Date: 20010523

Docket: A-688-00

     OTTAWA, ONTARIO, WEDNESDAY, MAY 23, 2001

CORAM:             DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

      WALTER OBODZINSKY

            (Alias Wlodzimierz or

         Volodya Obodzinsky)

        Appellant

AND:

   MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

   Respondent

JUDGMENT

The appeal is dismissed without costs.

            Robert Décary               

                  J.A.

Certified true translation

Mary Jo Egan, LLB

Date: 20010523

Docket: A-688-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 158

CORAM:             DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

      WALTER OBODZINSKY

            (Alias Wlodzimierz or

         Volodya Obodzinsky)

        Appellant

AND:

   MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

   Respondent

Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on Wednesday, May 16, 2001

         Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on Wednesday, May 23, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:       DÉCARY J.A.

   NOËL J.A.

Date: 20010523

Docket: A-688-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 158

CORAM :             DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

      WALTER OBODZINSKY

            (Alias Wlodzimierz or

         Volodya Obodzinsky)

        Appellant

AND:

   MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

   Respondent

   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

[1]         I have reviewed and carefully analyzed the decision of the Trial Division judge, the appellant's Charter arguments and his submissions based on the doctrine of abuse of process. In light of New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G.(J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 46 and Blencoe v. British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307, I also reviewed the decision of this Court in Canada (Secretary of State) v. Luitjens (1992), 142 N.R. 173 (F.C.A.), which was followed in Canada v. Katriuk (1999), 252 N.R. 68 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal refused by the Supreme Court of Canada on May 11, 2000, S.C.C. No. 27741. I am of the view that the Trial Judge properly directed himself as to the law, that he exercised his discretion judiciously and that there is no basis to intervene in this case.

[2]         The appellant also argued that, according to the Government of Canada's report entitled The Investigation of War Crimes in Canada, which was probably written in 1995, investigations by the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Section were suspended where the suspect was likely to be unfit to stand trial. Based on that, and on the principles of fair play and equity, he submits that the citizenship revocation proceedings against him should be stayed because his precarious health makes him unfit to stand trial.

[3]         It is clear from reading the entire report and specifically section III entitled Current State of Investigations, which contains the passage the appellant relies on, that, as of the date of the report, criminal investigations and not citizenship revocation proceedings had been suspended for that reason. Moreover, the government report adds that the files that were not closed or suspended were reassessed and ranked for possible future action such as criminal prosecution, denaturalization or deportation proceedings. The report also identifies the criteria that were applied to rank the files. The age and health of the individual concerned are among the criteria. However, the purpose of applying all the criteria, including age and health, is not to suspend the files, but to rank them so that appropriate legal proceedings can be commenced. With respect, the excerpt from the report cited to us by the appellant out of context does not have the purpose, weight or scope that he attributes to it.

[4]         For these reasons, I would dismiss the appeal, but without costs, since the respondent has not requested them.

               Gilles Létourneau               

                  J.A.

"I concur.

Robert Décary J.A.."

"I concur.

Marc Noël J.A."

Certified true translation

Mary Jo Egan, LLB

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                       A-688-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                     Walter Obozdinsky v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

PLACE OF HEARING:                                     Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                     May 16, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:             Létourneau J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                     Décary, Noël JJ.A

DATED:                                                          May 23, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Johanne Doyon                                                             FOR THE APPELLANT

David Lucas                                                                              FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Doyon, Guertin, Montbriand & Plamandon                                     FOR THE APPELLANT

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada