Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency - Government of Canada
Skip all menusSkip first menu
FrançaisContact UsHelpSearchCanada Site
  HomeAbout the AgencyMedia RoomLinksSite Map
 
Environmental Assessments
Public Participation
How to do Environmental Assessments
Legislation & Regulations
Training Opportunities
Research & Development
Strategic Environmental Assessment
Publications
Frequently Asked Questions
Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry. CEAR Main»
A primer for Industry. Will your project need a federal EA? More »
 
Search our site

Estimates

1998-99

A Report on Plans and Priorities

SECTION I: MESSAGES

SECTION II: DEPARTMENTAL OVERVIEW

SECTION III: PLANS, PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES

SECTION IV: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
1998-99

Estimates

A Report on Plans and Priorities

Approved

Minister of the Environment

SECTION I: MESSAGES

Minister's Message

More than a decade ago, the World Commission on Environment and Development, in response to growing public concern about the state of the environment, pointed out that a strong economy and a healthy environment need not be mutually exclusive. In fact, they are mutually dependent. The Commission's report, Our Common Future, called on governments worldwide to introduce policies and practices that promote the types of development that meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. Thus the concept of sustainable development was born.

Canada was quick to endorse the goal of sustainable development and has actively, both nationally and internationally, supported efforts to achieve it. One initiative was the implementation of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

Environmental assessment is based on a simple principle: prevention is better than cure. It identifies the possible adverse environmental effects of human activity on the environment before they occur, and leads to better designed, environmentally-friendly projects. Environmental assessment is an idea which, if fully implemented by governments, the private sector and individuals, could revolutionize our approach to the environment as we prepare to make an enlightened start to a new millennium.

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) is the federal focal point for environmental assessment. It has recently adopted an ambitious new strategic vision, a vision that will have it take a stronger, more assertive leadership role in co-ordinating the federal practice of environmental assessment. The Agency will enhance its science and research capacities to meet the needs of a more efficient and effective process. It will seek a broader acceptance of the practice of environmental assessment by promoting the economic, environmental, and personal benefits of the practice.

I am confident that the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act will make a positive contribution toward enlightened decision making in Canada, and provide the federal government and other sectors of society with an effective tool in achieving the goal of sustainable development.

The Honourable Christine S. Stewart, P.C., M.P.

Minister of the Environment

Management Representation Statement

MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATION

Report on Plans and Priorities 1998-99

I submit, for tabling in Parliament, the 1998-99 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

To the best of my knowledge, the information:

  • accurately portrays the Agency's mandate, plans, priorities, strategies and expected key results of the organization;

  • is consistent with the disclosure principles contained in the Guidelines for Preparing a Report on Plans and Priorities;

  • is comprehensive and accurate; and,

  • is based on sound underlying departmental information and management systems.

I am satisfied as to the quality assurance processes and procedures used for the RPP's production.

The planning and reporting accountability structure on which this document is based has been approved by Treasury Board Ministers, and is the basis for accountability for the results to be achieved with the resources and authorities provided.

Name:Sid Gershberg

Title: President, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

Date:February 19, 1998

SECTION II: DEPARTMENTAL OVERVIEW

Environmental assessment is an important tool for protecting and preserving our environment. It provides decision makers the information to make informed and consequently the best possible decisions. These decisions can lead to activities that are more compatible with sustaining a healthy environment for both present and future generations. Environmental assessment involves assessing the effects of a proposed project, policy or program on the ecosystem - the air, water, land, and living organisms including affected human populations. Such assessments provide a solid basis for reducing or eliminating negative environmental effects, and for making informed decisions.

Environmental assessment is now a part of public policy and decision making at all levels of government in Canada, and is used worldwide in over 100 countries, in many international organizations, funding agencies, and in industry. The Government of Canada has approximately 25 years of experience in integrating at an early stage, environmental factors, public concerns and community values into the decision-making process. This practice allows governments to make timely decisions concerning projects, and helps them to meet their responsibilities regarding the environment.

The purpose of this document is to describe the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's (the Agency) objective, goals, strategies and expected outcomes for the upcoming planning period. This is the first year that the Agency has prepared a Report on Plans and Priorities, which covers a three-year period starting in 1998-99. The Agency's activities and outcomes for the period ending March 31, 1997 were reported by the Agency in its November 1997 Departmental Performance Report.

Mandate

The Government of Canada has made a strong commitment to implement environmental assessment as a means of achieving sustainable development. Toward this end, it created the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency in December 1994. Operating as an independent entity within the portfolio of the Minister of the Environment, it is guided by the following instruments:

  • the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) and its regulations: the Law List Regulations, Comprehensive Study List Regulations, Inclusion List Regulations, Exclusion List Regulations, Projects Outside Canada Environmental Assessment Regulations, Federal Authorities Regulations, and the Regulations Respecting the Co-ordination by Federal Authorities of Environmental Assessment Procedures and Requirements (Federal Co-ordination Regulations);

  • signed multilateral and bilateral harmonization agreements with provincial governments that set out mutually agreed upon arrangements for environmental assessment activities; and

  • international agreements containing environmental assessment provisions to which Canada is a signatory, e.g., United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation.

