Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Crest Federal Court of Appeal of Canada
français

Access to decisions


Recent Decisions


Access by

Year
Style of Cause
Docket Number
Neutral Citation

Search


Stay Informed


Other Decisions

Federal Court
Tax Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs
Printer-Friendly PagePrinter-Friendly Page


Date: 19990913


Docket: A-199-99


Ottawa (Ontario), Monday, September 13, 1999.


CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         SEXTON J.A.


BETWEEN:

     OLYMPIA INTERIORS LTD.

     - and -

     MARY DAVID

     Appellants

     - and -

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondent



     JUDGMENT




     The appeal is dismissed with costs.




     "Robert Décary"

     J.A.






Date: 19990913
Docket: A-199-99

CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.
         ROBERTSON J.A.
         SEXTON J.A.

BETWEEN:
     OLYMPIA INTERIORS LTD.
     - and -
     MARY DAVID
     Appellants
     - and -
     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
     Respondent





     Heard at Ottawa (Ontario) on Thursday, September 9, 1999.
     Judgment delivered at Ottawa (Ontario) on Monday, September 13, 1999.










     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT




Date: 19990913


Docket: A-199-99


CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         SEXTON J.A.


BETWEEN:

     OLYMPIA INTERIORS LTD.

     - and -

     MARY DAVID

     Appellants

     - and -

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondent



     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT


THE COURT


[1]      The learned Trial Judge found that there was no evidence to establish liability of the respondent, for alleged tortious wrongs of malicious prosecution, misfeasance or abuse of authority, negligence, or conspiracy by servants of the respondent, and that there was no evidence to support a conclusion that rights protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, claimed by the appellants in relation to sections 7, 8 11 and 15, were infringed by any action of the respondent's servants.

[2]      The appellants have failed to identify any reviewable error in the comprehensive and thorough reasons of Mr. Justice MacKay.

[3]      The appeal should therefore be dismissed. The respondent has asked for costs on a solicitor and client basis. We are of the view that the conduct of this appeal by the appellant was not such as to warrant an award of costs on a solicitor and client basis. Respondent will be entitled to ordinary costs assessed in accordance with column III of Tariff B.




     "Robert Décary"

     J.A.



     "J.T. Robertson"

     J.A.



     "J. Edgar Sexton"

     J.A.







Modified : 2007-04-24 Top of the page Important Notices

[ Download Adobe Reader  |  Printer-Friendly Page ]