successfully enabled the delivery of these services to sharply increasing numbers of Canadians as indicated in the table above; it has provided tangible evidence of the department's commitment to the principles of openness and transparency.

Part 3
The Year Ahead

Transparency

Looking ahead to the coming year, DND plans to build on progress that it has made to date in the areas of openness and transparency. Consideration will be given, for example, to expanding the existing Departmental Access to Information Web Site to include not only synopses of closed AIA cases as is the present case, but to possibly include electronic copies of the released documents as well. Related to options that will be explored in this regard, are those that have to do with electronic receipt of and reply to, Access to Information Act requests - and, where indicated, electronic payment of chargeable fees.

Management of Information Holdings

As has been observed recently by the Information Commissioner, an institution's ability to respond fully and completely to AIA requests is heavily dependent on the quality of its information management practices. Like all other institutions, DND is in the process of migrating from an exclusively paper environment to one that is electronic. While the ability to respond fully to AIA requests should not be the only reason for an institution to manage its information assets effectively, Departmental ATIP staff have already begun acting as catalysts for managed change to existing DND information and records management practices.

Privacy Policy and Direction

With the promulgation of revised and updated AIA related DAODs, attention will be focussed on the production of similarly renewed policy direction respecting Privacy Act, and its administration within DND and the CF. Chief among the objectives of these DAODs will be the delivery of clear direction respecting the not only the right of access granted in the Privacy Act, but clear direction respecting the collection, use, disclosure, and retention of personal information under the control of the Department and the CF.

Training and Education

Departmental ATIP staff will continue to provide specialized and institutionally unique ATIP training to address the requirements of individual organizational elements. At the same time, emphasis will continue to be placed on the delivery of basic threshold ATIP knowledge to all members of the Defence Team. The use of alternative media in delivering ATIP educational messages will also be explored during the coming year. Awareness of those organizational elements that have received ATIP training may be coupled with ATIP performance measurement across the institution to help senior managers assess the extent of institutional compliance with ATIP legislation.

Part 4 - Statistics

Report on the access to information act

Report on the privacy act

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviations and Acronyms

This is an alphabetical list of abbreviations and acronyms used in this report.

AIA:

 Access to Information Act

ATIP:

 Access to Information and Privacy

CAC:

 Consulting and Audit Canada

CDS:

 Chief of the Defence Staff

CF:

 Canadian Forces

DAIP:

 Director or Directorate of Access to Information and Privacy

DM:

 Deputy Minister

DAOD:

 Defence Administrative Order and Directive

DSCDS:

 Defence Subject Classification & Disposition System

DND:

 Department of National Defence

FY:

 Fiscal year

MND:

 Minister of National Defence

NDHQ:

 National Defence Headquarters

PA:

 Privacy Act

TB:

 Treasury Board