The Agency also assists the Minister of the Environment with the implementation of the 1990 Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy and Program Proposals, by providing guidance to federal authorities on environmental assessment considerations and requirements in respect of proposed policies and programs.

In addition, the President of the Agency has been designated by Order in Council as the federal administrator of the environmental and social protection regimes set out in Chapters 22 and 23 of the 1975 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, and the North Eastern Quebec Agreement.

Roles and Responsibilities

The main focus of the Agency is to provide environmental assessment leadership in support of sustainable development. To achieve this, it must implement a co-ordinated, effective and consistent federal environmental assessment process. The Agency must also address the issues and concerns of Canadians who seek the opportunity to participate in the decisions that will affect their environment. Above all, the federal process must remain relevant to the Canadian public, and be an important tool to planners and decision makers. The main responsibilities of the Agency, as defined by the Act, are to:

  • administer the federal environmental assessment process established by the Act and its regulations;

  • provide administrative support for mediators and environmental assessment panel reviews;

  • promote the uniformity and harmonization of environmental assessment activities across Canada at all levels of government;

  • ensure opportunities for public participation in the federal environmental assessment process;

  • promote sound environmental assessment practices in a manner consistent with those established in the Act; and

  • promote or conduct research on environmental assessment matters, and encourage the development of sound environmental assessment techniques and practices.

Objective

The Agency's main objective is to ensure Canadians receive high quality environmental assessments. The scope of current activity can be divided into two categories: activities relating to the administration of the process, such as managing panel reviews; and activities relating to policy innovation, such as the development of national standards for environmental impact assessments at the screening level. Agency activities are interrelated and designed to meet its mission:

To provide Canadians with high quality federal environmental assessments that contribute to informed decision making in support of sustainable development.

The means by which the Agency achieves this objective are constantly evolving in response to a changing world. It is involved in the federal sector of public policy and decision making that includes difficult and sensitive issues, with stakeholders who have competing interests. Given the responsibilities outlined above, and the desire by Canadians for a healthy, sustainable environment, the Agency is challenged to ensure that the strategies chosen to achieve its mission are the right ones. These strategies, goals and action plans, as discussed in Section III, constitute the tools for the Agency to make a positive contribution in support of sustainable development.

Financial Spending Plan

(thousands of dollars)

Forecast
Spending
1997-98*

Planned
Spending
1998-99

Planned
Spending
1999-00

Planned
Spending
2000-01

Gross Program Spending:





Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

10,423.0

9,817.0

8,291.0

8,254.0

 

10,423.0

9,817.0

8,291.0

8,254.0

Less: Revenue Credited to the Vote

536.0

532.0

104.0

91.0

Net Program Spending

9,887.0

9,285.0

8,187.0

8,163.0

Less: Revenue Credited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund

400.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Plus: Cost of Services Provided by other Departments

1,105.0

1,219.6

1,219.6

1,219.6

Net Cost of the Department

10,592.0

10,504.6

9,406.6

9,382.6

* Reflects best forecast of total planned spending to the end of the fiscal year.

SECTION III: PLANS, PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES

Summary of Key Plans, Priorities and Strategies

The Agency's mandate consists of one program with one business line. The plan and strategies designed to meet the objective stated above all flow from this integrated relationship.

Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

(PLAN) provides Canadians with:

(STRATEGIES) to be demonstrated by:

High quality federal environmental assessments that contribute to informed decision making in support of sustainable development.

  • being a leading advocate of high quality environmental assessment;

  • advancing the science and practice of environmental assessment;

  • learning from experience and sharing the results;

  • improving the capacity to monitor, assess and foster compliance with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act;

  • addressing gaps in the application of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act;

  • clarifying and improving environmental assessment processes with other jurisdictions and with federal departments and agencies; and

  • strengthening relationships with partners and stakeholders.

Summary of Regulatory Initiatives

The following outlines the Agency's major or significant regulatory initiatives scheduled for implementation during the planning period (1998 to 2001):

Detail by Program and Business Line

Planned Spending

(thousands of dollars) Forecast
Spending*
1997-98
Planned
Spending
1998-99
Planned
Spending
1999-00
Planned
Spending
2000-01




 
Gross Expenditures 10,423.0 9,817.0 8,291.0 8,254.0




 
Less: Revenue Credited to the Vote 536.0 532.0 104.0 91.0
Less: Revenue Credited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Revenue 936.0 532.0 104.0 91.0




 
Total Net Expenditures 9,487.0 9,285.0 8,187.0 8,163.0

* Reflects best forecast of total planned spending to the end of the fiscal year.

