MR. AXWORTHY - ADDRESS TO THE 1999 POST-MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE ASEAN-CANADA 'TEN-PLUS-ONE' DIALOGUE - SINGAPORE
99/45 CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
NOTES FOR AN ADDRESS BY
THE HONOURABLE LLOYD AXWORTHY,
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS,
TO THE 1999 POST-MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE
ASEAN-CANADA "TEN-PLUS-ONE" DIALOGUE
SINGAPORE
July 27, 1999
(12:30 p.m. EDT)
It is a pleasure to be here today and to take another step in the long, historic and warm relationship between Canada and ASEAN [Association of Southeast Asian Nations], in this, the 22nd year of our dialogue
relationship. If I have one message to leave with you today, it is that Canada continues to have a high level of interest and engagement in the region and with ASEAN, including responding to the effects of the
economic crisis. Last year, Canada provided close to $100 million in development assistance to the region, but our relationship with ASEAN is much deeper and more important than aid alone.
With the passage of time over these 22 years, Canada's relationship with ASEAN has been changing. This is quite natural. ASEAN itself is changing, with more members, more dialogue partners and the advent of
both the ASEAN Regional Forum and APEC [Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum] as venues to address issues important to both Canada and the ASEAN countries. One outcome of the enlargement of
ASEAN over the past few years is the reality that not all ASEAN members are at or near the same level of development. Some observers have even spoken of a two- or three-tier ASEAN. Be that as it may, we in
Canada have concluded that revitalization of the Canada-ASEAN relationship -- something we sincerely hope for -- needs to acknowledge these differing states and rates of economic development.
Our dialogue will also be revitalized by acknowledging the much richer nature that our relationship has assumed over the years. Twenty-two years ago, our shared interests were mainly in development
assistance; now, they have broadened to include the whole range of economic, political and security issues. At the end of this century, as we navigate on the tides of globalization, there is ample opportunity for
large and smaller players alike to contribute to the management of international affairs. Globalization means that we are all interconnected, and that brings both benefits and responsibilities.
In the ARF [ASEAN Regional Forum], some have been using the term "comprehensive security" in response to these trends. I have put forth the term "human security," which means seeing security issues
differently, and, more broadly, in a way that takes account of new realities. While peace and security between states remains critically important, as governments in this region are well aware, it has become clear
that national security alone is insufficient to guarantee the security and safety of our people. A key question for us -- both in discussions between ASEAN and all dialogue partners and in the ASEAN-Canada
dialogue specifically -- is this: in a global era, how can we best enhance the security of our people?
The greatest threats to human security continue to flow from violent conflict. The end of the Cold War was hailed by some as a harbinger of global peace. To some extent, of course, this has been true; reduced
tensions between major powers have opened greater prospects for global stability and peace. At the same time, however, we have witnessed the proliferation of intrastate conflicts, a particularly dangerous
trend.
It is quite clear that to respond to these challenges, we must revitalize and rework our multilateral organizations, both global and regional. Time and challenge have hobbled these institutions, but the problem is
not confined to the institutions themselves. Where they are weak and ineffective, it is partly the result of a lack of political will on the part of member states.
The maintenance of peace and security underpins economic and social progress and lies at the heart of our principal multilateral organization, the United Nations [UN]. The nature of armed conflict has changed
in the intervening decades since the United Nations was created. In the First World War, approximately 10 percent of casualties of conflict were civilian. Now, 90 percent of these casualties are civilian. The UN,
particularly the Security Council, must adapt to reflect these changes. The issue is not so much the Council's size and composition, but its mandate and effectiveness in ensuring human security.
There is also a need for more effective regional organizations. There can be no doubt that the UN needs regional partners to provide expertise, perspective and commitment, including an effective and vibrant
ARF/Post-Ministerial Conference. ASEAN's collective voice needs to be heard in international forums as we consider issues critical to us all, including non-proliferation and disarmament. I think we see the real
importance of this in the significant proposals made in the just-completed session of the ARF, such as the proposal for a code of conduct in the South China Seas. Canada is very pleased to have contributed to
work in this area, through our support of the Track II seminars on preventing conflict in the South China Seas that have been so ably chaired by Indonesia. We look forward to further fruitful cross-fertilization
between Track I and Track II efforts.
