MINISTER AXWORTHYSTATEMENT TO THE 54TH SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONSGENERAL ASSEMBLY
99/48 CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
NOTES FOR AN ADDRESS BY
THE HONOURABLE LLOYD AXWORTHY
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
TO THE 54th SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
UNITED NATIONS, New York
September 23, 1999
(12:20 p.m. EDT)
Mr. President:
Allow me to congratulate you on your election as President of the General
Assembly. Canadians are proud to have accompanied you and your people on
their journey to join the community of nations. On behalf of Canada, allow me also
to welcome Kiribati, Nauru and Tonga as new members of the United Nations.
Mr. President, your wisdom and your dedication to the goals of the United Nations
have been recognized. Now, in turn, I am certain that you will guide us well in
carrying out the work that we are gathered to do on behalf of all of the world's
people.
Indeed, it is we the peoples for whom the UN was founded and its purposes forged.
We the peoples -- not we the nation states, the ministers, the ambassadors, the
secretariat. Recall these lines from the UN Charter:
"We the peoples determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of
war... to reaffirm faith in human rights...to establish the conditions under which
justice can be maintained and...to promote social progress and a better standard of
life in larger freedom...have resolved to combine our efforts to accomplish those
ends..."
Noble words, compelling goals. But do they still ring true -- or is there need for new
meaning and renewed commitment?
How would we the peoples assess the handiwork of the UN to date and judge the
world scene today:
- when we have seen in the last year alone the brutal ethnic cleansing of Kosovo;
the slaughter and maiming of innocents in Sierra Leone, Angola, both Congos
and Sudan; the cruel suppression of the independence agreement in East Timor;
- when we see kidnapping and terrorism plaguing virtually every region; the
growing, powerful influence of the drug traffickers and criminals; the return of the
slave merchants and the emergence of modern warlords who brutalize and
exploit communities for economic gain;
- when we are all subject to the darker side of globalization, where global
commerce brings new but poorly distributed wealth; where helpless children are
recruited into armies or sold on the Internet for exploitative purposes; where
environmental degradation inflicts a large cost on the smallest countries who can
least afford it?
Our world on the eve of the millennium is increasingly shaped by these and a
variety of other direct threats to people. If we the peoples were to have the chance
to rethink this preamble, we might well say that we are determined to save existing
generations from the grave new risks to their personal and family security.
Yet there is another perspective -- one that gives a glimmer of hope. We could point
with some satisfaction to the fact that, through the combined efforts of people
working together across borders, there is an emerging sense of accomplishment in
responding to these new threats to human security.
As of today, 86 nations have ratified the Convention on anti-personnel mines,
ushering in a legal regime and a plan of action that will save the lives of millions.
Working together last year, 120 nations voted in favour of an International Criminal
Court (ICC) that will establish individual accountability for crimes against humanity.
In the field of conflict, the UN is now attempting to rebuild the broken fields of
Kosovo after an unprecedented humanitarian intervention. And in East Timor,
peacekeepers are bringing order to that long-troubled land.
So, we the peoples have not given up in the face of the confusion, turmoil and
misery which beset our world, and we still search through the corridors of this
building for words of co-operation and acts of consensus.
Yet, it comes hard because too many forget that it is we the peoples -- all the
world's peoples -- whom we are here to serve, not just their specific national
interests. Too many protect their prerogatives, engage in exclusive power politics,
or refuse to pay their bills, thereby paralysing the institution and rendering it
incapable of meeting the challenges to our collective well-being.
Nor are we well-served by those opposed, on the basis of outmoded reasons of
state sovereignty, to an agenda for the security of people. The sovereignty of states
remains a fundamental tenet and key measure of peace and security. But it is
neither absolute nor is it a shield behind which the most egregious violations of
human rights and fundamental freedoms can be protected.
It is time, therefore, for we the peoples, represented in this Assembly, to reassess
our influence and raise our voices.
There is a new road map to lead the way. Last week, the Secretary-General tabled
a report on The Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, in which he captures many
of today's challenges and sets out 40 recommendations for action.
The heaviest burden falls on the Security Council. The search for global peace
increasingly turns on issues of personal safety. Modern conflict takes a hugely
disproportionate toll on civilians.
In this world, the protection of people must be central to the Council's work. It must
provide the sub-text to our future collective action and the impetus behind our
efforts to prevent conflict, keep the peace, enforce sanctions and support the
collective will of the United Nations.
The way ahead is not without obstacles.
There are legitimate questions about the purposes, limits and standards for Council
engagement for humanitarian ends, which also raise difficult contradictions with
regard to the principle of non-interference. Clear and consistent criteria are needed
against which the necessity, or not, of humanitarian intervention -- including
enforcement -- can be judged and applied. These tests must be very demanding,
based on fundamental breaches of international humanitarian and human rights
law.
The human dimension makes it imperative that the Council adapt the blunt
instrument of sanctions into a targeted tool so they hurt where they are supposed to
hurt. The Council also needs to show the resolve to implement sanctions once they
are in place. This is Canada's objective as Chair of the Council's Angola Sanctions
Committee -- to develop tougher measures to constrain the trade in arms and
diamonds, thereby making it more difficult for UNITA to wage war. It is time to tackle
the new war economy, where a direct relationship exists between certain
businesses, mercenaries and warlords, that perpetuates misery, conflict and the
victimization of innocent people.