External Factors Influencing the Program (Challenges)

Changing factors in Canadian society are determining the future effectiveness and direction of environmental assessment and sustainable development. Many initiatives are being undertaken to modernize the delivery of programs and services in an effort to get government right. These initiatives focus on ensuring that the government delivers an ever-improving mix of services that meets Canadians' needs, while respecting government fiscal restraints. They also expect affordable, accessible and responsive service, and opportunities to participate in decisions that will affect their environment. The changing ways in which governance is defined are leading to increasing attention to alternative and innovative service delivery for environmental assessment, including cost recovery and improved harmonization with other jurisdictions.

Public Perception of Environmental Quality: Environmental groups and Canadians in general are concerned that the quality of their environment. Good environmental assessments are a fundamental tool in protecting and preserving the environment to the highest extent possible. However, as environmental assessment encompasses numerous stakeholders with often complex and contrasting interests, the quality and consistent application of environmental assessment remains a challenge for the Agency. Through involvement, leadership and innovation, the Agency can strengthen its focus on improving the quality of service to Canadians. This will include providing new mechanisms to facilitate and communicate good environmental management that will lead to the achievement of sustainable development goals. An additional challenge is to improve the prediction and mitigation of adverse environmental effects through sound science and

policy measures. This also implies development and communication of demonstrable standards that stakeholders can use to assess the benefits and efficiencies of properly conducted environmental assessments.

Efficiency and Effectiveness: The Agency recognizes that efforts must continue to further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the environmental assessment process. For instance, there is growing pressure to increase consistency and predictability in the conduct of environmental assessment, and to ensure that it is not an impediment to economic development and competitiveness, particularly in international markets. This includes making greater use of existing efficiency tools, and closing gaps in the application of the Act. The Agency is working toward finding the appropriate balance of regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the environmental assessment process. However, this effort cannot interfere with high standards of environmental assessment, and must facilitate an increased compliance with the Act from government and industry alike.

International Agreements: The federal government has stated its commitment to actively promote sustainable development in the international sphere. To this end, Canada is a signatory to several international bilateral and multilateral transboundary agreements that involve environmental assessment provisions. The Agency is facing increasing pressure to provide leadership for the promotion of sound environmental assessment practices abroad, to respond to concerns regarding the application of environmental assessment to projects outside of Canada, and to conclude key agreements such as the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. The Agency's challenge is to remain in step with the environmental initiatives of international organizations and other countries. This will help to maintain a competitive edge with respect to Canadian exports and ensure the effectiveness of Canada's domestic assessment process.

Key Plans and Strategies

It is vital that the environmental assessment process continue to evolve in response to changing social, economic and technological factors throughout Canada and the world. Recognizing this, the Agency launched a strategic review exercise with the intention of determining priorities and developing strategic plans to guide its actions over the short to medium term. The results of this exercise will prepare the Agency for the five-year review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. The goals and related action plans are intended to respond to the challenges facing the Agency (discussed above), and to the evolving priorities in environmental assessment, both within and outside the federal government. Each strategic goal discussed below is supported by action items for the planning period which will lead to the goal's achievement, or demonstrable progress toward it.

Goal #1: To be recognized as a credible advocate of high quality environmental assessment.

Advocacy is crucial in today's business, and will be even more vital in tomorrow's. It is central to the Agency's leadership role in the environmental assessment process in the federal government; a role that is emphasized throughout this document. In order to be an effective advocate of good environmental management, stakeholders and Canadians need to have faith in an environmental assessment system that is relevant to their needs and depends on sound practices. Good environmental management means conducting environmental assessments early in a project's planning stage, to reduce or avoid environmental effects and related financial costs. Through effective advocacy,

sustainable environmental management also means conducting environmental assessments that are broad enough to cover all potential environmental effects.

The commitment to advocate "high quality" environmental assessment will place pressure on the science and policy capacities of the Agency as well as its overall corporate management of the process. A key to success will be the Agency's ability to convince decision makers of the value of good environmental assessment in terms of its long-term positive impact on the health of the environment.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • define and clarify the messages of the Agency, both within the federal government and with external partners and stakeholders. This encompasses efforts to communicate the benefits of environmental assessment compiled from completed studies such as the International Study on the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment and from future studies such as the Ongoing Monitoring Program (see Goal #3);

  • establish a system for project-related follow-ups that determine whether environmental assessments of projects are of high quality, and whether measures taken to mitigate any adverse environmental effects after a public review or comprehensive study are undertaken. The Agency also plans to publish authoritative studies that include best practices on project-related follow-ups;

  • encourage greater efficiency in the conduct of environmental assessments. For instance, the Agency will promote the implementation of the Ministerial Guideline on Procedures for an Assessment by a Review Panel, designed to ensure that panel reviews are conducted within predictable timeframes and that they assess all potential environmental effects. In addition, the Agency is intensifying efforts to encourage wider use of class screenings for the environmental assessment of similar projects; and

  • continue enhancing opportunities for the public to participate in the environmental assessment process. Currently, the Agency is examining the application of the Participant Funding Program, with the intent of improving its effectiveness and efficiency. Public participation is crucial for considering all potential environmental effects, and for obtaining support for the process itself.

