Equivalent Drop
Height |
Number of Events |
0 - |
15 cm |
799 |
15 - |
30 cm |
27 |
30 - |
45 cm |
14 |
45 - |
60 cm |
1 |
60 - |
75 cm |
1 |
75 - |
90 cm |
1 |
The data recorded during the 17 flights revealed that the packages received
many drops from lower heights and few drops from higher heights. This is
consistent with generalizations found in the packing literature. The three
largest impacts (equal to drops higher than 45 cm) each occurred on separate
journeys.
Of the 843 impact events that were recorded, 68% were impacts against a flat
side of the case, 26% were impacts along an edge, and 6% were impacts against
the comers of the case. This also agrees with generalizations found in the
literature: as package size increases, the probability of edge and comer drops
decreases.
Of 571 flat drops, 285 were against the bottom of the case. The other flat
surfaces of the case received between 12 and 105 impacts. The surface that
received 105 impacts was the back of the case (opposite the front handle). This
illustrates the effect that the orientation and placement of the handles can
have on how a package is manipulated. The large number of drops to the bottom
of the case also indicated that it was frequently handled and moved with the
"This Side Up" stickers in the correct direction. it is worth noting,
however, that trying to lift the case with the handles upside down is quite
painful, which may have had a greater effect than the labels for maintaining
the correct orientation of the case!
The highest impact recorded during the 17 flights was equivalent to an 84 cm
drop. This impact occurred on the third of the five trips.
The four most severe drops ranged from 44 cm to 84 cm. Two of these drops
occurred at Canadian airports during handling operations for flights with two
different Canadian-based carriers, and two occurred at U.S. airports during
handling operations for flights on two different U.S.-based carriers.
So, what happened to the fragile equipment? Nothing, because the cushioning
inside the case had been selected to keep the transmitted shock levels well
below levels that would damage the equipment for a 75 cm. drop. As a result,
the highest shock level transmitted to the equipment inside the case during the
greatest (84 cm drop equivalent) impact was only 36 G, and the equipment can
withstand shocks of up to 70 G.
In order to avoid shipping damage, one should benefit from the observations
and experience of others to arrive at reasonable estimates of handling risks.
Learn the methods frequently used by commercial package designers, which
involve relating package characteristics such as size or weight to the most
likely handling methods, in order to estimate the height from which a package
may be accidentally dropped. The reasoning behind this approach is that as
packages become larger and/or heavier, the height to which they are lifted, and
from which they are likely to be dropped, is generally expected to decrease.
A summary of probable drop heights based on different handling methods is
provided in Table I. When shipping highly valuable or fragile items, design
packages to a higher-than-anticipated drop height. For example, a drop height
of either 60 cm or 75 cm could have been used to design the cushioning for the
case described in this article. In. light of the value and fragility of the
contents, the cushioning was designed for a maximum drop height of 75 cm. When
trucks are used to transport fragile or valuable items, it is also common to
anticipate an accidental drop from the tailgate. In this situation, a 75 cm
drop height can be used regardless of package weight.
The results of this empirical study show a good agreement between the 75 cm.
design drop height obtained from probable drop height tables and the actual
airport handling data for a 45 kg package. The data also illustrates that the
design of a cushioning system should predict a reasonable worst case scenario
even if it has a relatively low frequency of occurrence. And, finally, the
results show that the worst case scenario will eventually happen!
Note: For light packages shipped by parcel post, the drop height can be up
to 3 m.
CCI has developed a Cushion Design Calculator and PadCAD, a computer program
for cushion design, to assist packers with cushion design problems. For further
information on either of these products, please contact the Extension Services
Division at CCI..
Figure 1. The packing case used to transport demonstration equipment to a
series of Art in Transit workshops. The case measures 80 cm x 40 cm x 42 cm and
weighs 45 kg. Inset: The electronic data logger inside the packing case prior
to shipment.
Table I
Probable Drop Heights
Weight
Range (kg) |
Type of Handling |
Drop
Height |
0 - 5 |
1 person throwing |
120 cm |
5 - 10 |
1 person carrying |
105 cm |
10 - 20 |
1 person carrying |
90 cm |
20 - 45 |
1-2 person(s) carrying |
75 cm |
45 - 115 |
2 persons carrying |
60 cm |
115+ |
Mechanical equipment carrying |
45 cm |
Note: For light packages shipped by parcel post, the drop height can be up
to 3 m.
|