Skip first menu Skip all menus Canada Canadian Heritage Government of Canada
FrançaisContact UsHelpSearchCanada Site
Decorative image
  Location: Home - Sport Canada - National Roundtables on Future High Performance Sport Funding 2006-12-15  




National Roundtables on Future High Performance Sport Funding

VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA

April 8, 2004

Chair:

The Honourable David Anderson
Minister of the Environment

Main Themes

  • Funding stability is a necessity for long-term athlete development
    • Timeframe for development should be at least six years
  • More money is needed at all levels of the Canadian sport system, and by all partners, including the corporate sector
  • Overwhelming consensus that we cannot continue to try to be everything to everybody
    • In doing this, we fall short everywhere
  • NSOs are the sport technical experts, and should be given more flexibility in funding from Sport Canada
  • NSOs need to be more directly involved in funding decisions – not just through the COC, etc.
  • NSCs are not being utilized to their full potential, yet are an extremely valuable tool for success
    • Athletes need to be full-time athletes
    • The policy behind the AAP needs to be clarified by the federal government
  • Winter sports focused on 2010, while summer sports focused on ensuring that the system was in place beyond 2010.
    • All acknowledged the danger of lack of funds in system post-2010
  • Some concern that with 2010 Olympic/Paralympics winter sports will be targetted.
  • Access to facilities is a consistent priority
  • Canada needs an international hosting program that provides Canadian athletes with competition opportunities at home
  • Return of physical activity in schools is essential
  • Increased funding for coaching is a priority
  • A great athlete needs a great coach

Other Comments

  • The government should take a leadership role
  • All funding partners need to collaborate
  • We need to bolster capacity – which can be done in 6 yrs
  • Winter sports have determined that $30 million (new money) is needed in winter sports to succeed in 2010
  • New funding should go through NSOs and NSCs
  • The role of governments needs to be clearly defined – governments should consider getting out of the program delivery business
  • Should money go directly to athletes?
    • 2002 Podium example where giving money to a team proved more successful than directly to the individual athletes
  • The difficulty with getting corporate sponsorship stems from a lack of media attention to amateur sport
  • Sports lack the capacity to attract corporate sponsorship
  • Ending the Sponsorship Program hit sport hard
  • Athletes need all the support and resources required to do their jobs
  • AAP should be increased at all levels, with a focus on junior athletes
  • Increased support for coaching, with a view to bridging the gap between the club level and the national level
  • Funding to NSOs should be flexible
  • Increase tax incentive
  • Promote active/healthy living
  • Important to not just target 2010, but beyond
  • Diversification of funding sources is required
    • Need a more integrated approach
  • The media should show more support – the CBC should take a leadership role, particularly in athletes development
  • Financial responsibilities have been downloaded to NSOs – both from the COC and from the CBC
  • There needs to be a balance between systemic and targeted approaches
  • High Performance athletes should be used to promote health
    • There is a clear link between sport and health
    • While athletes choose to compete, they still need help
    • AAP should be increased to $2000/month
  • Athletes are generally unprepared for the transition from junior to senior teams
  • Successful sports in Canada have centralized
    • Relocating means financial loss for athletes
  • Governments should take a leadership role on the nutritional supplements issue
  • Lack of funding for the Sport Centre in Victoria (Pacific Sport)
  • Link (or lack thereof) between sport and physical activity/health
    • Why are the two as separate at the federal level
  • $100 million (in Sport Canada budget) seems to be a lot of money
    • Not a matter necessarily of more money, but better spending of money
  • Money should be spent addressing the performance needs of athletes
  • Sports do not have stability in their coaching ranks
  • Coaching is critical
  • Long-term development is a key
  • There is a real need to develop National Sport Centres
  • Call for more AAP funding across the board v. call for targeting sports/athletes
  • All participants in the system do not share the same vision for high performance sport
  • Major reform is required in coaching
    • The federal government should challenge provinces to provide matching dollars for coaching positions
    • Need full-time developmental coaches
  • The organizational structure of sport in Canada needs revision
    • NSOs / PSOs are involved in the entire lifecycle of the athlete
      • As opposed to other partners, who get the athletes for specified periods of time (i.e. NSC's, COC, etc.)
      • These organizations need strong organizational foundations
  • Calls for fundamental policy reform of the system
    • If federal government is going to target, this needs to be reflected in its policies
  • Structural reform is required
  • Infrastructure – talk of high performance funding and success cannot be done without discussion of the need for facilities
  • Our system focuses on high performance at the international level
    • Need to focus on high performance at the national level
    • Need to give athletes an incentive to stay in Canada – in the form of training and competition opportunities
    • Athletes are headed to the US – where focus of high performance is on college competition – this can conflict with the Canadian focus on international competition
  • We need a solid domestic international hosting program
  • More money is needed for junior teams, which are for the most part self-funded
  • For Aboriginal athletes, high performance competition happens at the North American Indigenous Games
    • This can be the transition to mainstream high performance sport
  • The athlete development model for Aboriginal athletes is either non-existent or extremely under-developed
    • At this point, therefore, discussion of high performance sport is premature
    • Need the building blocks first
    • Need to focus on development
  • There is no aboriginal sport policy in Canada
  • Aboriginal sport is a parallel system
    • Approach should be wholistic
    • Direct funding to the ASC is required
    • Priority funding for NAIG is required
    • Need a sport excellence model
    • Need a total sport approach




Key Sport Links

Major Events

Sport Facts






Date modified: 2004-04-30
Important Notices