Goal #2: To advance the science and practice of environmental assessment.

Its capacity for leadership will be limited, unless the Agency works at the leading edge of environmental assessment, and is seen to be so by its partners and stakeholders. The Agency does not intend to duplicate the specific expertise of other federal departments and agencies in strengthening its science capacity. Rather, it intends to be a repository of environmental assessment theories and practices, in order to be an effective and credible advocate and liaison for other departments and the private sector. Solid knowledge capacities lead to sound advice that assists ministers in taking informed decisions on projects that have undergone a panel review or comprehensive study.

As governments downsize and privatize programs and services, it is essential for the Agency to initiate innovative approaches to environmental assessment that will improve the quality and practice of environment assessment. This will, in turn, assist in the attainment of the goal of sustainable development.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • strengthen its science capacity and knowledge of environmental assessment. The nurturing of partnerships both inside and outside the public sector will be key in strengthening science capacities;

  • invest in environmental assessment research and development, specifically with respect to what constitutes high-quality environmental assessment and how best to carry it out in practice. This includes working with the Canadian Standards Association to develop an innovative standard for environmental impact assessments at the screening level;

  • undertake a lead role in determining how strategic or policy environmental assessment should be conducted in the federal government. This includes providing advice and information to support other departments in the preparation of environmental assessments for policy and program proposals;

  • improve the application of cumulative effects assessment. The Agency will provide advice and guidance to other federal departments that are responsible for undertaking cumulative effects assessments in the form of a completed guide, and through training and workshop sessions;

  • examine ways to incorporate traditional ecological knowledge into the work of panel reviews, where appropriate, and environmental assessment in general; and

  • provide improved support for panel reviews and comprehensive studies.

Goal #3: To learn from experience and to share results.

There are many benefits to utilizing past experience gained from conducting environmental assessments. Evaluating the results of previous panel reviews and other accumulated information greatly assists the Agency in determining appropriate policy directions for the future. Governments and private sector proponents are keenly interested in the economic and environmental benefits of environmental assessment, given that they absorb the majority of the costs. Measuring, reporting and communicating the success and effectiveness of environmental assessment as a whole helps to strengthen public confidence. To learn from experience and to share results also contributes to the Agency's positioning as a centre of expertise. Being recognized as such, the Agency regularly provides advice to national and international stakeholders. This allows the Agency opportunities to communicate its vision and share its knowledge with others pursuing similar objectives.

When the Act first came into force, initial training programs were well received because they satisfied the needs of EA practitioners and managers . They clearly explained the scope, objectives and procedures of the new legislation. However, the needs of the Agency's clients have changed. More and more practitioners and managers require specialized guidance for their unique situations, and they want to access this information in a timely manner from a known and trusted source.

The Agency is evaluating different mechanisms to effectively provide current and readily accessible information. Effective communication of information is essential in obtaining beneficial public input. The Agency has an opportunity and a responsibility to take a more proactive leadership role in federal environmental assessment, by responding to clients' needs, and ensuring that communication with all stakeholders is maintained and enhanced.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • invest in information management systems and technologies that allow for easy communication and information exchange between the Agency and its stakeholders;

  • develop ways of sharing environmental assessment expertise and understanding;

  • measure the economic and environmental benefits of environmental assessments of projects through the Ongoing Monitoring Program and communicate these results to stakeholders. The objective of this initiative is to demonstrate that environmental assessment is contributing to better project planning and the consideration of environmental effects. In addition, efforts will be focused on assessing potential effects on competitiveness and the cost-effective manner in which environmental assessments are carried out;

  • compile and disseminate best-practices information with the intent to improve the conduct of similar environmental assessments in the future;

  • establish a stronger strategic communications capacity within the Agency to better address an increasing variety of client needs. One priority is to improve the design and content of the Agency's Website;

  • complete improvements to the Federal Environmental Assessment Index. These improvements should facilitate better communications between federal departments and the master index which contains a record of all environmental assessments conducted by departments; and improved searching capacities in the Index for interested stakeholders and researchers. These improvements will lead to improved accessibility for the public and practitioners;

  • continue developing guides and guidelines that are targeted to assist practitioners in carrying out effective environmental assessments. Guidance material to be completed in 1998 includes: cumulative effects assessment, environmental assessment of mining projects, and project-related follow-ups; and

  • promote a full range of Agency products and services, including advice the Agency provides based on practical experience. The Agency will also focus on improving practitioner and stakeholder awareness of existing guidance material.

Goal #4: To improve the Agency's capacity to monitor, assess and foster compliance.

