MR. PETTIGREW - ADDRESS TO THE HEMISPHERIC TRADE AND SUSTAINABILITY FORUM - QUEBEC CITY, QUEBEC
2001/19 CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
NOTES FOR AN ADDRESS BY
THE HONOURABLE PIERRE PETTIGREW,
MINISTER FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE,
TO THE HEMISPHERIC TRADE AND SUSTAINABILITY FORUM
QUEBEC CITY, Quebec
April 17, 2001
(10:15 a.m. EDT)
Introduction
It is a pleasure to join you this morning at the opening of this important symposium.
I would like to commend those responsible for this impressive gathering. As we prepare
for the opening of the Summit of the Americas, which is now just days away, I can think
of few issues more deserving of our attention than the relationship between trade and
sustainable development.
The two issues are, of course, closely linked. By its very nature, trade has an impact on
the economy, the environment and social equity -- the three essential elements of
sustainable development. As a result, depending on how trade is managed, it can either
promote or weaken the principles of sustainable development.
In my remarks today, I would like to discuss some of the steps we can take to ensure
that trade bolsters sustainable development for the greater good of the people of the
Americas, and indeed of the entire world. I want to assure you that, for me, this is far
more than just required political rhetoric -- it is a personal and long-held conviction.
I engage in debate quite often with those who blame human rights abuses and poverty
on trade and capitalism. While I feel that governments absolutely must continue to
pursue greater social equity and respect for human rights, I simply do not agree with
those who contend that trade and capitalism are the causes of these problems. In fact, I
take the view that greater openness to trade not only leads to increased wealth but also
encourages an exchange of values that promote democracy and enhanced respect for
human rights.
It is harder to argue, however, that environmentalists do not have a case to make about
the effect of capitalism on the environment. I have held this view for many years. In fact,
in my 1999 book, The New Politics of Confidence, I expressed my conviction that
today's environmental movement is the only vital force challenging capitalism,
denouncing its "negative effects" and proposing forceful united action to counter these
effects. While I believe this to be true, I still submit that trade is a very valuable tool for
social advancement, though I believe that we have an obligation to consider the
interaction between commerce and the environment.
Importance of Trade
First of all, though, let us consider the importance of trade in general. In Canada, at
least, it is not possible to overstate its importance. Exports now account for an
astonishing 45.6 percent of our GDP [gross domestic product] -- up dramatically from
just 25.7 percent in 1990. Every day, Canada does over $2.5 billion worth of business in
two-way trade with the rest of the world.
Within this hemisphere, things are equally impressive. Since NAFTA [North American
Free Trade Agreement] was implemented seven years ago, trade between Canada,
Mexico and the United States has grown to over $715 billion a year. Outside of NAFTA,
Canada exports nearly $6 billion in goods and commercial services annually to the rest
of the Americas, and has invested over $44 billion in the form of direct investment.
Obviously, Canada stands to gain a great deal from a future Free Trade Area of the
Americas [FTAA]. The FTAA will be the largest free trade zone in the world. With a
population of 800 million and a combined GDP of $17 trillion a year, its potential defies
the imagination. So do the opportunities it promises.
Of course, if we were to content ourselves solely with the commercial and financial
rewards, we would be turning our backs on one of the truly great benefits of increased
trade: the general improvement of society for the good of all citizens.
Let's be clear. I believe that increasing the amount of goods and services we trade is a
legitimate and a desirable objective. But it mustn't be our sole objective. In reality,
increased trade is important because it allows us to achieve other, more important
objectives, such as widespread respect for human rights, a clean environment, better
education and improved health services. In short, a better quality of life both for people
in our own country and for those living elsewhere.
For that reason, I strongly believe that one of Canada's key roles during the FTAA
negotiations is to promote the values we hold dear. After all, perhaps the most important
things that Canada can share with and export to the rest of the world are its values.
Ever since Lester B. Pearson proposed the concept of UN peacekeeping, Canadian
values have been recognized and admired around the world. My former colleague Lloyd
Axworthy's impressive work on behalf of Canada in pursuit of an international treaty on
landmines was another, more recent, example of what I regard as Canadian values
influencing global governance.
There are also examples of this in some of the nations of our hemisphere. Canada has
been recognized for the role we played in helping to strengthen democracy, for
providing disaster relief and for our peacekeeping efforts. Inspired by this proud
heritage, Canada must ensure that these noble values serve as building blocks for the
creation of the FTAA. And there are few values that Canadians cherish more than a
regard for our natural environment and a commitment to social equity, two fundamental
components of sustainable development.
That is not surprising. We Canadians are fortunate to live in a country that has been
blessed with great natural beauty -- a country characterized by towering mountain
peaks, rugged coastlines, limitless plains, vast forests, an abundance of lakes and
rivers, and fresh air. But we must not take this heritage for granted.
