MR. AXWORTHY - ADDRESS TO THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATESCONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAS - WASHINGTON, D.C.
98/13 CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
NOTES FOR AN ADDRESS BY
THE HONOURABLE LLOYD AXWORTHY,
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS,
TO THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES
CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAS
WASHINGTON, D.C.
March 6, 1998
This document is also available on the Department's Internet site: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I am honoured to have been called upon to make the closing address to this
conference commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Organization of American
States [OAS]. It is a particular pleasure to address such a varied and
distinguished audience.
In a new and rapidly changing era, international institutions have to break away
from conventional thinking. They have to rethink and reinvent themselves. This
Hemisphere has long been at the cutting edge of multilateral activity. I am glad
to see that the OAS is using the occasion of its 50th anniversary to once again
put itself at the forefront of change. It has drawn together this forward-thinking
group -- representatives of government, commerce and civil society, along with a
number of Nobel laureates from the Hemisphere -- to help it consider its future.
Making the Hemisphere Our Home
In Canada, too, we have been looking ahead to our future in this region. In one of
his first speeches as leader of the Liberal Party, Canada's Prime Minister Jean
Chrétien spoke of wanting to make the Hemisphere our home. In the short time since
Canada joined the OAS, we have worked hard to make those words a reality.
Canada is increasingly integrated into the Hemisphere economically through free
trade agreements: the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA], the Free Trade
Agreement with Chile, and soon, we hope, a Free Trade Area of the Americas [FTAA].
We are already seeing the results. Canada's two-way trade with Latin America and
the Caribbean is more than double what it was five years ago. The recent Team
Canada trade mission to Latin America, led by the Prime Minister, will further
unleash the potential for increased trade between our countries.
But Canada's growing engagement in the Hemisphere is not just about trade and
investment. Canada is the second-largest financial contributor to both the OAS and
the Pan-American Health Organization. Our Prime Minister participated in the first
Summit of the Americas in Miami, and is looking forward to the second Summit in
Santiago, including the launch of negotiations for the FTAA.
We have increasingly strong co-operative relations with many countries of the
region, bilaterally, within regional political groupings such as the Rio Group,
and in broader multilateral forums. In Haiti and Guatemala, Canada has been
working with the United Nations, the OAS and others to build peace and enhance
regional stability.
Perhaps most importantly, a growing number of Canadians are of Latin American and
Caribbean origin, and opportunities for our citizens to get to know one another
better are increasing. Under Canada's international youth internship program, many
young Canadian are now working in OAS member countries. I am pleased to tell you
that my colleague Sergio Marchi, the Minister for International Trade, announced a
new project today as part of that program. Through the Centre for Research on
Latin America and the Caribbean at York University, Canada will place 15 young
interns in the Secretariat of the OAS.
I think you will agree, then, that we have made good progress on making the
Hemisphere Canada's home. And there is more to come. As a Winnipeger, I am
particularly looking forward to the 1999 Pan-American Games, which will be held in
my home city. I am also pleased that Canada will host the OAS General Assembly in
the year 2000.
New Foreign Policy for New Times
These represent more than just a series of unconnected events. They are part of a
broader redefinition of Canadian foreign policy. In the face of a changing
international situation, we have recognized that it is essential that we develop
new partnerships, both within Canada and around the world.
We decided to pursue this new diplomacy in the face of four factors:
first, a seismic upheaval in the international landscape with the end of the Cold
War, shifting international patterns of economic and political power and increased
global integration;
second, the increasing prominence of human security issues on the world agenda:
issues that strike home directly to the individual, such as the illicit drug
trade, environmental problems, and human rights abuses;
third, the advent of powerful new players on the international scene, including
corporations, non-governmental bodies, and regional organizations such as the Rio
Group, the CARICOM and the Andean Community; and
fourth, the growing importance of what scholar and diplomat Joseph Nye terms
"soft power" -- the power that springs from attractive ideas, shared values and
partnership, rather than from military and economic might.
The campaign that led to the signing in Ottawa last December of an international
treaty banning anti-personnel landmines is, in my view, a clear example of "soft
power" in action. An ad-hoc but effective coalition of states and non-governmental
bodies brought governments and international public opinion on side with
unprecedented speed. The coalition, in which OAS members played a critical role,
overcame a deadlock within existing multilateral institutions, and scepticism on
the part of many of the major powers.