Government compliance with environmental assessment processes is an increasingly prominent issue. The Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development is pressing for stronger action and Canadians are looking to the Agency for leadership. Although the Act does not explicitly contain enforcement provisions, the Agency will evaluate how other departments understand their environmental assessment responsibilities, and play a more forceful advocacy role in encouraging compliance.

The Agency is developing a framework for compliance monitoring that is designed to assist other federal departments in gathering consistent information on compliance with the Act, and the quality and benefit of environmental assessments. This framework will provide tools to assist in its implementation, including: recommended sources of information, data collection procedures (for monitoring systems), performance standards and measurements, plus data collection instruments. The information that is collected will facilitate program evaluation by the Agency and input to the five-year review of the Act.

In addition, the Agency will focus more attention on reporting the challenges in implementing the Act and the results of efforts undertaken. In part, this document serves that purpose.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • develop a framework to facilitate compliance monitoring;

  • finalize the compliance policy for the Agency that outlines the promotion, education and guidance measures that the Agency will use to foster compliance; and

  • establish a co-ordinated approach to developing and implementing training and guidance on the application of the Act for federal departments and agencies.

Goal #5: To address gaps in the application of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

Since the Act came into force in 1995, a number of gaps have been identified in its application. For example, many federal organizations, particularly Crown corporations, are not required to conduct environmental assessments of their activities. To address this issue, the Agency has undertaken steps to enhance the regulatory regime that will broaden the range of activities to be assessed. This effort is evolving from years of extensive, nationwide public consultations and continued input from a multi-stakeholder Regulatory Advisory Committee.

Demand has also increased for stronger environmental assessment application of policy and program proposals, or "strategic environmental assessment". This is because it deals with broad based, longer term environmental effects that may be managed at the policy and program level.

By expanding the range of activities that is assessed, the application of the Act and other federal environmental assessment processes can become more transparent, predictable and consistent.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • increase the number of organizations that come within the scope of the Act. This involves the development of environmental assessment regimes for Crown corporations and for private entities operating on federal lands (refer to page 7);

  • broaden the range of physical activities assessed under the Inclusion List Regulations that may have potential environmental effects to be assessed under the Act (refer to page 7);

  • work with other federal departments to develop a consistent approach to the environmental assessment of policy and program proposals; and

  • assist other federal departments in undertaking project-related follow-ups. The Agency is leading an interdepartmental subcommittee of the Senior Management Committee on Environmental Assessment (SMCEA) to develop a follow-up regime. The results of this work will lead to options to facilitate information sharing and improved compliance with the Act.

Goal #6: To clarify and improve environmental assessment processes with other jurisdictions and with federal departments and agencies.

All federal and provincial jurisdictions in Canada administer some form of environmental assessment regime. The application of both federal and provincial regimes to a single project provides opportunities to harmonize processes to make them more efficient for proponents, the public and government agencies conducting the environmental assessment. As well, conducting a single environmental assessment process avoids conflicting decisions, increases certainty and reduces costs and delays.

Current federal government policy with respect to Aboriginal land claims and the inherent right to self-government recognizes the importance of Aboriginal people having greater control over their lives and the environment they inhabit. Land claims are adding another dimension to Aboriginal groups' interests in environmental assessment, as these settlements include the creation of new Aboriginal-based environmental assessment processes to support sustainable development. The Agency works with Aboriginal people to develop tools to ensure that environmental integrity and sustainable development are achieved for their communities.

The federal and provincial governments continue to press for greater efficiency and streamlining of the environmental assessment process, and seek co-operative, one-window processes wherever possible. As well, co-operative relations with Aboriginal organizations are important, as their environmental assessment processes play an increasing role in the review of new project proposals.

Consistent interpretation of responsibilities under the Act, both by other federal departments and by proponents, is extremely important to stakeholders. The Agency is addressing this issue through a more sustained and directed education and training initiative. The Agency is focussing on providing practical guidance and tangible benefits that foster compliance and improve co-ordination of efforts.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • strengthen the role of regional offices as key points of interaction with provinces, industry and Aboriginal groups. Numerous stakeholders have indicated that the regional offices have proved to be an effective and credible source of information, advice and guidance;

  • continue to provide sound advice and support to federal negotiators addressing environmental assessment issues in Aboriginal comprehensive land claim and self-government negotiations;

  • continue to pursue bilateral harmonization agreements with provinces in the context of the recently signed Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) multilateral agreement on environmental assessment harmonization, with the intention of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of environmental assessment;

  • continue to develop possibilities for substitution agreements with federal agencies and land claim authorities in the environmental assessment process; and

  • develop the full potential of international links and agreements. The majority of efforts will be concentrated on ratifying and implementing various transboundary environmental assessment agreements, such as the UNECE Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, and a binding agreement under the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation.

Goal #7: To strengthen relationships with partners and stakeholders.