In addition, we have established a social security system that is the envy of the world,
where governments, community organizations, citizens and other stakeholders work
together to provide affordable, high-quality education, health care, housing, income
support and other services.
By protecting the environment and fostering social equity while at the same time
building a strong and competitive economy, Canada is proof positive that sustainable
development can be more than a dream. Indeed, for us sustainable development is the
key to a better future.
That is why our government is committed to taking sustainable development into
account when planning programs and other activities -- and particularly as we prepare
for the Summit of the Americas. I am sure my colleague Environment Minister
David Anderson (who will speak later) will be able to tell us about the successful
meeting he and his counterparts from the Americas recently had in Montreal.
For my part, I would like to comment on some of the key initiatives being undertaken by
the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade [DFAIT] to strengthen the
bond between trade and sustainable development.
Agenda 2003: DFAIT's Sustainable Development Strategy
The cornerstone of our Department's commitment to sustainable development is,
without a doubt, Agenda 2003. Under this sustainable development strategy, we have
established six goals, one of which is to "strengthen the linkages between trade
promotion and policy and the protection of the environment."
Already, this commitment has led to the development of an innovative public policy tool,
the Environmental Assessment Framework for Trade Negotiations. The Framework,
which was unveiled in February, is a comprehensive blueprint that will enable us to
identify and assess the environmental impact of our trade negotiations.
Thanks to the Environmental Assessment Framework, the environmental impacts of
potential economic effects of trade negotiations will be identified from the very beginning
of the negotiating process. The results of the assessment will then guide and assist our
negotiators.
This new Environmental Assessment Framework will be applied initially to the WTO
[World Trade Organization] agriculture and services negotiations, to the FTAA
negotiations, and later to those related to any future bilateral or regional trade
agreements.
Finally, I am especially proud to note that under this new Framework, individual
Canadians will have the opportunity to make their views known at various points
throughout the environmental assessment process.
Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility -- Another Key Part of the Plan
Another element of our Department's commitment to enhancing sustainable
development is our efforts to promote corporate social responsibility, or CSR. As you
know, the term "corporate social responsibility" denotes the positive role that
corporations can play in a number of areas, including the safeguarding of the health and
safety and core labour rights of their workers, protection of the environment, elimination
of bribery and corruption, consumer protection, disclosure practices, and respect for
human rights.
Though many Canadian firms make a positive contribution to sustainable development
in the countries in which they operate, we continue to work domestically to encourage
and facilitate private sector dialogue on CSR issues, including the development and
implementation of voluntary initiatives such as codes of conduct.
Our efforts are based on a three-pronged strategy:
Promote the concept of CSR through dialogue, partnerships and information sharing
with civil society groups and business, and within government.
Support the development of voluntary standards and norms, such as the OECD
[Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development] Guidelines for Multinational
Enterprises, both domestically and internationally, and work with stakeholders to
translate these principles into practice.
Work with like-minded countries to build greater support for the principles of CSR
internationally.
Last June, I endorsed the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, along with my
OECD Ministerial colleagues. The guidelines are a framework of voluntary standards
and principles for responsible business conduct that were developed in consultation
with a wide range of civil society organizations. Canada is also supportive of the UN
Secretary-General's initiative on the Global Compact, which calls on business leaders to
adopt a set of nine broadly accepted international principles.
We've also been working to increase Southern nations' focus on CSR by formally
introducing the concept at the Organization of American States [OAS] last year and
successfully securing a commitment to study it through the adoption of a resolution at
the OAS General Assembly held last June in Windsor, Ontario. At the Quebec Summit,
we are hopeful that leaders will agree to deepen a hemispheric dialogue on corporate
social responsibility.
Our efforts to promote CSR are reflected as well in our work with Export Development
Corporation [EDC]. The issue of CSR was addressed in the recommendations of the
House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. In
response, we are establishing a mechanism to exchange information and guidance from
DFAIT to EDC on human rights developments in relevant countries. I should add that I
have asked EDC to provide more targeted support to the environmental sector, to help
Canadian companies supply their leading-edge environmental goods, services and
expertise to other countries.
Canada Working on Many Other Fronts to Promote Sustainable Development
Canada is working on many different levels to promote sustainable development.
For instance:
We are active at the WTO with proposals on improving transparency, as well as on
trade and the environment.
Our government is working through UNEP [United Nations Environment Programme]
in support of strengthening international environmental institutions and co-ordination.
We are providing financial support to UNEP and the WTO for capacity-building
conferences, and seminars on trade and environment for Latin America and the
Caribbean.
We established a Trade and Environment Roundtable under the Canada-Chile
Environmental Co-operation Agreement. This group meets every six months for a
discussion with civil society on specific topics, such as environmental assessments of
trade negotiations.
