|
![](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport18.jpg) |
National Roundtables on Future High Performance Sport Funding
VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA
April 8, 2004
Chair:
The Honourable David Anderson
Minister of the Environment
Main Themes
- Funding stability is a necessity for long-term athlete development
- Timeframe for development should be at least six years
- More money is needed at all levels of the Canadian sport system, and by all partners, including the corporate sector
- Overwhelming consensus that we cannot continue to try to be everything to everybody
- In doing this, we fall short everywhere
- NSOs are the sport technical experts, and should be given more flexibility in funding from Sport Canada
- NSOs need to be more directly involved in funding decisions – not just through the COC, etc.
- NSCs are not being utilized to their full potential, yet are an extremely valuable tool for success
- Athletes need to be full-time athletes
- The policy behind the AAP needs to be clarified by the federal government
- Winter sports focused on 2010, while summer sports focused on ensuring that the system was in place beyond 2010.
- All acknowledged the danger of lack of funds in system post-2010
- Some concern that with 2010 Olympic/Paralympics winter sports will be targetted.
- Access to facilities is a consistent priority
- Canada needs an international hosting program that provides Canadian athletes with competition opportunities at home
- Return of physical activity in schools is essential
- Increased funding for coaching is a priority
- A great athlete needs a great coach
Other Comments
- The government should take a leadership role
- All funding partners need to collaborate
- We need to bolster capacity – which can be done in 6 yrs
- Winter sports have determined that $30 million (new money) is needed in winter sports to succeed in 2010
- New funding should go through NSOs and NSCs
- The role of governments needs to be clearly defined – governments should consider getting out of the program delivery business
- Should money go directly to athletes?
- 2002 Podium example where giving money to a team proved more successful than directly to the individual athletes
- The difficulty with getting corporate sponsorship stems from a lack of media attention to amateur sport
- Sports lack the capacity to attract corporate sponsorship
- Ending the Sponsorship Program hit sport hard
- Athletes need all the support and resources required to do their jobs
- AAP should be increased at all levels, with a focus on junior athletes
- Increased support for coaching, with a view to bridging the gap between the club level and the national level
- Funding to NSOs should be flexible
- Increase tax incentive
- Promote active/healthy living
- Important to not just target 2010, but beyond
- Diversification of funding sources is required
- Need a more integrated approach
- The media should show more support – the CBC should take a leadership role, particularly in athletes development
- Financial responsibilities have been downloaded to NSOs – both from the COC and from the CBC
- There needs to be a balance between systemic and targeted approaches
- High Performance athletes should be used to promote health
- There is a clear link between sport and health
- While athletes choose to compete, they still need help
- AAP should be increased to $2000/month
- Athletes are generally unprepared for the transition from junior to senior teams
- Successful sports in Canada have centralized
- Relocating means financial loss for athletes
- Governments should take a leadership role on the nutritional supplements issue
- Lack of funding for the Sport Centre in Victoria (Pacific Sport)
- Link (or lack thereof) between sport and physical activity/health
- Why are the two as separate at the federal level
- $100 million (in Sport Canada budget) seems to be a lot of money
- Not a matter necessarily of more money, but better spending of money
- Money should be spent addressing the performance needs of athletes
- Sports do not have stability in their coaching ranks
- Coaching is critical
- Long-term development is a key
- There is a real need to develop National Sport Centres
- Call for more AAP funding across the board v. call for targeting sports/athletes
- All participants in the system do not share the same vision for high performance sport
- Major reform is required in coaching
- The federal government should challenge provinces to provide matching dollars for coaching positions
- Need full-time developmental coaches
- The organizational structure of sport in Canada needs revision
- NSOs / PSOs are involved in the entire lifecycle of the athlete
- As opposed to other partners, who get the athletes for specified periods of time (i.e. NSC's, COC, etc.)
- These organizations need strong organizational foundations
- Calls for fundamental policy reform of the system
- If federal government is going to target, this needs to be reflected in its policies
- Structural reform is required
- Infrastructure – talk of high performance funding and success cannot be done without discussion of the need for facilities
- Our system focuses on high performance at the international level
- Need to focus on high performance at the national level
- Need to give athletes an incentive to stay in Canada – in the form of training and competition opportunities
- Athletes are headed to the US – where focus of high performance is on college competition – this can conflict with the Canadian focus on international competition
- We need a solid domestic international hosting program
- More money is needed for junior teams, which are for the most part self-funded
- For Aboriginal athletes, high performance competition happens at the North American Indigenous Games
- This can be the transition to mainstream high performance sport
- The athlete development model for Aboriginal athletes is either non-existent or extremely under-developed
- At this point, therefore, discussion of high performance sport is premature
- Need the building blocks first
- Need to focus on development
- There is no aboriginal sport policy in Canada
- Aboriginal sport is a parallel system
- Approach should be wholistic
- Direct funding to the ASC is required
- Priority funding for NAIG is required
- Need a sport excellence model
- Need a total sport approach
|
![](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport18b.jpg) |
![](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sport132.jpg)
![Key Sport Links](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/kesportlinks_e.gif)
![Major Events](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/majorevents_e.gif)
![Sport Facts](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/sportfacts_e.gif)
![](/web/20061216033252im_/http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/images/news_e.gif)
|