Many nations have been seized with the need to define and identify the role they
intend to play in this new dispensation. This may be behind the proliferation of
new national slogans: the "New Britain" and the United States as the
"indispensable nation," for example.
In this context, I have spoken of Canada as the "value-added nation." Canada's new
approach to foreign policy is one that strives to add value internationally,
principally through the exercise of "soft power." Those qualities that
characterize Canada -- a history of commitment to reconciliation and peace; respect
for all cultures and ethnic groups; bilingualism and flexible federalism -- allow
us to add special value on the international scene.
They are reflected in a broadening of our horizons, and in new ways of doing
business internationally, which include:
promoting public diplomacy at home, through initiatives like our National Forum
on Foreign Policy, and internationally;
forming new alliances abroad, some with non-traditional partners. These range
from bilateral dialogues on human rights with Cuba and China, to closer working
relations with Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and Latin American and Caribbean
countries at the UN;
playing an active role in the reform and strengthening of international
institutions, including the UN and the OAS itself;
finding ways to bring non-state actors into line with international norms, for
example by designing peacebuilding measures that engage non-state groups that are
involved in internal conflicts; and, finally,
ensuring that marginalized sectors of society are on the international agenda, by
focussing on issues like child labour and the gender aspects of peacebuilding in
societies riven by conflict.
Canada and the OAS in a New Era
Many of the values that underpin this foreign policy are ones we share with fellow
OAS members: our belief in democracy, human rights, the rule of law, the
prosperity of our peoples, and fundamental human dignity. At the same time, Canada
has experience in a range of areas where it can add value in the Americas, from
social and urban governance, to peaceful conflict resolution, to the use of
advanced information technology.
Canada and the OAS are well-placed to work together to exercise "soft power" in
addressing the new priorities and demands of a new era. These priorities can, in
my view, be grouped into three main areas: strengthening regional institutions;
the "new" security and disarmament agenda; and the broader human security agenda.
In all three areas, we must ensure that we draw in civil society to work alongside
governments in addressing new challenges. As the landmines campaign illustrated,
this is a crucial element of the successful exercise of "soft power." We must
build on the important steps taken by the OAS through its Inter-American Strategy
for Public Participation on sustainable development issues, and by the Summit
process through its inter-governmental partnership.
Institution Building and Change
As we look to the next 50 years of the OAS, it is time to take a fresh look at the
institution. Do our regional institutions have the mandates, resources and
architecture they need to be effective? The OAS can only succeed in this endeavour
with the full support of its members. Members cannot afford to let the OAS slip
down their list of priorities. Unless we work constructively and pay our quotas,
we will be unable to look ahead, or plan ahead.
The OAS is changing. Under the leadership of Secretary-General César Gaviria, it
is embracing new perspectives and ideas, and supporting new initiatives such as
the FTAA discussions. We are already undertaking major reform and retooling in the
United Nations and in the international financial institutions.
Fundamental change can be achieved in our own neighbourhood, too. Through
restructuring and improved co-ordination, the OAS, the Inter-American Development
Bank and the Pan American Health Organization can fulfil their shared mandate in
such areas as sustainable and equitable development.
The Summit of the Americas process is a good example of a "soft-power" approach.
It is based on partnership, where leaders undertake collectively agreed actions,
domestically and multilaterally, to advance prosperity and democracy in the
Hemisphere. As the political forum of the Hemisphere, the OAS has a central
function in this new multilateral partnership. This 50th anniversary conference is
an important first step in linking the activities of inter-American institutions
like the OAS with the goals of the Summit of the Americas.
Cuba and the OAS
As we look ahead to the next 50 years, surely the time has come for all OAS
members to consider when the suspended 35th member of the organization, Cuba,
could once again be seated at the table.
The OAS, through determined and concerted efforts by all members, can play a vital
role in broader engagement with Cuba. I am encouraged by Secretary-General
Gaviria's recent comments in this regard. At the same time, the government of Cuba
can help to make political reintegration possible, by showing its willingness to
adopt the democratic values that prevail across the region.