The Agency's success lies in the strength of working relationships with key partners both inside and outside of government. Effective influence is becoming more a product of value-added service, and less a function of mandate fulfilment. Understanding, fostering and enriching relationships are priorities of the Agency because of the benefits of improved environmental management in general, and advanced federal interest in good environmental assessment in particular.

To achieve this goal, the Agency plans to:

  • develop an agenda for fostering new relationships and maintaining existing ones in order to establish common goals on which to base partnerships and to enhance the ability of the public to participate;

  • build on the credibility and trust that regional offices have established with other federal departments, provincial governments and the private sector;

  • strengthen networks that include federal, provincial, Aboriginal, industry and environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs). This includes the continuing use of the Agency's Regulatory Advisory Committee (RAC) as the key forum for consulting with environmental assessment stakeholders. This committee is comprised of members from the government, industry and environmental sectors; and

  • expand federal, provincial, private sector and ENGO information exchanges through the promotion of the Federal Environmental Assessment Index, and by redesigning the Agency's Website to create greater interaction with partners and stakeholders.

Expected Results

The goals and action plans discussed above are closely interrelated and all point the Agency toward a new strategic vision. This vision involves taking a more proactive and substantive approach to environmental assessment. The emphasis is to focus on results and value-added service, not simply on maintaining a process. This means developing closer, more productive relationships with key partners and stakeholders. In addition, the Agency is seeking ways to build on its credibility and knowledge capacities, and to effectively disseminate this knowledge to those who need it most. To this end, the Agency envisions environmental assessment as a fundamental tool in providing high environmental quality and protection.

Through the achievement of these strategic goals, Canadians can expect the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency to provide the following long-term results:

  • Decision makers receive timely recommendations that reflect public values, sound environmental assessment practices, and the principles of sustainable development.

  • Environmental assessment approaches are co-ordinated across government and harmonized with other jurisdictions.

  • Federal environmental assessments are effective, efficient, consistent, predictable, and of the highest quality.

  • Federal authorities have a greater understanding of, and are in compliance with, the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and its regulations.

  • Aboriginal environmental assessment regimes maintain or exceed the standards and principles of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, and are harmonized with existing federal environmental assessment processes.

  • Environmental factors are consistently and appropriately considered in federal policy and program proposals.

  • Canada's interests are effectively represented in international environmental assessment forums.

Management Issues

This report on plans and priorities is designed to provide Canadians with a "snapshot" of the challenges, issues and strategies that guide the actions of the Agency over the coming period. However, the issues that surround and direct the Agency are in constant evolution. The work that was invested into the strategic review exercise has only just begun. The Agency will continue to monitor and assess its performance in terms of previously stated benchmarks and goals, and take appropriate action when results are not as expected. The Agency will also adjust its strategic plans on an ongoing basis in response to emerging challenges.

Human Resources: A key theme that emerged from the strategic review exercise was the need to develop and maintain a strong human resource capacity. Without the right mix and level of skills, and the appropriate organizational structure, achieving successful results will be difficult. The focus over the short term will be on the consolidation, adjustment and development of the current workforce. This will involve stabilizing the organizational structure and completing outstanding classification and staffing actions. The Agency will examine ways to utilize available flexibility to staff strategically, so that it has the right mix of skills to provide the levels of service stakeholders expect. The Agency will also invest in the existing workforce through professional and career development initiatives. Mechanisms to facilitate exchanges with other federal, provincial and private organizations will also be developed to allow closer ties with the Agency's partners and to introduce a broader field of expertise to environmental assessment. In addition, the Agency will focus on the implementation of the Universal Classification Standard.

SECTION IV: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Table 1: Spending Authorities (Extract from the Ministry Summary table in Part II and Reconciliation to Program Expenditure Detail document)

Personnel Information

Table 2: Organizational Structure

Table 2.1: Planned Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) by Program

Table 2.2: Details of FTE Requirements

Capital Projects Information

Table 3: Capital Spending by Program (Nil Report)

Additional Financial Information

Table 4: Departmental Summary of Standard Objects by Expenditure

Table 5: Program Resources by Program for the Estimates Year

Table 6: Details of Transfer Payments by Program

Table 7: Details of Revenue by Program

Table 8: Net Cost of Program for 1998-99

Table 9: Revolving Fund Financial Statements (Nil Report)

Table 10: Loans, Investments and Advances by Program

Table 11: Tax Expenditures (Nil Report)

Other Information

Table 12: Listing of Statutes and Regulations

Table 13: References

Index

Table 1: Spending Authorities - Ministry Summary Part II of the Estimates

Vote (thousands of dollars) 1998-99
Main Estimates
1997-98
Main Estimates

Canadian Environmental
Assessment Agency


15 Program Expenditures 7,254 9,143
(S) Contributions to employee benefit plans 886 699

Total Agency 8,140 9,842

Explanation of Change:

The $1.7 million net decrease 1998-99 over 1997-98 Main Estimates is due mainly to:

Decreases:

  • a decrease of $1.7 million due to a change to the funding profile for environmental assessment public reviews.

