 Printer-Friendly Page
Date: 20020227 Docket: A-259-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 78 EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: GARY MARSHALL Applicant
- and -
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA THE MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 27, 2002 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on February 27, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20020227 Docket: A-259-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 78 EVANS. J.A. BETWEEN: GARY MARSHALL Applicant - and -
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA THE MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Wednesday, February 27, 2002) [1] The Applicant has made a very articulate argument but his application must be dismissed. The Applicant did not appear at the Board of Referees to refute evidence obtained by the Commission from his employer. Had he done so he might have been able to demonstrate that he had just cause for leaving his employment. In any event, by reason of his suing and recovering severance pay, he would not be entitled to employment insurance benefits. [2] The application will be dismissed. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-259-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: GARY MARSHALL Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA THE MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent
DATE OF HEARING: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2002 PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH AT TORONTO, ONTARIO ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2002. APPEARANCES BY: Gary Marshall For the Applicant, on his own behalf Derek Edwards For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Gary Marshall 8 Langwith Court Brampton, Ontario L6Y 1Z8 For the Applicant, on his own behalf Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Respondent FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Date: 20020227 Docket: A-259-01 BETWEEN: GARY MARSHALL Applicant
- and -
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA THE MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