It is time to start building bridges with Cuba and engaging it on issues of
concern, in order to encourage positive change. Canada has established a bilateral
dialogue with Cuba on human rights and a wide range of other issues. Most
recently, during the visit of Cuban Vice-President Lage to Ottawa, we renewed an
anti-hijacking agreement and discussed measures to enhance regional and global
stability. Following the historic visit of the Pope to Cuba, Canada has agreed in
principle to accept 19 Cuban prisoners of conscience who would not otherwise have
been released. These are, we believe, the first steps toward the day when the OAS
as an institution will bring together all states of the region.
New Security Issues
The second of the three priority areas I mentioned is the new challenges we face
in security and disarmament. The principal challenge is to address threats to
human security -- that is, to the daily lives of millions of people -- posed by
weapons like anti-personnel mines.
OAS members were at the heart of the landmines initiative, with 33 out of 35
members signing the treaty banning these terrible weapons. I hope that this
overwhelming regional solidarity will continue, and that member states will ratify
the treaty as quickly as possible. Let us exercise international leadership once
again, by being the first region in the world to have all its signatories ratify.
There is another area in which the OAS can exercise leadership: the development
of an integrated and co-ordinated approach to the destruction of stockpiles,
demining, and rehabilitation and reintegration of landmine survivors. Canada has
promised $100 million toward treaty implementation. We are working now on ways to
use that money as effectively as possible, in partnership with other countries.
During our Prime Minister's recent visit to Latin America, we signed agreements in
Argentina, Brazil and Mexico that provide a framework for co-operation in demining
in third countries.
In doing this, we can build on the pioneer role played by the OAS in demining in
Central America, which will make it "mine-free" by the year 2000. This will be an
achievement to be proud of, and a concrete example for other regions of the world
to follow.
Small Arms
Small arms, like landmines, present a problem that defies traditional
categorization, and hence the efforts of many of our existing institutions and
structures. Neither purely a humanitarian issue nor purely a disarmament issue,
the proliferation of light, cheap weapons is nonetheless having a devastating
impact in conflict-ridden societies around the world. The AK-47 presents a real
and immediate threat to the lives of millions of civilians -- many of them children
-- in the same way that anti-personnel mines do.
The OAS has undertaken precedent-setting work that addresses one important
dimension of the small arms issue: the illicit trafficking of firearms. With the
signing of the Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in
Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Material, the first of its kind
in the world, OAS members have targeted the illegal trade in firearms through more
effective controls on the legal trade. This is proof positive of the willingness
of member states to take collective action against crime and violence in the
Americas.
Now it is time to go one step further and address other aspects of the small arms
problem, through practical approaches tailored to real problems on the ground:
disarming and reintegrating child soldiers; buying back weapons in societies that
are saturated with them; and retraining and re-equipping people in these societies
so that they can lead peaceful and productive lives.
The Drug Trade
Stemming the illicit drug trade is another priority for action in terms of the
"new" security agenda. Porous borders, global economic integration, and instant
communications have benefited illegitimate as well as legitimate businesses. Add
to that weakness of state institutions, in some cases even state failure, illegal
trade in small arms, and the immense sums of money generated by this trade, and
you have an intractable and globalized problem.
This sort of problem clearly cannot be solved by using "hard" (that is, economic
and military) power alone. It cuts across state boundaries, and has a broad and
insidious impact -- social, economic, developmental, on human rights and on good
governance. Tackling the drug problem requires co-operative action among
governments, and the support and involvement of non-state actors.
The OAS has taken important steps to tackle the problem by establishing a
multilaterally based, balanced approach through the Hemispheric Drug Strategy,
through the work of the Inter-American Drug Control and Abuse Commission (CICAD),
and through work to establish the Multilateral Evaluation and Monitoring Mechanism
(MEMM).
Now we must build on our multilateral approach, recognizing that this is a shared
problem of societies where the drugs originate, where they transit, and where they
are consumed. We must snuff out both supply and demand. This requires a more
comprehensive plan for co-operation that links domestic and multilateral
strategies, and that has the benefit of high-level political impetus.
The Human Security Agenda
The third and final priority area for action by the OAS is, in my view, the
broader human security agenda, including human rights, peacebuilding, and
sustainable and equitable development. The importance of these issues is reflected
in the prominent place that they have had on the agenda of our discussions over
the last two days.
All of our citizens -- including women, children, the disabled, and our indigenous
people -- must be able to live in societies that reflect their interests, satisfy
their legitimate aspirations and guarantee real participation in the political,
economic and social life of our countries. As our leaders said in Miami, "a
democracy is judged by the rights enjoyed by its least influential members."