Vote - Wording and Amounts

Vote (dollars) 1998-99
Main Estimates
15 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency - Program expenditures, contributions and authority to expend revenues received during the fiscal year arising from the provision of environmental assessment services, training and information publications by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. 7,254,000

Table 2: Organizational Structure

The Agency consists of one program and one business line. The reporting structure to the Minister of the Environment is as follows:

Table 2: Organizational Structure

Table 2.1: Planned Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) by Program


Forecast
1997-98
Planned
1998-99
Planned
1999-00
Planned
2000-01
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 80 95 95 95
Agency Total 80 95 95 95

Table 2.2: Detail of FTE Requirements

($ dollars) Forecast
1997-98
Planned
1998-99
Planned
1999-00
Planned
2000-01
Salary Ranges


 
<30,000 6 6 6 6
30,000-40,000 20 23 23 23
40,001-50,000 18 19 19 19
50,001-60,000 14 17 17 17
60,001-70,000 11 17 17 17
70,001-80,000 7 8 8 8
>80,001 4 5 5 5
Total 80 95 95 95

Table 3: Capital Spending by Program

Nil Report.

Table 4: Departmental Summary of Standard Objects of Expenditure

(thousands of dollars) Forecast
Spending
1997-98
Planned
Spending
1998-99
Planned
Spending
1999-00
Planned
Spending
2000-01
Personnel


 
Salaries and wages 4,329 4,219 4,250 4,250
Contributions to employee benefit plans 736 886 893 893

5,065 5,105 5,143 5,143
Goods and Services


 
Transportation and communications 1,018 969 693 685
Information 97 375 236 233
Professional and special services 3,199 2,709 1,761 1,741
Rentals 194 170 107 106
Purchased repair and upkeep 10 10 8 8
Utilities, material and supplies 145 227 143 141
Other expenditures 20 20 17 17
Minor capital 165 137 88 85

4,848 4,617 3,053 3,016
Transfer Payments


 
Voted 510 95 95 95
Gross Expenditures 10,423 9,817 8,291 8,254
Less: Revenues credited to the Vote 536 532 104 91
Less: Revenues credited to the CRF 400 0 0 0
Net Budgetary Expenditures 9,487 9,285 8,187 8,163

Table 5: Program Resources by Program for the Estimates Year



Budgetary
 
(thousands of dollars) FTE Operating Grants and Contri-
butions
Gross Voted Less: Revenue Credited to the Vote Net Planned Spending
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 95 8,577 95 8,672 532 8,140

95 8,577 95 8,672 532 8,140

Table 6: Details of Transfer Payments by Program

(thousands of dollars) Forecast
Spending
1997-98
Planned
Spending
1998-99
Planned
Spending
1999-00
Planned
Spending
2000-01
Contributions


 
Contributions to assist public participation in environmental assessment reviews 415 0 0 0
Contribution to the Province of Quebec - James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement 95 95 95 95
Total Transfer Payments 510 95 95 95

Table 7: Details of Revenues by Program

(thousands of dollars) Forecast
Revenue
1997-98
Planned
Revenue
1998-99
Planned
Revenue
1999-00
Planned
Revenue
2000-01
Revenues credited to the Vote



Cost recovery for environmental assessment services 485 404 N/A N/A
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal) 17 59 50 46
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external) 34 69 54 45
Cost recovery for the Federal Environmental Assessment Index 0 0 0 0
Total credited to the Vote 536 532 104 91
Revenues credited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF)



Cost recovery for environmental assessment services 400 0 0 0
Total credited to the CRF 400 0 0 0
Total Program Revenues 936 532 104 91

Table 8: Net Cost of the Program for 1998-99

(thousands of dollars) Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Gross Planned Spending 9,817.0
Plus: Services Received without Charge  
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) 628.8
Contributions covering employees' share of insurance premiums and costs paid by TBS 278.5
Worker's compensation coverage provided by Human Resources Canada 0.0
Salary and associated costs of legal services provided by Justice Canada 312.3

1,219.6
Total Cost of Program 11,036.6
Less:  
Revenue Credited to the Vote 532.0
Revenue Credited to the CRF 0.0

532.0
Net Cost of Program 10,504.6
1997-98 Estimated Net Program Cost 10,592.0

Table 9: Revolving Fund Financial Statements

Nil Report

Table 10: Loans, Investments and Advances by Program

(thousands of dollars) Forecast
Spending
1997-98
Planned
Spending
1998-99
Planned
Spending
1999-00
Planned
Spending
2000-01
Universal Classification System 0.0 36.0 0.0 (14.0)
Total 0.0 36.0 0.0 (14.0)

