|
![](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport18.jpg) |
National Roundtables on Future High Performance Sport Funding
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA
April 16, 2004
Chair:
The Honourable David Anderson
Minister of the Environment
Main Themes
- Early introduction to professional, committed coaches, so kids develop the right skills immediately
- Network of support including sport scientists, classifiers, medical support, psychological support, etc
- Increased living allowances
- Training and competition opportunities
- Good Athlete Development Model
- Athlete support to address their needs
- Need increased number of full-time, professional coaches
- Salaries, mentoring and professional development for coaches
- Good coaches ensure good program delivery
- Need good coaches for developing athletes, in clubs
- Coaches have impact on athletes, performance, participation in sport and are role models.
- Need to target funding to National Sport Organizations (NSOs) to help them develop and implement systematic plans from grassroots to international.
- Need development to achieve high performance
- Sport Centres need to include all sports, and have full services (eg. Medical, Psychology, Specialists, etc.). Being all together, sports can learn from each other.
- Need to create a system, an effective environment for athlete and coaches, which include ancillary services
- There is a direct correlation between dollars and medals; “You get what you put in”
- Canada should be happy with results, as that is what we are putting in… until we put more in, we should not expect better results
- Canada does not have a driving force for excellence
- Government funding reflects this lack of direction, ambition or stated goals
- Canadians have to stop linking sport with other elements (health, fitness, fair-play, building ethics, building esteem). Linking sport with other elements has an anesthetizing effect.
- Currently, Canadians do not recognize or reward excellence. Canada needs to have a “desperate desire” to win – and funding has to support that.
- Medals come from centres of excellence, whether consciously created or happen by chance. Need to establish more centres of excellence.
- Learn from examples of winning nations
- Eg. Australia made decisions 30 years ago to be a winning nation.
Other Comments
- Sport needs a plan to drive its programming and support.
- Need to apply funds based on the NSOs plan and expectations of the future.
- Private sector, business, speculate with future potential, not just past performance.
- Athletes have been consulted over and over again. It's time for results.
- Canada has some great programs; we need to support better programs and not just more programs.
- The new $10 Million injection represents 0.5% of the gun registry.
- General consensus that there is a correlation between fitness and High Performance (HP) Sport.
- Community supports its athletes, hence does impact their participation.
- Sport providers have a responsibility to treat all participants as if they have the potential to become HP athletes.
- In current school sport system, PE teachers do not know how to make sport fun and keep kids involved.
- Need money at the top, but also need money at the lower level to encourage youth to go on.
- Kids need to learn to run, jump, throw and have fun. Excellence comes at a later stage.
- Kids not in sport because of Olympians, they get put in sport by their parents. However, kids leave sport because of poor coaching. Hence need quality coaching at entry level.
- One participant questioned the value of medals, specifically the impact of one team medal where 20 athletes are on the podium vs. individual medals where one sport may have 6-8 medals. What is the impact on participation, involvement of people? What value does the government put on the one team medal vs. the handful of individual medals?
- Double AAP Stipends.
- Double current contributions.
- $8-9M High Performance; $5M on coaching; $20M on La Relève; $1-5M on Aboriginal.
- $150M total investment.
- Need similar amount as what other winning nations are investing; and need to fund participation with 1-2% of the Health budget.
- Participants suggested Canada learn from other successful countries.
- Need clear focused plan, and the decision-making process will become evident once that is in place.
- Norway : retired athletes are put into decision-making roles
- Some participants favoured a process similar to the Sport Review Process: a panel of experts, sport people who can make knowledgeable decisions.
|
![](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport18b.jpg) |
![](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport132.jpg)
![Key Sport Links](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/kesportlinks_e.gif)
![Major Events](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/majorevents_e.gif)
![Sport Facts](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sportfacts_e.gif)
![](/web/20061216033304im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/news_e.gif)
|