MR. PARADIS - ADDRESS TO THE XXIX SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES - WASHINGTON, D.C.
CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
NOTES FOR AN ADDRESS BY
THE HONOURABLE DENIS PARADIS,
SECRETARY OF STATE
(LATIN AMERICA AND AFRICA) (FRANCOPHONIE),
TO THE XXIX SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE ORGANIZATION
OF AMERICAN STATES
WASHINGTON, D.C.
APRIL 18, 2002
Let me begin by thanking the Secretary-General for his report on the Mission to Venezuela, which he led earlier
this week under the mandate of OAS [Organization of American States] Permanent Council Resolution 811.
The report presents a disturbing picture of the situation in Venezuela and offers guidance to our deliberations
here today.
Canada stood in solidarity with OAS member states in invoking Article 20 of the Inter-American Democratic
Charter and adopting Resolution 811, which condemned the attempted coup or--to use charter language
reflected in the Resolution--condemned "the alteration of the constitutional order in Venezuela."
I must stress that this first invocation of the recently adopted Democratic Charter strikes a special chord for
Canada and Canadians. Indeed, it was in Quebec City, at the Summit of the Americas, only one year ago, that
all our countries united in a historic effort further to protect democracy in our hemisphere. In the declaration of
the Quebec Summit, our leaders included a democracy clause and, as an additional measure, mandated the
OAS to prepare an Inter-American Democratic Charter--a mechanism unprecedented in the world. In so doing,
we took a major step forward in the history of the Americas.
It was indeed a remarkable reflection of our common commitment to democracy that led to the expeditious
preparation and adoption of the Charter less than five months later, on September 11, in Lima, Peru. As we
know, however, the adoption of the Charter was overshadowed by the tragic events that took place on the
same day here in Washington, and in New York and Pennsylvania.
Just seven months after its adoption and barely a year after Quebec City, it took another regrettable event in
our hemisphere to bring the Charter to the foreground. With the attempted coup in Venezuela, we witnessed
armed forces playing a role that is utterly inappropriate and unacceptable in any democratic order. In the words
of Canada's permanent representative to the OAS Permanent Council, early on April 13, we also witnessed
"interim authorities who had no democratic legitimacy either in the way they assumed power or in the actions
they had taken since assuming power--namely the dismissal of democratic institutions."
The Charter was invoked and follow-up action was initiated through Resolution 811. I believe we are justified in
saying that the pressure brought to bear by the hemisphere, through its invocation of the Charter, was among
the factors that influenced developments in Venezuela and led to the end of the attempted coup. In Resolution
811, the Charter survived its first test.
Incidentally, the attempted coup led Canada, as Chair of the Summit of the Americas process, to give serious
consideration to invoking the democracy clause, which stipulates that "any unconstitutional alteration or
interruption of the democratic order in a state of the hemisphere constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to the
participation of that state's government in the Summit of the Americas process." With the return of constitutional
order in Venezuela, it is no longer necessary to invoke the democracy clause or its corollary, Article 19 of the
Democratic Charter.
I would like us to shift our focus at this point from the decisions that we have taken over the past few days to
those that we are about to take here today. We should recall that the spirit that imbued the Quebec City
Summit, and both the development of the Democratic Charter and its adoption in Lima, was one of
strengthening and safeguarding democracy. It is therefore particularly disappointing that the first invocation of
this mechanism was punitive in nature, responding to an outright assault on democratic processes and
institutions in a member state.
I would draw our attention to the fact that much of the Democratic Charter was built around a range of
measures that are fundamentally preventative and remedial in nature rather than punitive. It is Canada's
deepest hope that in future we will no longer see situations arise that require invoking the Charter for punitive
purposes. Instead, we would hope to see it invoked to invite OAS assistance and expertise with preventative
and remedial measures that would further strengthen democracy.
It is at this preventative and remedial stage that we find ourselves today. The events of the last few days have
underscored the fragility of democracy in Venezuela and the underlying threat of violence. For this reason,
Canada encourages Venezuela to take advantage of the assistance available through the OAS, including the
institutional and technical support that can be provided by the Unit for the Promotion of Democracy. In this
regard, we are pleased to note the planned in-situ visit of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to
Venezuela, at the invitation of the government of Venezuela, and trust it will be undertaken with dispatch.
Canada is determined to accompany Venezuela, through the OAS and the mechanisms at its disposal, as set
out in the Inter-American Democratic Charter, in taking the measures needed to further strengthen its approach
and its democratic institutions.
In accordance with the democratic principles contained in the Democratic Charter, and with the due process of
the Venezuelan constitution, we hope to see rapid and sustained progress in a number of key areas, including
the following:
• respect for basic freedoms, in particular freedom of expression and freedom of the press;
• respect for the autonomy of institutions and strengthening of the latter to ensure the separation of powers;
and
• establishment within Venezuelan society of a climate conducive to consensus decision making.
We are pleased to note that the Congress and the Supreme Court are functioning once again. Canada takes
note of the appeal for reconciliation by President Chavez, his firm commitment to the due process of law, and
his promise to hold consultations on national issues involving all sectors in society.
It is only through the profound commitment of President Chavez and his government to rapid and sustainable
progress in these areas that a viable and stable democracy can be actively promoted in Venezuela. However,
the shared commitment of all OAS member states to seeing a viable and stable democracy thrive in Venezuela
will be equally important in ensuring that it is achieved.
It is in this spirit of shared commitment that Canada proposes that we move quickly to adopt a resolution that
reflects that commitment and will provide concrete support to democracy in Venezuela.
Thank you.
The OAS Resolution on Support for Democracy in Venezuela is available at:
http://www.oas.org/OASpage/press2002/sp/resoluciónAGreng_1.htm