A human security agenda highlights the urgent need to face clearly the Council's
representation and its decision-making processes -- especially the inappropriate
use and persistent threat of the veto -- where it can compromise, complicate and
slow-down determined, urgent international action to protect people.
The Council needs to come to grips with these challenges if it is to maintain its
credibility in the eyes of the people it serves. Membership on the Council is a trust --
and Council members need to demonstrate their capacity to maintain this trust.
The issues raised by the Secretary-General in his report on the protection of
civilians in armed conflict are ones that plague all of our peoples. His proposals go
beyond the purview of the Security Council. The onus for action is a responsibility of
all member states.
For that reason, I would strongly urge that the General Assembly become seized
with this Report and move quickly to establish mechanisms to give effect to its
recommendations, including a system of reporting to review implementation.
Toward this end, Canada looks forward to working with Secretary-General Annan
and fellow members to establish a "Friends of Civilians in Armed Conflict" group to
help guide these efforts.
In efforts to protect civilians in armed conflict, the Assembly has the means to
enable the UN to act more quickly, the moral authority to establish universal
standards that hold us all accountable, and the legitimacy to direct efforts into new
areas of global endeavour.
The ability to respond rapidly when the security of civilians is threatened is
essential. Giving the UN a rapid response capability, particularly through the
creation of a rapidly deployable UN headquarters, would be an important step. How
much more effective could the UN have been in East Timor or in Kosovo, if this
were so.
The civilian side of peace operations -- police, judges, civil servants and human
rights experts -- is also of growing importance. But insufficient capacity for rapid
deployment is a problem here too. Clearly, the white helmets are as critical to
building peace as are the blue helmets -- they deserve no less of our attention.
Those of us who are able might start by improving our respective national capacity
to make contributions -- something my government has begun and is working to
improve -- to be put at the service of the United Nations.
Globally binding humanitarian and human rights standards for behaviour, and
concrete mechanisms to implement them, would also advance the security of
people subjected to the horrors of armed conflict.
The adoption of the International Criminal Court Statute was a qualitative step
forward. It will help to end the culture of impunity and protect all people against the
most egregious violations of humanitarian law.
The Assembly's priority now is to bring the Court to life. This means continued
co-operation by all of us in building the technical underpinnings of this Court. It also
means ensuring prompt and widespread ratification of the ICC Statute.
Strengthened standards and strategies are needed elsewhere. For example, the
negotiation of the strongest possible Optional Protocol on the Involvement of
Children in Armed Conflict to the Convention on the Rights of the Child,
accompanied by a comprehensive action plan, will help to confront one of the most
heinous aspects of modern conflict.
We also agree with the Secretary-General that more must be done to protect
humanitarian workers who risk their lives to help the victims of war. That is why
Canada will be seeking an additional Protocol to the Convention on the Safety of
UN and Associated Personnel, to provide legal protection to all personnel working in
situations of armed conflict, including a broader range of NGOs and locally
employed personnel.
Finally, the Assembly can direct its efforts toward making the safety of people the
emphasis in a wider range of global endeavour.
The greatest threat to human safety remains the possibility of nuclear annihilation
and the hazards posed by other weapons of mass destruction. Yet the non-proliferation regime that we have painstakingly built over the past 50 years remains
fragile. We should rededicate our efforts toward implementing the obligations of the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), toward an effective Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty (CTBT), and toward diminishing the risks that these weapon systems
pose to our collective security.
A focus on the human costs is also the impetus behind efforts to address the
proliferation of other weapons, including the challenges posed by small arms and
light military weapons. Their misuse, in conflict zones or on neighbourhood streets,
exacts an alarming human price.
The dimensions of the threat require us to act globally. A proposal for a Conference
on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons is on the table at this
Assembly. We should agree to convene this Conference and give it a broad and
comprehensive agenda.
Transnational crime, including the illicit drug trade, terrorism and human smuggling,
is a closely related challenge. It has a direct impact on the safety of all of our
people. The conclusion of an effective UN Transnational Organized Crime
Convention and its Protocols would be a start.
Taken together, these efforts would be a strong beginning in orienting the Assembly
to meet the real security needs of people today. Improvements in human security is
a necessary precondition for success in the other important actions that we take to
advance human, economic, aid and trade development.
Farmers cannot work fields strewn with landmines. Children cannot learn when they
are abused and brutalized by war. Investors will not send money to regions racked
by conflict. Societies cannot flourish when resources are pillaged to fuel violence
and people are victimized by terror. Ultimately, freedom from fear is intimately
connected to the freedom from want.
It is freedom from fear for all of our peoples -- at the heart of the Secretary-General's report and his recommendations -- that provides the UN with a clear
defining role at the century's close.
Our collective efforts to that end will give concrete expression to the hopes and
dreams of the generation that first made "we the peoples" the basis for this
Organization. Next year's Millennium Assembly and Summit offer an opportunity to
articulate a vision of the UN that places the safety of people at the centre of its
agenda.
The United Nations cannot do it all. The challenges to advancing human safety are
complex. Regional organizations play an important role. Practical co-operation
between countries can address specific problems. The participation of members of
civil society and non-governmental organizations is also imperative.
Security for all of us begins and ends with a strong, effective United Nations
focussed on this goal. We the peoples should resolve to work together to achieve
this end.
Thank you.