We support the activities of the North American Commission for Environmental
Co-operation, including its work on understanding trade and environment linkages.
Buenos Aires -- Achievements on Transparency and Sustainable Development
Another one of my personal priorities throughout the FTAA negotiations has been to
make the process more open and accessible to ordinary Canadians. That is why I am
very glad that -- after a bit of persuasion -- my counterparts from the rest of the
Americas agreed to Canada's proposal to make the draft texts of the FTAA agreement
public.
I want to congratulate them for taking a leap of faith and embracing openness and
transparency. I sincerely believe that accessible information will result in a stronger,
more credible agreement. These negotiations will evolve over the next three and a half
years, and having the text available this early in the process is not just a historic
achievement but, I am sure, a harbinger of good things to come. Governments
throughout the Americas are much more attuned and responsive now to the needs and
concerns of the public. I predict this trend will manifest itself in more ways as we
proceed, and I believe the environment is one area where there is particular reason for
optimism.
The decision to release the draft FTAA texts was not the only encouraging development
to come out of the trade ministers' meeting in Buenos Aires two weeks ago. If you'll
permit me, I'd like to quote directly from the official communiqué, so that you get a
sense of the strong commitment that was made to policies that will support sustainable
development.
The communiqué reads:
We reiterate that the negotiation of the FTAA will continue to take into account the
broad social and economic agenda contained in the Miami and Santiago Declarations
and Plans of Action, with a view to contributing to raising living standards, improving the
working conditions of all people in the Americas and better protecting the environment.
We reiterate that one of our general objectives is to strive to make our trade
liberalization and environmental policies mutually supportive, taking into account work
undertaken by the World Trade Organization and other international organizations, and
to further secure, in accordance with our respective laws and regulations, the
observance and promotion of worker rights, renewing our commitment to the
observance of internationally recognized core labour standards, and acknowledging that
the International Labour Organization is the competent body to set and deal [with] those
core labour standards.
Take a moment to reflect on the meaning of that communiqué.
When we talk about supporting environmental policies and promoting workers' rights, I
think it is fair to say that we have come a long way from the trade discussions of the
past!
FTAA Process Involves Extensive Engagement with Civil Society
I am also pleased to mention that, in the context of trade negotiations, the FTAA
process is setting a precedent regarding consultations with civil society. Here in
Canada, of course, our government has been in constant contact with civil society
groups throughout the negotiations. I am pleased to add, though, that at our meeting in
Buenos Aires less than two weeks ago, yet another achievement worthy of note was
that trade ministers from the Americas re-affirmed their commitment to the principle of
transparency, and instructed officials to foster a process of increasing and sustained
communication with civil society, to ensure that civil society has a clear perception of the
development of the FTAA negotiating process.
Given our commitment to linking sustainable development and trade, I am certain that
no one will be surprised to hear that we see the Summit of the Americas as an excellent
opportunity to promote the concept of policy coherence, with trade, environmental and
social policies all reinforcing one another.
We believe such a balanced outlook will be instrumental in achieving all three of the
Summit's objectives: creating prosperity, strengthening democracy and realizing human
potential.
In a sense, all of our government's efforts to promote sustainable development are
perhaps the best evidence available of the benefits of trade. Canada has a strong
economy, a stable political system and a solid policy-making infrastructure. In other
words, we have the "capacity" to take a progressive approach to this issue.
This is no accident of fortune; the strength of our society and our institutions has been
built over many years, and has benefited greatly from the rewards of trade. Increased
trade contributes to a nation's economic growth, giving countries added resources to
address their social and environmental problems. What the opponents of trade
liberalization fail to grasp is that prosperity is a strong foundation for social equity and
environmental integrity. And the fastest, surest way to prosperity is trade.
In closing, I would like to leave you with these thoughts. You are the experts in your
fields. You have come here, just days before a landmark summit, and are in an ideal
position to help shape the agenda of the Americas on the crucial question of how trade
can advance sustainable development.
On behalf of the government leaders preparing to take part in the Summit of the
Americas, let me assure you that we would benefit greatly if this symposium produces
concrete and practical recommendations that will lead to the win-win-win solutions that
we all seek in this area.
I would also ask that you reflect on what civil society and the private sector can do to
ensure the contribution of trade to sustainable development. In this regard, I encourage
you to think about how to build on existing sustainable mining initiatives throughout the
hemisphere, and how forest certification can fulfil its potential as a voluntary, market-based tool to encourage and support sustainable forest management.
To put it bluntly: your work here in the next two days can make a difference. You can
help make the Americas a better place. As I wrote in my book, today's decisions involve
not only relationships among states, societies and individuals, but also the relationship
of human beings with the rest of the world and with future generations.
I wish you all an interesting and rewarding symposium. I look forward with great interest
to seeing the results of your efforts.
Thank you.