Government of British Columbia FIRB Home Top Image Map
British Columbia Marketing Board
"" SearchWhat's NewReports and PoliciesContacts ""
     
""
Programs & Services

³

About the FIRB

³

Regulated Marketing
  • Supervisory Role
  • Appellate Role
  • Signatory Role

³

Farm Practices
  • What is a farm
     operation?
  • Complaints Role
  • Studies & Reports
     Role

³

The Board
  • Members
   - Recruitment
  • Staff

³

Policies, Practices and Procedures
  •  Appellate
     - Filing an Appeal
  •  Farm Practices
     - Filing a Complaint

³

Decisions
Specialty Review
Supervisory Reviews

Regulated Marketing
   Appeals

   (from 2003 onwards)

•  Farm Practices
    Complaints

³

Statistics
  • Regulated Marketing
  • Farm Practices

³

Board Governance

Other Links

³ Common Questions
(under development)
 

Other Links
³ Site Map  
³ Legislation  
³ Marketing Boards & Commissions
³ Related Links
³ Site Home

 

 

Farm Practices Complaints Administration

Fiscal Year 2005/06

BACKGROUND:

  • Fifty formal complaints have been received in the BC Farm Industry Review Board's (the "FIRB") first ten years of farm practices operation. The majority of complaints are filed on behalf of more than one person, with over 500 different neighbours represented in the complaints filed to date. These numbers can be attributed to increasing urban encroachment into farming areas; however, the changing nature of farming is also a factor.  The increased size of farms, new types of farming (such as large-scale greenhouses and fish farms) and the diversification of farm operations to include on-farm processing and direct marketing can have a greater and broader impact on their neighbourhoods.
     
  • Eight formal complaints were filed in 05/06.  With carryovers, a total of 20 complaints were administered. Two were resolved by settlement, 11 were heard/decided, 3 are heard and pending decision, 2 are scheduled to be heard, 2 are in the initial stages.
     
  • The settlement process continues to be the most effective method of resolving these disputes between neighbours. However, the increasing sensitivity, volatility and complexity of these interest-based disputes, along with their potential broader impact on both the farming and non-farming communities, raise issues which are sometimes best heard and decided by a FIRB hearing panel.


Summary of Complaints Administered by Fiscal Year
 

Complaints 

Fiscal Yr
2003/04
Fiscal Yr
2004/05
 

Fiscal Yr
2005/06

 

Carried over from previous year

7

11

12

Filed

8 5 8
Total Administered 15 16 20

Withdrawn

2 1  

Heard/Decided

4 3 11

Heard/Pending decision

0 5 3

Scheduled to be heard

4 5 2

Initial stages

0 1 2

Resolved by Settlement

5 1 2
Total complaints disposed of 4 4 13
Active complaints at end FY 11
(to Feb 9/04)
12
(to Jan 17/05)
7
(to Jan 23/06


Summary by commodity, issue and location of 8 complaints filed this fiscal year (to Jan 23/06)

Propane Cannon (noise)

2

Osoyoos and Oliver

Poultry farm
(odour/flies/dust/rodents/manure/noise)

4

Lindell Beach (2),
Abbotsford (2)

Compost (odour)  1 Richmond
Vineyard (irrigation)  1 Pender Island


 Updated January 30, 2006

 

Return to Top

 

Feedback Privacy Disclaimer Copyright Top Footer Image Map
"" "" "" "" ""