Table 11: Tax Expenditures

Nil Report

Table 12: Listing of Statutes and Regulations

Statutes and Regulations Currently in Force

Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S.C., 1992, C.37, as amended
Law List Regulations SOR/94-636 (October 7, 1994)
Comprehensive Study List Regulations SOR/94-638 (October 7, 1994)
Inclusion List Regulations SOR/94-637 (October 7, 1994)
Exclusion List Regulations SOR/94-639 (October 7, 1994)
Federal Authorities Regulations SOR/96-280 (May 28, 1996)
Projects Outside Canada Environmental Assessment Regulations SOR/96-491 (November 7, 1996)
Regulations Respecting the Co-ordination by Federal Authorities of Environmental Assessment Procedures and Requirements SOR/97-181 (April 8, 1997)

Proposed Regulations

Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service
Charges Order *
Carry over from 1997-98
Crown corporations * To be initiated in 1998-99
Private Operations Occurring on Federal Lands * To be initiated in 1998-99
Inclusion List Regulations - Part II To be completed in 1998-99
Minor Modifications to the existing Inclusion List, Exclusion List, Comprehensive Study List and Law List Regulations To be initiated in 1998-99

Table 13: References

The Agency and its predecessor, the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, have produced a number of publications. Most of these publications are of a general nature and are available free of charge. Publications of a technical nature, which are intended for specialized groups, have an associated price for the printed versions. Agency publications can be consulted free of charge at any library taking part in the federal government's Depository Services Program. The Agency has also published a collection of all its publications from 1975 to 1997 on CD-Rom. A complete list of publications can be obtained from the reference centre.

Reference Centre

200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H3
Tel.: (819) 953-2501
Fax.: (819) 994-1469
Internet E-mail: publications@ceaa-acee.gc.ca  

Alberta Region

Suite 100, Revillon Building
10237 - 104 Street N.W.
Edmonton, Alberta
T5J 1B1
Tel.: (403) 422-7704
Fax.: (403) 422-0055
Internet e-mail: ryerson.christie@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Atlantic Region

Suite 1030, TD Centre
1791 Barrington Street
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 2G1
Tel.: (902) 426-0564
Fax.: (902) 426-6550
Internet e-mail: william.coulter@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Ontario Region

200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard, 13th floor
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H3
Telephone: (819) 997-2244
Facsimile: (819) 994-1469
Internet e-mail: guy.riverin@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Pacific and Northern Region

757 West Hastings Street, Suite 320
Sinclair Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 1A1
Tel.: (604) 666-2431
Fax.: (604) 666-6990
Internet e-mail: paul.scott@ceaa-acee.gc.ca  

Prairie Region

Suite 500, The Federal Building
269 Main Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3C 1B2
Tel.: (204) 984-2457
Fax. (204) 983-4506
Internet e-mail: dan.mcnaughton@ceaa-acee.gc.ca  

Quebec Region

200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard, 13th floor
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H3
Tel. (819) 997-2213
Fax. (819) 994-1469
Internet e-mail: michel.bourgon@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Legislative Acts and/or Regulations Expected Results
Environmental Assessment

Review Panel Service Charges Order

Incremental costs for new environmental assessment (EA) panels will be recovered from non-government project proponents. All cost recovery schedules will be negotiated in an open and transparent process through a Memorandum of Understanding with proponents. Other federal department incremental costs for panels and comprehensive studies will be recovered in the second phase of implementation.

  • A transfer of a portion of the costs to conduct panel reviews from the general tax-payer to those who benefit directly from government services.

  • Added discipline in the federal EA system and more certainty for industry and the public as participants.

  • A more efficient EA process as a decision-making tool without sacrificing its integrity and effectiveness.

Crown Corporations Regulations

Rules are being considered to establish a process for conducting environmental assessments of projects for Crown corporations. Currently, these entities are not always required to carry out an EA of projects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. These rules will consider commercial and competitive circumstances, diversity of activities and responsibilities, and existing environmental policies of these entities.

  • More consistency in the assessment of projects that have a potential for significant environmental impact.

  • Enhanced accountability in the environmental management of projects.

  • Increased transparency in the assessment of projects, and greater opportunities for public involvement.

Private Operations

Occurring on Federal Lands Regulations

A requirement to introduce rules for private entities operating on federally leased lands (e.g. local airport authorities) has been identified in response to evolving government reorganization.

  • Consistent incorporation of environmental impacts into decisions with respect to private-sector projects that will operate on federal lands.
Inclusion List Regulations - Part II

In response to stakeholder consultations, the number of physical activities to be assessed will be expanded under the existing Inclusion List Regulations. These additional activities have the potential for significant environmental effects that cannot be routinely mitigated.

  • More consistency in the assessment of activities that have a potential for significant environmental impact.

  • Increased avoidance of environmental damage caused by physical activities.

 

Last Updated: 2004-04-29

Top of page

Important Notices