Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Crest Federal Court of Appeal of Canada
français}

Access to decisions


Recent Decisions


Access by

Year
Style of Cause
Docket Number
Neutral Citation

Search


Stay Informed


Other Decisions

Federal Court
Tax Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs
Printer-Friendly PagePrinter-Friendly Page

BETWEEN:

                 JEAN-PIERRE WALSH,

     Appellant,

                 AND

                 DEPUTY MINISTER OF REVENUE OF QUEBEC,

     Respondent.

     TAXATION OF COSTS - REASONS

M. LAMY

TAXING OFFICER

     This is an appeal from a decision of the Trial Division filed by Jean-Pierre Walsh on December 17, 1996. On April 21, 1997, the respondent filed a motion in the record seeking to have this appeal dismissed under paragraph 52(a) of the Federal Court Act because it was an abuse of process and dilatory. On June 2, 1997, Mr. Walsh discontinued his appeal and since then he has been represented by Jean-Pierre Gagné.

     On June 26, Pierre Séguin filed his bill of costs under Rule 1211 in the amount of $679.70, for the following costs: $600.00 in fees for taxation of costs under item 26 of Tariff B (column III, 6 units) and $39.70 for serving his motion to dismiss the appeal. In response to the appointment issued on July 15, the parties appeared on July 24 for the taxation of costs.

     Because of the appellant's hasty discontinuance, the Court was unable to dispose of the respondent's motion to dismiss on the merits and at the same time deal with the costs of that proceeding, which also explains why the respondent is not seeking any fees under item 21 of Tariff B. In the circumstances, it would be hard for me to allow the respondent's costs for serving that motion as I have no authority to do so.

     At the hearing, Mr. Séguin explained that he was seeking the maximum units provided in column III for taxation of costs because 26 is the only item that allows him to be compensated for the services performed in this case. Given that in this instance no fees can be taxed in accordance with the tariff, I believe that it is unwise to allow any amount as costs for the taxation itself. In order to comply with the spirit of Rule 1211, I invite the parties to reach an agreement.

     For these reasons, no certificate will issue in respect of this taxation.

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 30th DAY OF JULY 1997.

                                    MICHELLE LAMY

                                    MICHELLE LAMY

                                    TAXING OFFICER

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

     Federal Court of Canada

    

     Court file No. A-1015-96

between

     JEAN-PIERRE WALSH,

                 Appellant,

     " and "

     DEPUTY MINISTER OF REVENUE OF QUEBEC,

                 Respondent.

    

     TAXATION OF COSTS - REASONS

    


     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA        
     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD        
COURT FILE NO:      A-1015-96        
BETWEEN:      JEAN-PIERRE WALSH,        
                     Appellant,        
     AND        
     DEPUTY MINISTER OF REVENUE OF QUEBEC,        
                     Respondent.        
PLACE OF TAXATION:      Montréal, Quebec        
DATE OF TAXATION:      July 24, 1997        
REASONS OF THE TAXING OFFICER, M. LAMY        
DATE OF REASONS FOR TAXATION:      July 30, 1997        
APPEARANCES:        
Jean-Pierre Gagné                  for the appellant        
Pierre Séguin                  for the respondent        
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:        
Jean-Pierre Gagné                  for the appellant        
Montréal, Quebec        
Veillette et Associés                  for the respondent        
Montréal, Quebec        


Modified : 2007-04-24 Top of the page Important Notices

[ Download Adobe Reader  |  Printer-Friendly Page ]