The OAS has a central role to play in promoting a rules-based system, one of the
cornerstones of a "soft power" approach. It has already demonstrated that capacity
through the Inter-American Human Rights system, Resolution 1080, the
Washington/Managua protocols, and the Unit for the Promotion of Democracy. But
there are major challenges still ahead for the OAS:
how to strengthen the role of the Commission and preserve its independence;
how to better link existing regional institutions with national human rights
systems and human rights defenders; and
how to complement more effectively the defence of democratic systems of
government through the strengthening of democratic institutions and values.
Aboriginal Issues
One human rights issue of common concern to Canada and many other countries in the
Hemisphere is that of indigenous rights. Here too, we have been working at
different levels: multilateral, regional and bilateral.
At the United Nations, Canada has been very active in the development of a
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Within the OAS, we would like to
see an Inter-American Declaration developed through the Human Rights Commission,
consistent with and complementary to the UN instrument. The special mention of
indigenous people in the agenda for the Santiago Summit, an issue that Canada is
co-ordinating, is another encouraging sign of regional engagement on this issue.
Bilaterally, Canada hosted an aboriginal economic round table in Mexico in 1996,
which brought together indigenous business and community leaders from both
countries. This was the start of an ongoing process under which promising Canada-Mexico indigenous-to-indigenous joint ventures are being pursued. We are currently
planning for a second round table.
Earlier this year, I announced the appointment of Mr. Blaine Favel as our
Counsellor on International Indigenous Issues. He has just completed a successful
bilateral visit to Guatemala, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, and will be working to
increase Canada's activism on indigenous issues at all levels.
Another human rights issue of particular concern to Canada is that of the rights
of the disabled. Canada strongly supports work within the OAS on a Convention to
Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities. We have
also been active within the UN. In both bodies, our primary goal is to address
this as a human rights issue integrated into the broader work of the organization,
rather than simply as a social development issue. In this context, we are proud to
have recently received the Franklin D. Roosevelt International Disability Award,
recognizing our work to integrate persons with disabilities into Canadian society.
Peacebuilding
The promotion of human rights is closely linked with the prevention of conflict,
and with reconciliation in regions emerging from conflict. Both the OAS and Canada
have special value to add through approaches that build consensus and work with
civil society, particularly at the local level. Somewhat over a year ago now,
Canada established a Peacebuilding Initiative and Fund. Through these, we are
pursuing projects abroad and building capacity at home to prevent conflict and to
rebuild peace in its aftermath.
The experience of working in Haiti and in Guatemala has demonstrated to all of us
the need for greater co-ordination of our efforts and for new tools and
approaches. Traditional peacekeeping operations are important -- but they cannot
rebuild societies caught in long-term cycles of internal violence.
Through the OAS and other regional bodies, we must refocus our efforts in areas
like demilitarization; disarming of combatants and buy-back of small arms;
rebuilding capacity within government; and supporting a return to the rule of law
under an effective justice system. It was in this context that our Prime Minister
recently indicated Canada's interest in co-operating with Argentina in
establishing "white helmet" missions to undertake peacebuilding efforts.
Conclusion
Today, as we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the OAS, we have reached a
watershed for the organization, not only because of the distance that it has come
in its first half-century, but also because of the profoundly changed world it
faces as we look ahead.
Periods of fundamental change are always anxious times. Certainly, the challenges
before us are great. But I believe that an era in which soft power is an
increasingly significant force in international relations offers us significant
opportunities, opportunities for which the OAS is well-suited.
Through co-operation, flexibility, commitment to a clear and attractive set of
values, and a willingness to engage with civil society and other rising
international players, we can make an impact. More than ever before, it is within
our capacity to bring about a more stable, peaceful and prosperous Hemisphere. Let
us take heart in our strengths, and show ourselves worthy of the challenge.
Canadians have a reputation for being modest and self-deprecating. Sir Wilfrid
Laurier broke from that mould when he spoke early this century of Canada having
become "a star to which is directed the gaze of the whole civilized world." I hope
you will not think me too immodest if I repeat his words, for I do believe that,
in an era of soft power, Canada can join with other stars to create a new galaxy
in the Western Hemisphere. A galaxy that will, I hope, shed a new light on the
world.
Thank you.