Conflict, whether actual or potential, is not the only pressing challenge to the security of our people. Their security is affected by a growing number of transnational threats. In an increasingly interdependent
world, we have all become more vulnerable. Open markets, increased world trade and a revolution in communications are highly beneficial, but they have also made borders more porous to a range of threats.
The proliferation of small arms, the mass movement of populations, international crime and corruption, and the trafficking of drugs and even of people are just some of the trends that have profoundly negative
consequences for us all. Over half the total supply of refined heroin in the world -- and the vast majority of the heroin that finds its way onto the streets of Western Canadian cities -- comes from the Golden
Triangle area. This illicit trade leaves a trail of misery in ASEAN and in Canada. Threats to human security of this kind require multilateral responses, and the ASEAN Regional Forum and the Post-Ministerial
Conference should seize the opportunity to address these emerging challenges.
Canada shares many of the priorities outlined in ASEAN's Hanoi Plan of Action -- from trade liberalization, to improving respect for human rights, to dealing with the corrosive impacts of transnational crime --
and we look forward to working with you to achieve them. In doing so, we will look to approaches that are multifaceted, targeted and flexible enough to be able to recognize the particular needs of individual
ASEAN members. It has been encouraging to see ASEAN economies recovering, but the need to address the social impact of the crisis remains. Canada will continue to devote resources to this, helping to
ensure that the recovery is sustainable.
Canada is already providing significant assistance to ASEAN in priority areas of development: in 1998-99, a total of $97 million in bilateral and regional programs. This sum is being used increasingly in
innovative ways that reflect the new realities, needs and priorities of ASEAN. In this vein, some of you will, no doubt, be aware of the training symposium earlier this month, here in Singapore, co-hosted by the
governments of Singapore and Canada. It brought together senior ASEAN and Canadian civil servants, including the recently retired head of the Canadian public service. This event aimed to strengthen regional
capacity to deal with public sector issues in the current economic situation. Similarly, there are the very successful training courses situated here in Singapore, jointly funded and presented by Canada, which
provide much-valued English as a second language education for government officials from Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.
I would also like to highlight briefly a number of other innovative and effective areas of co-operation that do not always get the attention they deserve:
- Canada is appointing a new regional Finance Counsellor this year, to be based in our High Commission in Singapore and to cover all ASEAN countries;
- Canada is funding new co-operative efforts to improve governance and build capacity in Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia and Laos; and
- in the case of East Timor, our development assistance efforts run in tandem with our contributions to improving the security situation, through our contribution to UNAMET [United Nations Mission to East
Timor] and our support to the Catholic Bishops' efforts at community reconciliation.
I would like to take this opportunity to welcome Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor as our next country co-ordinator, and extend my congratulations to Cambodia on joining ASEAN. Cambodia's accession
represents an historic moment for ASEAN, and not just because it makes the logistics of choosing country co-ordinators for your 10 dialogue partners a great deal simpler! I look forward to signing the exchange
of letters by which Cambodia will accede to the Canada-ASEAN Economic Co-operation Agreement, immediately after our meeting today.
Finally, let me say a few words of appreciation to the Philippines, our current dialogue co-ordinator. Foreign Secretary Siazon and his officials have been at the forefront of the international effort to deal with anti-personnel mines, and were welcome participants at the December 1997 Ottawa Conference on this matter. This is another example of a human security issue -- one that directly affects the daily lives of people in
the region and around the world -- that Canada and ASEAN have good reasons to discuss together. The Philippines has also been a most helpful partner in looking at ways to develop and define a new and
revitalized Canada-ASEAN relationship. The easy relationship that we have developed at the level of foreign ministers and officials bodes well for the future. We look forward to working with the Philippines, and,
looking ahead to next year, with Cambodia, to continue our efforts at revitalization. In this way, we can ensure that the Canada-ASEAN dialogue is in the future, as it has increasingly been in the past, a true
reflection of our relationship: wide-ranging, rich and effective.
Thank you.